Nobel Laureate Economist- Krugman eviscerates Repub's Budget

[The Rabbi]

What spending did Democrats cut in their budgets? Oh, wait. Democrats didnt pass a budget for 6 years.
Krugman has been discredited more times than Joe Stalin.

Apparently Krugman has not been discredited by the Nobel Committee.
Talk about budgets, let's talk about the national debt. The Democratic party is the only party that has ever paid our national debt off.

Neither has Obama. Says more about the Nobel committee.
Let's not talk about budgets because it makes Democrats look bad.
Let's talk about national debt, which Democrats have added to more than every other president combined, based on projections.
You're not doing too well here.

 

[Dot Com]

Instead of tossing out lame ad hominem shots at Krugman, why not address his points?

Point one, the magic asterisk of spending cuts:

See it? The highlighted number? A trillion dollars in anonymous cuts claimed for the next ten years.

In fact, that entire chart looks like a fantasy.

wait for a repub-voter "yabut" post.

 

[whitehall]

Why do they insist on using words like "laureate"? Do they think it enhances the argument? The Nobel committee awarded Al Gore the prize for nothing but inventing fake science that he wasn't even qualified for. Nobel awarded Obama a prize for doing nothing but getting elected. The democrat controlled senate didn't even have a budget for six years. What did Krugman think about that?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Instead of tossing out lame ad hominem shots at Krugman, why not address his points?

Point one, the magic asterisk of spending cuts:

See it? The highlighted number? A trillion dollars in anonymous cuts claimed for the next ten years.

In fact, that entire chart looks like a fantasy.

wait for a repub-voter "yabut" post.

They have nothing. The voodoo of voodoo economics either renders them mute, or causes them to speak in tongues. lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

Instead of tossing out lame ad hominem shots at Krugman, why not address his points?

Point one, the magic asterisk of spending cuts:

See it? The highlighted number? A trillion dollars in anonymous cuts claimed for the next ten years.

In fact, that entire chart looks like a fantasy.

wait for a repub-voter "yabut" post.

Here's what makes the budget so laughable:

They claim they're going to get over a trillion in cuts in 10 years out of that 'other mandatory' spending that only comprises 15% of the budget to begin with. Where in the chart to the right do they get that?

 

[Dot Com]

by punishing the poor of course. They didn't close one solitary tax loophole of subsidy either. Surprised?

 

[daws101]

it's funny that every time a non republican's credentials are brought up, the consevobots do their best to talk shit about it .
odd that!