New York Times Finally Begins Pushing The Benefits Of Cannibalism

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Jul 21, 2009
132,711
69,170
First the were trying to push on us the benefits of eating insects.
Now (like the communists we knew they are) they're talking about how we need to consider cannibalism during the coming forced socialist famine.

Yes....shared misery for all.


They sort of dance around the issue and try to act like they aren't suggesting it as a viable option.



BTW, how dare you accuse elitists of eating babies.
But it seems that some of them may have been doing it.....at least they seem to be thinking about it an awful lot.

 
First the were trying to push on us the benefits of eating insects.
Now (like the communists we knew they are) they're talking about how we need to consider cannibalism during the coming forced socialist famine.

Yes....shared misery for all.


They sort of dance around the issue and try to act like they aren't suggesting it as a viable option.



BTW, how dare you accuse elitists of eating babies.
But it seems that some of them may have been doing it.....at least they seem to be thinking about it an awful lot.


Preparation for post-election riots.
 
First the were trying to push on us the benefits of eating insects.
Now (like the communists we knew they are) they're talking about how we need to consider cannibalism during the coming forced socialist famine.

Yes....shared misery for all.


They sort of dance around the issue and try to act like they aren't suggesting it as a viable option.



BTW, how dare you accuse elitists of eating babies.
But it seems that some of them may have been doing it.....at least they seem to be thinking about it an awful lot.


411.jpeg
 
First the were trying to push on us the benefits of eating insects.
Now (like the communists we knew they are) they're talking about how we need to consider cannibalism during the coming forced socialist famine.

Yes....shared misery for all.


They sort of dance around the issue and try to act like they aren't suggesting it as a viable option.



BTW, how dare you accuse elitists of eating babies.
But it seems that some of them may have been doing it.....at least they seem to be thinking about it an awful lot.




~~~~~~
LOL, Nothing new for Progressive Maoist/DSA Democrat Commies.
They're pushing for Soylent Green for the masses....
Why is it that Sci-Fi has a way of becoming reality?
 
Similar minds think alike :laugh:


 
First the were trying to push on us the benefits of eating insects.
Now (like the communists we knew they are) they're talking about how we need to consider cannibalism during the coming forced socialist famine.

Yes....shared misery for all.


They sort of dance around the issue and try to act like they aren't suggesting it as a viable option.



BTW, how dare you accuse elitists of eating babies.
But it seems that some of them may have been doing it.....at least they seem to be thinking about it an awful lot.


Holy fucking shit! How stupid can you be. The NYT is not promoting canabalism. The article is reporting on a trend in literature about canabalism



An image came to Chelsea G. Summers: a boyfriend, accidentally on purpose hit by a car, some quick work with a corkscrew and his liver served Tuscan style, on toast.

That figment of her twisted imagination is what prompted Ms. Summers to write her novel, “A Certain Hunger,” about a restaurant critic with a taste for (male) human flesh.

Turns out, cannibalism has a time and a place. In the pages of some recent stomach-churning books, and on television and film screens, Ms. Summers and others suggest that that time is now.
 
What kind of sick fucks are these? Enlighten US NyT apologists? All the News that’s fit to eat.
 
I have predicted for years liberal democrats would ride that PC woke toboggan down that slippery slope to legitimize ANYTHING. Pedophilia, cannibalism, murder. There isn't any cause so low that these pandering manipulative weasels won't push or pander to. And they say republicans are an "existential threat" to democracy.
 
First the were trying to push on us the benefits of eating insects.
Now (like the communists we knew they are) they're talking about how we need to consider cannibalism during the coming forced socialist famine.

Yes....shared misery for all.


They sort of dance around the issue and try to act like they aren't suggesting it as a viable option.



BTW, how dare you accuse elitists of eating babies.
But it seems that some of them may have been doing it.....at least they seem to be thinking about it an awful lot.


The idea is to legitimatize the other serious taboos that they LIKE ---- abortion, male-on-male sex, incest, pretending men are women. See, if there ARE no out-of-bounds taboos, then anything goes and the Dems have successfully torn up the human contract, destroyed everything we agreed on.
 
Certain groups of people are already eating human flesh.
Want to rape children? Opps, what to "love minors"? Democrats are the party for you! Want to murder your neighbor, and then barbeque the corpse, serve em' for din-din? Democrats are the party for you! Fighting for the rights of ANYONE to do anything or everything because we HAVE lost ANY sense of reality and we are funded by George Soros! Come one, Come ALL!
 
oh i am sure that the left can come up with more abominable actions. It is hard for the rest of us to think what can come after, and i dare not consider it.....homosexuality, bestiality, child rape, abortion, satanism, cannibalism..... ALL to be tolerated in the democrat platform.
 
First the were trying to push on us the benefits of eating insects.
Now (like the communists we knew they are) they're talking about how we need to consider cannibalism during the coming forced socialist famine.

Yes....shared misery for all.


They sort of dance around the issue and try to act like they aren't suggesting it as a viable option.



BTW, how dare you accuse elitists of eating babies.
But it seems that some of them may have been doing it.....at least they seem to be thinking about it an awful lot.


Seeing I know how to hunt and fish mean I don’t have to worry about eating a family member.

Mud, have your ever realized all these Zombie shows are about the decay of society to the point where humans become cannibal’s?

So now MSM is trying to convince if you eating your family member or friend is perfectly fine.
 
'Who would have thought a 73 movie would become reality?'

I would. I'm not the only one to notice that there is some kind of incestuous relationship between gov't and entertainment. I said and gave a link that these evil demonic people MUST TELL US what we're doing. They can do it through entertainment or they can just tell us as many politicians do. They Have to. We might take it as a joke or not even hear it which is what our fellow posters here must be doing. They've been telling us for years what evil men will be coming up with next. I'm seeing a lot of alien stuff, alien invasion and related. You watch...at some point they will spring that on us to terrify the masses or to enamor them to what they think are their creators. A night or two ago, i happened to catch a show on radio called Coast to Coast am. The person interviewed was in my thinking full of bs, but he said that 'the aliens who tell him what is going to happen said that they will show themselves for some reason in broad daylight for all to see before the end of this year,' Well i wouldn't doubt it...but i think those in power are going to have to delay that for a while yet. HOWEVER, tonite i read that there is a rise in Christian nationalism....so satan may have to hurry.
 
The NY Times needs to investigate the mysteries "impartiality" and "integrity". Two values the legacy main stream media seems to have lost. Apparently, like a fustian bargain, the NY Times and the entire legacy media sold their soul not to the devil, but the devils advocate, Soros.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top