Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have never before seen an American President intentionally give aid and comfort to the enemy.
This is not good.
With any luck, Congress will be able to marginalize and isolate him to an extent that prevents him from doing much more mischief between now and January 20, 2017.
great speech if you like lies. the crusades were to stop muslim agression in europe, not to attack the poor muslims in the name of Jesus. You and obama are historical ignorants.
This speech was abomination. Obviously some idiot speech writer put that in without even realizing what he was talking about. the Crusades were defensive wars against Islam. Once Islam had wiped out all the Christians except for Greece, the Christians that remained had had enough and fought back.
Obama hates this country and no president should hate his own country.
You are the main one making that BS statement................I have never before seen an American President intentionally give aid and comfort to the enemy.
This is not good.
With any luck, Congress will be able to marginalize and isolate him to an extent that prevents him from doing much more mischief between now and January 20, 2017.
and you haven't seen it now.
Guy, I'm going to make this REALLY simple for you.
A war against a radical groups of Extremists- VERY WINNABLE.
A War against the world's second largest religions- NOT WINNABLE.
You dumbshits on Faux News want to make this Christianity vs. Islam. That's not a winnable war. Even George W. Bush, who was clinically retarded, was smart enough to realize that.
I have never before seen an American President intentionally give aid and comfort to the enemy.
This is not good.
With any luck, Congress will be able to marginalize and isolate him to an extent that prevents him from doing much more mischief between now and January 20, 2017.
and you haven't seen it now.
Guy, I'm going to make this REALLY simple for you.
A war against a radical groups of Extremists- VERY WINNABLE.
A War against the world's second largest religions- NOT WINNABLE.
You dumbshits on Faux News want to make this Christianity vs. Islam. That's not a winnable war. Even George W. Bush, who was clinically retarded, was smart enough to realize that.
LOLgreat speech if you like lies. the crusades were to stop muslim agression in europe, not to attack the poor muslims in the name of Jesus. You and obama are historical ignorants.
So they were stopping aggression in Europe which had ended 400 years earlier...
By attacking the Middle East.
And weakening the only country - Byzantium- that was a bulwark against Islamic Encroachment?
He is a HACK and BS artist for OBAMA and the left wing drones...................His purpose is to Inflame everyone with his LIES.......................I have never before seen an American President intentionally give aid and comfort to the enemy.
This is not good.
With any luck, Congress will be able to marginalize and isolate him to an extent that prevents him from doing much more mischief between now and January 20, 2017.
and you haven't seen it now.
Guy, I'm going to make this REALLY simple for you.
A war against a radical groups of Extremists- VERY WINNABLE.
A War against the world's second largest religions- NOT WINNABLE.
You dumbshits on Faux News want to make this Christianity vs. Islam. That's not a winnable war. Even George W. Bush, who was clinically retarded, was smart enough to realize that.
bullshit, no one wants to make this Christianity vs islam. NO ONE. WTF is wrong with you?
the enemy is radical terrorist islam, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, boko harem, etc. Islam is not the enemy you dumb asshole, The king of Jordan is a muslim, do you think he considers this a war against islam?
once more----------------WTF is wrong with you?
ANYONE have a BACK HOE........................we need to shovel this post out and remove the BS.This speech was abomination. Obviously some idiot speech writer put that in without even realizing what he was talking about. the Crusades were defensive wars against Islam. Once Islam had wiped out all the Christians except for Greece, the Christians that remained had had enough and fought back.
Obama hates this country and no president should hate his own country.
sorry, pointing out our flaws is not "hating our country'. It's honest self-evaluation.
Here, I'll put it in terms you can understand.
"Billy, don't draw on the wall with your crayons!"
"Why do you hate me?"
"Gee, the black community needs to do something about crime and out of wedlock births."
"Why do you hate Black Men?"
"It's really kind of stupid to keep making wars in the Middle East and engaging in Torture."
"Why do you hate AMerica?"
oui mon ami, oui...This is deflectionISIS burns man alive................................
LIB response......................LOOK WHAT CHRISTIANS DID..................
ISIS kills over 150 girls who refuse to marry..............
LIB response....................LOOK WHAT CHRISTIANS DID..................
ISIS crucifies men in IRAQ..............
LIB response......................LOOK WHAT CHRISTIANS DID..........
BROKEN RECORD..........get a new line.
We know! Islam is a much worse religion. We just like pointing out the hypocrisy. Islam is a great example of what's wrong with religions. It highlights the extremes people will go for religions.
And you guys want us to go into a holy war. Doesn't your bible predict it? Sorry but you can't make your prophecy come true.
No YOU need to deflect from reality so YOU can make this a holy war.
This is deflectionISIS burns man alive................................
LIB response......................LOOK WHAT CHRISTIANS DID..................
ISIS kills over 150 girls who refuse to marry..............
LIB response....................LOOK WHAT CHRISTIANS DID..................
ISIS crucifies men in IRAQ..............
LIB response......................LOOK WHAT CHRISTIANS DID..........
BROKEN RECORD..........get a new line.
We know! Islam is a much worse religion. We just like pointing out the hypocrisy. Islam is a great example of what's wrong with religions. It highlights the extremes people will go for religions.
And you guys want us to go into a holy war. Doesn't your bible predict it? Sorry but you can't make your prophecy come true.
No YOU need to deflect from reality so YOU can make this a holy war.
And you are the king of such
They take their cues from the same play-book as the more Radical and Militant of their co-religionists do.Indeed, it is an Atheist point of view.Then let the invention with the least objectionable Core Teachings dominate.How many of you realize that a conflict between Christianity and Islam is in all likelihood just a conflict between
two of man's inventions?
That's an atheist point of view. You resort to atheism to defend your version of God. That's some heady stuff.
If there is a God, he is no more likely to be a kind and merciful God than a violent, vengeful, merciless God.
If there is a God, it's only mankind's various guesses as to what he really is.
Utilized as a convenience, to sweep away the clutter and background noise, and to get to the gist of the matter.
Namely: which 'flavor' of vision of a godhead is least objectionable and most likely to promote peace and tolerance.
From that perspective, it doesn't matter a damn, whether a Deity (if He/She/It exists) is Loving or Vengeful.
From that perspective, what matters is which vision of the Deity is going to be the least destructive and most likely to promote peace.
And, of course, a vision that promotes 'Love thy neighbor' and 'Turn the other cheek' is far more likely to achieve such objectives, than one saturated with enjoinders and rationalizations to wage war against and commit violence upon those who do not think and act in the same manner as its adherents.
If one has to have a Flying Spaghetti Monster at all, then...
I'll take folks worshiping and obeying a LOVING Flying Spaghetti Monster over a BLOODTHIRSTY AND VENGEFUL Flying Spaghetti Monster any day.
As would most sane folk who are interested in peace.
And what about the moderate, peaceful Muslims who've invented a less scary God ?
The problem does not lie with the peaceful inclinations of the majority of adherents to Islam.
The problem lies within the Core Teachings of that belief system - rationalizing and calling for war and violence under various circumstances.
Even amongst the most passive of them, that rotten foundation or core is always in the background - lying dormant - ready to be resurrected by any street-corner mullah.
Eh, soccer...it's okay if there is nothing more....oui mon ami, oui...This is deflectionWe know! Islam is a much worse religion. We just like pointing out the hypocrisy. Islam is a great example of what's wrong with religions. It highlights the extremes people will go for religions.
And you guys want us to go into a holy war. Doesn't your bible predict it? Sorry but you can't make your prophecy come true.
No YOU need to deflect from reality so YOU can make this a holy war.
This is deflectionWe know! Islam is a much worse religion. We just like pointing out the hypocrisy. Islam is a great example of what's wrong with religions. It highlights the extremes people will go for religions.
And you guys want us to go into a holy war. Doesn't your bible predict it? Sorry but you can't make your prophecy come true.
No YOU need to deflect from reality so YOU can make this a holy war.
And you are the king of such
وسوف تلعب كرة القدم مع
رؤوسكم الكفار .
It's the Tea Party whey.....They take their cues from the same play-book as the more Radical and Militant of their co-religionists do.Indeed, it is an Atheist point of view.Then let the invention with the least objectionable Core Teachings dominate.
That's an atheist point of view. You resort to atheism to defend your version of God. That's some heady stuff.
If there is a God, he is no more likely to be a kind and merciful God than a violent, vengeful, merciless God.
If there is a God, it's only mankind's various guesses as to what he really is.
Utilized as a convenience, to sweep away the clutter and background noise, and to get to the gist of the matter.
Namely: which 'flavor' of vision of a godhead is least objectionable and most likely to promote peace and tolerance.
From that perspective, it doesn't matter a damn, whether a Deity (if He/She/It exists) is Loving or Vengeful.
From that perspective, what matters is which vision of the Deity is going to be the least destructive and most likely to promote peace.
