No more white farmers: Govt vows (Zimbabwe)

[Osomir]

The "Scramble for Africa" (also the Partition of Africa and the Conquest of Africa) was the invasion and occupation, colonization and annexation of African territory by European powers during the period of New Imperialism, between 1881 and 1914. In 1870, 10 percent of Africa was under European control; by 1914 it was 90 percent of the continent, with only Abyssinia (Ethiopia) and Liberia still independent.

Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

the Europeans pulled out in the early 60s this is how much later?

Zimbabwe didn't gain majority rule until 1980.

 

[squeeze berry]

Totally racist regime, if a European country said no black farmers all hell would be breaking loose.

If blacks did to Europe what they've been doing to africa all...would be fine, right?

really?

the former colonies were propped up propped up by the European nations with massive aid and it was squandered

Africa, welfare continent

Squandered largely because of the systems of government that colonial entities left behind were conducive to such malpractices. The blame game isn't necessarily very important though, how we solve it moving forward is. In either case, it is impossible to really separate the colonial experience from the governments in these coutnries that we see even today in many cases.

now you are making excuses

 

[ClosedCaption]

It's pretty ironic. White folk on this board pissing and moaning about the injustices supposedly committed against whites in Africa.
Yet , they willfully lie and state that whites committed no genocides or slaughters to come into the control of the lands they stole or they state that those actions were justified because they elevated Africans to a higher standard of living.

Why is it that the actions that the Africans may be taking against whites is so atrocious but not when the whites were doing it to the Africans???

PRIVILEGE

 

[Manonthestreet]

Alrdy blew your personal sanction routine out of the water....next

 

[DriftingSand]

Racism against those "oppressive" whites is and always will be TOTALLY ACCEPTABLE from the Libtard point of view. The blacks of South Africa never enjoyed the riches of their land until that land was plowed up, planted, and mined by the Dutch and English. Apparently they prefer to go back in time and become another Haiti:

Link to anyone in this thread calling racism and massacres acceptable? (besides those calling the massacres of blacks acceptable).

You might be within the minority. I don't know much about you so time will tell. Nevertheless, why isn't Obama screaming about the abuse? Why isn't he sending American troops to protect the white farmers? Why? Because I believe he hates white people.

So then no one is saying massacres are acceptable then? (Except for massacres against blacks)

There are no massacres against blacks. In South Africa whites are being murdered by the blacks. A fact you won't hear from CNN, MSNBC, or the Obama Administration.

South Africa White Genocide Escalates International Groups Seek Solution

"The daily escalation of murders in and around South Africa has drawn recognition from International groups seeking a solution for this crisis. The term genocide is the deliberate killing of large groups of people of a particular race or ethnic group. The country’s whites are the victims of racial killings spiraling out of control. The pointless and often brutal slayings have no agenda or motive by the attackers and often it is the innocent, elderly, and young who become victims.
Read more at South Africa White Genocide Escalates International Groups Seek Solution"

 

[Osomir]

Racism against those "oppressive" whites is and always will be TOTALLY ACCEPTABLE from the Libtard point of view. The blacks of South Africa never enjoyed the riches of their land until that land was plowed up, planted, and mined by the Dutch and English. Apparently they prefer to go back in time and become another Haiti:

Link to anyone in this thread calling racism and massacres acceptable? (besides those calling the massacres of blacks acceptable).

You might be within the minority. I don't know much about you so time will tell. Nevertheless, why isn't Obama screaming about the abuse? Why isn't he sending American troops to protect the white farmers? Why? Because I believe he hates white people.

We haven't sent troops into the Central African Republic or South Sudan either and both instances are MUCH more bloody and violent towards civilians. Our sanctions against Zimbabwe are also relatively harsher than the sanctions we've seen in South Sudan and the C.A.R. as well. We don't invade countries just because of human rights abuses otherwise we would have occupied Burma long ago. the largest example of President Obama doing something close would be the civil war in Libya and the civil conflicts in Syria and Iraq and those are likewise on a completely different scale than anything we have seen in Zimbabwe.

