NEWSFLASH FOR SNOWFLAKES: Ameria NEVER JOINED The Paris Accords

[Wyatt earp]

Snowflakes and Liberals are losing their minds because Obama's Un-Constitutional Global Warming pact in France has been rejected...

President Obama's deal to enter the Paris Accords was just another UN-Constitutional Personal TREATY Obama entered into without ever going through Congress - just like Obama's PERSONAL DEAL with Iran. It was never ratified by Congress, which is what the Constitution calls for.

So the Liberal Extremists, Globalists, and snowflakes are all having breakdowns, becoming 'triggered', and ranting, screaming, crying, and personally attacking President Trump for declaring the United States will not JOIN the Paris Accords, after it never JOINED / AGREED TO ENTER the Paris Accords.


Newsflash: America never joined Paris Agreement - Hot Air

"The fact is the Paris Agreement is a treaty, and the U.S. was never ever a part of it. The United States was the ONLY country that joined by EXECUTIVE ORDER"
...which is is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL!

"Countries seem invariably to have accepted the agreement as a treaty that requires going through their internal treaty-ratification processes, typically submission to the legislature. Countries from the United Kingdom to China to Jamaica have ratified it through their legislatures. So has Brazil, Japan, the Philippines and Australia. In the latter, the question of whether it was a binding international accord requiring submission to Parliament received some discussion, and a parliamentary analysis concluded it was a “major treaty” that needed to be submitted."

"There are people out there saying Paris Agreement is non-binding, the language and State Department guidelines appear to suggest otherwise, and reinforce the idea it’s a treaty."


President Trump did not actually withdraw from anything by what the Fake News Liberal media called 'pulling out'' of the Paris Accord. He simply pointed out that the United States had never joined the Paris Accord, as Obama never had the Constitutional Authority he believed he did not need to enter such a Treaty.
** And this clown considered himself a 'Constitutional Scholar'.

So the 'asshole' in this situation is not the one who accurately pointed out the United States had never joined the Paris Accords - it is the one who violated the Constitution...AGAIN...by entering ANOTHER Un-Constitutional Treaty by Executive Order.

How does the U.S. exit the agreement?

Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.

The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.

A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.

But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.

It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.

With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord

That's all well and good if the US had entered into an agreement. It did not. Obama violated the Constitution by entering into a TREATY.
-- The US was the only one to enter into the treaty by Executive Order'...which, again, is Un-Constitutional.

Again, IMO, Trump did not 'exit' anything as we were never legally, Constitutionally entered in the Accords.
-- If you never entered into a treaty legally, you were never in it.

Well, why don't you trot straight to the U.N. and straighten that out with them? I'm sure they'd be very grateful for your expertise on the subject. Save everyone a lot of time and headaches.

Who cares about the UN?

 

[OldLady]

Snowflakes and Liberals are losing their minds because Obama's Un-Constitutional Global Warming pact in France has been rejected...

President Obama's deal to enter the Paris Accords was just another UN-Constitutional Personal TREATY Obama entered into without ever going through Congress - just like Obama's PERSONAL DEAL with Iran. It was never ratified by Congress, which is what the Constitution calls for.

So the Liberal Extremists, Globalists, and snowflakes are all having breakdowns, becoming 'triggered', and ranting, screaming, crying, and personally attacking President Trump for declaring the United States will not JOIN the Paris Accords, after it never JOINED / AGREED TO ENTER the Paris Accords.


Newsflash: America never joined Paris Agreement - Hot Air

"The fact is the Paris Agreement is a treaty, and the U.S. was never ever a part of it. The United States was the ONLY country that joined by EXECUTIVE ORDER"
...which is is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL!

"Countries seem invariably to have accepted the agreement as a treaty that requires going through their internal treaty-ratification processes, typically submission to the legislature. Countries from the United Kingdom to China to Jamaica have ratified it through their legislatures. So has Brazil, Japan, the Philippines and Australia. In the latter, the question of whether it was a binding international accord requiring submission to Parliament received some discussion, and a parliamentary analysis concluded it was a “major treaty” that needed to be submitted."

"There are people out there saying Paris Agreement is non-binding, the language and State Department guidelines appear to suggest otherwise, and reinforce the idea it’s a treaty."


