Nothing generates unemployment like liberal policy

There is no denying the facts (though some will sadly still try)...

Walmart Closes LA Store Over $15 Minimum Wage - Breitbart

oh no! The Walton family are now only going to be worth $9.999999 gazillion instead of $10 gazillion....
And the unskilled worker will still not amount to shit despite being handed a wage far exceeding his/her skill level. It must be bad that despite being handed something you didn't earn the $15/hour workers still have nothing to show for it.
 
over 40 million on foodstamps for a record period of time and 93 million not working...heck of a job Brownie
You can thank corporate America for a job well done...and the trickle theory some idiot named Reagan put the nation on...
That's not corporate America. Obama was President. If he is going to get credit for all the jobs his supporters claim he created, he gets the blame for all the food stamp users he created.
 
There is no denying the facts (though some will sadly still try)...

Walmart Closes LA Store Over $15 Minimum Wage - Breitbart

oh no! The Walton family are now only going to be worth $9.999999 gazillion instead of $10 gazillion....
And the unskilled worker will still not amount to shit despite being handed a wage far exceeding his/her skill level. It must be bad that despite being handed something you didn't earn the $15/hour workers still have nothing to show for it.
The minimum wage isnt set by worker skill, but instead by cost of living in the particular city.
 
You mean all those that Obama told could keep their policy if they liked it?
No. I'm saying its not the disaster you fuckers are trying to make it out to be.

For those that liked the doctor and plan they couldn't keep despite Obama's promise they could, I'd say it's up to them to make that determination. Why do you think you should get to make it on their behalf?

Anything where one group is forced to subsidize another is a disaster.
 
There is no denying the facts (though some will sadly still try)...

Walmart Closes LA Store Over $15 Minimum Wage - Breitbart

oh no! The Walton family are now only going to be worth $9.999999 gazillion instead of $10 gazillion....
And the unskilled worker will still not amount to shit despite being handed a wage far exceeding his/her skill level. It must be bad that despite being handed something you didn't earn the $15/hour workers still have nothing to show for it.
The minimum wage isnt set by worker skill, but instead by cost of living in the particular city.

Never said it was. I said an artificial wage like the minimum wage pays workers more than their skills are worth on the open market.

Are you saying a city could set the minimum wage at $5/hour?
 
For those that liked the doctor and plan they couldn't keep despite Obama's promise they could, I'd say it's up to them to make that determination. Why do you think you should get to make it on their behalf?

Anything where one group is forced to subsidize another is a disaster.
I don't agree with your cherry-picked definition of "disaster". Over 25 million people now have insurance (that they would not have had), because of the ACA.
 
For those that liked the doctor and plan they couldn't keep despite Obama's promise they could, I'd say it's up to them to make that determination. Why do you think you should get to make it on their behalf?

Anything where one group is forced to subsidize another is a disaster.
I don't agree with your cherry-picked definition of "disaster". Over 25 million people now have insurance (that they would not have had), because of the ACA.

More like you don't like it so you called it cherry picked.

Seems you didn't answer my question on why you think it's your place to determine for someone else what is and isn't a disaster. You don't get to make that determination for anyone but yourself.

How many of those 25 million are freeloaders because they get something where someone else is forced to offset the costs? Hate to break it to you but one group being forced to fund it for another group isn't something to be proud of.
 
For those that liked the doctor and plan they couldn't keep despite Obama's promise they could, I'd say it's up to them to make that determination. Why do you think you should get to make it on their behalf?

Anything where one group is forced to subsidize another is a disaster.
I don't agree with your cherry-picked definition of "disaster". Over 25 million people now have insurance (that they would not have had), because of the ACA.

More like you don't like it so you called it cherry picked.

Seems you didn't answer my question on why you think it's your place to determine for someone else what is and isn't a disaster. You don't get to make that determination for anyone but yourself.

How many of those 25 million are freeloaders because they get something where someone else is forced to offset the costs? Hate to break it to you but one group being forced to fund it for another group isn't something to be proud of.
Like millionaire homes in zones that flood even without a hurricane that taxpayers help pay for under the government's flood insurance program?
 
And the unskilled worker will still not amount to shit despite being handed a wage far exceeding his/her skill level. It must be bad that despite being handed something you didn't earn the $15/hour workers still have nothing to show for it.

What? Do what they do in third world countries? Throw the unskilled worker on the scrap heap? You think $15 is too much? Why? How much is an unskilled worker worth?

Just a little reminder to you Petals. Not everybody gets a $100,000 job with health and other benefits. Your Utopia has never existed and never will. Stop making your point by trying to make there is this perfect solution. There isn't.
 
More like you don't like it so you called it cherry picked.
No, I got it right the first time. You took one aspect of the ACA and applied it to the whole. You deliberately refused to consider other aspects of the legislation that has helped everyone, liked prohibiting the refusal of insurance with people with pre-existing conditions.

Seems you didn't answer my question on why you think it's your place to determine for someone else what is and isn't a disaster. You don't get to make that determination for anyone but yourself.
I'm not going to respond to your bullshit little strawman argument.

How many of those 25 million are freeloaders because they get something where someone else is forced to offset the costs? Hate to break it to you but one group being forced to fund it for another group isn't something to be proud of.
Since those people have to pay premiums and out of pocket costs, your conclusion that these are "freeloaders", is bullshit.

