Obama had us at near world peace. Trump taking us to war ..

[Dschrute3]

Really? So you'd rather he start a horrific War with North Korea? Because i'm pretty sure you would savagely criticize him for that too. So what do you want Trump to do about North Korea? Let's hear it. I'm open-minded. I'm willing to listen.

If you're gonna threaten a country with a show of force like Trump did, you should have the ships available to show up there. Trump didn't.

No, I'm not interested in a war with N. Korea, but if the president says he's gonna send carriers somewhere, he should at least make sure they are available to do so before announcing it to the world.

When he said he was sending 3 carriers over there, that is probably the reason that Russia and China deployed spy ships, but they then found out there weren't any carriers to be seen.

What he did with N. Korea was nothing more than an empty threat, and if he keeps it up, our enemies will stop being afraid of Trump.

Oh, so when or if he engages in conflict with North Korea, you'll fully support him? Ok, i can respect that. I won't allow you to have it both ways.

Depends on the reason he decides to engage N. Korea. If it's for something real that is a genuine threat, yeah, I'll support his actions. If it's for something stupid, I'll bitch about it then.

By the way, do you think that Kim Jong Un is gonna be scared of Trump after finding out that there was no armada to begin with?

I asked you what you want Trump to do about North Korea. You still haven't answered. I'm willing to listen. Go for it.

I'd like him to keep tabs on the country and if there is a genuine threat to the USA, to handle it as effectively as possible.

I'd much prefer that to the empty threats of a 3 carrier armada that never was.

Well, i guess we can be very relieved you're not the Commander in Chief. That was a very vague non-informative non-answer.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Basically what i'm hearing from rabid Trump-Hater Democrats, is that he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. He supposedly turns away the 'armada' and avoids all-out War, and they're bitterly angry about that. But if he engages in conflict with North Korea, they'll be bitterly angry about that too.

So, Democrats are simply full of shite in the end. They're just playing the old tired 'Party before Country' game. They just want the power back. And they're willing to say or do anything to get it back. They're gonna savagely attack Trump no matter what he does. They're very shallow hateful folks. It is what it is.

Trump didn't turn back the "armada". He never sent one in the first place.

So now Trump don't have three carrier groups headed for NK?




What do you think pretend military guy that ships can cover thousands of miles in a hour now?

.

Doesn't matter to them. If he turns back the 'armada', they'll bitch & whine. If he engages in conflict with North Korea, they'll bitch & whine about that too. He can't win with them. It's all just hateful 'Party before Country' Bullshite. It is what it is.

Hey Stupid.....................................

HE NEVER SENT AN ARMADA TO NORTH KOREA IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!

Ok, do you support that?

If he'd actually had the carriers to send, yeah, I would have supported 2 of them. 3 is kinda overkill, because each carrier has roughly 90 aircraft.

What I don't support is making empty threats to other countries with our military, which is the whole reason I'm pissed at him for this.

Do you support a president who threatens action but does nothing?

 

[EverCurious]

As I understand it Trump never said what ships he was sending, that was the media making assumptions. Trump said /submarines/.

As far as "not" blowing up the airstrip - do you morons actually believe that our boys were supposed to blow up the airstrip but "missed"? If so, please do keep spreading the misinformation, it's good that our enemies won't know our true capabilities - like sending a fucking missile inside a partially underground aircraft hanger...


I am constantly amazed by the level of stupidity partisans are capable of putting out there with no hint of shame... I mean they can't /actually/ be that stupid right?

 

[Correll]

And the mission statement was?
A show of power.
You are a phony!

If that was a show of power it was a pretty piss poor one.

And, I really don't care what you think about my service, because I've got a retired ID card and a military retirement that suits me just fine, so your opinion really doesn't matter much to me.

I am not on here claiming to be a top notch GI Joe, I already said I didn't serve..


Your the one who says that the military objective wasn't served because they didn't hit anything of worth while..

It's called sending a message..

Look at my profile, my aviator..


The 85 bears won the Superbowl was not because they were better, but they put fear in their opponents


.

In the military, you don't send a message by leaving the base standing. You level it. What is the point of spending 1.2 MILLION per missile when you leave the airbase so that they can start using it again almost immediately?

And, not cratering the runway with 4 of the 59 missiles they sent over there was a bad call. Same with not taking out the chemical bunker, because the only thing in that area is the base which is populated by soldiers, so no civilians would have been hurt.

And, even if most of the gas had been released into the atmosphere, it would dissipate into the atmosphere to non lethal levels after about a mile to mile and a half.