 

[Manonthestreet]

What he is doing in Libya and Syria is arming terrorists.....while claiming not to

 

[DriftingSand]

It's pretty ironic. White folk on this board pissing and moaning about the injustices supposedly committed against whites in Africa.
Yet , they willfully lie and state that whites committed no genocides or slaughters to come into the control of the lands they stole or they state that those actions were justified because they elevated Africans to a higher standard of living.

Why is it that the actions that the Africans may be taking against whites is so atrocious but not when the whites were doing it to the Africans???

So you're one of those dumbasses who justifies a horrible wrong because horrible wrongs have occurred in the past.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Racism against those "oppressive" whites is and always will be TOTALLY ACCEPTABLE from the Libtard point of view. The blacks of South Africa never enjoyed the riches of their land until that land was plowed up, planted, and mined by the Dutch and English. Apparently they prefer to go back in time and become another Haiti:

Link to anyone in this thread calling racism and massacres acceptable? (besides those calling the massacres of blacks acceptable).

You might be within the minority. I don't know much about you so time will tell. Nevertheless, why isn't Obama screaming about the abuse? Why isn't he sending American troops to protect the white farmers? Why? Because I believe he hates white people.

So then no one is saying massacres are acceptable then? (Except for massacres against blacks)

There are no massacres against blacks. In South Africa whites are being murdered by the blacks. A fact you won't hear from CNN, MSNBC, or the Obama Administration.

South Africa White Genocide Escalates International Groups Seek Solution

"The daily escalation of murders in and around South Africa has drawn recognition from International groups seeking a solution for this crisis. The term genocide is the deliberate killing of large groups of people of a particular race or ethnic group. The country’s whites are the victims of racial killings spiraling out of control. The pointless and often brutal slayings have no agenda or motive by the attackers and often it is the innocent, elderly, and young who become victims.
Read more at South Africa White Genocide Escalates International Groups Seek Solution"

No they arent they are being helped by Africans to be more like their ancestors....dead.

 

[squeeze berry]

The "Scramble for Africa" (also the Partition of Africa and the Conquest of Africa) was the invasion and occupation, colonization and annexation of African territory by European powers during the period of New Imperialism, between 1881 and 1914. In 1870, 10 percent of Africa was under European control; by 1914 it was 90 percent of the continent, with only Abyssinia (Ethiopia) and Liberia still independent.

Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

the Europeans pulled out in the early 60s this is how much later?

Zimbabwe didn't gain majority rule until 1980.

then it all went downhill

 

[Osomir]

It's pretty ironic. White folk on this board pissing and moaning about the injustices supposedly committed against whites in Africa.
Yet , they willfully lie and state that whites committed no genocides or slaughters to come into the control of the lands they stole or they state that those actions were justified because they elevated Africans to a higher standard of living.

Why is it that the actions that the Africans may be taking against whites is so atrocious but not when the whites were doing it to the Africans???

So you're one of those dumbasses who justifies a horrible wrong because horrible wrongs have occurred in the past.

Once again, I don't see anyone attempting to justify Mugabe's actions. Understanding why something happens isn't the same thing as supporting it. Do you have a link to any post where someone has voiced support for Mugabe?

 

[Osomir]

The "Scramble for Africa" (also the Partition of Africa and the Conquest of Africa) was the invasion and occupation, colonization and annexation of African territory by European powers during the period of New Imperialism, between 1881 and 1914. In 1870, 10 percent of Africa was under European control; by 1914 it was 90 percent of the continent, with only Abyssinia (Ethiopia) and Liberia still independent.

Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

the Europeans pulled out in the early 60s this is how much later?

Zimbabwe didn't gain majority rule until 1980.

then it all went downhill

It was long a crappy state prior to 1980.

