NY Times says that Trump asked Comey to stop Flynn investigation. But why are all sources anonymous?

[iceberg]

Wow, you really got nothing more in the tank than this?

Nobody accused Trump of doing anything inappropriate when he called Flynn a good guy who did nothing illegal after he fired him. That was his opinion and a public statement and it was fine. It's the same that obama was doing for Clinton.

now if Trump asked for a private meeting to ask Comey to back off the Flynn investigation, and then proceeded to fire him for persisting in the investigation, well he is definitely acting inappropriately and flirting with obstruction. Don't see how you can deny that

well maybe it would have been better to meet in secret on a tarmac and talk about golf and their kids.

Thank you! If you had a problem with Bill then you should have a problem with Trump! Bills meeting was inappropriate and Lynch recused herself as a result. Trumps meeting was inappropriate if true... what should his consequence be?

it would be if it was in secret. far as i know it was dinner in the usual places, was it not?

you're comparing a "let's hide over here" meeting to a "hey come to the whitehouse and let's talk" one. not to say what they talked about was appropriate - but the whole tarmac thing was bullshit and excusing herself to let her clone step in was pretty pointless.

so the meeting was inappropriate - but was comey meeting with trump also inappropriate? hidden?

I'm also comparing a husband meeting with the head prosecutor to the active president, the boss, meeting with the head investigator.

It wasn't the dinner meeting... That one was when Trump asked if HE was being investigated and asked for Comey's loyalty. What we are talking about was an oval office meeting with Comey, Pence, Trump and I believe a few others. After the meeting Trumped asked everybody but Comey to leave the room and then he asked Comey to back off the Flynn investigation. It was supposedly detailed in Comeys memo which we have only gotten a peak at, so there is much more info to be revealed. Comey needs to come forward. But it isn't looking good for Trump

not even getting to the content of the meetings. one we'll never know the other we'll never hear the end of. but to date, we still don't know for sure what was said and we have now found out that if you write down what someone said then it must be true. but only if it makes trump look bad. use that logic on the same liberal using it on trump they squeal like a pig still trying to get a part in deliverance.

all i'm saying is linking those 2 meetings as being the same thing is asinine.

 

[Slade3200]

Trumps comment was inappropriate but not an order and not a direct obstruction of justice. I don't believe Comey has claimed that it was and this didn't have a responsibility to report it.

The case for obstruction is not very strong but it does exist when all factors are considered

That can be said about allot of things. This is nothing more then character assassination. To say there is anything more is just not true.

Really? You don't think there is anything inappropriate going on? You would have been cool with Obama doing this with Comey regarding the Clinton investigation?

If you objected to Bills meeting with Lynch you shouldn't be saying what you're saying right now. Makes you a complete hypocrite

bill and lynch met in secret in separate planes on a tarmac they thought no one could see.

where did trump and comey meet again? or are you saying they did the whole "hide in plain site" thing?

Oval Office, trump had the room cleared and is accused of tElling Comey to back off when they were one on one. You cool with that?

let's not get ahead of ourselves -

are you comparing a secret tarmac meeting to be on par with a public oval office one where according to you he cleared the room first?

kinda freaking hard to hide the meeting itself if you kicked everyone out of the meeting isn't it?

there is no connection to these meetings in how they were setup. none. as for the content of the meetings, well we don't know what clinton and lynch talked about. we were told kids and golf. believe it?

we know what trump and comey talked about.

again - where's the connection naturally? you seem to be forcing it to fit your views.

Why do you keep bringing up this secret meeting. Trumps meeting with Comey doesn't have to be secret to be inappropriate. It is what was said that makes it inappropriate.

 

[jc456]

"Really? You don't think there is anything inappropriate going on? You would have been cool with Obama doing this with Comey regarding the Clinton investigation?"


He did.

What did he do and were you cool with it?

Thrice???

You must be a moron.

OK....stop begging:

A US President attempting to obstruct justice?????