President Trump did not actually withdraw from anything by what the Fake News Liberal media called 'pulling out'' of the Paris Accord. He simply pointed out that the United States had never joined the Paris Accord, as Obama never had the Constitutional Authority he believed he did not need to enter such a Treaty.
** And this clown considered himself a 'Constitutional Scholar'.

So the 'asshole' in this situation is not the one who accurately pointed out the United States had never joined the Paris Accords - it is the one who violated the Constitution...AGAIN...by entering ANOTHER Un-Constitutional Treaty by Executive Order.

How does the U.S. exit the agreement?

Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.

The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.

A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.

But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.

It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.

With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord

That's all well and good if the US had entered into an agreement. It did not. Obama violated the Constitution by entering into a TREATY.
-- The US was the only one to enter into the treaty by Executive Order'...which, again, is Un-Constitutional.

Again, IMO, Trump did not 'exit' anything as we were never legally, Constitutionally entered in the Accords.
-- If you never entered into a treaty legally, you were never in it.

Well, why don't you trot straight to the U.N. and straighten that out with them? I'm sure they'd be very grateful for your expertise on the subject. Save everyone a lot of time and headaches.

Who cares about the UN?

They wrote the Agreement. LOL

 

[easyt65]

Snowflakes and Liberals are losing their minds because Obama's Un-Constitutional Global Warming pact in France has been rejected...

President Obama's deal to enter the Paris Accords was just another UN-Constitutional Personal TREATY Obama entered into without ever going through Congress - just like Obama's PERSONAL DEAL with Iran. It was never ratified by Congress, which is what the Constitution calls for.

So the Liberal Extremists, Globalists, and snowflakes are all having breakdowns, becoming 'triggered', and ranting, screaming, crying, and personally attacking President Trump for declaring the United States will not JOIN the Paris Accords, after it never JOINED / AGREED TO ENTER the Paris Accords.


Newsflash: America never joined Paris Agreement - Hot Air

"The fact is the Paris Agreement is a treaty, and the U.S. was never ever a part of it. The United States was the ONLY country that joined by EXECUTIVE ORDER"
...which is is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL!

"Countries seem invariably to have accepted the agreement as a treaty that requires going through their internal treaty-ratification processes, typically submission to the legislature. Countries from the United Kingdom to China to Jamaica have ratified it through their legislatures. So has Brazil, Japan, the Philippines and Australia. In the latter, the question of whether it was a binding international accord requiring submission to Parliament received some discussion, and a parliamentary analysis concluded it was a “major treaty” that needed to be submitted."

"There are people out there saying Paris Agreement is non-binding, the language and State Department guidelines appear to suggest otherwise, and reinforce the idea it’s a treaty."


President Trump did not actually withdraw from anything by what the Fake News Liberal media called 'pulling out'' of the Paris Accord. He simply pointed out that the United States had never joined the Paris Accord, as Obama never had the Constitutional Authority he believed he did not need to enter such a Treaty.
** And this clown considered himself a 'Constitutional Scholar'.

So the 'asshole' in this situation is not the one who accurately pointed out the United States had never joined the Paris Accords - it is the one who violated the Constitution...AGAIN...by entering ANOTHER Un-Constitutional Treaty by Executive Order.

How does the U.S. exit the agreement?

Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.

The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.

A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.

But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.

It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.

With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord

That's all well and good if the US had entered into an agreement. It did not. Obama violated the Constitution by entering into a TREATY.
-- The US was the only one to enter into the treaty by Executive Order'...which, again, is Un-Constitutional.

Again, IMO, Trump did not 'exit' anything as we were never legally, Constitutionally entered in the Accords.
-- If you never entered into a treaty legally, you were never in it.

Well, why don't you trot straight to the U.N. and straighten that out with them? I'm sure they'd be very grateful for your expertise on the subject. Save everyone a lot of time and headaches.

Hmmm, looks like someone took their 'condescending ass' pills this morning...

 

[Wyatt earp]

Snowflakes and Liberals are losing their minds because Obama's Un-Constitutional Global Warming pact in France has been rejected...

President Obama's deal to enter the Paris Accords was just another UN-Constitutional Personal TREATY Obama entered into without ever going through Congress - just like Obama's PERSONAL DEAL with Iran. It was never ratified by Congress, which is what the Constitution calls for.

