bodecea
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2009
- 185,066
- 66,530
You know the fascist Right wants to shut up the free press.So much for free speech.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know the fascist Right wants to shut up the free press.So much for free speech.
And if a judge decides a lawsuit is frivolous, he can impose penalties.Alleged slander and libel
Nunes has a history of filing frivolous lawsuits alleging slander and libel.
And the Truth has con-sequences for lying MAGAts.Speech has consequences.
Boy, I'm glad that's not going on, that would be bad.You know the fascist Right wants to shut up the free press.
People love to use the threat and nuisance of these lawsuits to prevent people from speaking freely about them.
It’s absolutely a disrespect of the freedom of speech.
This does not involve Congress - it has absolutely NOTHING to do with "free speech".It’s absolutely a disrespect of the freedom of speech.
That’s a lie.Mr. Maddows show is 24/7 hate republicans. The only reason she has a show is the dumb leftists continue to believe her.
~~~~~~So much for free speech.
It would be laughable in the extreme if a talking head on TV sued an anonymous citizen over speech. The judge would throw it out as frivolous and stick them with the court costs.That’s a lie.
I hope you are sued for saying it.
You are free to deceive but there are consequences.....So much for free speech.
Consequences shouldn’t be having to pay lawyers to defend yourself from frivolous and meritless lawsuits.You are free to deceive but there are consequences.....
Funny. Nunes tried it at least twice.It would be laughable in the extreme if a talking head on TV sued an anonymous citizen over speech. The judge would throw it out as frivolous and stick them with the court costs.
LOL THIS is rich coming from a liberal that supports shouting down speakers he disagrees with and threatening violence to cancel their speeches.People love to use the threat and nuisance of these lawsuits to prevent people from speaking freely about them.
It’s absolutely a disrespect of the freedom of speech.
LOL remind me when you complained about shouting down conservative speakers ot causing so much violence they were prevented from speaking?You know the fascist Right wants to shut up the free press.
Like when the right said that Paul Pelosi was attacked by his lover?~~~~~~
It's one thing to report the truth, it's another to falsely defame and maliciously slander a person.
See:
What Are Defamation of Character and Slander?
Defamation of character is when one party makes untrue statements that may be malicious or accusatory about another person. In order for the action to be identified as defamation of character, the actions must harm or be intended to harm another person.legalbeagle.com
If its frivolous than they have nothing to worry about... you can't lie and smear people without paying a price....Consequences shouldn’t be having to pay lawyers to defend yourself from frivolous and meritless lawsuits.
That’s abuse of the law.
That’s a lie.LOL THIS is rich coming from a liberal that supports shouting down speakers he disagrees with and threatening violence to cancel their speeches.
Lawyers aren’t free, moron. There’s a cost to defending lawsuits like these. That’s the point.If its frivolous than they have nothing to worry about... you can't lie and smear people without paying a price....