"Obama says Clinton didn’t harm national security with private email server"
Obama says Hillary Clinton didn’t harm national security with private email server




"Obama Whines About Criticism Of Hillary’s Private Email Server; ‘A Mistake’ That Gets ‘Blown Up’"
Obama Whines About Criticism Of Hillary's Private Email Server; 'A Mistake' That Gets 'Blown Up'




"CHRIS WALLACE: In October, you were prepared to say you were prepared to say she hadn't jeopardized. And the question is, can you still say that?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security.

WALLACE: Can you guarantee to the American people, can you direct the Justice Department to say, Hillary Clinton will be treated as the evidence goes, she will not be, in any way, protected?

OBAMA: I can guarantee that. I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case. Full stop. Period.

[END VIDEO]

HEGSETH: Bret, he went on to say that there's classified and then there's classified. Is the president setting the table here? Is he already meddling?"
After Obama Says He Is Not Influencing Email Investigation, Conservative Media Claim President Is “Tipping The Scale” For Clinton



"OBAMA EFFECTIVELY PARDONS HILLARY"
Obama effectively pardons Hillary



"EX-DOJ OFFICIAL: OBAMA SIGNALING FBI TO BACK OFF HILLARY"
Ex-DOJ official: Obama signaling FBI to back off Hillary




Were you enraged about Obama obstructing justice?

Wow, you really got nothing more in the tank than this?

Nobody accused Trump of doing anything inappropriate when he called Flynn a good guy who did nothing illegal after he fired him. That was his opinion and a public statement and it was fine. It's the same that obama was doing for Clinton.

now if Trump asked for a private meeting to ask Comey to back off the Flynn investigation, and then proceeded to fire him for persisting in the investigation, well he is definitely acting inappropriately and flirting with obstruction. Don't see how you can deny that

unless it never happened. you got evidence other than the NYT? it's a rhetorical question.

I'm not claiming it happened for sure. We are all just pigeons being fed bread crumbs. But we have a situation where it is Trumps word vs Comeys word. And when looking at the track record for honesty, integrity, and trustworthiness for both men, it is a no brainer who I believe who is telling the truth. We shall see

or neithers words and someone from butthurt NYT's made it up. hly fk. the left are indeed unglued.

 

[jc456]

That can be said about allot of things. This is nothing more then character assassination. To say there is anything more is just not true.

Really? You don't think there is anything inappropriate going on? You would have been cool with Obama doing this with Comey regarding the Clinton investigation?

If you objected to Bills meeting with Lynch you shouldn't be saying what you're saying right now. Makes you a complete hypocrite

bill and lynch met in secret in separate planes on a tarmac they thought no one could see.

where did trump and comey meet again? or are you saying they did the whole "hide in plain site" thing?

Oval Office, trump had the room cleared and is accused of tElling Comey to back off when they were one on one. You cool with that?

let's not get ahead of ourselves -

are you comparing a secret tarmac meeting to be on par with a public oval office one where according to you he cleared the room first?

kinda freaking hard to hide the meeting itself if you kicked everyone out of the meeting isn't it?

there is no connection to these meetings in how they were setup. none. as for the content of the meetings, well we don't know what clinton and lynch talked about. we were told kids and golf. believe it?

we know what trump and comey talked about.

again - where's the connection naturally? you seem to be forcing it to fit your views.

Why do you keep bringing up this secret meeting. Trumps meeting with Comey doesn't have to be secret to be inappropriate. It is what was said that makes it inappropriate.

it is? you just said you don't know what happened, and now you're passing out inappropriate. wtf is wrong with you?

 

[iceberg]

That can be said about allot of things. This is nothing more then character assassination. To say there is anything more is just not true.

Really? You don't think there is anything inappropriate going on? You would have been cool with Obama doing this with Comey regarding the Clinton investigation?

If you objected to Bills meeting with Lynch you shouldn't be saying what you're saying right now. Makes you a complete hypocrite

bill and lynch met in secret in separate planes on a tarmac they thought no one could see.

where did trump and comey meet again? or are you saying they did the whole "hide in plain site" thing?