So the Liberal Extremists, Globalists, and snowflakes are all having breakdowns, becoming 'triggered', and ranting, screaming, crying, and personally attacking President Trump for declaring the United States will not JOIN the Paris Accords, after it never JOINED / AGREED TO ENTER the Paris Accords.


Newsflash: America never joined Paris Agreement - Hot Air

"The fact is the Paris Agreement is a treaty, and the U.S. was never ever a part of it. The United States was the ONLY country that joined by EXECUTIVE ORDER"
...which is is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL!

"Countries seem invariably to have accepted the agreement as a treaty that requires going through their internal treaty-ratification processes, typically submission to the legislature. Countries from the United Kingdom to China to Jamaica have ratified it through their legislatures. So has Brazil, Japan, the Philippines and Australia. In the latter, the question of whether it was a binding international accord requiring submission to Parliament received some discussion, and a parliamentary analysis concluded it was a “major treaty” that needed to be submitted."

"There are people out there saying Paris Agreement is non-binding, the language and State Department guidelines appear to suggest otherwise, and reinforce the idea it’s a treaty."


President Trump did not actually withdraw from anything by what the Fake News Liberal media called 'pulling out'' of the Paris Accord. He simply pointed out that the United States had never joined the Paris Accord, as Obama never had the Constitutional Authority he believed he did not need to enter such a Treaty.
** And this clown considered himself a 'Constitutional Scholar'.

So the 'asshole' in this situation is not the one who accurately pointed out the United States had never joined the Paris Accords - it is the one who violated the Constitution...AGAIN...by entering ANOTHER Un-Constitutional Treaty by Executive Order.

How does the U.S. exit the agreement?

Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.

The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.

A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.

But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.

It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.

With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord

That's all well and good if the US had entered into an agreement. It did not. Obama violated the Constitution by entering into a TREATY.
-- The US was the only one to enter into the treaty by Executive Order'...which, again, is Un-Constitutional.

Again, IMO, Trump did not 'exit' anything as we were never legally, Constitutionally entered in the Accords.
-- If you never entered into a treaty legally, you were never in it.

Well, why don't you trot straight to the U.N. and straighten that out with them? I'm sure they'd be very grateful for your expertise on the subject. Save everyone a lot of time and headaches.

Who cares about the UN?

They wrote the Agreement. LOL

It was one man who went around the Senate another man told them nope.
.

 

[easyt65]

It was reported that the United States was the ONLY nation to 'join' the Accords by Executive Order. Every other leader, it seems, recognized the importance of the Accords and how it was much too big of a deal for them to enter into without discussing it with the rest of their governments...all except for Barry. He felt no need to discuss speaking for the entire United States on his own, entering into a treaty / pact / agreement of such magnitude simply because HE thought it was best.

It must be 'special' to be the only leader at the table who believes he can ignore the rest of his country / government and make such a decision on his own. I guess what they say is true: 'It's good to be the king.'


Obama had an 8 year history of ignoring Congress and making such decisions on his won.
- Declaring since HE did not like DOMA, a law passed by Congress, he was ordering his DOJ not to enforce it.

- Dragging the United States into an Un-Authorized, Un-Constitutional war in Libya to help Al Qaeda, terrorists who slaughtered 3,000 Americans, to murder and replace a nation's leader who was helping the coalition fight terrorists in northern Africa.

- Dragging the United States into an Un-Authorized, Un-Constitutional war in Syria - in the middle of a civil war between a dictator and terrorists - to help the terrorists.

- Releasing the Taliban 5

- Paying Iran a ransom

- Lying to Americans and giving billions to the PLO and the UN

- etc...


The opposite argument could be made, too, I guess - that unlike every other leader, Barry thought it was no big deal and simply joined on his own. If Barry was right, that it was no big deal, snowflakes and Globalist Leftists wouldn't be shitting a cow right now. Evidently it was a huge deal...to them.

 

[OldLady]

Snowflakes and Liberals are losing their minds because Obama's Un-Constitutional Global Warming pact in France has been rejected...

President Obama's deal to enter the Paris Accords was just another UN-Constitutional Personal TREATY Obama entered into without ever going through Congress - just like Obama's PERSONAL DEAL with Iran. It was never ratified by Congress, which is what the Constitution calls for.

So the Liberal Extremists, Globalists, and snowflakes are all having breakdowns, becoming 'triggered', and ranting, screaming, crying, and personally attacking President Trump for declaring the United States will not JOIN the Paris Accords, after it never JOINED / AGREED TO ENTER the Paris Accords.


