ding
Confront reality
- Oct 25, 2016
- 120,109
- 21,294
It seems that you want to restrict the constitutional rights of peaceable law abiding citizens because of bad acts of a handful of deranged violent people.Putting out a fire in nothing like you shooting a fucking gun.No, moron......we do not tell the fire dept. they can only use so many gallons of water to put out a house fire...they get all the water they need....so you don't get to tell a law abiding, good person, how many bullets they get to keep themselves or family members alive and safe from violent criminals....
You van keep all ther bullets you want. Just can put them all in a single magazine/
You still can't explain why it is so important to asshats like yourself to keep those bullets out of a magazine......we show you the actual research, we show you why you are wrong....but you start weeping, pulling out your hair and start yelling...."Because I say so..." as if that is a legitimate argument...
You gave two contradicting arguments. Make up your tiny little mind.
No moron.....a mass public shooter, murdering unarmed, helpless people in a gun free zone is a different situation from a law abiding, good person under attack by one or more criminals....completely different dynamics...... you know it...which is why you refuse to acknowledge it....
So, why not use a muzzle loader in these attacks. Accorduing to you, the victims just stand still & allow you to shoot them.
How does that make sense to you?