Oval Office, trump had the room cleared and is accused of tElling Comey to back off when they were one on one. You cool with that?

let's not get ahead of ourselves -

are you comparing a secret tarmac meeting to be on par with a public oval office one where according to you he cleared the room first?

kinda freaking hard to hide the meeting itself if you kicked everyone out of the meeting isn't it?

there is no connection to these meetings in how they were setup. none. as for the content of the meetings, well we don't know what clinton and lynch talked about. we were told kids and golf. believe it?

we know what trump and comey talked about.

again - where's the connection naturally? you seem to be forcing it to fit your views.

Why do you keep bringing up this secret meeting. Trumps meeting with Comey doesn't have to be secret to be inappropriate. It is what was said that makes it inappropriate.

um...why do i? cause you keep saying they're on par with each other and if you're mad at one you must be mad at the other and i'm tired of people living in some jacked up fantasy land and getting pissed off when logic is presented and others don't wanna follow the hate trail.

 

[Slade3200]

Trumps comment was inappropriate but not an order and not a direct obstruction of justice. I don't believe Comey has claimed that it was and this didn't have a responsibility to report it.

The case for obstruction is not very strong but it does exist when all factors are considered

That can be said about allot of things. This is nothing more then character assassination. To say there is anything more is just not true.

Really? You don't think there is anything inappropriate going on? You would have been cool with Obama doing this with Comey regarding the Clinton investigation?

If you objected to Bills meeting with Lynch you shouldn't be saying what you're saying right now. Makes you a complete hypocrite

bill and lynch met in secret in separate planes on a tarmac they thought no one could see.

where did trump and comey meet again? or are you saying they did the whole "hide in plain site" thing?

Oval Office, trump had the room cleared and is accused of tElling Comey to back off when they were one on one. You cool with that?

And no one has come out and said that excep for this secret memo Comey wrote. That's also a complete 180 from what I heard. I was under the impression Trump asked over dinner. Still, that's not to good for Comey because as an officer of the court and director of the FBI it was his suits to take that inappropriate behavior as well as his notes and memos to the powers that be. Why diddnt he do that?

The dinner is where Trump asked if he was being investigated and he also asked for Comey's loyalty. If Comey didn't feel like Trumps statement was obstructing justice or effecting his ability to do the investigation then why would he report it. He documented it because that was what he has done for years and it appears to be useful for him to now disclose them. Not very good for Trump though

 

[jc456]

Once the memo - if it exists - is produced, Trump is gone.

dude, there is no possible way to respond to this asinine post. something that doesn't even exists proves it happened. wow. dude enjoy your drugs.

 

[Crixus]

Thrice???

You must be a moron.

OK....stop begging:

A US President attempting to obstruct justice?????

"Obama says Clinton didn’t harm national security with private email server"
Obama says Hillary Clinton didn’t harm national security with private email server




"Obama Whines About Criticism Of Hillary’s Private Email Server; ‘A Mistake’ That Gets ‘Blown Up’"
Obama Whines About Criticism Of Hillary's Private Email Server; 'A Mistake' That Gets 'Blown Up'




"CHRIS WALLACE: In October, you were prepared to say you were prepared to say she hadn't jeopardized. And the question is, can you still say that?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security.

WALLACE: Can you guarantee to the American people, can you direct the Justice Department to say, Hillary Clinton will be treated as the evidence goes, she will not be, in any way, protected?

OBAMA: I can guarantee that. I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case. Full stop. Period.

[END VIDEO]

HEGSETH: Bret, he went on to say that there's classified and then there's classified. Is the president setting the table here? Is he already meddling?"
After Obama Says He Is Not Influencing Email Investigation, Conservative Media Claim President Is “Tipping The Scale” For Clinton



"OBAMA EFFECTIVELY PARDONS HILLARY"
Obama effectively pardons Hillary



"EX-DOJ OFFICIAL: OBAMA SIGNALING FBI TO BACK OFF HILLARY"
Ex-DOJ official: Obama signaling FBI to back off Hillary




Were you enraged about Obama obstructing justice?

Wow, you really got nothing more in the tank than this?

Nobody accused Trump of doing anything inappropriate when he called Flynn a good guy who did nothing illegal after he fired him. That was his opinion and a public statement and it was fine. It's the same that obama was doing for Clinton.

now if Trump asked for a private meeting to ask Comey to back off the Flynn investigation, and then proceeded to fire him for persisting in the investigation, well he is definitely acting inappropriately and flirting with obstruction. Don't see how you can deny that

This is the part you are missing. This memo at (at this point at least) can not even be proven to exist. No person making any accusation or offering commentaries on TV have even seen it or even met this mysterious third party who allegedly saw it and to my knowledge Comey him self has not commented either. All their is is allegations. That's all. Then the investigation that was going on since July has not produced ANY leads pointing to collusion between Donald Trump and Russia. Not one piece of paper, no video nothing at all.

Youre right, the memo hasn't been verified. We are speculating the "what ifs" should it be true. We will see what's up after Comey comes forward.

Your collusion arguement is lame. Evidence wouldn't be presented in the middle of an investigation. But you're right, there could be absolutely nothing at the end of the investigation. We shall see

If the collusion argument is lame pleas point to,

1. Any criminal investigation of any one person in Trumps Campaigne or whitehouse staff.

2. Any evidence of attempts by Trump or his people to jam up the intelligence investigations. So far y'all at zip on that one.

So far the investigation has amounted to a huge nothing sandwhich. Your attempt to hang on to anconspracy theory is even more lame and just flat lazy. Think for your self one time. You will like it better gen the 24/7 news cycle tell you what you need to think.

You wouldn't know what the investigation has amounted to because you are not privy to the details of whats being investigated. The FBI does not make that stuff public as they find it and they do not release results of an investigation until they are 100% sure of the findings. They could have a lot and they could have very little. They obviously have enough to keep this thing going for almost a year now. Other than that we know nothing.

Ecause none has come out. I have stated nothing as fact except for these.

1. At no time was Donald JnTrump under criminal investigation for colluding with Russia. None, zip, zero, zilch, nada.

2. No member of Trumps staff during the campaign were under criminal investigation for collusion with Russia.

3. As far as the intelligence investigation as that's been the only investigation so (fact) not one person other then Flynn has even had any trouble. Some bowed out of contention for Comeys job, but that's about it.


Hell, no one of the many allegations made against Trump or his people stuck. Nothing. Even the liftest folks on the left are saying less. So far nothing compelling has come out at all .

 

[jc456]

That can be said about allot of things. This is nothing more then character assassination. To say there is anything more is just not true.

Really? You don't think there is anything inappropriate going on? You would have been cool with Obama doing this with Comey regarding the Clinton investigation?

If you objected to Bills meeting with Lynch you shouldn't be saying what you're saying right now. Makes you a complete hypocrite

bill and lynch met in secret in separate planes on a tarmac they thought no one could see.

where did trump and comey meet again? or are you saying they did the whole "hide in plain site" thing?

Oval Office, trump had the room cleared and is accused of tElling Comey to back off when they were one on one. You cool with that?

And no one has come out and said that excep for this secret memo Comey wrote. That's also a complete 180 from what I heard. I was under the impression Trump asked over dinner. Still, that's not to good for Comey because as an officer of the court and director of the FBI it was his suits to take that inappropriate behavior as well as his notes and memos to the powers that be. Why diddnt he do that?

The dinner is where Trump asked if he was being investigated and he also asked for Comey's loyalty. If Comey didn't feel like Trumps statement was obstructing justice or effecting his ability to do the investigation then why would he report it. He documented it because that was what he has done for years and it appears to be useful for him to now disclose them. Not very good for Trump though

dude, you fking write these things like you were there for every fking trump event. hly shit. WTF is wrong with you. You don't know shit about any of this tinkerbell.

 

[iceberg]

The dinner is where Trump asked if he was being investigated and he also asked for Comey's loyalty. If Comey didn't feel like Trumps statement was obstructing justice or effecting his ability to do the investigation then why would he report it. He documented it because that was what he has done for years and it appears to be useful for him to now disclose them. Not very good for Trump though

good. so we're done with the bullshit of trying to say the trump/comey meeting is on par with the clinton/lynch one. right? they're not. nothing to do with each other. i'll stop bringing it up if you stop trying to link 'em. deal?

now - we don't know what was said but much like we don't know what evidence ANYONE has on trump/russia - liberals don't give a fuck. trump is guilty and the evidence will come along soon and make me right.

WAH gimme binky!!!

WHEN we know what was said AND THE CONTEXT being it THEN we can have a rational discussion. until then we're bitching and whining at each other on nothing more than guesses, suppositions and wishing trump harm usually.

so anyone saying NOT GOOD FOR TRUMP is ONLY DOING IT cause they don't like trump and FUCK FACTS. they'll come along later.

 

[Slade3200]

Wow, you really got nothing more in the tank than this?

Nobody accused Trump of doing anything inappropriate when he called Flynn a good guy who did nothing illegal after he fired him. That was his opinion and a public statement and it was fine. It's the same that obama was doing for Clinton.

now if Trump asked for a private meeting to ask Comey to back off the Flynn investigation, and then proceeded to fire him for persisting in the investigation, well he is definitely acting inappropriately and flirting with obstruction. Don't see how you can deny that

well maybe it would have been better to meet in secret on a tarmac and talk about golf and their kids.

Thank you! If you had a problem with Bill then you should have a problem with Trump! Bills meeting was inappropriate and Lynch recused herself as a result. Trumps meeting was inappropriate if true... what should his consequence be?

it would be if it was in secret. far as i know it was dinner in the usual places, was it not?

you're comparing a "let's hide over here" meeting to a "hey come to the whitehouse and let's talk" one. not to say what they talked about was appropriate - but the whole tarmac thing was bullshit and excusing herself to let her clone step in was pretty pointless.

so the meeting was inappropriate - but was comey meeting with trump also inappropriate? hidden?

I'm also comparing a husband meeting with the head prosecutor to the active president, the boss, meeting with the head investigator.

It wasn't the dinner meeting... That one was when Trump asked if HE was being investigated and asked for Comey's loyalty. What we are talking about was an oval office meeting with Comey, Pence, Trump and I believe a few others. After the meeting Trumped asked everybody but Comey to leave the room and then he asked Comey to back off the Flynn investigation. It was supposedly detailed in Comeys memo which we have only gotten a peak at, so there is much more info to be revealed. Comey needs to come forward. But it isn't looking good for Trump

not even getting to the content of the meetings. one we'll never know the other we'll never hear the end of. but to date, we still don't know for sure what was said and we have now found out that if you write down what someone said then it must be true. but only if it makes trump look bad. use that logic on the same liberal using it on trump they squeal like a pig still trying to get a part in deliverance.

all i'm saying is linking those 2 meetings as being the same thing is asinine.

You are right, it is a he said he said situation. Comey is known for his documentation of meetings and also has much more credibility for honesty when compared to Trump. The memo is not hard evidence like a recording would be but it is enough to be taken seriously. In the end congress will have to make up their mind about what they believe and how they want to act.

 

[Crixus]

That can be said about allot of things. This is nothing more then character assassination. To say there is anything more is just not true.

Really? You don't think there is anything inappropriate going on? You would have been cool with Obama doing this with Comey regarding the Clinton investigation?

If you objected to Bills meeting with Lynch you shouldn't be saying what you're saying right now. Makes you a complete hypocrite

bill and lynch met in secret in separate planes on a tarmac they thought no one could see.

where did trump and comey meet again? or are you saying they did the whole "hide in plain site" thing?

Oval Office, trump had the room cleared and is accused of tElling Comey to back off when they were one on one. You cool with that?

And no one has come out and said that excep for this secret memo Comey wrote. That's also a complete 180 from what I heard. I was under the impression Trump asked over dinner. Still, that's not to good for Comey because as an officer of the court and director of the FBI it was his suits to take that inappropriate behavior as well as his notes and memos to the powers that be. Why diddnt he do that?

