Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the repubs have filibustered every single jobs bill or part thereof.
Yes, they have a majority in one house, the senate. The Repubs own the house.No, dipshit. 22 n unemployed and the repubs block all legislation out of the houise and filibuster anything that gets to the senate. And please, dipshit, what should a pres do at that point. McConnell was happy, until the pres go reelected. And cons are like pigs in shit. They love the bad numbers.
Dipshit.
what a child
reps control one branch of government.
the dems have fucked the country for fun.
but hey, 22 million people on UE, but obama created 200 million jobs.
However, the dems do not have a FILIBUSTER PROOF MAJORITY IN THE SENATE. And the repubs have filibustered every single jobs bill or part thereof. All of them. Record number of filibusters in a four year period. Higher than any 8 year period by a long, long ways. And, of course, the house brings NO jobs bill to the senate.
Get it yet? The us population does. Which is why a pres with a high UE rate was reelected.
And perhaps you would like to show us where you got the 22 million on unemployment? Didn't think so. Tool.
House Has Passed 22 Bipartisan Jobs Bills, & Counting | Speaker.govHouse Has Passed 22 Bipartisan Jobs Bills, & Counting
And, of course, the house brings NO jobs bill to the senate.
Get it yet?
If obama could shift everyone who is unemployed to some type of public benefit, he could reach an unemployment rate of zero.
Yes, they have a majority in one house, the senate. The Repubs own the house.No, dipshit. 22 n unemployed and the repubs block all legislation out of the houise and filibuster anything that gets to the senate. And please, dipshit, what should a pres do at that point. McConnell was happy, until the pres go reelected. And cons are like pigs in shit. They love the bad numbers.
Dipshit.
what a child
reps control one branch of government.
the dems have fucked the country for fun.
but hey, 22 million people on UE, but obama created 200 million jobs.
However, the dems do not have a FILIBUSTER PROOF MAJORITY IN THE SENATE. And the repubs have filibustered every single jobs bill or part thereof. All of them. Record number of filibusters in a four year period. Higher than any 8 year period by a long, long ways. And, of course, the house brings NO jobs bill to the senate.
Get it yet? The us population does. Which is why a pres with a high UE rate was reelected.
And perhaps you would like to show us where you got the 22 million on unemployment? Didn't think so. Tool.
Three Stooges:apparently this kid doesn't know what "falls" means
"Falls" is part of a headlineapparently this kid doesn't know what "falls" means
Employed:
October 2012 -- 143,328
November 2012 -- 143,277
December 2012 -- 143,305
Dropping Out Of Labor Force
October 2012 -- 88,407
November 2012 -- 88,855
December 2012 -- 88,839
www.bls.gov/news/release/empsit.a.htm
Doesn't speak all that well for Obama's economy, when you include ALL the important details.
What that does not speak well of is your honesty.
Again, people shouldn't post things they don't understand.
The numbers you posted for "dropping out of Labor Force" are NOT people dropping out, just total people not in the Labor Force. And about 92% of them say they don't want to work. (Table A-1 subtract "persons who currently want a job" from not in the labor force and take that as a percent of the labor force)Over half of those Not in the Labor Force are over 65 or disabled (or both). (Table A-6)
Then we have 16.4% of not in the labor force are students age 16-24 (derived from Table A-16)and 27.6 are married women living with their spouse (some overlap there with disabled, over 65 and students derived from Data retriever).
And even of those who "dropped out" (which includes retirees and people going back to school etc) who stopped looking...most were for personal reasons, not labor market...child care issues, school, family emergencies etc.
wellm me boy, you may want to go to the cbo site, and see if they agree with you. I can tell you, they do not. And, if you know how a budget is done, you will find it gets submitted finally by congress after starting with the pres. Interesting that you blame the pres, eh. I bet you normally are quite non partial.Yes, they have a majority in one house, the senate. The Repubs own the house.what a child
reps control one branch of government.
the dems have fucked the country for fun.
but hey, 22 million people on UE, but obama created 200 million jobs.
However, the dems do not have a FILIBUSTER PROOF MAJORITY IN THE SENATE. And the repubs have filibustered every single jobs bill or part thereof. All of them. Record number of filibusters in a four year period. Higher than any 8 year period by a long, long ways. And, of course, the house brings NO jobs bill to the senate.
Get it yet? The us population does. Which is why a pres with a high UE rate was reelected.
And perhaps you would like to show us where you got the 22 million on unemployment? Didn't think so. Tool.
And the dems have refused to pass a budget
and by refuse, I mean they won't vote on any proposed budget.
and every "jobs bill" has sucked balls, and the one that got through made it worse.
here's the link to prove you didn't think;
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
obama got re-elected b/c sheep were convinced that birth control was more important than the economy.
