🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Obama: I've Never Been Briefed on Hillarys Investigation But She's Innocent

Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law

The Federal Records Act requires agencies hold on to official communications, including all work-related emails, and government employees cannot destroy or remove relevant records.

Here's some of what he reported:

"A State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email so long as relevant documents are preserved for history."

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office.

-----------------------

You think Republicans in congress don't know that? You think the GOP head of the FBI doesn't know that? They are hoping Americans are too stupid to know that. Like Republicans on the USMB. Well, they know it now. They just don't care.

Republicans are such assholes. Trying to convict an innocent for a law that was changed two years after she left office. Are they just dumb fuck lemmings or just bad people?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyone who gets real news knows this is only a reaction to a tidal wave of ignorant RW BS...
You didn't even know about all the donations going to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for government policy changes.

Psst….she’s been out of government for 4 years and out of lawmaking for 8. But don’t let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Psst...she's running for President and is a presumptive major party candidate. But don't let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.
 
Obama did not say that! Geez, every right wing thread in this place is premised on lies .
What didn't Obama say?

He didn't say she was "innocent ". Which is the focus of your thread title . In fact he said she was careless wh the emails .

You are just another right wing hack liar .
Obama also said, "I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security."
 
Psst….she’s been out of government for 4 years and out of lawmaking for 8. But don’t let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Congress has been stonewalled on her activities for most of those 4 years....espionage whether willful or by accident is still a serious felony.....2,000+ counts plus what she deleted which is obstruction of justice....3,000+ counts.
 
Obama did not say that! Geez, every right wing thread in this place is premised on lies .
What didn't Obama say?

He didn't say she was "innocent ". Which is the focus of your thread title . In fact he said she was careless wh the emails .

You are just another right wing hack liar .
He said she never jeopardized classified documents, doofus.

Did he say she was "innocent "? Cause that's what you said . Hack liar that you are .
Obama also said, "I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security."
 
Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law

The Federal Records Act requires agencies hold on to official communications, including all work-related emails, and government employees cannot destroy or remove relevant records.

Here's some of what he reported:

"A State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email so long as relevant documents are preserved for history."

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office.

-----------------------

You think Republicans in congress don't know that? You think the GOP head of the FBI doesn't know that? They are hoping Americans are too stupid to know that. Like Republicans on the USMB. Well, they know it now. They just don't care.

Republicans are such assholes. Trying to convict an innocent for a law that was changed two years after she left office. Are they just dumb fuck lemming or just bad people?

You've never done government work, everyone knows you can't set up a server for your official account. What you are referring to using your own personal account doesn't apply, she was sending e-mails as if they came from the government e-mail address, not a personal account.

What is stupid is why she did that in the first place. Hillary Leona Helmsley just didn't think the law applied to her, she's a Clinton
 
Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law

The Federal Records Act requires agencies hold on to official communications, including all work-related emails, and government employees cannot destroy or remove relevant records.

Here's some of what he reported:

"A State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email so long as relevant documents are preserved for history."

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office.

-----------------------

You think Republicans in congress don't know that? You think the GOP head of the FBI doesn't know that? They are hoping Americans are too stupid to know that. Like Republicans on the USMB. Well, they know it now. They just don't care.

Republicans are such assholes. Trying to convict an innocent for a law that was changed two years after she left office. Are they just dumb fuck lemmings or just bad people?
It's looking more and more like just bad people.
 
Anyone who gets real news knows this is only a reaction to a tidal wave of ignorant RW BS...
You didn't even know about all the donations going to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for government policy changes.

Psst….she’s been out of government for 4 years and out of lawmaking for 8. But don’t let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Psst...she's running for President and is a presumptive major party candidate. But don't let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Facts are, she doesn’t make policy as a candidate. This is another dream of yours like Obama taking personal credit for killing OBL and his being more divisive than Republicans.

You have shit for brains. Sorry but you’re consistently operating on rumor and some cartoon fantasy you have about how things work.
 
Actually, you're the one who didn't follow his point, he was correct.

:lol: Dumb and Dumber.....this place attracts it's share of airheads alright.

Read what he said. He said "if" Lynch indicts her.

The FBI investigates and decides whether to recommend indictment or not.

The Justice department makes the determination whether to indict.

He said even if Lynch doesn't indict, the recommendation to indict will destroy her.

None of the three of us are disagreeing on content, go back and re-read what he wrote, it was correct. You misread it
 
Anyone who gets real news knows this is only a reaction to a tidal wave of ignorant RW BS...
You didn't even know about all the donations going to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for government policy changes.

Psst….she’s been out of government for 4 years and out of lawmaking for 8. But don’t let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Psst...she's running for President and is a presumptive major party candidate. But don't let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Facts are, she doesn’t make policy as a candidate. This is another dream of yours like Obama taking personal credit for killing OBL and his being more divisive than Republicans.

You have shit for brains. Sorry but you’re consistently operating on rumor and some cartoon fantasy you have about how things work.

So you're thinking people aren't smart enough to bribe her now for payback later? That's ridiculous, they clearly are. Corporations, special interests, big donors, Wall Street, all of them. You're being a silly girl
 
Actually, you're the one who didn't follow his point, he was correct.

:lol: Dumb and Dumber.....this place attracts it's share of airheads alright.

Read what he said. He said "if" Lynch indicts her.

The FBI investigates and decides whether to recommend indictment or not.

The Justice department makes the determination whether to indict.

He said even if Lynch doesn't indict, the recommendation to indict will destroy her.

None of the three of us are disagreeing on content, go back and re-read what he wrote, it was correct. You misread it

I didn't "misread" anything...the dumbass claimed she could be "charged" without being indicted. That's not how it works, dipshit.
 
