SherriMunnerlyn
VIP Member
- Jun 11, 2012
- 12,201
- 265
- 83
- Thread starter
- #1,001
What's Wrong with Wikipedia?
I found an article specifically addressing the problems in relying on Wikipedia as a source to prove the truth about anything.
According to the article, the problem with Wikipedia is identified in its own disclaimer, information on Wikipedia is contributed by anyone who wants to post material, and the expertise of the posters is not taken into consideration.
At any time, today or tomorrow, users may be reading information that is outdated or that has been posted by someone who is not an expert in the field or by someone who wishes to provide misinformation.
An example is provided in this article: 4 years ago, an Expos student who was writing a paper about the limitations of Wikipedia posted a fictional entry for himself, stating that he was the mayor of a small town in China. 4 years later, if you type in his name, or if you do a subject search on Wikipedia for mayors of towns in China, you will still find this fictional entry.
Some information on Wikipedia may well be accurate, but because no experts review the site's entries, there is a considerable risk in relying on this source.
Here is where Wikipedia is helpful:
As a basic reference material to familiarize yourself with a topic.
And it leads a person to credible sources.
http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k70847&pageid=icb.page346376
I found an article specifically addressing the problems in relying on Wikipedia as a source to prove the truth about anything.
According to the article, the problem with Wikipedia is identified in its own disclaimer, information on Wikipedia is contributed by anyone who wants to post material, and the expertise of the posters is not taken into consideration.
At any time, today or tomorrow, users may be reading information that is outdated or that has been posted by someone who is not an expert in the field or by someone who wishes to provide misinformation.
An example is provided in this article: 4 years ago, an Expos student who was writing a paper about the limitations of Wikipedia posted a fictional entry for himself, stating that he was the mayor of a small town in China. 4 years later, if you type in his name, or if you do a subject search on Wikipedia for mayors of towns in China, you will still find this fictional entry.
Some information on Wikipedia may well be accurate, but because no experts review the site's entries, there is a considerable risk in relying on this source.
Here is where Wikipedia is helpful:
As a basic reference material to familiarize yourself with a topic.
And it leads a person to credible sources.
http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k70847&pageid=icb.page346376
Last edited: