Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CRACKER BABY KILLER
We all know you want to suck the guy off but keep he pictures to yourself ok?
CRACKER BABY KILLER
We all know you want to suck the guy off but keep he pictures to yourself ok?
We all know you want to suck the guy off but keep he pictures to yourself ok?
wow...you're actually sharing her brain on this? I have been giving you WAY too much credit.
But not anymore.
Phyllis Hampton, general counsel of the Florida Elections Commission, testified that her office could investigate the wrongful removal of a Floridian from the voter rolls if there was evidence of a willful violation. Ms. Hampton stated:
"If we had a sworn complaint, which on its face was legally sufficient, we would proceed and look into the matter and see. But one of the requirements to find a violation is that there is willfulness. So if you had a person who had accidentally been removed during the purging of the election records, that would not be a willful violation. You would have to have someone who was deliberately removing people when they should not be removed, for there to be an election law violation."
That was the lawyer for teh people who commited the crime you asshole
what crime?
The crime they know they commited and dropped the list right after they were forced to provide the names which were on it.
"If we had a sworn complaint, which on its face was legally sufficient, we would proceed and look into the matter and see. But one of the requirements to find a violation is that there is willfulness. So if you had a person who had accidentally been removed during the purging of the election records, that would not be a willful violation. You would have to have someone who was deliberately removing people when they should not be removed, for there to be an election law violation."
CRACKER BABY KILLER
We all know you want to suck the guy off but keep he pictures to yourself ok?
that's what i figured....nothing but insults from the bitch who hates as strongly as he does.
What's wrong hack? Can't stand to see the truth? Does it bother you to know that he's getting a pass when he's clearly a danger to society? He looks a bit more intimidating holding a couple of guns instead of a stick huh?
But he's not intimidating anyone is he? He's just standing there. He doesn't intend to look scary... does he? No...he's just an average guy...minding his own business. Nothing to worry about here.
wow...you're actually sharing her brain on this? I have been giving you WAY too much credit.
But not anymore.
take the black dick out of your mouth. I can't hear you.
We all know you want to suck the guy off but keep he pictures to yourself ok?
that's what i figured....nothing but insults from the bitch who hates as strongly as he does.
What's wrong hack? Can't stand to see the truth? Does it bother you to know that he's getting a pass when he's clearly a danger to society? He looks a bit more intimidating holding a couple of guns instead of a stick huh?
But he's not intimidating anyone is he? He's just standing there. He doesn't intend to look scary... does he? No...he's just an average guy...minding his own business. Nothing to worry about here.
Hey asshole if you wouldnt ignore all the court documented evidence I keep giving you then you would see more than insults.
Until then enjoy your skin flute.
what crime?
The crime they know they commited and dropped the list right after they were forced to provide the names which were on it.
And you got that from this statement?
"If we had a sworn complaint, which on its face was legally sufficient, we would proceed and look into the matter and see. But one of the requirements to find a violation is that there is willfulness. So if you had a person who had accidentally been removed during the purging of the election records, that would not be a willful violation. You would have to have someone who was deliberately removing people when they should not be removed, for there to be an election law violation."
that's what i figured....nothing but insults from the bitch who hates as strongly as he does.
What's wrong hack? Can't stand to see the truth? Does it bother you to know that he's getting a pass when he's clearly a danger to society? He looks a bit more intimidating holding a couple of guns instead of a stick huh?
But he's not intimidating anyone is he? He's just standing there. He doesn't intend to look scary... does he? No...he's just an average guy...minding his own business. Nothing to worry about here.
Hey asshole if you wouldnt ignore all the court documented evidence I keep giving you then you would see more than insults.
Until then enjoy your skin flute.
Oh please keep hanging on to your precious court documented evidence. It's doing you SO MUCH GOOD NOW isn't it!
CRACKER BABY KILLER
We all know you want to suck the guy off but keep he pictures to yourself ok?
that's what i figured....nothing but insults from the bitch who hates as strongly as he does.
What's wrong hack? Can't stand to see the truth? Does it bother you to know that he's getting a pass when he's clearly a danger to society? He looks a bit more intimidating holding a couple of guns instead of a stick huh?
But he's not intimidating anyone is he? He's just standing there. He doesn't intend to look scary... does he? No...he's just an average guy...minding his own business. Nothing to worry about here.
The crime they know they commited and dropped the list right after they were forced to provide the names which were on it.
And you got that from this statement?
"If we had a sworn complaint, which on its face was legally sufficient, we would proceed and look into the matter and see. But one of the requirements to find a violation is that there is willfulness. So if you had a person who had accidentally been removed during the purging of the election records, that would not be a willful violation. You would have to have someone who was deliberately removing people when they should not be removed, for there to be an election law violation."
That is the lawyer for the people who ordered the flawed list, there is also testimony from the company they had compile the list. In that testimony the company said they warned Harris that the list would cause real voters to lose their vote, you know what Harris did? she asked for a list even worse that would cause even MORE mismatches.
Do you really think a defense lawyer is a good judge of wether their client commited a crime?
And you got that from this statement?
That is the lawyer for the people who ordered the flawed list, there is also testimony from the company they had compile the list. In that testimony the company said they warned Harris that the list would cause real voters to lose their vote, you know what Harris did? she asked for a list even worse that would cause even MORE mismatches.
Do you really think a defense lawyer is a good judge of wether their client commited a crime?
just as much credibility on one side as the other...or is that not a fair way to play the legal game?
Do you think Shapiro and Cochran were good judges of whether OJ killed his wife or not?
The lawyer isn't there to JUDGE....that JUDGE is...the lawyer's job is to represent their client and provide the evidence they have to prove the position of said client.
I fail to see your point.
Hey asshole if you wouldnt ignore all the court documented evidence I keep giving you then you would see more than insults.
Until then enjoy your skin flute.
Oh please keep hanging on to your precious court documented evidence. It's doing you SO MUCH GOOD NOW isn't it!
Its only doing "no good" because you are a partisn hack with no shred of honesty left.
Can you even recount any of the evidence I have already given you?
That is the lawyer for the people who ordered the flawed list, there is also testimony from the company they had compile the list. In that testimony the company said they warned Harris that the list would cause real voters to lose their vote, you know what Harris did? she asked for a list even worse that would cause even MORE mismatches.
Do you really think a defense lawyer is a good judge of wether their client commited a crime?
just as much credibility on one side as the other...or is that not a fair way to play the legal game?
Do you think Shapiro and Cochran were good judges of whether OJ killed his wife or not?
The lawyer isn't there to JUDGE....that JUDGE is...the lawyer's job is to represent their client and provide the evidence they have to prove the position of said client.
I fail to see your point.
You fail to see the racists point, because the racist fails to HAVE a point.