I'd like to see your evidence that that's the reason why a growing number of people say they do not want to work.Employed:
October 2012 -- 143,328
November 2012 -- 143,277
December 2012 -- 143,305
Dropping Out Of Labor Force
October 2012 -- 88,407
November 2012 -- 88,855
December 2012 -- 88,839
www.bls.gov/news/release/empsit.a.htm
Doesn't speak all that well for Obama's economy, when you include ALL the important details.
What that does not speak well of is your honesty.
Here's your link from the Bureau of Labor Statistics which is anything but made up and dishonest. If you are going to call me dishonest, better have the facts to back that up.
Employment Situation Summary Table A. Household data, seasonally adjusted
Again, people shouldn't post things they don't understand.
The numbers you posted for "dropping out of Labor Force" are NOT people dropping out, just total people not in the Labor Force. And about 92% of them say they don't want to work. (Table A-1 subtract "persons who currently want a job" from not in the labor force and take that as a percent of the labor force)Over half of those Not in the Labor Force are over 65 or disabled (or both). (Table A-6)
Then we have 16.4% of not in the labor force are students age 16-24 (derived from Table A-16)and 27.6 are married women living with their spouse (some overlap there with disabled, over 65 and students derived from Data retriever).
And even of those who "dropped out" (which includes retirees and people going back to school etc) who stopped looking...most were for personal reasons, not labor market...child care issues, school, family emergencies etc.
Oh contrayer. The numbers reflect those who choose another path, as a result of what they discovered as a poor producing economy.
All choices as to what's best for the individual. NOT the same as giving up out of despair which you're claiming.Instead they pursue other interests: to further their education to attain some form of degree towards work, or just accept plans of an early retirement.
True. There's about 1 million of those.Still others have simply given up altogether, becoming discouraged over a lack of quality skilled employment.
Except eligibility or receipt of Unemployment Insurance Benefits has NEVER been part of the Unemployment calculations.s there becomes less of a demand to collect unemployment, or their benefits simply ran out, naturally it gives a inaccurate misconception of the TRUE state of the economy.
Ok. From November 1998 to May 2001 the UE rate averaged 4.1%. On average during that time period, 5.2 million people left the labor force every month. (retrieved from Labor Force Flows Tool adding together monthly change of Employed to Not in the Labor Force and Unemployed to Not in the Labor Force). More joined, of course, for a positive net gain, but that's not what you asked.Show me a report from a vigorous strong and healthy economy that has over 80,000 dropping out of the labor force each month.
Still the fault of BOOOOOOOOSH!If we were at 7.8 unemployment in 2004, you and the rest of the liberoidal howler monkeys would've been howling like the monkeys that you are.
of course because 2004 was not an election after an economic crisis as terrible as what Obama inherited.
in 2008 the economy was collapsing. in 2000 teh economy was marching along just fine thank you
What an asshole.
Don't like the fact that BOOOOOOOOOOOSHHHHHH left Obama an economy in free fall to bottom
Poor ed. Can not explain why unemployment is getting better. And he just hates it. Being a mental case, it really screws up his sense of order. And one of his heroes, Mitch McConnell, promised to make Obama a one term president. And spent three years trying to crash the economy. Ed is so confused.
hmmm Rshermr says that unemployment is getting better, and you reply with the levels for Jan 2009 and Dec 2012, Are you trying to claim that the level has only gone up?Poor ed. Can not explain why unemployment is getting better. And he just hates it. Being a mental case, it really screws up his sense of order. And one of his heroes, Mitch McConnell, promised to make Obama a one term president. And spent three years trying to crash the economy. Ed is so confused.
unemployed Jan 2009 11,616,000
unemployed Dec 2012 12,206,000
Poor ed. Can not explain why unemployment is getting better
Poor ed. Can not explain why unemployment is getting better
Too stupid but perfectly liberal
Better??? U1,U5,U6 are almost double their historical averages.
U6 Unemployment Rate | MacroTrends
See why we say slow????????
not according to thishmmm Rshermr says that unemployment is getting better, and you reply with the levels for Jan 2009 and Dec 2012, Are you trying to claim that the level has only gone up?Poor ed. Can not explain why unemployment is getting better. And he just hates it. Being a mental case, it really screws up his sense of order. And one of his heroes, Mitch McConnell, promised to make Obama a one term president. And spent three years trying to crash the economy. Ed is so confused.
unemployed Jan 2009 11,616,000
unemployed Dec 2012 12,206,000
oh, and your numbers are off. The Jan 2009 number has been revised up to 12,079,000
