Vandalshandle
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #181
Well but, libtards children mature more slowly. Mom and dad provide their insurance til they are 26.Why would a murderer be a poster child for the NRA? What does the NRA have to do with some woman killing her kids with guns? Would it be better had she drowned them like this woman?
Monster mom who drowned her two daughters appeals convinction
Or would it have been better had she stabbed them to death like this woman:
Mother allegedly stabs 3 sons to death; children found partially dismembered, police say
Or would it have been better had she ran over them with her car like this woman:
Police: Mother runs over 1-year-old in driveway
Or finally, would it have been better had she simply beat them to death like this woman:
Girl, 4, Beaten to Death By Mom and Boyfriend For Drinking Brother's Juice: Cops - Inside Edition
If a woman wants her kids dead, she doesn't need guns to do it. Only liberals are too stupid to realize a gun is nothing more than a tool. Do you say a hammer built a house, or do you say the carpenter did?
Or she could have just drowned the kids in a bath tub like Andrea Yates
If we didn't allow crazy people to have tubs her kids would be alive today too?
And as far as I can tell there is no right to have a tub
Here! A great way to murder your child. No guns involved.
NJ mom who set newborn on fire sentenced to 30 years
Because women never killed their kids in any other way. You are an idiot.
Soooo....357,000,000 guns in private hands.........
in 2014 there were 8,124 gun murders......
and each year guns are used to save lives and stop violent criminal attack 1,500,000 times a year......
Can you guys count those numbers and see which ones are bigger and what they mean?
She would have murdered those girls without the gun, Remember the woman who drowned her beautiful children in her car that she drove into a lake...because her boyfriend didn't want kids....she didn't use a gun...or the woman who drowned her children in a bathtub..........it isn't the death of the girls that is your issue, because had she killed them in the womb you would have supported and protected that action....you just hate guns.....
T
And some actual perspective on the murder of children.....
total gun murder of children.....193
murder of children by other means.....703
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_02.pdf
Kids murdered by guns....
under 1: 12
age 1-4: 39
age 5-14: 142
total gun murder of children.....193
Kids murdered by other means...
under 1: 270
age 1-4: 298
age 5-14: 135
murder of children by other means.....703
Accidental death for kids by gun in 2013....69
Total accidental gun death for kids in 2014...48
These were NOT BABY CHILDREN OR TODDLERS....They were young adults, one 22 and one 17
Sheesh, what silly, ridiculous responses from all of you...they could not be simultaneously drowned or run over or beaten to death or set on fire... shakes head
Guess you all are just giving knee jerk responses WITHOUT even reading the article and KNOWING THE FACTS of these murders including who was murdered....
So they weren't really children either
Who calls a 17 and a 22 year old children unless they have an agenda?
My child is 31. My agenda is to love and protect her. It always will be my agenda.
Most people I know with grown offspring don't call them children anymore
At age 26, my daughter was an licensed operating room nurse.
However, I can't help but wonder how old you will be when you finally stop typing "libtard".