Obama compares Iraq to Viet Nam

[easyt65]

I don't have a link, so delete this post if you want. I watched Obama do this during his State of the Union Speech.

Obama claimed, 'It's the lesson from Iraq. It's the lesson from Viet Nam.' He said we should have learned by now.

Unlike Viet Nam, we liberated a nation in Iraq. He allowed Iraq to be invaded afterwards by enabling ISIS to flow in UNOPPOSED!

Obama said we could not try to rebuild nations when they dall into chaos, but HE dragged our nation into war on his own to help Al Qaeida - who killed over 1,000 Americans - take over their own country, and he dragged us into the middle of a Syrian cuvil war by trying to fight his on Proxy war there.

What a piece of crap....

 

[SeniorChief_Polock]

Thanks to Obama pulling OUT of Iraq, it's now the headquarters of ISIS and every other third world terrorist group in the world.
Brilliant strategist - that dumbfuck from Kenya. Simply brilliant.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

 

[deltex1]

Wait till Joe Biden cures cancer...you will all regret your remarks.

 

[IcebergSlim]

I don't have a link, so delete this post if you want. I watched Obama do this during his State of the Union Speech.

Obama claimed, 'It's the lesson from Iraq. It's the lesson from Viet Nam.' He said we should have learned by now.

Unlike Viet Nam, we liberated a nation in Iraq. He allowed Iraq to be invaded afterwards by enabling ISIS to flow in UNOPPOSED!

Obama said we could not try to rebuild nations when they dall into chaos, but HE dragged our nation into war on his own to help Al Qaeida - who killed over 1,000 Americans - take over their own country, and he dragged us into the middle of a Syrian cuvil war by trying to fight his on Proxy war there.

What a piece of crap....

Uh....there was no need for ISIS to "flow in"....... It's led by Sunnis purged from Iraqnamese military and police by Commander Bunnypants.....

It took roughly 500 of them to kick the $25 billion Legion of the Inarticulate Deserter out of Mosul....

 

[IcebergSlim]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

 

[Geaux4it]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

Same reason we are in Japan, Germany, Korea, etc.

-Geaux

 

[SassyIrishLass]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

Germany, Japan ring a bell? You're dismissed

 

[IcebergSlim]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

Same reason we are in Japan, Germany, Korea, etc.

-Geaux

Make work?

Korea is a unique circumstance...

There were no factions of German and Japanese populations eager, or able, to conquer Yokohama or Munich....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Iraq was won, then Obama switched sides

 

[IcebergSlim]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

Germany, Japan ring a bell? You're dismissed

As I said.....make work....

There were obvious issues with trying to re-integrate millions of US servicemen into the domestic labor force.....

For an illustration, see what happened after WW1......in your case, just remember what you saw....

 

[IcebergSlim]

Iraq was won, then Obama switched sides

Iraqnam was so "won" that the Iraqnamese wanted us out....

 

[The Rabbi]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

Same reason we are in Japan, Germany, Korea, etc.

-Geaux

Make work?

Korea is a unique circumstance...

There were no factions of German and Japanese populations eager, or able, to conquer Yokohama or Munich....

And we still kept troops there. Actually there were. They were called the USSR. Thats why we kept troops in those place. Because if you withdraw you create a power vacuum and someone comes to fill it. Something Commander Clueless Obungles doesn't get.
As for the comparisons, they are apt. Tet was a disasterous defeat for the North Vietnamese and virtually wiped out the Vietcong. Had we followed up the advantage the North would have sued for peace. But the left in this countr declared it was a defeat and we blew the opportunity.
In Iraq we had a stable democracy that had staged two free and fair elections. Had we done what Obozo's own commanders recommended and left troops there it would still be that way. But Nobama managed to lose the peace and now has sent ground troops back in.

 

[The Rabbi]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

Germany, Japan ring a bell? You're dismissed

As I said.....make work....

There were obvious issues with trying to re-integrate millions of US servicemen into the domestic labor force.....

For an illustration, see what happened after WW1......in your case, just remember what you saw....

Was the word salad of a post supposed to present some kind of argument or point? Because the point seems to be you dont have a fucking clue what you're babbling about.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I don't have a link, so delete this post if you want. I watched Obama do this during his State of the Union Speech.

Obama claimed, 'It's the lesson from Iraq. It's the lesson from Viet Nam.' He said we should have learned by now.

Unlike Viet Nam, we liberated a nation in Iraq. He allowed Iraq to be invaded afterwards by enabling ISIS to flow in UNOPPOSED!

Obama said we could not try to rebuild nations when they dall into chaos, but HE dragged our nation into war on his own to help Al Qaeida - who killed over 1,000 Americans - take over their own country, and he dragged us into the middle of a Syrian cuvil war by trying to fight his on Proxy war there.

What a piece of crap....

Cut the crap yourself.

 

[NYcarbineer]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

Same reason we are in Japan, Germany, Korea, etc.

-Geaux

Make work?

Korea is a unique circumstance...

There were no factions of German and Japanese populations eager, or able, to conquer Yokohama or Munich....

