NSA collecting phone records of millions of Verizon users: Why?

Why not? Let's just go with the Conservative position when the Bush Administration started doing the same thing...

If you have nothing to hid, then what's the problem?

It makes me laugh to see people who were SO sure Bush was an evil despot now squirming because their guy continued the policy that they were so opposed to and having to defend it in spite of their earlier comments.

It's great entertainment to see a vivid example of Leftist hypocrisy!:clap2:
 
the Director of National Intelligence released a statement regarding it -

[snip]

Discussing programs like this publicly will have an impact on the behavior of our adversaries and make it more difficult for us to understand their intentions. Surveillance programs like this one are consistently subject to safeguards that are designed to strike the appropriate balance between national security interests and civil liberties and privacy concerns. …

James R. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence


###

:lmao:

IOW – don’t you know that you should not be talking about this in public!!!!

WOW.
 
the Director of National Intelligence released a statement regarding it -

June 6, 2013

DNI Statement on Recent Unauthorized Disclosures of Classified Information

The highest priority of the Intelligence Community is to work within the constraints of law to collect, analyze and understand information related to potential threats to our national security.

The unauthorized disclosure of a top secret U.S. court document threatens potentially long-lasting and irreversible harm to our ability to identify and respond to the many threats facing our nation.

The article omits key information regarding how a classified intelligence collection program is used to prevent terrorist attacks and the numerous safeguards that protect privacy and civil liberties.

I believe it is important for the American people to understand the limits of this targeted counterterrorism program and the principles that govern its use. In order to provide a more thorough understanding of the program, I have directed that certain information related to the “business records” provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act be declassified and immediately released to the public.

The following important facts explain the purpose and limitations of the program:


■The judicial order that was disclosed in the press is used to support a sensitive intelligence collection operation, on which members of Congress have been fully and repeatedly briefed. The classified program has been authorized by all three branches of the Government.
■Although this program has been properly classified, the leak of one order, without any context, has created a misleading impression of how it operates. Accordingly, we have determined to declassify certain limited information about this program.
■The program does not allow the Government to listen in on anyone’s phone calls. The information acquired does not include the content of any communications or the identity of any subscriber. The only type of information acquired under the Court’s order is telephony metadata, such as telephone numbers dialed and length of calls.■The collection is broad in scope because more narrow collection would limit our ability to screen for and identify terrorism-related communications. Acquiring this information allows us to make connections related to terrorist activities over time. The FISA Court specifically approved this method of collection as lawful, subject to stringent restrictions.
■The information acquired has been part of an overall strategy to protect the nation from terrorist threats to the United States, as it may assist counterterrorism personnel to discover whether known or suspected terrorists have been in contact with other persons who may be engaged in terrorist activities.
■There is a robust legal regime in place governing all activities conducted pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which ensures that those activities comply with the Constitution and laws and appropriately protect privacy and civil liberties. The program at issue here is conducted under authority granted by Congress and is authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). By statute, the Court is empowered to determine the legality of the program.
■By order of the FISC, the Government is prohibited from indiscriminately sifting through the telephony metadata acquired under the program. All information that is acquired under this program is subject to strict, court-imposed restrictions on review and handling. The court only allows the data to be queried when there is a reasonable suspicion, based on specific facts, that the particular basis for the query is associated with a foreign terrorist organization. Only specially cleared counterterrorism personnel specifically trained in the Court-approved procedures may even access the records.
■All information that is acquired under this order is subject to strict restrictions on handling and is overseen by the Department of Justice and the FISA Court. Only a very small fraction of the records are ever reviewed because the vast majority of the data is not responsive to any terrorism-related query.
■The Court reviews the program approximately every 90 days. DOJ conducts rigorous oversight of the handling of the data received to ensure the applicable restrictions are followed. In addition, DOJ and ODNI regularly review the program implementation to ensure it continues to comply with the law.
■The Patriot Act was signed into law in October 2001 and included authority to compel production of business records and other tangible things relevant to an authorized national security investigation with the approval of the FISC. This provision has subsequently been reauthorized over the course of two Administrations – in 2006 and in 2011. It has been an important investigative tool that has been used over the course of two Administrations, with the authorization and oversight of the FISC and the Congress.


Discussing programs like this publicly will have an impact on the behavior of our adversaries and make it more difficult for us to understand their intentions. Surveillance programs like this one are consistently subject to safeguards that are designed to strike the appropriate balance between national security interests and civil liberties and privacy concerns. I believe it is important to address the misleading impression left by the article and to reassure the American people that the Intelligence Community is committed to respecting the civil liberties and privacy of all American citizens.


James R. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence


###

That supposed to make me feel better? Apologize to Obama and Bush for the misunderstandings? What you've missed since this memo are the Court decisions and interpretations to let them access and process ALL the domestic phone metadata. Not just stuff flagged for foreigners.

They have NO IDEA if it's a citizen or a foreigner from the metadata. It's all being mined and refined and distilled in any way they like..

And as for oversight? You mean Feinstein? The know-nothing Intelligience Committee chair? The one that said "Don't worry. It's only metadata" a couple days ago?

That's a screwed up sense of security you've got there. And maybe your media sources aren't too hot either..
 
That's a screwed up sense of security you've got there. And maybe your media sources aren't too hot either..

What the government is doing to Verizon's customers is wrong for these reasons.

The government argues that it's going to use the data to catch terrorists or potential terrorists who intend to violate rights of innocent people. The government is for sure invading our free speech rights against the slim possibility that terrorists will invade our lives. Which of these is a greater threat to us? Our own government's totalitarian moves in the past 10 years or potential terrorists who are being encouraged by our own government's activities overseas?"

.
 
Not a conspiracy theory. It's really happening. The Guardian has a copy of the court order.

I'd heard this on Levin earlier and checked it out. The Guardian (left wing Brit newspaper) is reporting that the NSA is secretly collecting millions of Verizon subscribers phone records.

Check this out.

Revealed: NSA collecting phone records of millions of Americans daily

Exclusive: Top secret court order requiring Verizon to hand over all call data shows scale of domestic surveillance under Obama

The National Security Agency is currently collecting the telephone records of millions of US customers of Verizon, one of America's largest telecoms providers, under a top secret court order issued in April.

The order, a copy of which has been obtained by the Guardian, requires Verizon on an "ongoing, daily basis" to give the NSA information on all telephone calls in its systems, both within the US and between the US and other countries.

The document shows for the first time that under the Obama administration the communication records of millions of US citizens are being collected indiscriminately and in bulk – regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing.

The secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (Fisa) granted the order to the FBI on April 25, giving the government unlimited authority to obtain the data for a specified three-month period ending on July 19.

Under the terms of the blanket order, the numbers of both parties on a call are handed over, as is location data, call duration, unique identifiers, and the time and duration of all calls. The contents of the conversation itself are not covered.

The disclosure is likely to reignite longstanding debates in the US over the proper extent of the government's domestic spying powers.

Under the Bush administration, officials in security agencies had disclosed to reporters the large-scale collection of call records data by the NSA, but this is the first time significant and top-secret documents have revealed the continuation of the practice on a massive scale under President Obama.

The unlimited nature of the records being handed over to the NSA is extremely unusual. Fisa court orders typically direct the production of records pertaining to a specific named target who is suspected of being an agent of a terrorist group or foreign state, or a finite set of individually named targets.

The Guardian approached the National Security Agency, the White House and the Department of Justice for comment in advance of publication on Wednesday.

All declined. The agencies were also offered the opportunity to raise specific security concerns regarding the publication of the court order.

The court order expressly bars Verizon from disclosing to the public either the existence of the FBI's request for its customers' records, or the court order itself.


More at link:

Revealed: NSA collecting phone records of millions of Americans daily | World news | The Guardian

Perhaps conservatives will now consider joining the ACLU.
 
the Director of National Intelligence released a statement regarding it -

June 6, 2013

DNI Statement on Recent Unauthorized Disclosures of Classified Information

The highest priority of the Intelligence Community is to work within the constraints of law to collect, analyze and understand information related to potential threats to our national security.

The unauthorized disclosure of a top secret U.S. court document threatens potentially long-lasting and irreversible harm to our ability to identify and respond to the many threats facing our nation.

The article omits key information regarding how a classified intelligence collection program is used to prevent terrorist attacks and the numerous safeguards that protect privacy and civil liberties.

I believe it is important for the American people to understand the limits of this targeted counterterrorism program and the principles that govern its use. In order to provide a more thorough understanding of the program, I have directed that certain information related to the “business records” provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act be declassified and immediately released to the public.