Newsflash: America never joined Paris Agreement - Hot Air

"The fact is the Paris Agreement is a treaty, and the U.S. was never ever a part of it. The United States was the ONLY country that joined by EXECUTIVE ORDER"
...which is is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL!

"Countries seem invariably to have accepted the agreement as a treaty that requires going through their internal treaty-ratification processes, typically submission to the legislature. Countries from the United Kingdom to China to Jamaica have ratified it through their legislatures. So has Brazil, Japan, the Philippines and Australia. In the latter, the question of whether it was a binding international accord requiring submission to Parliament received some discussion, and a parliamentary analysis concluded it was a “major treaty” that needed to be submitted."

"There are people out there saying Paris Agreement is non-binding, the language and State Department guidelines appear to suggest otherwise, and reinforce the idea it’s a treaty."


President Trump did not actually withdraw from anything by what the Fake News Liberal media called 'pulling out'' of the Paris Accord. He simply pointed out that the United States had never joined the Paris Accord, as Obama never had the Constitutional Authority he believed he did not need to enter such a Treaty.
** And this clown considered himself a 'Constitutional Scholar'.

So the 'asshole' in this situation is not the one who accurately pointed out the United States had never joined the Paris Accords - it is the one who violated the Constitution...AGAIN...by entering ANOTHER Un-Constitutional Treaty by Executive Order.

How does the U.S. exit the agreement?

Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.

The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.

A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.

But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.

It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.

With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord

That's all well and good if the US had entered into an agreement. It did not. Obama violated the Constitution by entering into a TREATY.
-- The US was the only one to enter into the treaty by Executive Order'...which, again, is Un-Constitutional.

Again, IMO, Trump did not 'exit' anything as we were never legally, Constitutionally entered in the Accords.
-- If you never entered into a treaty legally, you were never in it.

Well, why don't you trot straight to the U.N. and straighten that out with them? I'm sure they'd be very grateful for your expertise on the subject. Save everyone a lot of time and headaches.

Hmmm, looks like someone took their 'condescending ass' pills this morning...

Mmmmmm.......
nah
Let 'em stay stupid

 

[Wyatt earp]

Snowflakes and Liberals are losing their minds because Obama's Un-Constitutional Global Warming pact in France has been rejected...

President Obama's deal to enter the Paris Accords was just another UN-Constitutional Personal TREATY Obama entered into without ever going through Congress - just like Obama's PERSONAL DEAL with Iran. It was never ratified by Congress, which is what the Constitution calls for.

So the Liberal Extremists, Globalists, and snowflakes are all having breakdowns, becoming 'triggered', and ranting, screaming, crying, and personally attacking President Trump for declaring the United States will not JOIN the Paris Accords, after it never JOINED / AGREED TO ENTER the Paris Accords.


Newsflash: America never joined Paris Agreement - Hot Air

"The fact is the Paris Agreement is a treaty, and the U.S. was never ever a part of it. The United States was the ONLY country that joined by EXECUTIVE ORDER"
...which is is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL!

"Countries seem invariably to have accepted the agreement as a treaty that requires going through their internal treaty-ratification processes, typically submission to the legislature. Countries from the United Kingdom to China to Jamaica have ratified it through their legislatures. So has Brazil, Japan, the Philippines and Australia. In the latter, the question of whether it was a binding international accord requiring submission to Parliament received some discussion, and a parliamentary analysis concluded it was a “major treaty” that needed to be submitted."

"There are people out there saying Paris Agreement is non-binding, the language and State Department guidelines appear to suggest otherwise, and reinforce the idea it’s a treaty."


President Trump did not actually withdraw from anything by what the Fake News Liberal media called 'pulling out'' of the Paris Accord. He simply pointed out that the United States had never joined the Paris Accord, as Obama never had the Constitutional Authority he believed he did not need to enter such a Treaty.
** And this clown considered himself a 'Constitutional Scholar'.

So the 'asshole' in this situation is not the one who accurately pointed out the United States had never joined the Paris Accords - it is the one who violated the Constitution...AGAIN...by entering ANOTHER Un-Constitutional Treaty by Executive Order.

How does the U.S. exit the agreement?

Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.

The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.

A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.

But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.

It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.

