NEWSFLASH FOR SNOWFLAKES: Ameria NEVER JOINED The Paris Accords

[Thinker101]

We as a people are not the equal of our grand parents or great grand parents. We are no longer exceptional, and that shows in who we elect as leaders.

You speak for yourself well.

I identify the Alt Right and Far Right in particular. You are the shame of America. You want to go back to bad ways our ancestors so recently tried to eliminate. But you go back to the bad ways.

Freedom? Virtue? The constitution? Reason?
When did those become bad?

That is not what the Alt Right and a good number of the Far Right want. And American as an overwhelming majority want nothing to do with libertarianism as the last thirty years have shown.

We don't?? Tell us, oh wise one, what do we want.

 

[bripat9643]

Snowflakes and Liberals are losing their minds because Obama's Un-Constitutional Global Warming pact in France has been rejected...

President Obama's deal to enter the Paris Accords was just another UN-Constitutional Personal TREATY Obama entered into without ever going through Congress - just like Obama's PERSONAL DEAL with Iran. It was never ratified by Congress, which is what the Constitution calls for.

So the Liberal Extremists, Globalists, and snowflakes are all having breakdowns, becoming 'triggered', and ranting, screaming, crying, and personally attacking President Trump for declaring the United States will not JOIN the Paris Accords, after it never JOINED / AGREED TO ENTER the Paris Accords.


Newsflash: America never joined Paris Agreement - Hot Air

"The fact is the Paris Agreement is a treaty, and the U.S. was never ever a part of it. The United States was the ONLY country that joined by EXECUTIVE ORDER"
...which is is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL!

"Countries seem invariably to have accepted the agreement as a treaty that requires going through their internal treaty-ratification processes, typically submission to the legislature. Countries from the United Kingdom to China to Jamaica have ratified it through their legislatures. So has Brazil, Japan, the Philippines and Australia. In the latter, the question of whether it was a binding international accord requiring submission to Parliament received some discussion, and a parliamentary analysis concluded it was a “major treaty” that needed to be submitted."

"There are people out there saying Paris Agreement is non-binding, the language and State Department guidelines appear to suggest otherwise, and reinforce the idea it’s a treaty."


President Trump did not actually withdraw from anything by what the Fake News Liberal media called 'pulling out'' of the Paris Accord. He simply pointed out that the United States had never joined the Paris Accord, as Obama never had the Constitutional Authority he believed he did not need to enter such a Treaty.
** And this clown considered himself a 'Constitutional Scholar'.

So the 'asshole' in this situation is not the one who accurately pointed out the United States had never joined the Paris Accords - it is the one who violated the Constitution...AGAIN...by entering ANOTHER Un-Constitutional Treaty by Executive Order.

How does the U.S. exit the agreement?

Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.

The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.

A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.

But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.

It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.

With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord

No treaty can be designed to avoid the constitutional requirements. The founders specifically designed our republic so the president could not take unilateral action on international agreements

NON BINDING AGREEMENT IS NOT A TREATY.

If it's non-binding, then it's meaningless, but then why are all you snowflakes having such a hissyfit about what Trump did?

 

[bripat9643]

No, little Bri, it's not a Treaty. Tough but there it is.

That's right, because Senate never approved it. That means it's wastepaper.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Sorry, bri, but the fact is that American cannot get out of it until Nov 2020.

 

[bripat9643]

Snowflakes and Liberals are losing their minds because Obama's Un-Constitutional Global Warming pact in France has been rejected...

President Obama's deal to enter the Paris Accords was just another UN-Constitutional Personal TREATY Obama entered into without ever going through Congress - just like Obama's PERSONAL DEAL with Iran. It was never ratified by Congress, which is what the Constitution calls for.

So the Liberal Extremists, Globalists, and snowflakes are all having breakdowns, becoming 'triggered', and ranting, screaming, crying, and personally attacking President Trump for declaring the United States will not JOIN the Paris Accords, after it never JOINED / AGREED TO ENTER the Paris Accords.