The following important facts explain the purpose and limitations of the program:


■The judicial order that was disclosed in the press is used to support a sensitive intelligence collection operation, on which members of Congress have been fully and repeatedly briefed. The classified program has been authorized by all three branches of the Government.
■Although this program has been properly classified, the leak of one order, without any context, has created a misleading impression of how it operates. Accordingly, we have determined to declassify certain limited information about this program.
■The program does not allow the Government to listen in on anyone’s phone calls. The information acquired does not include the content of any communications or the identity of any subscriber. The only type of information acquired under the Court’s order is telephony metadata, such as telephone numbers dialed and length of calls.■The collection is broad in scope because more narrow collection would limit our ability to screen for and identify terrorism-related communications. Acquiring this information allows us to make connections related to terrorist activities over time. The FISA Court specifically approved this method of collection as lawful, subject to stringent restrictions.
■The information acquired has been part of an overall strategy to protect the nation from terrorist threats to the United States, as it may assist counterterrorism personnel to discover whether known or suspected terrorists have been in contact with other persons who may be engaged in terrorist activities.
■There is a robust legal regime in place governing all activities conducted pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which ensures that those activities comply with the Constitution and laws and appropriately protect privacy and civil liberties. The program at issue here is conducted under authority granted by Congress and is authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). By statute, the Court is empowered to determine the legality of the program.
■By order of the FISC, the Government is prohibited from indiscriminately sifting through the telephony metadata acquired under the program. All information that is acquired under this program is subject to strict, court-imposed restrictions on review and handling. The court only allows the data to be queried when there is a reasonable suspicion, based on specific facts, that the particular basis for the query is associated with a foreign terrorist organization. Only specially cleared counterterrorism personnel specifically trained in the Court-approved procedures may even access the records.
■All information that is acquired under this order is subject to strict restrictions on handling and is overseen by the Department of Justice and the FISA Court. Only a very small fraction of the records are ever reviewed because the vast majority of the data is not responsive to any terrorism-related query.
■The Court reviews the program approximately every 90 days. DOJ conducts rigorous oversight of the handling of the data received to ensure the applicable restrictions are followed. In addition, DOJ and ODNI regularly review the program implementation to ensure it continues to comply with the law.
■The Patriot Act was signed into law in October 2001 and included authority to compel production of business records and other tangible things relevant to an authorized national security investigation with the approval of the FISC. This provision has subsequently been reauthorized over the course of two Administrations – in 2006 and in 2011. It has been an important investigative tool that has been used over the course of two Administrations, with the authorization and oversight of the FISC and the Congress.


Discussing programs like this publicly will have an impact on the behavior of our adversaries and make it more difficult for us to understand their intentions. Surveillance programs like this one are consistently subject to safeguards that are designed to strike the appropriate balance between national security interests and civil liberties and privacy concerns. I believe it is important to address the misleading impression left by the article and to reassure the American people that the Intelligence Community is committed to respecting the civil liberties and privacy of all American citizens.


James R. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence


###

That supposed to make me feel better? Apologize to Obama and Bush for the misunderstandings? What you've missed since this memo are the Court decisions and interpretations to let them access and process ALL the domestic phone metadata. Not just stuff flagged for foreigners.

They have NO IDEA if it's a citizen or a foreigner from the metadata. It's all being mined and refined and distilled in any way they like..

And as for oversight? You mean Feinstein? The know-nothing Intelligience Committee chair? The one that said "Don't worry. It's only metadata" a couple days ago?

That's a screwed up sense of security you've got there. And maybe your media sources aren't too hot either..

Hey, I'm just the messenger. :eusa_hand: Ran across it and thought I'd post it. :eusa_whistle:
 
Depotoo:

Would really like your link for that DNI announcement because there's a different message up on their website for June 6, 2013.. That appears to be older..

DNI Statement on Activities Authorized Under Section 702 of FISA

DNI Statement on Activities Authorized Under Section 702 of FISA
Thursday, June 06, 2013

June 6, 2013

DNI Statement on Activities Authorized Under Section 702 of FISA

The Guardian and The Washington Post articles refer to collection of communications pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. They contain numerous inaccuracies.

Section 702 is a provision of FISA that is designed to facilitate the acquisition of foreign intelligence information concerning non-U.S. persons located outside the United States. It cannot be used to intentionally target any U.S. citizen, any other U.S. person, or anyone located within the United States.

Activities authorized by Section 702 are subject to oversight by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the Executive Branch, and Congress. They involve extensive procedures, specifically approved by the court, to ensure that only non-U.S. persons outside the U.S. are targeted, and that minimize the acquisition, retention and dissemination of incidentally acquired information about U.S. persons.

Section 702 was recently reauthorized by Congress after extensive hearings and debate.

Information collected under this program is among the most important and valuable foreign intelligence information we collect, and is used to protect our nation from a wide variety of threats.

