Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It said so in your article, moron.
The article stated: Google hasn't released ANY accident reports. Without accident reports you can't determine fault or percentage of fault.
From your article:
"It wasn't immediately clear where and when the accident took place, but company co-founder Sergey Brin said the vehicle was stopped at a traffic light and rear-ended by another driver."
Then why not release the police report? Brake lights not working? Google hasn't released ANY accident reports. Without accident reports you can't determine fault or percentage of fault.
You'll have to ask Google.
That doesn't even seem relevant. If the break lights are not working, how would that be a problem of the automation? You think the program pushed the brake pedal too hard, and it burned out the bulb? (/sarcasm).
In the words of Hillary, what difference does that make?
Give you a hint..... If I'm driving my car, or a friend of mine is driving my car, it's still me as the cars owners, who is responsible for replacing a brake light.
The more OnePercenter talks about this, the more I'm convinced he's too old to be a forum. He sounds like an old codger talking about "those darn kids and their new fangled gadgets!".
Seriously dude, the abacus is outdated.
Why would that matter? When is it permissible to run into the back of a car?
Dude...there already are!
No matter how loud you shriek, it's still bullshit.
I would willingly pay a premium to use self-checkout...I can check out my order a hell of a lot faster than the typical marginally-sentient stoner cashier. I also know that if I do, things will be bagged properly!
I will not go to full-serve gas under any circumstances!
Dude...there already are!
Really? Who's marketing them? Ford? Chevy? Dodge? Your current science fiction movie?
They're still new and expensive. Keep raising the cost of human labor and more will be sold, bringing down the cost. It happens that way with every new technology. Change is inevitable.
[
I predict that urban centers will go first. Once control mechanisms are in place, it will become illegal to drive a car in the city.
The automated car would know when the brake lights aren't working and report it to the owner. Whether your brake lights are working are not, the buy who hits you from behind is still at fault, especially when you are stopped at a light.
Dude...there already are!
Really? Who's marketing them? Ford? Chevy? Dodge? Your current science fiction movie?
Google (and others) is testing them...they are on the road RIGHT NOW.
If your break lights weren't working, then you would get a ticket for your break lights not working, but the car that hits you from behind gets the moving violation. There's absolutely no excuse for hitting a car stopped at a light.Why would that matter? When is it permissible to run into the back of a car?
I don't know about Canada, but in the United States of America, if the brake lights aren't working on the car that is struck, then the accident becomes 50/50. We don't know because Sergay won't release the accident reports.
Dude...there already are!
Really? Who's marketing them? Ford? Chevy? Dodge? Your current science fiction movie?
Google (and others) is testing them...they are on the road RIGHT NOW.
(and others) have been testing them over the past twenty years, and yet, no driver-less car is available to buy. The driver-less car is nothing but a pipe-dream.
If your break lights weren't working, then you would get a ticket for your break lights not working, but the car that hits you from behind gets the moving violation. There's absolutely no excuse for hitting a car stopped at a light.Why would that matter? When is it permissible to run into the back of a car?
I don't know about Canada, but in the United States of America, if the brake lights aren't working on the car that is struck, then the accident becomes 50/50. We don't know because Sergay won't release the accident reports.
Dude...there already are!
Really? Who's marketing them? Ford? Chevy? Dodge? Your current science fiction movie?
Google (and others) is testing them...they are on the road RIGHT NOW.
(and others) have been testing them over the past twenty years, and yet, no driver-less car is available to buy. The driver-less car is nothing but a pipe-dream.
Everything was a pipe dream until it became reality. Within 10 years driverless semis will be everywhere.
Dude...there already are!
Really? Who's marketing them? Ford? Chevy? Dodge? Your current science fiction movie?
Google (and others) is testing them...they are on the road RIGHT NOW.
(and others) have been testing them over the past twenty years, and yet, no driver-less car is available to buy. The driver-less car is nothing but a pipe-dream.
Everything was a pipe dream until it became reality. Within 10 years driverless semis will be everywhere.
If I (or wall street) thought there would be any chance of that, we'd be investing.
You mean some people are not?!?!?[
I predict that urban centers will go first. Once control mechanisms are in place, it will become illegal to drive a car in the city.
I'll bet you are a fan of Sci-Fi.
There are two ways we can go with driver-less cars. Either put incredible smarts (and more points of failure) in cars so they can deal with human drivers (who are unpredictable and uncontrollable), or outlaw human controlled cars and put the smarts into a control system. Here's how I think it will go. The first "smart" cars are being developed now that will try to be smart enough to handle interactions with human driven cars. They will fail, and the second option will be adopted. Cities will build in control mechanisms for city streets, and cars will be developed that will communicate with those mechanisms. Then human driven cars will be illegal within ever expanding prescribed areas.Dude...there already are!
Really? Who's marketing them? Ford? Chevy? Dodge? Your current science fiction movie?
Google (and others) is testing them...they are on the road RIGHT NOW.
(and others) have been testing them over the past twenty years, and yet, no driver-less car is available to buy. The driver-less car is nothing but a pipe-dream.
It doesn't take incredible smarts for self driving cars to avoid accidents with humans. A typical laptop has more than enough smarts. the number of rules to be followed is really quite small.There are two ways we can go with driver-less cars. Either put incredible smarts (and more points of failure) in cars so they can deal with human drivers (who are unpredictable and uncontrollable), or outlaw human controlled cars and put the smarts into a control system. Here's how I think it will go. The first "smart" cars are being developed now that will try to be smart enough to handle interactions with human driven cars. They will fail, and the second option will be adopted. Cities will build in control mechanisms for city streets, and cars will be developed that will communicate with those mechanisms. Then human driven cars will be illegal within ever expanding prescribed areas.Dude...there already are!
Really? Who's marketing them? Ford? Chevy? Dodge? Your current science fiction movie?
Google (and others) is testing them...they are on the road RIGHT NOW.
(and others) have been testing them over the past twenty years, and yet, no driver-less car is available to buy. The driver-less car is nothing but a pipe-dream.
Why would that matter? When is it permissible to run into the back of a car?
I don't know about Canada, but in the United States of America, if the brake lights aren't working on the car that is struck, then the accident becomes 50/50. We don't know because Sergay won't release the accident reports.
You mean some people are not?!?!?[
I predict that urban centers will go first. Once control mechanisms are in place, it will become illegal to drive a car in the city.
I'll bet you are a fan of Sci-Fi.