With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord

That's all well and good if the US had entered into an agreement. It did not. Obama violated the Constitution by entering into a TREATY.
-- The US was the only one to enter into the treaty by Executive Order'...which, again, is Un-Constitutional.

Again, IMO, Trump did not 'exit' anything as we were never legally, Constitutionally entered in the Accords.
-- If you never entered into a treaty legally, you were never in it.

Well, why don't you trot straight to the U.N. and straighten that out with them? I'm sure they'd be very grateful for your expertise on the subject. Save everyone a lot of time and headaches.

Hmmm, looks like someone took their 'condescending ass' pills this morning...

Mmmmmm.......
nah
Let 'em stay stupid

No are you going to stomp bunny rabbit slippers and say there is no natural variations!

And fork over money?


.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Got love the anti jobs Trump crowd...

China to plow $361 billion into renewable fuel by 2020

That's 13 million jobs idiots... Marcon of France has publicly welcomed scientists in the area from US to France...

Renewable Energy creates a hell of a lot of jobs, way more than coal... The Trumpettes are completely clueless on were the future business lies and want to continue with out dated technology..

China was the big winner here, 3 billion was chicken feed and will be picked up by other nations who will also take the mantle of leading the world... Trump has put the US at the back of the bus again...

13 million jobs that don't improve the material welfare of the Chinese people one iota. We could put 10 million Americans to work digging holes and filling them up again. The net result would be exactly the same.

Lets do comparisions

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, there are 374,000 American jobs in solar energy, 102,000 in wind energy and more than 2.2 million related to energy efficiency. For comparison, 160,000 Americans work in coal, 360,000 in natural gas and 515,000 in oil.

And Coal is continiously falling:
In 2015, U.S. coal production, consumption, and employment fell by more than 10% - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

And you are backing the bad horse... There is a future in Fracking as a technology, Oil will start to go as well as Electric Car Technology increases... Oils and Gas want the Paris Deal it is only Coal that is against it...Why are you backing a soon to be dead technology?

Why are you backing wind Mills ? A 500 year old technology?

Statement like that reveal your simple on the subject. Thank you.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Got love the anti jobs Trump crowd...

China to plow $361 billion into renewable fuel by 2020

That's 13 million jobs idiots... Marcon of France has publicly welcomed scientists in the area from US to France...

Renewable Energy creates a hell of a lot of jobs, way more than coal... The Trumpettes are completely clueless on were the future business lies and want to continue with out dated technology..

China was the big winner here, 3 billion was chicken feed and will be picked up by other nations who will also take the mantle of leading the world... Trump has put the US at the back of the bus again...

13 million jobs that don't improve the material welfare of the Chinese people one iota. We could put 10 million Americans to work digging holes and filling them up again. The net result would be exactly the same.

Lets do comparisions

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, there are 374,000 American jobs in solar energy, 102,000 in wind energy and more than 2.2 million related to energy efficiency. For comparison, 160,000 Americans work in coal, 360,000 in natural gas and 515,000 in oil.

And Coal is continiously falling:
In 2015, U.S. coal production, consumption, and employment fell by more than 10% - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

And you are backing the bad horse... There is a future in Fracking as a technology, Oil will start to go as well as Electric Car Technology increases... Oils and Gas want the Paris Deal it is only Coal that is against it...Why are you backing a soon to be dead technology?

Why are you backing wind Mills ? A 500 year old technology?

Statement like that reveal your simple on the subject. Thank you.

Because we need ancient technology?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Got love the anti jobs Trump crowd...

China to plow $361 billion into renewable fuel by 2020

That's 13 million jobs idiots... Marcon of France has publicly welcomed scientists in the area from US to France...

Renewable Energy creates a hell of a lot of jobs, way more than coal... The Trumpettes are completely clueless on were the future business lies and want to continue with out dated technology..

China was the big winner here, 3 billion was chicken feed and will be picked up by other nations who will also take the mantle of leading the world... Trump has put the US at the back of the bus again...

13 million jobs that don't improve the material welfare of the Chinese people one iota. We could put 10 million Americans to work digging holes and filling them up again. The net result would be exactly the same.

Lets do comparisions

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, there are 374,000 American jobs in solar energy, 102,000 in wind energy and more than 2.2 million related to energy efficiency. For comparison, 160,000 Americans work in coal, 360,000 in natural gas and 515,000 in oil.