The dinner is where Trump asked if he was being investigated and he also asked for Comey's loyalty. If Comey didn't feel like Trumps statement was obstructing justice or effecting his ability to do the investigation then why would he report it. He documented it because that was what he has done for years and it appears to be useful for him to now disclose them. Not very good for Trump though

Agree, but still, Comeyhas not commented. Only a mysterious third party a reporter said he talked to on the phone. Nothing at all.

 

[Crixus]

The dinner is where Trump asked if he was being investigated and he also asked for Comey's loyalty. If Comey didn't feel like Trumps statement was obstructing justice or effecting his ability to do the investigation then why would he report it. He documented it because that was what he has done for years and it appears to be useful for him to now disclose them. Not very good for Trump though

good. so we're done with the bullshit of trying to say the trump/comey meeting is on par with the clinton/lynch one. right? they're not. nothing to do with each other. i'll stop bringing it up if you stop trying to link 'em. deal?

now - we don't know what was said but much like we don't know what evidence ANYONE has on trump/russia - liberals don't give a fuck. trump is guilty and the evidence will come along soon and make me right.

WAH gimme binky!!!

WHEN we know what was said AND THE CONTEXT being it THEN we can have a rational discussion. until then we're bitching and whining at each other on nothing more than guesses, suppositions and wishing trump harm usually.

so anyone saying NOT GOOD FOR TRUMP is ONLY DOING IT cause they don't like trump and FUCK FACTS. they'll come along later.

I disagree. Democrats don't need to convict or impeach, only impede.

 

[Slade3200]

Really? You don't think there is anything inappropriate going on? You would have been cool with Obama doing this with Comey regarding the Clinton investigation?

If you objected to Bills meeting with Lynch you shouldn't be saying what you're saying right now. Makes you a complete hypocrite

bill and lynch met in secret in separate planes on a tarmac they thought no one could see.

where did trump and comey meet again? or are you saying they did the whole "hide in plain site" thing?

Oval Office, trump had the room cleared and is accused of tElling Comey to back off when they were one on one. You cool with that?

let's not get ahead of ourselves -

are you comparing a secret tarmac meeting to be on par with a public oval office one where according to you he cleared the room first?

kinda freaking hard to hide the meeting itself if you kicked everyone out of the meeting isn't it?

there is no connection to these meetings in how they were setup. none. as for the content of the meetings, well we don't know what clinton and lynch talked about. we were told kids and golf. believe it?

we know what trump and comey talked about.

again - where's the connection naturally? you seem to be forcing it to fit your views.

Why do you keep bringing up this secret meeting. Trumps meeting with Comey doesn't have to be secret to be inappropriate. It is what was said that makes it inappropriate.

it is? you just said you don't know what happened, and now you're passing out inappropriate. wtf is wrong with you?

Try to keep up man... I've said multiple times that we are speculating on whether these events happened or not. If they happened then YES they are inappropriate. We will get more info when Comey comes forward and then it will likely be a matter of us deciding whose story we believe

 

[iceberg]

You are right, it is a he said he said situation. Comey is known for his documentation of meetings and also has much more credibility for honesty when compared to Trump. The memo is not hard evidence like a recording would be but it is enough to be taken seriously. In the end congress will have to make up their mind about what they believe and how they want to act.

no. fuck that. i'm not going to give you that one. i don't give a rats ass who wrote what and the cred they may or may not have. a written note about what may or may not have been said is not fact, not true until proven by facts, and only people who have one hellacious agenda up their ass will make it true but NEVER ALLOW that same fucktarted tactic to be used against them.

ie - anything goes for trump but not for the rest of us.

that entire mindset is bullshit. what goes for one goes for us all when it comes to the rights we have and share.

 

[jc456]

well maybe it would have been better to meet in secret on a tarmac and talk about golf and their kids.

Thank you! If you had a problem with Bill then you should have a problem with Trump! Bills meeting was inappropriate and Lynch recused herself as a result. Trumps meeting was inappropriate if true... what should his consequence be?

it would be if it was in secret. far as i know it was dinner in the usual places, was it not?

you're comparing a "let's hide over here" meeting to a "hey come to the whitehouse and let's talk" one. not to say what they talked about was appropriate - but the whole tarmac thing was bullshit and excusing herself to let her clone step in was pretty pointless.

so the meeting was inappropriate - but was comey meeting with trump also inappropriate? hidden?