Newsflash: America never joined Paris Agreement - Hot Air

"The fact is the Paris Agreement is a treaty, and the U.S. was never ever a part of it. The United States was the ONLY country that joined by EXECUTIVE ORDER"
...which is is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL!

"Countries seem invariably to have accepted the agreement as a treaty that requires going through their internal treaty-ratification processes, typically submission to the legislature. Countries from the United Kingdom to China to Jamaica have ratified it through their legislatures. So has Brazil, Japan, the Philippines and Australia. In the latter, the question of whether it was a binding international accord requiring submission to Parliament received some discussion, and a parliamentary analysis concluded it was a “major treaty” that needed to be submitted."

"There are people out there saying Paris Agreement is non-binding, the language and State Department guidelines appear to suggest otherwise, and reinforce the idea it’s a treaty."


President Trump did not actually withdraw from anything by what the Fake News Liberal media called 'pulling out'' of the Paris Accord. He simply pointed out that the United States had never joined the Paris Accord, as Obama never had the Constitutional Authority he believed he did not need to enter such a Treaty.
** And this clown considered himself a 'Constitutional Scholar'.

So the 'asshole' in this situation is not the one who accurately pointed out the United States had never joined the Paris Accords - it is the one who violated the Constitution...AGAIN...by entering ANOTHER Un-Constitutional Treaty by Executive Order.

How does the U.S. exit the agreement?

Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.

The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.

A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.

But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.

It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.

With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord

He need simply to publicly declare the agreement null and void, that it constitutes a treaty not ratified, that Obama's letter of is of no account as it was outside of his constitutional authority to cement such a treaty in the first place.

In other words, there was never an "agreement" except in the mind of Barack Obama.

Why should we need to do anything? If we didn't agree to it, then we didn't agree to it.

 

[bripat9643]

He need simply to publicly declare the agreement null and void, that it constitutes a treaty not ratified, that Obama's letter of is of no account as it was outside of his constitutional authority to cement such a treaty in the first place.

In other words, there was never an "agreement" except in the mind of Barack Obama.

Oh, Billy, he has already done what he could, and the rest of your post in meaningless.

Five states, more than a hundred cities, scores of Corporations and businesses small and large, and tens of millions of Americans will go right ahead with the accord and ignore Trump and you.

There is nothing you can do except disagree.

When are they going to pay the $380 billion tax to the UN?

 

[bripat9643]

Sorry, bri, but the fact is that American cannot get out of it until Nov 2020.

You're delusional, Fakey. Did you forget to take your Alzeimer's medication?

 

[bripat9643]

Snowflakes and Liberals are losing their minds because Obama's Un-Constitutional Global Warming pact in France has been rejected...

President Obama's deal to enter the Paris Accords was just another UN-Constitutional Personal TREATY Obama entered into without ever going through Congress - just like Obama's PERSONAL DEAL with Iran. It was never ratified by Congress, which is what the Constitution calls for.

So the Liberal Extremists, Globalists, and snowflakes are all having breakdowns, becoming 'triggered', and ranting, screaming, crying, and personally attacking President Trump for declaring the United States will not JOIN the Paris Accords, after it never JOINED / AGREED TO ENTER the Paris Accords.


Newsflash: America never joined Paris Agreement - Hot Air

"The fact is the Paris Agreement is a treaty, and the U.S. was never ever a part of it. The United States was the ONLY country that joined by EXECUTIVE ORDER"
...which is is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL!

"Countries seem invariably to have accepted the agreement as a treaty that requires going through their internal treaty-ratification processes, typically submission to the legislature. Countries from the United Kingdom to China to Jamaica have ratified it through their legislatures. So has Brazil, Japan, the Philippines and Australia. In the latter, the question of whether it was a binding international accord requiring submission to Parliament received some discussion, and a parliamentary analysis concluded it was a “major treaty” that needed to be submitted."

"There are people out there saying Paris Agreement is non-binding, the language and State Department guidelines appear to suggest otherwise, and reinforce the idea it’s a treaty."