So, why do you think it was a good idea to send missiles, but not destroy the airfield? Like I said earlier, the primary mission and vision statement of the U.S. Military is to deliver ordnance on target and on time to destroy things and kill people in the furtherance of the goals of this country.

And, it hasn't helped that the "armada" Trump threatened to send to N. Korea was never actually assembled.

Bet you won't see further chemical weapon use in Syria for the rest of Trump's presidency.

Gentlemen's bet of a dollar?

Done.

 

[Votto]

You know, I have to hand it to Obama.

He destroyed Libya, only for it to become an ISIS stronghold and have a US ambassador murdered. He made a prisoner swap for an American who ended up being a deserter who aided the Taliban, so that Obama could release Taliban prisoners at club Gitmo who went immediately back to fighting the US. Then he drew red lines in the sand that Assad crossed without any consequence, making him and the US look like a chump and swore that Assad had no more WMD's and the situation was resolved. He withdrew US troops from Iraq, again only to have ISIS fill the void. He escalated the war in Afghanistan for absolutely no reason whatsoever. Of course, his ultimate achievement was Iran. He basically gave them a boat load of cash so that they could continue to spread unrest and terrorism throughout the Middle East and continue to inch closer toward nukes.

I suspect Obama is on the ISIS payroll.

 

[Wyatt earp]

No, it seems you and the OP are very disappointed that Trump may have turned the 'armada' away from North Korea. It seems like y'all are desperately hoping for him to start a War with North Korea. What's your motive? Why do you want all these Wars? Is it only about 'Party before Country' for y'all?

Nope, I'm not "disappointed that Trump turned the 'armada" away from North Korea". I'm disappointed that it was an empty threat because there were never any carriers sent that way in the first place.

If he says he's gonna do it, he should, don't you think?

Really? So you'd rather he start a horrific War with North Korea? Because i'm pretty sure you would savagely criticize him for that too. So what do you want Trump to do about North Korea? Let's hear it. I'm open-minded. I'm willing to listen.

If you're gonna threaten a country with a show of force like Trump did, you should have the ships available to show up there. Trump didn't.

No, I'm not interested in a war with N. Korea, but if the president says he's gonna send carriers somewhere, he should at least make sure they are available to do so before announcing it to the world.

When he said he was sending 3 carriers over there, that is probably the reason that Russia and China deployed spy ships, but they then found out there weren't any carriers to be seen.

What he did with N. Korea was nothing more than an empty threat, and if he keeps it up, our enemies will stop being afraid of Trump.

Oh, so when or if he engages in conflict with North Korea, you'll fully support him? Ok, i can respect that. I won't allow you to have it both ways.

Depends on the reason he decides to engage N. Korea. If it's for something real that is a genuine threat, yeah, I'll support his actions. If it's for something stupid, I'll bitch about it then.

By the way, do you think that Kim Jong Un is gonna be scared of Trump after finding out that there was no armada to begin with?

What you don't think little Kim doesn't know we have B1 bombers stationed in

Basically what i'm hearing from rabid Trump-Hater Democrats, is that he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. He supposedly turns away the 'armada' and avoids all-out War, and they're bitterly angry about that. But if he engages in conflict with North Korea, they'll be bitterly angry about that too.

So, Democrats are simply full of shite in the end. They're just playing the old tired 'Party before Country' game. They just want the power back. And they're willing to say or do anything to get it back. They're gonna savagely attack Trump no matter what he does. They're very shallow hateful folks. It is what it is.

Trump didn't turn back the "armada". He never sent one in the first place.

So now Trump don't have three carrier groups headed for NK?




What do you think pretend military guy that ships can cover thousands of miles in a hour now?

.

Doesn't matter to them. If he turns back the 'armada', they'll bitch & whine. If he engages in conflict with North Korea, they'll bitch & whine about that too. He can't win with them. It's all just hateful 'Party before Country' Bullshite. It is what it is.

Hey Stupid.....................................

HE NEVER SENT AN ARMADA TO NORTH KOREA IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!

Your shouting , that means you think aircraft carriers move as fast as jets

You're just a kid


.

 

[Timmy]

As obama left the office in his wake was about as much world peace as we have seen maybe ever . Think about it. Sure their are some mostly civil war hot spots in the Mideast and parts of Africa , but overall there's no active warring countries .

Conservatives and Trump hate that . Their war machine masters do not approve . Just a few months in, they are already on the warpath .

A vote for the GOP is a vote for war .