I'm also comparing a husband meeting with the head prosecutor to the active president, the boss, meeting with the head investigator.

It wasn't the dinner meeting... That one was when Trump asked if HE was being investigated and asked for Comey's loyalty. What we are talking about was an oval office meeting with Comey, Pence, Trump and I believe a few others. After the meeting Trumped asked everybody but Comey to leave the room and then he asked Comey to back off the Flynn investigation. It was supposedly detailed in Comeys memo which we have only gotten a peak at, so there is much more info to be revealed. Comey needs to come forward. But it isn't looking good for Trump

not even getting to the content of the meetings. one we'll never know the other we'll never hear the end of. but to date, we still don't know for sure what was said and we have now found out that if you write down what someone said then it must be true. but only if it makes trump look bad. use that logic on the same liberal using it on trump they squeal like a pig still trying to get a part in deliverance.

all i'm saying is linking those 2 meetings as being the same thing is asinine.

You are right, it is a he said he said situation. Comey is known for his documentation of meetings and also has much more credibility for honesty when compared to Trump. The memo is not hard evidence like a recording would be but it is enough to be taken seriously. In the end congress will have to make up their mind about what they believe and how they want to act.

what memo? dude you keep making the statement as if you know what exists. WTF is wrong with you?

 

[iceberg]

Thank you! If you had a problem with Bill then you should have a problem with Trump! Bills meeting was inappropriate and Lynch recused herself as a result. Trumps meeting was inappropriate if true... what should his consequence be?

it would be if it was in secret. far as i know it was dinner in the usual places, was it not?

you're comparing a "let's hide over here" meeting to a "hey come to the whitehouse and let's talk" one. not to say what they talked about was appropriate - but the whole tarmac thing was bullshit and excusing herself to let her clone step in was pretty pointless.

so the meeting was inappropriate - but was comey meeting with trump also inappropriate? hidden?

I'm also comparing a husband meeting with the head prosecutor to the active president, the boss, meeting with the head investigator.

It wasn't the dinner meeting... That one was when Trump asked if HE was being investigated and asked for Comey's loyalty. What we are talking about was an oval office meeting with Comey, Pence, Trump and I believe a few others. After the meeting Trumped asked everybody but Comey to leave the room and then he asked Comey to back off the Flynn investigation. It was supposedly detailed in Comeys memo which we have only gotten a peak at, so there is much more info to be revealed. Comey needs to come forward. But it isn't looking good for Trump

not even getting to the content of the meetings. one we'll never know the other we'll never hear the end of. but to date, we still don't know for sure what was said and we have now found out that if you write down what someone said then it must be true. but only if it makes trump look bad. use that logic on the same liberal using it on trump they squeal like a pig still trying to get a part in deliverance.

all i'm saying is linking those 2 meetings as being the same thing is asinine.

You are right, it is a he said he said situation. Comey is known for his documentation of meetings and also has much more credibility for honesty when compared to Trump. The memo is not hard evidence like a recording would be but it is enough to be taken seriously. In the end congress will have to make up their mind about what they believe and how they want to act.

what memo? dude you keep making the statement as if you know what exists. WTF is wrong with you?

he can't handle the potential of being wrong.

a very passive aggressive type trait.

 

[Slade3200]

Really? You don't think there is anything inappropriate going on? You would have been cool with Obama doing this with Comey regarding the Clinton investigation?

If you objected to Bills meeting with Lynch you shouldn't be saying what you're saying right now. Makes you a complete hypocrite

bill and lynch met in secret in separate planes on a tarmac they thought no one could see.

where did trump and comey meet again? or are you saying they did the whole "hide in plain site" thing?