And Coal is continiously falling:
In 2015, U.S. coal production, consumption, and employment fell by more than 10% - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

And you are backing the bad horse... There is a future in Fracking as a technology, Oil will start to go as well as Electric Car Technology increases... Oils and Gas want the Paris Deal it is only Coal that is against it...Why are you backing a soon to be dead technology?

Why are you backing wind Mills ? A 500 year old technology?

Statement like that reveal your simple on the subject. Thank you.

Because we need ancient technology?

Thank you.

 

[Wyatt earp]

13 million jobs that don't improve the material welfare of the Chinese people one iota. We could put 10 million Americans to work digging holes and filling them up again. The net result would be exactly the same.

Lets do comparisions

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, there are 374,000 American jobs in solar energy, 102,000 in wind energy and more than 2.2 million related to energy efficiency. For comparison, 160,000 Americans work in coal, 360,000 in natural gas and 515,000 in oil.

And Coal is continiously falling:
In 2015, U.S. coal production, consumption, and employment fell by more than 10% - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

And you are backing the bad horse... There is a future in Fracking as a technology, Oil will start to go as well as Electric Car Technology increases... Oils and Gas want the Paris Deal it is only Coal that is against it...Why are you backing a soon to be dead technology?

Why are you backing wind Mills ? A 500 year old technology?

Statement like that reveal your simple on the subject. Thank you.

Because we need ancient technology?

Thank you.

Pittsburgh before Paris

 

[JakeStarkey]

Pittsburg, Texas?

 

[Care4all]

The 'POS' who continually violated the Constitution to carry out his own personal agenda is the one deserving of condemnation, not the one who points it out and refuses to go along with it.

What exactly do you think Trump has been doing?

One executive order and action after another, and certainly has broken the presidential record at this point....

With NOT a single action done by our Congress, who represent us.....

 

[easyt65]

What exactly do you think Trump has been doing? One executive order and action after another, and certainly has broken the presidential record at this point....With NOT a single action done by our Congress, who represent us.....

Wow, I think you just set a USMB record for 'most hypocrisy' in 1 post.

 

[OldLady]

How does the U.S. exit the agreement?

Leaving the Paris Agreement itself is an easy, but lengthy, task.

The deal was specifically designed so that the U.S. could join without the need for congressional approval. On Aug. 29, 2016, President Barack Obama wrote a short letter, which was deposited at the United Nations, signaling that the United States would join the agreement.

A short letter from President Trump will suffice to reverse this action. According to the Paris Agreement, nations that want to withdraw only have to leave a written notice in a U.N. depository.

But Trump won’t be able to write this letter until three years after the Paris Agreement came into force — that is to say, not until Nov. 4, 2019 — thanks to a clause in the deal itself.

It then takes another year before the U.S. can leave the agreement — bringing it to Nov. 4, 2020 — which is also the day after the next presidential election.

With these rules in place, Trump will only see the fulfillment of his campaign promise to leave the Paris agreement either after he’s won a second term as president or been voted out of office.
Top questions and answers now that the U.S. has decided to leave the Paris climate accord

That's all well and good if the US had entered into an agreement. It did not. Obama violated the Constitution by entering into a TREATY.
-- The US was the only one to enter into the treaty by Executive Order'...which, again, is Un-Constitutional.

Again, IMO, Trump did not 'exit' anything as we were never legally, Constitutionally entered in the Accords.
-- If you never entered into a treaty legally, you were never in it.

Well, why don't you trot straight to the U.N. and straighten that out with them? I'm sure they'd be very grateful for your expertise on the subject. Save everyone a lot of time and headaches.

Hmmm, looks like someone took their 'condescending ass' pills this morning...

Mmmmmm.......
nah
Let 'em stay stupid

No are you going to stomp bunny rabbit slippers and say there is no natural variations!

And fork over money?


.

Like I told Iceberg long ago in this thread, it might have made more sense to contribute equipment and technology rather than cash to countries needing help, but yes, I would have wanted to stay in the agreement and help. We are the #2 emitter of C02. It is well established that greater amounts of C02 leads to global warming and climate change. So as the second largest "problem" on the planet, I see only good intentions behind trying to turn this puppy around.
Don't matter anymore, though. Trump was elected and he decided different. I don't understand why there needs to be such a lot of thunderous bullshit put up by his supporters to justify it.