Was that before or after Obama invaded two nations who we were not at war with and were no threat to the US?

What 2 ?

 

[Wyatt earp]

You know, I have to hand it to Obama.

He destroyed Libya, only for it to become an ISIS stronghold and have a US ambassador murdered. He made a prisoner swap for an American who ended up being a deserter who aided the Taliban, so that Obama could release Taliban prisoners at club Gitmo who went immediately back to fighting the US. Then he drew red lines in the sand that Assad crossed without any consequence, making him and the US look like a chump and swore that Assad had no more WMD's and the situation was resolved. He withdrew US troops from Iraq, again only to have ISIS fill the void. Of course, his ultimate achievement was Iran. He basically gave them a boat load of cash so that they could continue to spread unrest and terrorism throughout the Middle East and continue to inch closer toward nukes.

I suspect Obama is on the ISIS payroll.

Not bad

 

[Timmy]

You know, I have to hand it to Obama.

He destroyed Libya, only for it to become an ISIS stronghold and have a US ambassador murdered. He made a prisoner swap for an American who ended up being a deserter who aided the Taliban, so that Obama could release Taliban prisoners at club Gitmo who went immediately back to fighting the US. Then he drew red lines in the sand that Assad crossed without any consequence, making him and the US look like a chump and swore that Assad had no more WMD's and the situation was resolved. He withdrew US troops from Iraq, again only to have ISIS fill the void. Of course, his ultimate achievement was Iran. He basically gave them a boat load of cash so that they could continue to spread unrest and terrorism throughout the Middle East and continue to inch closer toward nukes.

I suspect Obama is on the ISIS payroll.

The Libyan people overthrew their dictator. We just have some air cover . No us troop was killed .

And isis doesn't control the place . Stop lying .

 

[Dschrute3]

Trump didn't turn back the "armada". He never sent one in the first place.

So now Trump don't have three carrier groups headed for NK?




What do you think pretend military guy that ships can cover thousands of miles in a hour now?

.

Doesn't matter to them. If he turns back the 'armada', they'll bitch & whine. If he engages in conflict with North Korea, they'll bitch & whine about that too. He can't win with them. It's all just hateful 'Party before Country' Bullshite. It is what it is.

Hey Stupid.....................................

HE NEVER SENT AN ARMADA TO NORTH KOREA IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!

Ok, do you support that?

If he'd actually had the carriers to send, yeah, I would have supported 2 of them. 3 is kinda overkill, because each carrier has roughly 90 aircraft.

What I don't support is making empty threats to other countries with our military, which is the whole reason I'm pissed at him for this.

Do you support a president who threatens action but does nothing?

Well, now you aren't make any sense. Thank God you aren't the Commander in Chief. But i'll ask one more time anyway, what do you want Trump to do about North Korea? Try to be specific.

 

[ABikerSailor]

If that was a show of power it was a pretty piss poor one.

And, I really don't care what you think about my service, because I've got a retired ID card and a military retirement that suits me just fine, so your opinion really doesn't matter much to me.

I am not on here claiming to be a top notch GI Joe, I already said I didn't serve..


Your the one who says that the military objective wasn't served because they didn't hit anything of worth while..

It's called sending a message..

Look at my profile, my aviator..


The 85 bears won the Superbowl was not because they were better, but they put fear in their opponents


.

In the military, you don't send a message by leaving the base standing. You level it. What is the point of spending 1.2 MILLION per missile when you leave the airbase so that they can start using it again almost immediately?

And, not cratering the runway with 4 of the 59 missiles they sent over there was a bad call. Same with not taking out the chemical bunker, because the only thing in that area is the base which is populated by soldiers, so no civilians would have been hurt.

And, even if most of the gas had been released into the atmosphere, it would dissipate into the atmosphere to non lethal levels after about a mile to mile and a half.

So, why do you think it was a good idea to send missiles, but not destroy the airfield? Like I said earlier, the primary mission and vision statement of the U.S. Military is to deliver ordnance on target and on time to destroy things and kill people in the furtherance of the goals of this country.

And, it hasn't helped that the "armada" Trump threatened to send to N. Korea was never actually assembled.

Bet you won't see further chemical weapon use in Syria for the rest of Trump's presidency.

Gentlemen's bet of a dollar?

Done.

Accepted. See you when Trump leaves office, and we'll take care of addresses and such.

 

[Votto]

You know, I have to hand it to Obama.