President Trump did not actually withdraw from anything by what the Fake News Liberal media called 'pulling out'' of the Paris Accord. He simply pointed out that the United States had never joined the Paris Accord, as Obama never had the Constitutional Authority he believed he did not need to enter such a Treaty.
** And this clown considered himself a 'Constitutional Scholar'.

So the 'asshole' in this situation is not the one who accurately pointed out the United States had never joined the Paris Accords - it is the one who violated the Constitution...AGAIN...by entering ANOTHER Un-Constitutional Treaty by Executive Order.

How does the U.S. exit the agreement?

Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.

The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.

A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.

But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.

It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.

With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord

No treaty can be designed to avoid the constitutional requirements. The founders specifically designed our republic so the president could not take unilateral action on international agreements

NON BINDING AGREEMENT IS NOT A TREATY.

A nonbinding agreement is nonbinding

Either way results are the same.

The result as we agreed to it (yes agreement does actually exist, even if non-binding) and now Trump announced withdrawal from agreement.

"non binding agreement" is an oxymoron.

 

[AntonToo]

How does the U.S. exit the agreement?

Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.

The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.

A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.

But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.

It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.

With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord

No treaty can be designed to avoid the constitutional requirements. The founders specifically designed our republic so the president could not take unilateral action on international agreements

NON BINDING AGREEMENT IS NOT A TREATY.

A nonbinding agreement is nonbinding

Either way results are the same.

The result as we agreed to it (yes agreement does actually exist, even if non-binding) and now Trump announced withdrawal from agreement.

"non binding agreement" is an oxymoron.

No it isn't.

 

[bripat9643]

Watch the confag cucks cry their little eyes out.

Not a thing they can do about the accord until Nov 2020.

too funny fakey. who's going to hand out the money? who's going to make us hand out any money? come on fakey, let's hear you now.

The states (five are on board), the more than 100 cities, the scores of corporations and businesses large and small, and the millions of American who are committed to it.

You fascist far right types can't stop it.

Meaningless. When are they going to hand over the $380 billion to the UN?

 

[bripat9643]

Watch the confag cucks cry their little eyes out.

Not a thing they can do about the accord until Nov 2020.

too funny fakey. who's going to hand out the money? who's going to make us hand out any money? come on fakey, let's hear you now.

The states (five are on board), the more than 100 cities, the scores of corporations and businesses large and small, and the millions of American who are committed to it.

You fascist far right types can't stop it.

Private individuals and companies can do as they please. Who cares about that?

But the federal government will be giving none of our tax money and that is the point.

The point is that the American people no longer care what Trump does. Better read the law again. They certainly can enter into business agreements.

You don't speak for the American people, dumbass.

 

[easyt65]

Zoom....right over his head.....

 

[bripat9643]

No treaty can be designed to avoid the constitutional requirements. The founders specifically designed our republic so the president could not take unilateral action on international agreements

NON BINDING AGREEMENT IS NOT A TREATY.

A nonbinding agreement is nonbinding

Either way results are the same.

The result as we agreed to it (yes agreement does actually exist, even if non-binding) and now Trump announced withdrawal from agreement.

"non binding agreement" is an oxymoron.

No it isn't.

Yes it is.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Sorry, bri, but the fact is that American cannot get out of it until Nov 2020.

You're delusional, Fakey. Did you forget to take your Alzeimer's medication?

You are the one in dementia, little buddy. Remind me: are you an anarchist?

 

[easyt65]

Watch the confag cucks cry their little eyes out.

Not a thing they can do about the accord until Nov 2020.

too funny fakey. who's going to hand out the money? who's going to make us hand out any money? come on fakey, let's hear you now.

The states (five are on board), the more than 100 cities, the scores of corporations and businesses large and small, and the millions of American who are committed to it.

You fascist far right types can't stop it.

Meaningless. When are they going to hand over the $380 billion to the UN?

You mean the ADDITIONAL $380 billion to the UN, on top of what Barry already gave them, the money he lied to Americans by saying it was for Zika in the US.

