RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
LOL then post where you EVER said all the college campus riots or protests that shut down conservatives was bad or wrong?That’s a lie.
Perhaps I should sue you for it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL then post where you EVER said all the college campus riots or protests that shut down conservatives was bad or wrong?That’s a lie.
Perhaps I should sue you for it.
So much for free speech.
slander is not protected speechSo much for free speech.
They can have their legal fees paid by the accuser... interesting that you didn't use these arguments to defend Trump when he has been sued frivolously...Lawyers aren’t free, moron. There’s a cost to defending lawsuits like these. That’s the point.
maybe he can't...maybe he can....but what we do know is the Court said there was enough at this point to allow the case to move forwardHe can’t prove actual malice.
But he filed the lawsuit in Texas where the courts don’t care about standards anymore so it’s anyone’s guess what happens next.
hahah the Court isn't the one alleging the slander, nor are they the ones being sued. Gosh you are dumb.The judicial system (where these lawsuits are managed) is the government.
Post where I said it was right.LOL then post where you EVER said all the college campus riots or protests that shut down conservatives was bad or wrong?
Sometimes. Often not.They can have their legal fees paid by the accuser... interesting that you didn't use these arguments to defend Trump when he has been sued frivolously...
Yes I do deny that... people don't risk having to pay for both lawyers with a suit with no substance...Sometimes. Often not.
People use lawsuits to suppress speech. Do you deny it?
you are a liberal and have never ONCE complained when your liberal herd does it so there for you support it.Post where I said it was right.
Then you’re incredibly naive. They have laws to prevent it, called SLAPP laws. It happens.Yes I do deny that... people don't risk having to pay for both lawyers with a suit with no substance...
Now people do threaten legal action to suppress speech but they don't follow through....
Will you admit that you’ve never seen me support it?you are a liberal and have never ONCE complained when your liberal herd does it so there for you support it.
Are you suggesting this is true in this case?...Then you’re incredibly naive. They have laws to prevent it, called SLAPP laws. It happens.
You don’t understand that this technique is particularly useful to rich people who sue normal people. Paying lawyers is no big deal to rich people but can be a devastating to normal people.
No, your silence proves you DO support it.Will you admit that you’ve never seen me support it?
Yes, based on his well established history of filing similar lawsuits.Are you suggesting this is true in this case?...
You are naïve if you think slapp suits are widely utilized... Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia and Guam have enacted statutory protections against SLAPPs.....Then you’re incredibly naive. They have laws to prevent it, called SLAPP laws. It happens.
You don’t understand that this technique is particularly useful to rich people who sue normal people. Paying lawyers is no big deal to rich people but can be a devastating to normal people.
That’s also false. It proves nothing.No, your silence proves you DO support it.
Whoa, wait a minute. I thought the narrative was that he was an intruder. When did that change come through the fax machine?Like when the right said that Paul Pelosi was attacked by his lover?
And how did that go for him?Funny. Nunes tried it at least twice.