He destroyed Libya, only for it to become an ISIS stronghold and have a US ambassador murdered. He made a prisoner swap for an American who ended up being a deserter who aided the Taliban, so that Obama could release Taliban prisoners at club Gitmo who went immediately back to fighting the US. Then he drew red lines in the sand that Assad crossed without any consequence, making him and the US look like a chump and swore that Assad had no more WMD's and the situation was resolved. He withdrew US troops from Iraq, again only to have ISIS fill the void. Of course, his ultimate achievement was Iran. He basically gave them a boat load of cash so that they could continue to spread unrest and terrorism throughout the Middle East and continue to inch closer toward nukes.

I suspect Obama is on the ISIS payroll.

The Libyan people overthrew their dictator. We just have some air cover . No us troop was killed .

And isis doesn't control the place . Stop lying .

You dolt, the Libyan people had the highest standard of living in North Africa.

Sure, he was a murderous dictator, they all are.

So why did the US intervene taking Gadaffi out on the mere threat of killing off a bunch of his own people when in the Sudan they did just that without so much as a peep?

Any ideas genius?

 

[Wyatt earp]

You know, I have to hand it to Obama.

He destroyed Libya, only for it to become an ISIS stronghold and have a US ambassador murdered. He made a prisoner swap for an American who ended up being a deserter who aided the Taliban, so that Obama could release Taliban prisoners at club Gitmo who went immediately back to fighting the US. Then he drew red lines in the sand that Assad crossed without any consequence, making him and the US look like a chump and swore that Assad had no more WMD's and the situation was resolved. He withdrew US troops from Iraq, again only to have ISIS fill the void. Of course, his ultimate achievement was Iran. He basically gave them a boat load of cash so that they could continue to spread unrest and terrorism throughout the Middle East and continue to inch closer toward nukes.

I suspect Obama is on the ISIS payroll.

The Libyan people overthrew their dictator. We just have some air cover . No us troop was killed .

And isis doesn't control the place . Stop lying .

That was Hillary's war
.

 

[DarkFury]

Nope, I'm not "disappointed that Trump turned the 'armada" away from North Korea". I'm disappointed that it was an empty threat because there were never any carriers sent that way in the first place.

If he says he's gonna do it, he should, don't you think?

Really? So you'd rather he start a horrific War with North Korea? Because i'm pretty sure you would savagely criticize him for that too. So what do you want Trump to do about North Korea? Let's hear it. I'm open-minded. I'm willing to listen.

If you're gonna threaten a country with a show of force like Trump did, you should have the ships available to show up there. Trump didn't.

No, I'm not interested in a war with N. Korea, but if the president says he's gonna send carriers somewhere, he should at least make sure they are available to do so before announcing it to the world.

When he said he was sending 3 carriers over there, that is probably the reason that Russia and China deployed spy ships, but they then found out there weren't any carriers to be seen.

What he did with N. Korea was nothing more than an empty threat, and if he keeps it up, our enemies will stop being afraid of Trump.

Oh, so when or if he engages in conflict with North Korea, you'll fully support him? Ok, i can respect that. I won't allow you to have it both ways.

Depends on the reason he decides to engage N. Korea. If it's for something real that is a genuine threat, yeah, I'll support his actions. If it's for something stupid, I'll bitch about it then.

By the way, do you think that Kim Jong Un is gonna be scared of Trump after finding out that there was no armada to begin with?

What you don't think little Kim doesn't know we have B1 bombers stationed in

Basically what i'm hearing from rabid Trump-Hater Democrats, is that he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. He supposedly turns away the 'armada' and avoids all-out War, and they're bitterly angry about that. But if he engages in conflict with North Korea, they'll be bitterly angry about that too.

So, Democrats are simply full of shite in the end. They're just playing the old tired 'Party before Country' game. They just want the power back. And they're willing to say or do anything to get it back. They're gonna savagely attack Trump no matter what he does. They're very shallow hateful folks. It is what it is.

Trump didn't turn back the "armada". He never sent one in the first place.

So now Trump don't have three carrier groups headed for NK?




What do you think pretend military guy that ships can cover thousands of miles in a hour now?

.

Doesn't matter to them. If he turns back the 'armada', they'll bitch & whine. If he engages in conflict with North Korea, they'll bitch & whine about that too. He can't win with them. It's all just hateful 'Party before Country' Bullshite. It is what it is.

Hey Stupid.....................................

HE NEVER SENT AN ARMADA TO NORTH KOREA IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!

Your shouting , that means you think aircraft carriers move as fast as jets

You're just a kid


.