You didn't even know about all the donations going to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for government policy changes.
Still waiting...LINK? lol
What an ignoramous fool.

181 Clinton Foundation donors who lobbied Hillary's State Department
And of course no evidence of policy changes- OR that they lobbied the State Department...Hillary had no contact with the Foundation during that time. Very scary, dupes.
FBI has her under investigation.
Amazing someone on a political board isn't even aware of the basic facts as to major issues going on with his candidate.
Ignorance bordering on stupidity.
Only to shut up functional morons like you and the bs PPM. Did she still kill Foster? lol
 
Actually, you're the one who didn't follow his point, he was correct.

:lol: Dumb and Dumber.....this place attracts it's share of airheads alright.

Read what he said. He said "if" Lynch indicts her.

The FBI investigates and decides whether to recommend indictment or not.

The Justice department makes the determination whether to indict.

He said even if Lynch doesn't indict, the recommendation to indict will destroy her.

None of the three of us are disagreeing on content, go back and re-read what he wrote, it was correct. You misread it

I didn't "misread" anything...the dumbass claimed she could be "charged" without being indicted. That's not how it works, dipshit.

No he didn't, he said "It's irrelevant whether Lych indicts her. Once the FBI recommends Hillary be charged with multiple felonies the bitch's political life is over."

What you are saying about the process is right. You aren't reading his post right, he said what you did. He said the FBI "recommends" she be charged. Seriously you guys said the same thing, and you're both right. Slow down and read it more carefully
 
Anyone who gets real news knows this is only a reaction to a tidal wave of ignorant RW BS...
You didn't even know about all the donations going to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for government policy changes.

Psst….she’s been out of government for 4 years and out of lawmaking for 8. But don’t let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Psst...she's running for President and is a presumptive major party candidate. But don't let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Facts are, she doesn’t make policy as a candidate. This is another dream of yours like Obama taking personal credit for killing OBL and his being more divisive than Republicans.

You have shit for brains. Sorry but you’re consistently operating on rumor and some cartoon fantasy you have about how things work.

So you're thinking people aren't smart enough to bribe her now for payback later? That's ridiculous, they clearly are. Corporations, special interests, big donors, Wall Street, all of them. You're being a silly girl

Gee more speculation on your part. How surprising. Not. You’re just a little silly boy who doesn’t know shit but you have quite the imagination. Now run along sonny; grown folks are talking.
 
You didn't even know about all the donations going to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for government policy changes.

Psst….she’s been out of government for 4 years and out of lawmaking for 8. But don’t let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Psst...she's running for President and is a presumptive major party candidate. But don't let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Facts are, she doesn’t make policy as a candidate. This is another dream of yours like Obama taking personal credit for killing OBL and his being more divisive than Republicans.

You have shit for brains. Sorry but you’re consistently operating on rumor and some cartoon fantasy you have about how things work.

So you're thinking people aren't smart enough to bribe her now for payback later? That's ridiculous, they clearly are. Corporations, special interests, big donors, Wall Street, all of them. You're being a silly girl

Gee more speculation on your part. How surprising. Not. You’re just a little silly boy who doesn’t know shit but you have quite the imagination. Now run along sonny; grown folks are talking.

I'm imagining that special interests line the pockets of Presidential candidates and expect to be paid back if they are elected? Seriously? That's "speculation" on my part?

:wtf:

You have a brain injury?
 
Psst….she’s been out of government for 4 years and out of lawmaking for 8. But don’t let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Psst...she's running for President and is a presumptive major party candidate. But don't let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Facts are, she doesn’t make policy as a candidate. This is another dream of yours like Obama taking personal credit for killing OBL and his being more divisive than Republicans.

You have shit for brains. Sorry but you’re consistently operating on rumor and some cartoon fantasy you have about how things work.

So you're thinking people aren't smart enough to bribe her now for payback later? That's ridiculous, they clearly are. Corporations, special interests, big donors, Wall Street, all of them. You're being a silly girl

Gee more speculation on your part. How surprising. Not. You’re just a little silly boy who doesn’t know shit but you have quite the imagination. Now run along sonny; grown folks are talking.

I'm imagining that special interests line the pockets of Presidential candidates and expect to be paid back if they are elected? Seriously? That's "speculation" on my part?

:wtf:

You have a brain injury?

All you do is speculate.

Obama is divisive—speculation
Obama took personal credit for killing OBL—speculation
Clinton is taking money for political favors even though she isn’t in office—speculation.

Maybe you should give your plumber an extra $20 on the next service call, he/she may run for mayor someday.

Dumbass.
 
You didn't even know about all the donations going to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for government policy changes.

Psst….she’s been out of government for 4 years and out of lawmaking for 8. But don’t let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Psst...she's running for President and is a presumptive major party candidate. But don't let the facts stand in the way of good fiction; carry on.

Facts are, she doesn’t make policy as a candidate. This is another dream of yours like Obama taking personal credit for killing OBL and his being more divisive than Republicans.

You have shit for brains. Sorry but you’re consistently operating on rumor and some cartoon fantasy you have about how things work.

So you're thinking people aren't smart enough to bribe her now for payback later? That's ridiculous, they clearly are. Corporations, special interests, big donors, Wall Street, all of them. You're being a silly girl

Gee more speculation on your part. How surprising. Not. You’re just a little silly boy who doesn’t know shit but you have quite the imagination. Now run along sonny; grown folks are talking.

I want in on this fantasy land you live in where politicians aren't corrupt and being bought. How do I get in? Do you have a magic portal? I'm stuck here in the real world where politicians are corrupt and for sale to both sides
 

Forum List

Back
Top