 

[easyt65]

I don't understand why there needs to be such a lot of thunderous bullshit put up by his supporters to justify it.

...or thunderous bullshit put up by snowflakes attacking it. Obama said it best, 'Elections have consequences. If you want something else, win some elections.'

 

[Wyatt earp]

That's all well and good if the US had entered into an agreement. It did not. Obama violated the Constitution by entering into a TREATY.
-- The US was the only one to enter into the treaty by Executive Order'...which, again, is Un-Constitutional.

Again, IMO, Trump did not 'exit' anything as we were never legally, Constitutionally entered in the Accords.
-- If you never entered into a treaty legally, you were never in it.

Well, why don't you trot straight to the U.N. and straighten that out with them? I'm sure they'd be very grateful for your expertise on the subject. Save everyone a lot of time and headaches.

Hmmm, looks like someone took their 'condescending ass' pills this morning...

Mmmmmm.......
nah
Let 'em stay stupid

No are you going to stomp bunny rabbit slippers and say there is no natural variations!

And fork over money?


.

Like I told Iceberg long ago in this thread, it might have made more sense to contribute equipment and technology rather than cash to countries needing help, but yes, I would have wanted to stay in the agreement and help. We are the #2 emitter of C02. It is well established that greater amounts of C02 leads to global warming and climate change. So as the second largest "problem" on the planet, I see only good intentions behind trying to turn this puppy around.
Don't matter anymore, though. Trump was elected and he decided different. I don't understand why there needs to be such a lot of thunderous bullshit put up by his supporters to justify it.

Obama went around 50 senators . he was playing a dictator


.

 

[Rustic]

That's all well and good if the US had entered into an agreement. It did not. Obama violated the Constitution by entering into a TREATY.
-- The US was the only one to enter into the treaty by Executive Order'...which, again, is Un-Constitutional.

Again, IMO, Trump did not 'exit' anything as we were never legally, Constitutionally entered in the Accords.
-- If you never entered into a treaty legally, you were never in it.

Well, why don't you trot straight to the U.N. and straighten that out with them? I'm sure they'd be very grateful for your expertise on the subject. Save everyone a lot of time and headaches.

Hmmm, looks like someone took their 'condescending ass' pills this morning...

Mmmmmm.......
nah
Let 'em stay stupid

No are you going to stomp bunny rabbit slippers and say there is no natural variations!

And fork over money?


.

Like I told Iceberg long ago in this thread, it might have made more sense to contribute equipment and technology rather than cash to countries needing help, but yes, I would have wanted to stay in the agreement and help. We are the #2 emitter of C02. It is well established that greater amounts of C02 leads to global warming and climate change. So as the second largest "problem" on the planet, I see only good intentions behind trying to turn this puppy around.
Don't matter anymore, though. Trump was elected and he decided different. I don't understand why there needs to be such a lot of thunderous bullshit put up by his supporters to justify it.

The accord does nothing for this country, in fact it's harmful to the small businesses. And on top of that we can't afford it. And by the way polar bears are not drowning…

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Alt Righties are yelling about elections have consequences, but, consequently, since January 20, almost nothing has stumbled. Trump is whining, "When is the winning going to start."

 

[OldLady]

Well, why don't you trot straight to the U.N. and straighten that out with them? I'm sure they'd be very grateful for your expertise on the subject. Save everyone a lot of time and headaches.

Hmmm, looks like someone took their 'condescending ass' pills this morning...

Mmmmmm.......
nah
Let 'em stay stupid

No are you going to stomp bunny rabbit slippers and say there is no natural variations!

And fork over money?


.

Like I told Iceberg long ago in this thread, it might have made more sense to contribute equipment and technology rather than cash to countries needing help, but yes, I would have wanted to stay in the agreement and help. We are the #2 emitter of C02. It is well established that greater amounts of C02 leads to global warming and climate change. So as the second largest "problem" on the planet, I see only good intentions behind trying to turn this puppy around.
Don't matter anymore, though. Trump was elected and he decided different. I don't understand why there needs to be such a lot of thunderous bullshit put up by his supporters to justify it.

The accord does nothing for this country, in fact it's harmful to the small businesses. And on top of that we can't afford it. And by the way polar bears are not drowning…

Save a polar bear today, Rustic.