The unauthorized disclosure of information about this important and entirely legal program is reprehensible and risks important protections for the security of Americans.

Gotta pick the sorry ass excuses apart...

You cant' determine from phone metarecords whether they are "US citizens, any other US person, or anyone else located in the US".. So what GOOD is it? Literally that phrase gives exemption to the 9-11 hijackers DOESN'T IT? We know he's lying right there. Since you can't TELL the status from the data, ALL OF THE DATA IS being processed.

And WE KNOW that isn't true from the court ruling that ALL the data must be made available. The DNI hasn't got a peg-leg to stand on... You still not concerned Depotoo? You got any sense of self-preservation?
 
Who's worried about privacy? That was taken away long ago.

Are you saying that since government has disrespected our rights for a long time and they've been increasingly spying on us that we should just bend over and take it?

Hope you understand that some things are worth fighting for. Our rights top the list.

Lakhota types need massive govt to make decisions for them. There's not much upstairs.
 
Not a conspiracy theory. It's really happening. The Guardian has a copy of the court order.

I'd heard this on Levin earlier and checked it out. The Guardian (left wing Brit newspaper) is reporting that the NSA is secretly collecting millions of Verizon subscribers phone records.

Check this out.

Revealed: NSA collecting phone records of millions of Americans daily

Exclusive: Top secret court order requiring Verizon to hand over all call data shows scale of domestic surveillance under Obama

The National Security Agency is currently collecting the telephone records of millions of US customers of Verizon, one of America's largest telecoms providers, under a top secret court order issued in April.

The order, a copy of which has been obtained by the Guardian, requires Verizon on an "ongoing, daily basis" to give the NSA information on all telephone calls in its systems, both within the US and between the US and other countries.

The document shows for the first time that under the Obama administration the communication records of millions of US citizens are being collected indiscriminately and in bulk – regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing.

The secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (Fisa) granted the order to the FBI on April 25, giving the government unlimited authority to obtain the data for a specified three-month period ending on July 19.

Under the terms of the blanket order, the numbers of both parties on a call are handed over, as is location data, call duration, unique identifiers, and the time and duration of all calls. The contents of the conversation itself are not covered.

The disclosure is likely to reignite longstanding debates in the US over the proper extent of the government's domestic spying powers.

Under the Bush administration, officials in security agencies had disclosed to reporters the large-scale collection of call records data by the NSA, but this is the first time significant and top-secret documents have revealed the continuation of the practice on a massive scale under President Obama.

The unlimited nature of the records being handed over to the NSA is extremely unusual. Fisa court orders typically direct the production of records pertaining to a specific named target who is suspected of being an agent of a terrorist group or foreign state, or a finite set of individually named targets.

The Guardian approached the National Security Agency, the White House and the Department of Justice for comment in advance of publication on Wednesday.

All declined. The agencies were also offered the opportunity to raise specific security concerns regarding the publication of the court order.

The court order expressly bars Verizon from disclosing to the public either the existence of the FBI's request for its customers' records, or the court order itself.


More at link:

Revealed: NSA collecting phone records of millions of Americans daily | World news | The Guardian

Perhaps conservatives will now consider joining the ACLU.

Nope.. I'm a huge fan and donor to Institute for Justice (IJ). It's the ACLU without all the activist leftist bias... That and big sponsor for Cato and Reason and an occasional member of the NRA... THink I got those bases covered quite well..
 
Not a conspiracy theory. It's really happening. The Guardian has a copy of the court order.

I'd heard this on Levin earlier and checked it out. The Guardian (left wing Brit newspaper) is reporting that the NSA is secretly collecting millions of Verizon subscribers phone records.

Check this out.

Revealed: NSA collecting phone records of millions of Americans daily

Exclusive: Top secret court order requiring Verizon to hand over all call data shows scale of domestic surveillance under Obama

The National Security Agency is currently collecting the telephone records of millions of US customers of Verizon, one of America's largest telecoms providers, under a top secret court order issued in April.

The order, a copy of which has been obtained by the Guardian, requires Verizon on an "ongoing, daily basis" to give the NSA information on all telephone calls in its systems, both within the US and between the US and other countries.

The document shows for the first time that under the Obama administration the communication records of millions of US citizens are being collected indiscriminately and in bulk – regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing.

The secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (Fisa) granted the order to the FBI on April 25, giving the government unlimited authority to obtain the data for a specified three-month period ending on July 19.