And, of course, a vision that promotes 'Love thy neighbor' and 'Turn the other cheek' is far more likely to achieve such objectives, than one saturated with enjoinders and rationalizations to wage war against and commit violence upon those who do not think and act in the same manner as its adherents.
If one has to have a Flying Spaghetti Monster at all, then...
I'll take folks worshiping and obeying a LOVING Flying Spaghetti Monster over a BLOODTHIRSTY AND VENGEFUL Flying Spaghetti Monster any day.
As would most sane folk who are interested in peace.
And what about the moderate, peaceful Muslims who've invented a less scary God ?
The problem does not lie with the peaceful inclinations of the majority of adherents to Islam.
The problem lies within the Core Teachings of that belief system - rationalizing and calling for war and violence under various circumstances.
Even amongst the most passive of them, that rotten foundation or core is always in the background - lying dormant - ready to be resurrected by any street-corner mullah.
So now you're flip flopping into another comical angle on how to justify your hatred of all Muslims, not to mention the religion itself.
Christianity has repeatedly and frequently been subverted, in order to wage war and to wreak violence upon the enemies of Faction A or B or C.If one has to have a Flying Spaghetti Monster at all, then...
I'll take folks worshiping and obeying a LOVING Flying Spaghetti Monster over a BLOODTHIRSTY AND VENGEFUL Flying Spaghetti Monster any day.
As would most sane folk who are interested in peace.
But you miss the point. If one truly believes in a Flying Spaghetti Monster, then you are doing its will by smiting the unbeliever.
the only reason why Christians aren't as "savage" as Muslims is we are all living fat, comfortable lives where we don't even go to church if we don't have to.
If you lived in some war-torn country, you'd probably not be so "civilized">
They take their cues from the same play-book as the more Radical and Militant of their co-religionists do.Indeed, it is an Atheist point of view.Then let the invention with the least objectionable Core Teachings dominate.How many of you realize that a conflict between Christianity and Islam is in all likelihood just a conflict between
two of man's inventions?
That's an atheist point of view. You resort to atheism to defend your version of God. That's some heady stuff.
If there is a God, he is no more likely to be a kind and merciful God than a violent, vengeful, merciless God.
If there is a God, it's only mankind's various guesses as to what he really is.
Utilized as a convenience, to sweep away the clutter and background noise, and to get to the gist of the matter.
Namely: which 'flavor' of vision of a godhead is least objectionable and most likely to promote peace and tolerance.
From that perspective, it doesn't matter a damn, whether a Deity (if He/She/It exists) is Loving or Vengeful.
From that perspective, what matters is which vision of the Deity is going to be the least destructive and most likely to promote peace.
And, of course, a vision that promotes 'Love thy neighbor' and 'Turn the other cheek' is far more likely to achieve such objectives, than one saturated with enjoinders and rationalizations to wage war against and commit violence upon those who do not think and act in the same manner as its adherents.
If one has to have a Flying Spaghetti Monster at all, then...
I'll take folks worshiping and obeying a LOVING Flying Spaghetti Monster over a BLOODTHIRSTY AND VENGEFUL Flying Spaghetti Monster any day.
As would most sane folk who are interested in peace.
And what about the moderate, peaceful Muslims who've invented a less scary God ?
The problem does not lie with the peaceful inclinations of the majority of adherents to Islam.
The problem lies within the Core Teachings of that belief system - rationalizing and calling for war and violence under various circumstances.
Even amongst the most passive of them, that rotten foundation or core is always in the background - lying dormant - ready to be resurrected by any street-corner mullah.
Sorry but there is no watery parts of milk that remains after the formation of curds in the Tea party!It's the Tea Party whey.....They take their cues from the same play-book as the more Radical and Militant of their co-religionists do.Indeed, it is an Atheist point of view.That's an atheist point of view. You resort to atheism to defend your version of God. That's some heady stuff.
If there is a God, he is no more likely to be a kind and merciful God than a violent, vengeful, merciless God.
If there is a God, it's only mankind's various guesses as to what he really is.
Utilized as a convenience, to sweep away the clutter and background noise, and to get to the gist of the matter.
Namely: which 'flavor' of vision of a godhead is least objectionable and most likely to promote peace and tolerance.
From that perspective, it doesn't matter a damn, whether a Deity (if He/She/It exists) is Loving or Vengeful.
From that perspective, what matters is which vision of the Deity is going to be the least destructive and most likely to promote peace.
And, of course, a vision that promotes 'Love thy neighbor' and 'Turn the other cheek' is far more likely to achieve such objectives, than one saturated with enjoinders and rationalizations to wage war against and commit violence upon those who do not think and act in the same manner as its adherents.
