Rozman
Gold Member
Is there any proof that Fox News wansn't involved?
If FoxNews was doing its job, they could have prevented the attack
Huh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there any proof that Fox News wansn't involved?
If FoxNews was doing its job, they could have prevented the attack
I had no idea FOX news was part of any branch of government.
Is there any proof that Fox News wansn't involved?
If FoxNews was doing its job, they could have prevented the attack
You screwed up again.
FOX isn't news.
Apparently, Obama takes FOX seriously enough to agree to an interview with Bill O'Reilly. So, does he think "FOX isn't news"?
Take that MediaMatters crap somewhere else.
Seems fair to me, Fox news blames him for just about everything so why not blame them right back? Both are totally wrong but since when did that matter?
yeah for sure, lets have a President who act's like a petulant child because of a news station who REPORTS on his and comrades in arms administration's actions
I had no idea FOX news was part of any branch of government.
Just to stay on track here - President Obama did not blame fux for anything.
"These kinds of things keep on surfacing, in part, because you and your TV station will promote them."
-President Obama to Bill O'Reilly
Is there any proof that Fox News wansn't involved?
If FoxNews was doing its job, they could have prevented the attack
Huh?
Just to stay on track here - President Obama did not blame fux for anything.
"These kinds of things keep on surfacing, in part, because you and your TV station will promote them."
-President Obama to Bill O'Reilly
That was when he was blaming Faux for the IRS.......
Here's the part when the echo-chamber wants to say he blame Faux for Benghazi.....
O'REILLY: -- but I just want to say that they're -- your detractors believe that you did not tell the world it was a terror attack because your campaign didn't want that out.
OBAMA: Bill, think about...
O'REILLY: That's what they believe.
OBAMA: -- and they believe it because folks like you are telling them that.
O'REILLY: No, I'm not telling them that.
TRANSCRIPT: Bill O'Reilly interviews President Obama | Fox News
Typical O'REILLY. All Spin Zone.
They know that it was reported by the administration that it was due to some anti-Islam movie a handful of people saw. Rice went out on the media trails selling it right before the election to help her boy look good since the spin was that Mr. O had terrorists on the run. Now they lie about it and try to rewrite history since FOX isn't letting it die like all the other Democrat media outlets. Next question.What did FoxNews know about the attacks and when did they know it?
Why are they covering up?
Obama didn't want anyone to think he was lying about winning the war against al Qaeda, so they made up this story about a video being the cause. The real cause was lax security and a fear of failure after the attack began. This is bad enough, but since the attack the administration has been involved in a cover-up. Nixon wash't impeached for breaking into the Watergate hotel. He was impeached for covering it up and lying about it.
This is just completely wrong on so many levels.
Only to a warped mind.
We've found out that Obama knew within the first 24 hrs it was not some protest. Yet he chose to tell the world it was for weeks. He never admitted to screwing it up. He even arrested the producer of that video.
What is wrong is this failure by his supporters to face the truth. They never question any bold-faced lie he makes. The latest is his claim that Fox dreamed up the whole thing.
It's just a pattern you refuse to see.
Please post the Presidents exact words from the interview to back up your claim.
Obama lashes out, blames Fox News during O'Reilly pre-Super Bowl interview - Spokane Conservative | Examiner.com
"Your detractors believe that you did not tell the world it was a terror attack because your campaign didn't want that out," O'Reilly said.
"And they believe it because folks like you are telling them that"
It's an obvious truth. This thread is a testament to that fact. Does anyone truly believe Fox (and the entire right wing echo chamber) didn't present that point of view?
It's okay. There was plenty of time before the election to get that message out. Didn't resonate well.
This is just completely wrong on so many levels.
Only to a warped mind.
We've found out that Obama knew within the first 24 hrs it was not some protest. Yet he chose to tell the world it was for weeks. He never admitted to screwing it up. He even arrested the producer of that video.
What is wrong is this failure by his supporters to face the truth. They never question any bold-faced lie he makes. The latest is his claim that Fox dreamed up the whole thing.
It's just a pattern you refuse to see.
"My" warped mind?
Nixon was never impeached.
That's just one of your most glaring errors.
And the "lax" security was the result of Republicans cutting funding and the CIA setting up a headquarters there.
And Obama was and still is winning a war against Al Qaeda.
Last time this country experienced an event that was even close to 9/11 was when?
Seems fair to me, Fox news blames him for just about everything so why not blame them right back? Both are totally wrong but since when did that matter?
yeah for sure, lets have a President who act's like a petulant child because of a news station who REPORTS on his and comrades in arms administration's actions
you have the mind of a child.
This is just completely wrong on so many levels.
Only to a warped mind.
We've found out that Obama knew within the first 24 hrs it was not some protest. Yet he chose to tell the world it was for weeks. He never admitted to screwing it up. He even arrested the producer of that video.
What is wrong is this failure by his supporters to face the truth. They never question any bold-faced lie he makes. The latest is his claim that Fox dreamed up the whole thing.
It's just a pattern you refuse to see.
"My" warped mind?
Nixon was never impeached.
That's just one of your most glaring errors.
And the "lax" security was the result of Republicans cutting funding and the CIA setting up a headquarters there.
And Obama was and still is winning a war against Al Qaeda.
Last time this country experienced an event that was even close to 9/11 was when?
They know that it was reported by the administration that it was due to some anti-Islam movie a handful of people saw. Rice went out on the media trails selling it right before the election to help her boy look good since the spin was that Mr. O had terrorists on the run. Now they lie about it and try to rewrite history since FOX isn't letting it die like all the other Democrat media outlets. Next question.What did FoxNews know about the attacks and when did they know it?
Why are they covering up?
Fox is the number 1 Cable News outlet. They should have known that something was going down in Benghazi. Covering up for their inneptnes does not prove anything
Someone at Fox should take the fall for this
So should the Obama administration have known, and they have a lot bigger Army than Fox news. The people that knew in the Obama administration were promoted for lieing about the attack.
Don't you think CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS AND NBC should have done something as well, or did they not know?
Deflection
I'm tired of rightwingers covering for FoxNews ineptness in Benghazi. Any quality news organization should have been able to report the pending attack. Did Fox cover up an attack they knew was coming?
FoxNews dropped the ball big time on Benghazi