Under the terms of the blanket order, the numbers of both parties on a call are handed over, as is location data, call duration, unique identifiers, and the time and duration of all calls. The contents of the conversation itself are not covered.

The disclosure is likely to reignite longstanding debates in the US over the proper extent of the government's domestic spying powers.

Under the Bush administration, officials in security agencies had disclosed to reporters the large-scale collection of call records data by the NSA, but this is the first time significant and top-secret documents have revealed the continuation of the practice on a massive scale under President Obama.

The unlimited nature of the records being handed over to the NSA is extremely unusual. Fisa court orders typically direct the production of records pertaining to a specific named target who is suspected of being an agent of a terrorist group or foreign state, or a finite set of individually named targets.

The Guardian approached the National Security Agency, the White House and the Department of Justice for comment in advance of publication on Wednesday.

All declined. The agencies were also offered the opportunity to raise specific security concerns regarding the publication of the court order.

The court order expressly bars Verizon from disclosing to the public either the existence of the FBI's request for its customers' records, or the court order itself.


More at link:

Revealed: NSA collecting phone records of millions of Americans daily | World news | The Guardian

Perhaps conservatives will now consider joining the ACLU.

Nope.. I'm a huge fan and donor to Institute for Justice (IJ). It's the ACLU without all the activist leftist bias... That and big sponsor for Cato and Reason and an occasional member of the NRA... THink I got those bases covered quite well..

The ACLU is an advocate for equal rights under the US Constitution and the law for EVERYONE, even for people and groups with whom they don't agree. The IJ seems considerably more selective.
 
Perhaps conservatives will now consider joining the ACLU.

Nope.. I'm a huge fan and donor to Institute for Justice (IJ). It's the ACLU without all the activist leftist bias... That and big sponsor for Cato and Reason and an occasional member of the NRA... THink I got those bases covered quite well..

The ACLU is an advocate for equal rights under the US Constitution and the law for EVERYONE, even for people and groups with whom they don't agree. The IJ seems considerably more selective.

Nope.

The ACLU has a political agenda that supports (at a minimum) socialism.

I will grant you that they are pretty devout in their support of an "absolutist" interpretation of the First Amendment.

But they absolutely tilt HARD and FAR left.
 
Then why don’t you show us what congress did that keeps GITMO open against Obama’s wishes.

I would be that if you took your head out of the sand long enough you might even notice Obama’s signature at the bottom of that piece of legislation or are you suggesting that Congress did this without the president.

The house put it into the defense bill. There was no way, politically, he could veto that..especially with a war going on.

It's not something you'd understand.

I understand perfectly. You give the president credit for everything that he signs that you agree with. Then you absolve him of every action that he takes that you disagree with.

Here is the simple truth – he signed the bill. A bill that was a travesty BTW but he still signed it either way. That is his responsibility and his decision. There is no way of taking his part in its passing away from him other than being a blind partisan hack.

Continue to call anyone anyone holding Obama responsible for the legislation he signs as unintelligent by saying they won’t understand. It only reinforces the known fact that you are a hack.

:lol:

Like I said.

You wouldn't understand it.

If you think he was going to lose re-election on to stand on principle..you're thinking that Obama is either Gerald Ford or Jimmy Carter.

That's not the case.
 
Perhaps conservatives will now consider joining the ACLU.

Nope.. I'm a huge fan and donor to Institute for Justice (IJ). It's the ACLU without all the activist leftist bias... That and big sponsor for Cato and Reason and an occasional member of the NRA... THink I got those bases covered quite well..

The ACLU is an advocate for equal rights under the US Constitution and the law for EVERYONE, even for people and groups with whom they don't agree. The IJ seems considerably more selective.

Au contraire.. THe ACLU is more selective. They could give a rats ass about a "hair braider" or flower arranger or interior decorator who needs a license or an eminent domain case. When was the last time the ACLU took a 2nd amendment issue? Or an economic issue?

ACLU is big on 1st amendment issues and will defend some awful speech, but they don't really care about overblown political correctness or the 2nd and 9th, and 10th amendment stuff. Or calling a cartel a cartel when it comes to onerous local codes and licensing..
 
man oh man..
links in article at site


SNIP:
Flashback: Obama Intel Chief Tells Congress NSA Does Not Collect Information on Americans (Video)

Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, June 7, 2013, 9:06 AM


At a March 2013 hearing, Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the Senate Intelligence Committee the United States government does not “wittingly” collect information on Americans.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, asked Clapper if the NSA collects data on millions of Americans. Clapper answered that no the NSA does not at least not wittingly collect info on American.
It looks like this was a lie.
Via The Blaze:
[ame=http://youtu.be/rLeyxCkugUo]Does the NSA collect any type of data on millions of Americans? - YouTube[/ame]

all of it here
Flashback: Obama Intel Chief Tells Congress NSA Does Not Collect Information on Americans (Video) | The Gateway Pundit
 
Not a conspiracy theory. It's really happening. The Guardian has a copy of the court order.

