emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
- Jan 21, 2010
- 23,669
- 4,181
I got this email below from ACLJ.
Made me wonder if there isn't some "parallel" between the people
lobbying for sympathy for Syrian refugees, but getting no response to take more action.
And people lobbying for action to save Christians from genocide.
Is it any coincidence that both sides argue the other is not taking this seriously?
Could there be a double wall dividing them from seeing where the other side is coming from?
Isn't this barrier mutual, and what will it take to bring it down and get on the same page?
Genocide is affecting both sides. Why aren't they uniting together?
Why this double separation politically where both sides think the other is doing nothing??
=======================================================
emily,
Today's midnight deadline determines our fight for dying Christians.
We're vigorously fighting in federal court against the Obama Administration's inaction on genocide.
Christians are being savagely slaughtered for refusing to convert to Islam. Women are publicly raped and barbarically beheaded. Children are crucified. Mass graves and chemical warfare are expanding. Christians are pleading for help, "No one cares about us like we are not human."
The devastation is cataclysmic. It must be stopped. Now.
This year we've exponentially expanded our largest global legal advocacy effort for Christians facing genocide. We're preparing new critical legal letters to world leaders. We're aggressively battling the Obama Administration's inaction on genocide through our massive federal lawsuit, and we could force the Administration into action in its final days.
We won't sit by as Christians die. But we face the Administration's taxpayer-funded resources. We desperately need your vital support before our MIDNIGHT Matching Challenge Deadline.
Made me wonder if there isn't some "parallel" between the people
lobbying for sympathy for Syrian refugees, but getting no response to take more action.
And people lobbying for action to save Christians from genocide.
Is it any coincidence that both sides argue the other is not taking this seriously?
Could there be a double wall dividing them from seeing where the other side is coming from?
Isn't this barrier mutual, and what will it take to bring it down and get on the same page?
Genocide is affecting both sides. Why aren't they uniting together?
Why this double separation politically where both sides think the other is doing nothing??
=======================================================
emily,
Today's midnight deadline determines our fight for dying Christians.
We're vigorously fighting in federal court against the Obama Administration's inaction on genocide.
Christians are being savagely slaughtered for refusing to convert to Islam. Women are publicly raped and barbarically beheaded. Children are crucified. Mass graves and chemical warfare are expanding. Christians are pleading for help, "No one cares about us like we are not human."
The devastation is cataclysmic. It must be stopped. Now.
This year we've exponentially expanded our largest global legal advocacy effort for Christians facing genocide. We're preparing new critical legal letters to world leaders. We're aggressively battling the Obama Administration's inaction on genocide through our massive federal lawsuit, and we could force the Administration into action in its final days.
We won't sit by as Christians die. But we face the Administration's taxpayer-funded resources. We desperately need your vital support before our MIDNIGHT Matching Challenge Deadline.