Why am I being forced to pay higher taxes just so the government can fund corporate welfare? And on the subject of a smaller group deciding for the larger group, everything Trump has done in office was to appease his base, which is only 20% of the population. So 20% of the dumbest, most lunatic morons, are deciding for the rest of the 80% that government services should be deconstructed to the point of oblivion.

I never thought I would see a dumber group of people than the Tea Party, but unfortunately, we've found another rock layer and what was under that, was Trump's base.
 
The law has caused a significant reduction in the number and percentage of people without health insurance.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act#Coverage

Nothing but fallacy for your Cause and projecting onto the left, is not any more true.
/----/ Yeah, many people get free stuff at the cost of everyone else. So why is Obozocare collapsing is it is so wonderful?
This map shows how much of the US could see zero Obamacare insurers next year
Your guy is in office now. Nothing but repeal won't work very well, for very long, in the executive office.
/----/ Please re post in English. TIA
lol. why should i take you seriously in political discourse.
/----/ How can I take anyone seriously who can't form a coherent sentence? Your word salad is laughable.
"Your guy is in office now. Nothing but repeal won't work very well, for very long, in the executive office."
BWHAHAHAHAHAHA
I don't make excuses, like right wingers with nothing but repeal.
 
/----/ Yeah, many people get free stuff at the cost of everyone else. So why is Obozocare collapsing is it is so wonderful?
This map shows how much of the US could see zero Obamacare insurers next year
Your guy is in office now. Nothing but repeal won't work very well, for very long, in the executive office.
/----/ Please re post in English. TIA
lol. why should i take you seriously in political discourse.
/----/ How can I take anyone seriously who can't form a coherent sentence? Your word salad is laughable.
"Your guy is in office now. Nothing but repeal won't work very well, for very long, in the executive office."
BWHAHAHAHAHAHA
I don't make excuses, like right wingers with nothing but repeal.
/----/ repeal and replace with the free market, you socialist dope.
 
And the unskilled worker will still not amount to shit despite being handed a wage far exceeding his/her skill level. It must be bad that despite being handed something you didn't earn the $15/hour workers still have nothing to show for it.

What? Do what they do in third world countries? Throw the unskilled worker on the scrap heap? You think $15 is too much? Why? How much is an unskilled worker worth?

Just a little reminder to you Petals. Not everybody gets a $100,000 job with health and other benefits. Your Utopia has never existed and never will. Stop making your point by trying to make there is this perfect solution. There isn't.
/----/ it's up to the worker to get skills and earn a better wage, just like it's their responsibility to do everything else in life like get dressed, feed themselves and brush their teeth.
 
For those that liked the doctor and plan they couldn't keep despite Obama's promise they could, I'd say it's up to them to make that determination. Why do you think you should get to make it on their behalf?

Anything where one group is forced to subsidize another is a disaster.
I don't agree with your cherry-picked definition of "disaster". Over 25 million people now have insurance (that they would not have had), because of the ACA.

More like you don't like it so you called it cherry picked.

Seems you didn't answer my question on why you think it's your place to determine for someone else what is and isn't a disaster. You don't get to make that determination for anyone but yourself.

How many of those 25 million are freeloaders because they get something where someone else is forced to offset the costs? Hate to break it to you but one group being forced to fund it for another group isn't something to be proud of.
Like millionaire homes in zones that flood even without a hurricane that taxpayers help pay for under the government's flood insurance program?
/----/ are those policies required by law? Do those homeowners have to pay for those policies? What is your point?
 
For those that liked the doctor and plan they couldn't keep despite Obama's promise they could, I'd say it's up to them to make that determination. Why do you think you should get to make it on their behalf?

Anything where one group is forced to subsidize another is a disaster.
I don't agree with your cherry-picked definition of "disaster". Over 25 million people now have insurance (that they would not have had), because of the ACA.

More like you don't like it so you called it cherry picked.

Seems you didn't answer my question on why you think it's your place to determine for someone else what is and isn't a disaster. You don't get to make that determination for anyone but yourself.

How many of those 25 million are freeloaders because they get something where someone else is forced to offset the costs? Hate to break it to you but one group being forced to fund it for another group isn't something to be proud of.
Like millionaire homes in zones that flood even without a hurricane that taxpayers help pay for under the government's flood insurance program?
/----/ are those policies required by law? Do those homeowners have to pay for those policies? What is your point?
Should not be insuring homes in areas that flood easily and repetitively....
 
For those that liked the doctor and plan they couldn't keep despite Obama's promise they could, I'd say it's up to them to make that determination. Why do you think you should get to make it on their behalf?

Anything where one group is forced to subsidize another is a disaster.
I don't agree with your cherry-picked definition of "disaster". Over 25 million people now have insurance (that they would not have had), because of the ACA.

More like you don't like it so you called it cherry picked.

Seems you didn't answer my question on why you think it's your place to determine for someone else what is and isn't a disaster. You don't get to make that determination for anyone but yourself.

How many of those 25 million are freeloaders because they get something where someone else is forced to offset the costs? Hate to break it to you but one group being forced to fund it for another group isn't something to be proud of.
Like millionaire homes in zones that flood even without a hurricane that taxpayers help pay for under the government's flood insurance program?
/----/ are those policies required by law? Do those homeowners have to pay for those policies? What is your point?
Should not be insuring homes in areas that flood easily and repetitively....
/----/ I wouldn't build in a flood zone or tornado alley but others want to and are willing to pay for the insurance
 

Forum List

Back
Top