 

[oreo]

Snowflakes and Liberals are losing their minds because Obama's Un-Constitutional Global Warming pact in France has been rejected...

President Obama's deal to enter the Paris Accords was just another UN-Constitutional Personal TREATY Obama entered into without ever going through Congress - just like Obama's PERSONAL DEAL with Iran. It was never ratified by Congress, which is what the Constitution calls for.

So the Liberal Extremists, Globalists, and snowflakes are all having breakdowns, becoming 'triggered', and ranting, screaming, crying, and personally attacking President Trump for declaring the United States will not JOIN the Paris Accords, after it never JOINED / AGREED TO ENTER the Paris Accords.


Newsflash: America never joined Paris Agreement - Hot Air

"The fact is the Paris Agreement is a treaty, and the U.S. was never ever a part of it. The United States was the ONLY country that joined by EXECUTIVE ORDER"
...which is is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL!

"Countries seem invariably to have accepted the agreement as a treaty that requires going through their internal treaty-ratification processes, typically submission to the legislature. Countries from the United Kingdom to China to Jamaica have ratified it through their legislatures. So has Brazil, Japan, the Philippines and Australia. In the latter, the question of whether it was a binding international accord requiring submission to Parliament received some discussion, and a parliamentary analysis concluded it was a “major treaty” that needed to be submitted."

"There are people out there saying Paris Agreement is non-binding, the language and State Department guidelines appear to suggest otherwise, and reinforce the idea it’s a treaty."


President Trump did not actually withdraw from anything by what the Fake News Liberal media called 'pulling out'' of the Paris Accord. He simply pointed out that the United States had never joined the Paris Accord, as Obama never had the Constitutional Authority he believed he did not need to enter such a Treaty.
** And this clown considered himself a 'Constitutional Scholar'.

So the 'asshole' in this situation is not the one who accurately pointed out the United States had never joined the Paris Accords - it is the one who violated the Constitution...AGAIN...by entering ANOTHER Un-Constitutional Treaty by Executive Order.

Then someone should have notified Trump---that the United States wasn't part of the Paris accord---before he made an ass out of himself. Yes, of course I am being sarcastic.

 

[bripat9643]

So, does the OP mean that Trump's Executive Orders are also worthless and nonbinding? The Paris Climate Accord is simply a "voluntary" agreement.

His executive orders aren't treaties, moron. Furthermore, they don't make law as Obama's attempted to do.

 

[bripat9643]

Acting US ambassador to China quit over Trump climate decision
Source: CNN

Washington (CNN)Acting US ambassador to China David Rank resigned from his post in Beijing over President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement, several sources familiar with the decision told CNN.

A career foreign service officer since 1990, Rank assumed the position of deputy chief of mission at the US embassy in Beijing in January 2016 and had been serving until the arrival of Trump's pick for the job, former Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, who was confirmed by Congress late last month.

Rank has served in several senior positions within the US State Department including time as the director of the office of Afghanistan affairs and as a senior adviser to the special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan.

"Mr. Rank made a personal decision," a senior State Department official told CNN, stopping short of citing the climate deal developments as the reason. "We appreciate his years of dedicated service to the State Department."

Read more: Acting US ambassador to China resigns - CNNPolitics.com

He's an Obama appointed hack and a dead ender. His resignation means nothing.

 

[bripat9643]

Read more: Acting US ambassador to China resigns - CNNPolitics.com

So what?

Maybe Democrats in the Senate should quit blocking his appointments.

 

[bripat9643]

Many would say the same thing about you. Perhaps you would be prudent to be more compassionate and merciful with how you judge others.

As Trump is, avatar?

How can we expect.to have a better leader than trump if we aren't better people than he is?

That is the point. We as a people are not the equal of our grand parents or great grand parents. We are no longer exceptional, and that shows in who we elect as leaders.

We can change that

Probably not until a great series of trials come upon us, much like the GD and WWII. That's a sorry training cycle, that one generation can't learn from the previous ones.

We'll be going through some tremendous trials if douche bags of your ilk ever get their way. The people of Britain already are.