Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 74,152
- 68,171
- 3,615
Where are you seeing that?Look at the anti-American cheering his Marxist Regime. PATHETIC.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Where are you seeing that?Look at the anti-American cheering his Marxist Regime. PATHETIC.
Ol' MAGA mike just keeps digging, lol. I gotta admire the commitment, too bad it's a commitment to stupidity.So embarrassing.
Stay in school, kids.
Oh my! Can't move the buildings, can't hide them. Take away the visible fruits of his crime...sounds like justice, to me~
Letitia James says she's prepared to seize Trump's buildings if he can't pay his $354M civil fraud fine
New York AG Letitia James tells ABC News that she is prepared to seize Donald Trump's assets if he is unable to pay the $354 million fine in his civil fraud case.abcnews.go.com
Four days after a judge ordered former President Donald Trump to pay $354 million in his civil fraud case, New York Attorney General Letitia James told ABC News that she is prepared to seize the former president's assets if he is unable to find the cash to cover the fine.
"If he does not have funds to pay off the judgment, then we will seek judgment enforcement mechanisms in court, and we will ask the judge to seize his assets," James said in an interview with ABC News' Aaron Katersky.
Trump was fined $354.8 million plus approximately $100 million in pre-judgment interest on Friday after Judge Arthur Engoron determined that he inflated his net worth in order get more favorable loan terms.
The former president has denied all wrongdoing and has said he will appeal.
Saying that she was "very confident" with the strength of her case on appeal, James reiterated that her office would not hesitate to seize Trump's assets -- mentioning Trump's 40 Wall Street skyscraper by name -- if the former president is unable to find the cash to cover the court-ordered disgorgement.
"We are prepared to make sure that the judgment is paid to New Yorkers, and yes, I look at 40 Wall Street each and every day," James said of the standard court process for collecting judgments in civil cases.
You're dealing with straight up communists, really.
That whole case against him, as well as the ruling, was Stalinist in nature.
Businesses would do well to take heed to how they operate in New York.
"the tower formerly known as trump"Rename them. Maybe Letties Place.
"Conservatives LOVE Fascism, until it’s directed at them"ProgressivesLOVE Fascism, until it’s directed at them
Why?All hell will break loose if she is stupid enough to attempt this crap!!
"Conservatives LOVE Fascism, until it’s directed at them"
Fixed it for ya.
It may not really mean that much.Go ahead .....sieze the buildings retards
That'll help
tRump was not prosecuted because of his politics. He broke the law. The pending prosecutions are for other broken laws.Which side sends the Federal police after their political "enemies"?
Which side uses the Court to persecute their political enemies and seize their assets?
Right, look in the mirror
The only way we'll ever get justice to return to America is to develop an infallible lie detector test and feed all the results into an AI program for the verdict and sentencing. Lawyers and Judges in this country have outlived their usefulness. Justice is dead. MAGA.
No bigger threat to America and Americans then the Democrats.Oh my! Can't move the buildings, can't hide them. Take away the visible fruits of his crime...sounds like justice, to me~
Letitia James says she's prepared to seize Trump's buildings if he can't pay his $354M civil fraud fine
New York AG Letitia James tells ABC News that she is prepared to seize Donald Trump's assets if he is unable to pay the $354 million fine in his civil fraud case.abcnews.go.com
Four days after a judge ordered former President Donald Trump to pay $354 million in his civil fraud case, New York Attorney General Letitia James told ABC News that she is prepared to seize the former president's assets if he is unable to find the cash to cover the fine.
"If he does not have funds to pay off the judgment, then we will seek judgment enforcement mechanisms in court, and we will ask the judge to seize his assets," James said in an interview with ABC News' Aaron Katersky.
Trump was fined $354.8 million plus approximately $100 million in pre-judgment interest on Friday after Judge Arthur Engoron determined that he inflated his net worth in order get more favorable loan terms.
The former president has denied all wrongdoing and has said he will appeal.
Saying that she was "very confident" with the strength of her case on appeal, James reiterated that her office would not hesitate to seize Trump's assets -- mentioning Trump's 40 Wall Street skyscraper by name -- if the former president is unable to find the cash to cover the court-ordered disgorgement.
"We are prepared to make sure that the judgment is paid to New Yorkers, and yes, I look at 40 Wall Street each and every day," James said of the standard court process for collecting judgments in civil cases.
You and the rest of the Marxists cheering this sham trial manufactured by the Democrats and their operatives in New York. Actually Stalinists would be more appropriate in the context of this case, my mistake.Where are you seeing that?
Ah, it's all in your imaginations then.You and the rest of the Marxists cheering this sham trial manufactured by the Democrats and their operatives in New York. Actually Stalinists would be more appropriate in the context of this case, my mistake.
Exactly how business people think. Without the need of a victim, everyone is a criminal.You're dealing with straight up communists, really.
That whole case against him, as well as the ruling, was Stalinist in nature.
Businesses would do well to take heed to how they operate in New York.
Because you don't know what that word means.sounds like fascism to me ..
Haha, and you don't know what the word Marxist meansYou and the rest of the Marxists cheering this sham trial manufactured by the Democrats and their operatives in New York. Actually Stalinists would be more appropriate in the context of this case, my mistake.