I'd heard this on Levin earlier and checked it out. The Guardian (left wing Brit newspaper) is reporting that the NSA is secretly collecting millions of Verizon subscribers phone records.

Check this out.

Revealed: NSA collecting phone records of millions of Americans daily

Exclusive: Top secret court order requiring Verizon to hand over all call data shows scale of domestic surveillance under Obama

The National Security Agency is currently collecting the telephone records of millions of US customers of Verizon, one of America's largest telecoms providers, under a top secret court order issued in April.

The order, a copy of which has been obtained by the Guardian, requires Verizon on an "ongoing, daily basis" to give the NSA information on all telephone calls in its systems, both within the US and between the US and other countries.

The document shows for the first time that under the Obama administration the communication records of millions of US citizens are being collected indiscriminately and in bulk – regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing.

The secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (Fisa) granted the order to the FBI on April 25, giving the government unlimited authority to obtain the data for a specified three-month period ending on July 19.

Under the terms of the blanket order, the numbers of both parties on a call are handed over, as is location data, call duration, unique identifiers, and the time and duration of all calls. The contents of the conversation itself are not covered.

The disclosure is likely to reignite longstanding debates in the US over the proper extent of the government's domestic spying powers.

Under the Bush administration, officials in security agencies had disclosed to reporters the large-scale collection of call records data by the NSA, but this is the first time significant and top-secret documents have revealed the continuation of the practice on a massive scale under President Obama.

The unlimited nature of the records being handed over to the NSA is extremely unusual. Fisa court orders typically direct the production of records pertaining to a specific named target who is suspected of being an agent of a terrorist group or foreign state, or a finite set of individually named targets.

The Guardian approached the National Security Agency, the White House and the Department of Justice for comment in advance of publication on Wednesday.

All declined. The agencies were also offered the opportunity to raise specific security concerns regarding the publication of the court order.

The court order expressly bars Verizon from disclosing to the public either the existence of the FBI's request for its customers' records, or the court order itself.


More at link:

Revealed: NSA collecting phone records of millions of Americans daily | World news | The Guardian

Perhaps conservatives will now consider joining the ACLU.

Perhaps the Left will stand up and tell President asshole to STOP all of this now.
 
hummmhumm, while at a EVENT for another sermon on ObamaCare
video at site


SNIP:

By JOSH GERSTEIN and JENNIFER EPSTEIN | 6/7/13 12:38 PM EDT Updated: 6/7/13 4:17 PM EDT



SAN JOSE, Calif. — President Barack Obama defended his administration’s data-gathering programs Friday, calling them necessary for national security and well within the bounds of the law, and saying he believed his administration had “struck the right balance” between privacy and security.

“I think it’s important to understand that you can’t have 100 percent security and then have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience. We’re going to have to make some choices as a society,” he said at an event which was scheduled as a chance to promote his health care law but became an opportunity for him to discuss controversial national security policies that spilled into public view this week.

all of it here
Read more: President Obama defends surveillance - Josh Gerstein and Jennifer Epstein - POLITICO.com
 
Steph, you're sig is the appropriate reply to Obama's nonsense.
 
Steph, you're sig is the appropriate reply to Obama's nonsense.

It can't be shouted loud enough to him and his followers..
but I'm afraid we are past enough people caring they will let him do whatever he wants...
 
Last edited:
hey, Mr. Obama...

"Those who would give up essential Liberty to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Ben Franklin
 
hey, Mr. Obama...

"Those who would give up essential Liberty to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Ben Franklin

I always thought that Ben's aphorism was a bit over-stated.

There have been times in our history when it has been commendable for folks to voluntarily give up (temporarily) some of their essential liberties. Like, for example, when they join the military, especially in times of war.

There are times when non military folks can also make a temporary sacrifice of some of their liberties for the greater good of keeping all of us (body and soul) together.

That said, Obama was OPPOSED to this kind of thing BEFORE he was President. NOW, he's apparently okay with it enough to DO it. He's just not all that fond of admitting what he's up to.
 

Forum List

Back
Top