 

[ClosedCaption]

It's pretty ironic. White folk on this board pissing and moaning about the injustices supposedly committed against whites in Africa.
Yet , they willfully lie and state that whites committed no genocides or slaughters to come into the control of the lands they stole or they state that those actions were justified because they elevated Africans to a higher standard of living.

Why is it that the actions that the Africans may be taking against whites is so atrocious but not when the whites were doing it to the Africans???

So you're one of those dumbasses who justifies a horrible wrong because horrible wrongs have occurred in the past.

You tried to change it to "justifications".

He said plainly that you are crying about injustices while LYING that injustices happen against anyone other than a white person.

Nice try at the outrage angle tho. 3 out of 10 stars

 

[Steinlight]

Fine. If they don't want white people in their country, than they shouldn't take white aid either. Let them go at it on their own and give them full independence.

As for the leftists here justifying Mugabe's actions. The collapse of Zimbabwe has nothing to do with colonialism, but with the corrupt and inept government of Mugabe. When they were Rhodesia they were the bread basket of the world.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Fine. If they don't want white people in their country, than they shouldn't take white aid either. Let them go at it on their own and give them full independence.

As for the leftists here justifying Mugabe's actions. The collapse of Zimbabwe has nothing to do with colonialism, but with the corrupt and inept government of Mugabe. When they were Rhodesia they were the bread basket of the world.

Pause....No one did.

Unpause

 

[Steinlight]

Fine. If they don't want white people in their country, than they shouldn't take white aid either. Let them go at it on their own and give them full independence.

As for the leftists here justifying Mugabe's actions. The collapse of Zimbabwe has nothing to do with colonialism, but with the corrupt and inept government of Mugabe. When they were Rhodesia they were the bread basket of the world.

Pause....No one did.

Unpause

So you oppose what the Mugabe regime is doing in taking the land of white farmers?

 

[Osomir]

Fine. If they don't want white people in their country, than they shouldn't take white aid either. Let them go at it on their own and give them full independence.

As for the leftists here justifying Mugabe's actions. The collapse of Zimbabwe has nothing to do with colonialism, but with the corrupt and inept government of Mugabe. When they were Rhodesia they were the bread basket of the world.

Two things:

1.) No one in this thread has been supporting Mugabe.

2.) It was a shit hole long before it gained its independence

 

[Osomir]

Fine. If they don't want white people in their country, than they shouldn't take white aid either. Let them go at it on their own and give them full independence.

As for the leftists here justifying Mugabe's actions. The collapse of Zimbabwe has nothing to do with colonialism, but with the corrupt and inept government of Mugabe. When they were Rhodesia they were the bread basket of the world.

Pause....No one did.

Unpause

So you oppose what the Mugabe regime is doing?

Yes. Everyone in this thread seems to oppose Mugabe's actions.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Fine. If they don't want white people in their country, than they shouldn't take white aid either. Let them go at it on their own and give them full independence.

As for the leftists here justifying Mugabe's actions. The collapse of Zimbabwe has nothing to do with colonialism, but with the corrupt and inept government of Mugabe. When they were Rhodesia they were the bread basket of the world.

Pause....No one did.

Unpause

So you oppose what the Mugabe regime is doing in taking the land of white farmers?

Yes, not sure how you thought...well yeah I do, too sensitive

 

[Steinlight]

Fine. If they don't want white people in their country, than they shouldn't take white aid either. Let them go at it on their own and give them full independence.

As for the leftists here justifying Mugabe's actions. The collapse of Zimbabwe has nothing to do with colonialism, but with the corrupt and inept government of Mugabe. When they were Rhodesia they were the bread basket of the world.

Two things:

1.) No one in this thread has been supporting Mugabe.

2.) It was a shit hole long before it gained its independence

So you oppose Mugabe taking the land of white farmers?

No it wasnt, along with South Africa it had one of the highest standards of living on the continent and fed the continent as well as an agricultural exporter