All this time he has been a fake trading on what real men and women have done in the military.
That earns him lifetime ignore in my book.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Nope, I'm not "disappointed that Trump turned the 'armada" away from North Korea". I'm disappointed that it was an empty threat because there were never any carriers sent that way in the first place.

If he says he's gonna do it, he should, don't you think?

Really? So you'd rather he start a horrific War with North Korea? Because i'm pretty sure you would savagely criticize him for that too. So what do you want Trump to do about North Korea? Let's hear it. I'm open-minded. I'm willing to listen.

If you're gonna threaten a country with a show of force like Trump did, you should have the ships available to show up there. Trump didn't.

No, I'm not interested in a war with N. Korea, but if the president says he's gonna send carriers somewhere, he should at least make sure they are available to do so before announcing it to the world.

When he said he was sending 3 carriers over there, that is probably the reason that Russia and China deployed spy ships, but they then found out there weren't any carriers to be seen.

What he did with N. Korea was nothing more than an empty threat, and if he keeps it up, our enemies will stop being afraid of Trump.

Oh, so when or if he engages in conflict with North Korea, you'll fully support him? Ok, i can respect that. I won't allow you to have it both ways.

Depends on the reason he decides to engage N. Korea. If it's for something real that is a genuine threat, yeah, I'll support his actions. If it's for something stupid, I'll bitch about it then.

By the way, do you think that Kim Jong Un is gonna be scared of Trump after finding out that there was no armada to begin with?

What you don't think little Kim doesn't know we have B1 bombers stationed in

Basically what i'm hearing from rabid Trump-Hater Democrats, is that he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. He supposedly turns away the 'armada' and avoids all-out War, and they're bitterly angry about that. But if he engages in conflict with North Korea, they'll be bitterly angry about that too.

So, Democrats are simply full of shite in the end. They're just playing the old tired 'Party before Country' game. They just want the power back. And they're willing to say or do anything to get it back. They're gonna savagely attack Trump no matter what he does. They're very shallow hateful folks. It is what it is.

Trump didn't turn back the "armada". He never sent one in the first place.

So now Trump don't have three carrier groups headed for NK?




What do you think pretend military guy that ships can cover thousands of miles in a hour now?

.

Doesn't matter to them. If he turns back the 'armada', they'll bitch & whine. If he engages in conflict with North Korea, they'll bitch & whine about that too. He can't win with them. It's all just hateful 'Party before Country' Bullshite. It is what it is.

Hey Stupid.....................................

HE NEVER SENT AN ARMADA TO NORTH KOREA IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!

Your shouting , that means you think aircraft carriers move as fast as jets

You're just a kid


.

No, what I said was that we never sent carriers there in the first place. Nothing was said about the speed of a carrier.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I am not on here claiming to be a top notch GI Joe, I already said I didn't serve..


Your the one who says that the military objective wasn't served because they didn't hit anything of worth while..

It's called sending a message..

Look at my profile, my aviator..


The 85 bears won the Superbowl was not because they were better, but they put fear in their opponents


.

In the military, you don't send a message by leaving the base standing. You level it. What is the point of spending 1.2 MILLION per missile when you leave the airbase so that they can start using it again almost immediately?

And, not cratering the runway with 4 of the 59 missiles they sent over there was a bad call. Same with not taking out the chemical bunker, because the only thing in that area is the base which is populated by soldiers, so no civilians would have been hurt.

And, even if most of the gas had been released into the atmosphere, it would dissipate into the atmosphere to non lethal levels after about a mile to mile and a half.

So, why do you think it was a good idea to send missiles, but not destroy the airfield? Like I said earlier, the primary mission and vision statement of the U.S. Military is to deliver ordnance on target and on time to destroy things and kill people in the furtherance of the goals of this country.

And, it hasn't helped that the "armada" Trump threatened to send to N. Korea was never actually assembled.

Bet you won't see further chemical weapon use in Syria for the rest of Trump's presidency.

Gentlemen's bet of a dollar?

Done.

Accepted. See you when Trump leaves office, and we'll take care of addresses and such.

You had 8 years of Obama why didn't he take care of it?

 

[Timmy]

You know, I have to hand it to Obama.

He destroyed Libya, only for it to become an ISIS stronghold and have a US ambassador murdered. He made a prisoner swap for an American who ended up being a deserter who aided the Taliban, so that Obama could release Taliban prisoners at club Gitmo who went immediately back to fighting the US. Then he drew red lines in the sand that Assad crossed without any consequence, making him and the US look like a chump and swore that Assad had no more WMD's and the situation was resolved. He withdrew US troops from Iraq, again only to have ISIS fill the void. Of course, his ultimate achievement was Iran. He basically gave them a boat load of cash so that they could continue to spread unrest and terrorism throughout the Middle East and continue to inch closer toward nukes.

