Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 16,594
- 29,522
- 2,430
Non-whites do not need to show they personally are at risk for severe illness to be eligible for treament, it is presumed from their racial and ethnic status. Whites need proof, a clearly discriminatory standard.
NY State Announces Racially Discriminatory Standard For Rationing COVID Therapeutic Treatment
Non-whites do not need to show they personally are at risk for severe illness to be eligible for treament, it is presumed from their racial and ethnic status. Whites need proof, a clearly discriminatory standard.
legalinsurrection.com
Citing a “significant surge” in COVID cases and “severe resource limitations”, the New York State Department of Health this week announced it would ration oral antiviral and monoclonal antibody treatments based on race:
Oral antiviral treatment is authorized for patients who meet all the following criteria (emphasis added):
- Age 12 years and older weighing at least 40 kg (88 pounds) for Paxlovid, or 18 years and older for molnupiravir
- Test positive for SARS-CoV-2 on a nucleic acid amplification test or antigen test; results from an FDA-authorized home-test kit should be validated through video or photo but, if not possible, patient attestation is adequate
- Have mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms o Patient cannot be hospitalized due to severe or critical COVID-19
- Able to start treatment within 5 days of symptom onset
- Have a medical condition or other factors that increase their risk for severe illness.
Non-white race or Hispanic/Latino ethnicity should be considered a risk factor, as longstanding systemic health and social inequities have contributed to an increased risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19
NY State Announces Racially Discriminatory Standard For Rationing COVID Therapeutic Treatment
Non-whites do not need to show they personally are at risk for severe illness to be eligible for treament, it is presumed from their racial and ethnic status. Whites need proof, a clearly discriminatory standard.Posted by Jane Coleman Friday, December 31, 2021 at 01:30pm 35 Comments
Citing a “significant surge” in COVID cases and “severe resource limitations”, the New York State Department of Health this week announced it would ration oral antiviral and monoclonal antibody treatments based on race:
Oral antiviral treatment is authorized for patients who meet all the following criteria (emphasis added):
- Age 12 years and older weighing at least 40 kg (88 pounds) for Paxlovid, or 18 years and older for molnupiravir
- Test positive for SARS-CoV-2 on a nucleic acid amplification test or antigen test; results from an FDA-authorized home-test kit should be validated through video or photo but, if not possible, patient attestation is adequate
- Have mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms o Patient cannot be hospitalized due to severe or critical COVID-19
- Able to start treatment within 5 days of symptom onset
- Have a medical condition or other factors that increase their risk for severe illness.
Non-white race or Hispanic/Latino ethnicity should be considered a risk factor, as longstanding systemic health and social inequities have contributed to an increased risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19
Based on these guidelines, non-whites do not need to show they personally are at risk for severe illness, it is presumed from their racial and ethnic status. Whites need proof, a clearly discriminatory standard.
Such brazen discrimination against white Americans based on vague, sweeping claims of “systemic” “inequities” was rejected by several federal courts earlier this year when they considered the Biden Administration’s race-based pandemic relief programs. In those cases, the courts “rejected systemic racial discrimination as a compelling state interest to support race-based legislation.”
Commentary:
This should be an incredibly interesting case study when the eventual litigation is resolved. When people choose to demonstrate very publicly in their actions that they wish to prioritize race or ethnicity and demand those concepts be injected into decision making to choose winners and losers we should make sure to label them correctly as racist.
When the PM/SA Left abandons the restraints the rule of law, they provide the calculus changes dramatically. No doubt many of these Commies would like to impose their will and punish their opponents and reward their friends; they already do so in many spheres under their ideological yoke. Some would willingly employ the armed apparatus of the state against its citizens who dissent.
It's a wonder that this edict of the state has not yet been enjoined within hours of publication.
If another state, say for example a state in South, adopted a policy prohibiting black people from attending public school, how long would it take for a judge to put a stop to it?
If this Governor's edict is allowed to stand and government were to run all health care, think of the power Progressive Marxist/DSA DEmocrats will have to achieve their call for “Equity”.