And we still kept troops there. Actually there were. They were called the USSR. Thats why we kept troops in those place. Because if you withdraw you create a power vacuum and someone comes to fill it. Something Commander Clueless Obungles doesn't get.
As for the comparisons, they are apt. Tet was a disasterous defeat for the North Vietnamese and virtually wiped out the Vietcong. Had we followed up the advantage the North would have sued for peace. But the left in this countr declared it was a defeat and we blew the opportunity.
In Iraq we had a stable democracy that had staged two free and fair elections. Had we done what Obozo's own commanders recommended and left troops there it would still be that way. But Nobama managed to lose the peace and now has sent ground troops back in.

What were our vital interests in invading Vietnam in the first place?

List them.

 

[The Rabbi]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

Same reason we are in Japan, Germany, Korea, etc.

-Geaux

Make work?

Korea is a unique circumstance...

There were no factions of German and Japanese populations eager, or able, to conquer Yokohama or Munich....

And we still kept troops there. Actually there were. They were called the USSR. Thats why we kept troops in those place. Because if you withdraw you create a power vacuum and someone comes to fill it. Something Commander Clueless Obungles doesn't get.
As for the comparisons, they are apt. Tet was a disasterous defeat for the North Vietnamese and virtually wiped out the Vietcong. Had we followed up the advantage the North would have sued for peace. But the left in this countr declared it was a defeat and we blew the opportunity.
In Iraq we had a stable democracy that had staged two free and fair elections. Had we done what Obozo's own commanders recommended and left troops there it would still be that way. But Nobama managed to lose the peace and now has sent ground troops back in.

What were our vital interests in invading Vietnam in the first place?

List them.

Contain the spread of communism
Protect the lives of vulnerable people.

You dont give a shit about either one, of course.

 

[Geaux4it]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

Same reason we are in Japan, Germany, Korea, etc.

-Geaux

Make work?

Korea is a unique circumstance...

There were no factions of German and Japanese populations eager, or able, to conquer Yokohama or Munich....

And we still kept troops there. Actually there were. They were called the USSR. Thats why we kept troops in those place. Because if you withdraw you create a power vacuum and someone comes to fill it. Something Commander Clueless Obungles doesn't get.
As for the comparisons, they are apt. Tet was a disasterous defeat for the North Vietnamese and virtually wiped out the Vietcong. Had we followed up the advantage the North would have sued for peace. But the left in this countr declared it was a defeat and we blew the opportunity.
In Iraq we had a stable democracy that had staged two free and fair elections. Had we done what Obozo's own commanders recommended and left troops there it would still be that way. But Nobama managed to lose the peace and now has sent ground troops back in.

What were our vital interests in invading Vietnam in the first place?

List them.

We were trying to stop the advance of communism. Now due to liberal leadership, communism is here in America and coming down out of Washington. Libs are right, no need to fight over there anymore. This fight is coming here.... and hopefully sooner than later

-Geaux

 

[SassyIrishLass]

We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

Same reason we are in Japan, Germany, Korea, etc.

-Geaux

Make work?

Korea is a unique circumstance...

There were no factions of German and Japanese populations eager, or able, to conquer Yokohama or Munich....

And we still kept troops there. Actually there were. They were called the USSR. Thats why we kept troops in those place. Because if you withdraw you create a power vacuum and someone comes to fill it. Something Commander Clueless Obungles doesn't get.
As for the comparisons, they are apt. Tet was a disasterous defeat for the North Vietnamese and virtually wiped out the Vietcong. Had we followed up the advantage the North would have sued for peace. But the left in this countr declared it was a defeat and we blew the opportunity.
In Iraq we had a stable democracy that had staged two free and fair elections. Had we done what Obozo's own commanders recommended and left troops there it would still be that way. But Nobama managed to lose the peace and now has sent ground troops back in.

What were our vital interests in invading Vietnam in the first place?

List them.

You're a demoquack ask the democrats why they chose to

 

[NYcarbineer]

Had it won?

So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?

Same reason we are in Japan, Germany, Korea, etc.

-Geaux

Make work?

Korea is a unique circumstance...

There were no factions of German and Japanese populations eager, or able, to conquer Yokohama or Munich....

And we still kept troops there. Actually there were. They were called the USSR. Thats why we kept troops in those place. Because if you withdraw you create a power vacuum and someone comes to fill it. Something Commander Clueless Obungles doesn't get.
As for the comparisons, they are apt. Tet was a disasterous defeat for the North Vietnamese and virtually wiped out the Vietcong. Had we followed up the advantage the North would have sued for peace. But the left in this countr declared it was a defeat and we blew the opportunity.
In Iraq we had a stable democracy that had staged two free and fair elections. Had we done what Obozo's own commanders recommended and left troops there it would still be that way. But Nobama managed to lose the peace and now has sent ground troops back in.

What were our vital interests in invading Vietnam in the first place?

List them.

You're a demoquack ask the democrats why they chose to

I'm an independent liberal. You can't answer the question. Shut up.