I suspect Obama is on the ISIS payroll.

The Libyan people overthrew their dictator. We just have some air cover . No us troop was killed .

And isis doesn't control the place . Stop lying .

You dolt, the Libyan people had the highest standard of living in North Africa.

Sure, he was a murderous dictator, they all are.

So why did the US intervene taking Gadaffi out on the mere threat of killing off a bunch of his own people when in the Sudan they did just that without so much as a peep?

Any ideas genius?

The time was right .

You righties just love dictators don't you .

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

And the mission statement was?
A show of power.
You are a phony!

If that was a show of power it was a pretty piss poor one.

It wasn't a show of power. It was a love tap signalling a warning. That's all.

Do you want increased involvement of Trump/US in Syria, or do you want to leave well enough alone?

Syria does not threaten us directly. The DPRK and Iran do.

Are you saying you want Trump to take stronger action in Korea?

If necessary, of course.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Really? So you'd rather he start a horrific War with North Korea? Because i'm pretty sure you would savagely criticize him for that too. So what do you want Trump to do about North Korea? Let's hear it. I'm open-minded. I'm willing to listen.

If you're gonna threaten a country with a show of force like Trump did, you should have the ships available to show up there. Trump didn't.

No, I'm not interested in a war with N. Korea, but if the president says he's gonna send carriers somewhere, he should at least make sure they are available to do so before announcing it to the world.

When he said he was sending 3 carriers over there, that is probably the reason that Russia and China deployed spy ships, but they then found out there weren't any carriers to be seen.

What he did with N. Korea was nothing more than an empty threat, and if he keeps it up, our enemies will stop being afraid of Trump.

Oh, so when or if he engages in conflict with North Korea, you'll fully support him? Ok, i can respect that. I won't allow you to have it both ways.

Depends on the reason he decides to engage N. Korea. If it's for something real that is a genuine threat, yeah, I'll support his actions. If it's for something stupid, I'll bitch about it then.

By the way, do you think that Kim Jong Un is gonna be scared of Trump after finding out that there was no armada to begin with?

What you don't think little Kim doesn't know we have B1 bombers stationed in

Trump didn't turn back the "armada". He never sent one in the first place.

So now Trump don't have three carrier groups headed for NK?




What do you think pretend military guy that ships can cover thousands of miles in a hour now?

.

Doesn't matter to them. If he turns back the 'armada', they'll bitch & whine. If he engages in conflict with North Korea, they'll bitch & whine about that too. He can't win with them. It's all just hateful 'Party before Country' Bullshite. It is what it is.

Hey Stupid.....................................

HE NEVER SENT AN ARMADA TO NORTH KOREA IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!

Your shouting , that means you think aircraft carriers move as fast as jets

You're just a kid


.

No, what I said was that we never sent carriers there in the first place. Nothing was said about the speed of a carrier.

It's only been like a day and the Carl vision was all the way a thousand miles away near Australia.


Like I said you are a child and don't know how big the oceans are

 

[Wyatt earp]

You know, I have to hand it to Obama.

He destroyed Libya, only for it to become an ISIS stronghold and have a US ambassador murdered. He made a prisoner swap for an American who ended up being a deserter who aided the Taliban, so that Obama could release Taliban prisoners at club Gitmo who went immediately back to fighting the US. Then he drew red lines in the sand that Assad crossed without any consequence, making him and the US look like a chump and swore that Assad had no more WMD's and the situation was resolved. He withdrew US troops from Iraq, again only to have ISIS fill the void. Of course, his ultimate achievement was Iran. He basically gave them a boat load of cash so that they could continue to spread unrest and terrorism throughout the Middle East and continue to inch closer toward nukes.

I suspect Obama is on the ISIS payroll.

The Libyan people overthrew their dictator. We just have some air cover . No us troop was killed .

And isis doesn't control the place . Stop lying .

You dolt, the Libyan people had the highest standard of living in North Africa.

Sure, he was a murderous dictator, they all are.

So why did the US intervene taking Gadaffi out on the mere threat of killing off a bunch of his own people when in the Sudan they did just that without so much as a peep?

Any ideas genius?

The time was right .

You righties just love dictators don't you .

Not as much as you when you can get free stuff from your old Messiah..

Not so much from Trump who wants you to get a job

.