Oval Office, trump had the room cleared and is accused of tElling Comey to back off when they were one on one. You cool with that?

let's not get ahead of ourselves -

are you comparing a secret tarmac meeting to be on par with a public oval office one where according to you he cleared the room first?

kinda freaking hard to hide the meeting itself if you kicked everyone out of the meeting isn't it?

there is no connection to these meetings in how they were setup. none. as for the content of the meetings, well we don't know what clinton and lynch talked about. we were told kids and golf. believe it?

we know what trump and comey talked about.

again - where's the connection naturally? you seem to be forcing it to fit your views.

Why do you keep bringing up this secret meeting. Trumps meeting with Comey doesn't have to be secret to be inappropriate. It is what was said that makes it inappropriate.

um...why do i? cause you keep saying they're on par with each other and if you're mad at one you must be mad at the other and i'm tired of people living in some jacked up fantasy land and getting pissed off when logic is presented and others don't wanna follow the hate trail.

You have a point that a secret meeting is worse than a publicly known meeting. But I'd hope you'd agree that an active president, the boss, asking the head investigator to back off is much more inappropriate than a husband meeting with the head prosecutor. Despite the optics Lynch recused herself because the meeting was inappropriate. I agree that it was. Why can't you agree that if these accusations are true, Trump is over the line as well?

 

[jc456]

bill and lynch met in secret in separate planes on a tarmac they thought no one could see.

where did trump and comey meet again? or are you saying they did the whole "hide in plain site" thing?

Oval Office, trump had the room cleared and is accused of tElling Comey to back off when they were one on one. You cool with that?

let's not get ahead of ourselves -

are you comparing a secret tarmac meeting to be on par with a public oval office one where according to you he cleared the room first?

kinda freaking hard to hide the meeting itself if you kicked everyone out of the meeting isn't it?

there is no connection to these meetings in how they were setup. none. as for the content of the meetings, well we don't know what clinton and lynch talked about. we were told kids and golf. believe it?

we know what trump and comey talked about.

again - where's the connection naturally? you seem to be forcing it to fit your views.

Why do you keep bringing up this secret meeting. Trumps meeting with Comey doesn't have to be secret to be inappropriate. It is what was said that makes it inappropriate.

it is? you just said you don't know what happened, and now you're passing out inappropriate. wtf is wrong with you?

Try to keep up man... I've said multiple times that we are speculating on whether these events happened or not. If they happened then YES they are inappropriate. We will get more info when Comey comes forward and then it will likely be a matter of us deciding whose story we believe

you keep making that comment about inappropriate. Well if nothing exists, it can't be inappropriate. so just stop. there is nothing. if there was a name behind it it would be made available. why do you supposed it is anonymous. Why would Comey need to be anonymous? dude, you're losing it. And btw, it is you that is stuck in the mud.

 

[jc456]

bill and lynch met in secret in separate planes on a tarmac they thought no one could see.

where did trump and comey meet again? or are you saying they did the whole "hide in plain site" thing?

Oval Office, trump had the room cleared and is accused of tElling Comey to back off when they were one on one. You cool with that?

let's not get ahead of ourselves -

are you comparing a secret tarmac meeting to be on par with a public oval office one where according to you he cleared the room first?

kinda freaking hard to hide the meeting itself if you kicked everyone out of the meeting isn't it?

there is no connection to these meetings in how they were setup. none. as for the content of the meetings, well we don't know what clinton and lynch talked about. we were told kids and golf. believe it?

we know what trump and comey talked about.

again - where's the connection naturally? you seem to be forcing it to fit your views.

Why do you keep bringing up this secret meeting. Trumps meeting with Comey doesn't have to be secret to be inappropriate. It is what was said that makes it inappropriate.

um...why do i? cause you keep saying they're on par with each other and if you're mad at one you must be mad at the other and i'm tired of people living in some jacked up fantasy land and getting pissed off when logic is presented and others don't wanna follow the hate trail.

You have a point that a secret meeting is worse than a publicly known meeting. But I'd hope you'd agree that an active president, the boss, asking the head investigator to back off is much more inappropriate than a husband meeting with the head prosecutor. Despite the optics Lynch recused herself because the meeting was inappropriate. I agree that it was. Why can't you agree that if these accusations are true, Trump is over the line as well?

stfu already. stop with all this presumption of guilt that is yours. stupid fk.