If one has to have a Flying Spaghetti Monster at all, then...
I'll take folks worshiping and obeying a LOVING Flying Spaghetti Monster over a BLOODTHIRSTY AND VENGEFUL Flying Spaghetti Monster any day.
As would most sane folk who are interested in peace.
And what about the moderate, peaceful Muslims who've invented a less scary God ?
The problem does not lie with the peaceful inclinations of the majority of adherents to Islam.
The problem lies within the Core Teachings of that belief system - rationalizing and calling for war and violence under various circumstances.
Even amongst the most passive of them, that rotten foundation or core is always in the background - lying dormant - ready to be resurrected by any street-corner mullah.
So now you're flip flopping into another comical angle on how to justify your hatred of all Muslims, not to mention the religion itself.
[
In a religious context, Christians are now less 'savage' than Muslims because the Reformation allowed rank-and-file Christians to slowly re-align their practices more closely with the fundamental or basic or Core Teachings of their Founder, rather than continuing to allow misguided clerics to do their thinking for them in a religious context.
In the case of Christianity, when one re-aligns one's practices more closely in keeping with those of the Founder, one more closely approximates the ideals of "Love thy neighbor" and "Turn the other cheek".
.
They take their cues from the same play-book as the more Radical and Militant of their co-religionists do.Indeed, it is an Atheist point of view.Then let the invention with the least objectionable Core Teachings dominate.
That's an atheist point of view. You resort to atheism to defend your version of God. That's some heady stuff.
If there is a God, he is no more likely to be a kind and merciful God than a violent, vengeful, merciless God.
If there is a God, it's only mankind's various guesses as to what he really is.
Utilized as a convenience, to sweep away the clutter and background noise, and to get to the gist of the matter.
Namely: which 'flavor' of vision of a godhead is least objectionable and most likely to promote peace and tolerance.
From that perspective, it doesn't matter a damn, whether a Deity (if He/She/It exists) is Loving or Vengeful.
From that perspective, what matters is which vision of the Deity is going to be the least destructive and most likely to promote peace.
And, of course, a vision that promotes 'Love thy neighbor' and 'Turn the other cheek' is far more likely to achieve such objectives, than one saturated with enjoinders and rationalizations to wage war against and commit violence upon those who do not think and act in the same manner as its adherents.
If one has to have a Flying Spaghetti Monster at all, then...
I'll take folks worshiping and obeying a LOVING Flying Spaghetti Monster over a BLOODTHIRSTY AND VENGEFUL Flying Spaghetti Monster any day.
As would most sane folk who are interested in peace.
And what about the moderate, peaceful Muslims who've invented a less scary God ?
The problem does not lie with the peaceful inclinations of the majority of adherents to Islam.
The problem lies within the Core Teachings of that belief system - rationalizing and calling for war and violence under various circumstances.
Even amongst the most passive of them, that rotten foundation or core is always in the background - lying dormant - ready to be resurrected by any street-corner mullah.
I guess then by that logic child molesting is the rotten foundation in the background of every Catholic.
We have very different opinions of what President Obama is doing.I have never before seen an American President intentionally give aid and comfort to the enemy.
100% true.
This is not good.
With any luck, Congress will be able to marginalize and isolate him to an extent that prevents him from doing much more mischief between now and January 20, 2017.
He's doing no such thing. He is trying to drive a wedge between Muslim terrorism and Muslim not-terrorism, not just for Muslims for everyone else, especially Americans.
The easiest bias/bigotry right now is to hate Islam. That is why so many Americans are falling into that bias.
We have very different opinions of what President Obama is doing.I have never before seen an American President intentionally give aid and comfort to the enemy.
100% true.
This is not good.
With any luck, Congress will be able to marginalize and isolate him to an extent that prevents him from doing much more mischief between now and January 20, 2017.
He's doing no such thing. He is trying to drive a wedge between Muslim terrorism and Muslim not-terrorism, not just for Muslims for everyone else, especially Americans.
The easiest bias/bigotry right now is to hate Islam. That is why so many Americans are falling into that bias.
For that matter, much of the country, formerly willing to give him his chance, have, by now, come to the realization that he is not a viable leader, and have abandoned him.
What he has done here is one of the most idiotic things that I have ever seen coming from a sitting American President.
Like a moth to a flame, he continues to manifest his nature, which is not in keeping with what much of America needs or wants.
Once again, your guy has shot himself in the foot.
It's gotten to be a familiar pattern by now.
Pity.
