Obama the Socialist

In other words you cannot support your bogus claim.
FU, it's a matter of history. Do your own research. I'm not your mother.

You made a bogus claim and you have been called on it. Since you can't support it then you were lying. That is your problem, not mine.
If you spent a little more time educating yourself and a little less time jerking off you wouldn't have to look like such an idiot.

Here's a link (not that you'll read it). Maybe you can find a smart person to tell you what it says.

The Real Reagan Economic Record Responsible and Successful Fiscal Policy

rofl_logo.jpg


They cut off the data in 1993!

Thanks for admitting to being both gullible and having a reading comprehension disorder.

Let's look at the FACTS instead of partisan BS from Heritage.

averagegdp.png


New-Jobs-1.png


FederalDeficit1.jpg


clinton211.png


clintonbushreaganincome.png


Doesn't matter which measure you want to use Clinton beats St Reagan when it comes to the largest peace time expansion of the economy in the history of the nation.
Why don't you include the links to your graphs? Incidentally, if you want to use your information, you will have to admit that Obama has had the worst performance of ALL of them, including Carter and both Bush's.

All you have to do is right click on the image and open it in another tab and your will see that the images come from Forbes, 538, Census Bureau, Congressional Budget Office, Federal Reserve, etc. Some even say that on the images themselves.

Yes, Obama does have the worst but his administration is still ongoing. That data won't be finalized until 2017 or later so you are not comparing apples to apples.

Those charts prove beyond any doubt whatsoever that Clinton had the best peacetime economy in the history of the nation to date.
 
The math doesn't lie!

If you want to live like a Republican you need to vote for Democrats because the economy always does better under Dem administrations.
Yeah, that's why the biggest peace time expansion took place during the Reagan Administration.

Sure it did.


"My colleagues and I have been very appreciative of your [President Clinton's] support of the Fed over the years, and your commitment to fiscal discipline has been instrumental in achieving what in a few weeks will be the longest economic expansion in the nation's history."
Alan Greenspan, Federal Reserve Board Chairman, January 4, 2000, with President Clinton at Chairman Greenspan's re-nomination announcement


Jan 1979 65,636,000
Jan 1981 74,677,000

INCREASE OF 9,041,000 Total private IN 4 YEARS

Jan 1981 74,677,000
Jan 1989 89,394,000

14,717,00 Total private IN 8 YEARS

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data


I THOUGH CARTER WAS HORRIBLE? LOL
 

declining incomes, 11.4% unemployment, 0% interest rates , forcing corps/jobs offshore with highest corporate taxes in world, fewer full time jobs than before he took office.

Imagine the socialist destruction if Republicans weren't roadblocking Obama.

You need to grow a brain Buba

Harding/Coolidge created the great depression Hoover inherited, ALL 3 were GOPers/Conservatives

Dubya and the GOP 'job creator' policies they pushed created the recent one!
 
In other words you cannot support your bogus claim.
FU, it's a matter of history. Do your own research. I'm not your mother.

You made a bogus claim and you have been called on it. Since you can't support it then you were lying. That is your problem, not mine.
If you spent a little more time educating yourself and a little less time jerking off you wouldn't have to look like such an idiot.

Here's a link (not that you'll read it). Maybe you can find a smart person to tell you what it says.

The Real Reagan Economic Record Responsible and Successful Fiscal Policy

rofl_logo.jpg


They cut off the data in 1993!

Thanks for admitting to being both gullible and having a reading comprehension disorder.

Let's look at the FACTS instead of partisan BS from Heritage.

averagegdp.png


New-Jobs-1.png


FederalDeficit1.jpg


clinton211.png


clintonbushreaganincome.png


Doesn't matter which measure you want to use Clinton beats St Reagan when it comes to the largest peace time expansion of the economy in the history of the nation.
Why don't you include the links to your graphs? Incidentally, if you want to use your information, you will have to admit that Obama has had the worst performance of ALL of them, including Carter and both Bush's.

Obama? Oh right the economy that Dubya/GOP dumped in his lap. The one where he has created more than 10+ million PRIVATE sector jobs since passing Obamacares, AFTER 8 years of Dubya where he lost 1+ million private sector jobs in 8 years. For you cons, that's a NET of over 5_+ million PRIVATE sector jobs under Obama


You realize Heritage only used a trumped up GOP Congress talking point right? Joint Economic? lol

And even more weird they want to claim 17 years? Forget Poppy's recession or the FACT that Clinton's 4 budget surpluses, came BECAUSE Clinton/Dems created 3 new tax brackets and took US back to Carter level revenues, AFTER Clinton's first budget surplus, the GOP passed a$700+ billion tax cut BJ Bill had to veto to get 3 more, lol


The Whitewashing of Ronald Reagan

A Gallup poll taken in 1992 found that Ronald Reagan was the most unpopular living president apart from Nixon, and ranked even below Jimmy Carter; just 46 percent of Americans had a favorable view of Reagan while Carter was viewed favorably by 63 percent of Americans.

This was before the Hollywood-style re-write of Reagan’s presidency that created the fictional character portrayed during Reagan’s 100th birthday celebration. The campaign was led by Grover Norquist and his “Ronald Reagan Legacy Project,” along with corporate-funded propaganda mills like Heritage and American Enterprise Institute that underwrote hundreds of flattering books to create a mythic hero and perpetual tax-cutter.

Vox Verax The Whitewashing of Ronald Reagan


The Myths of Reaganomics


RIGHT WING MISES

Mises Daily Mises Institute
 
The NASDAQ bubble and the DOT COM bubble gave the impression of real growth during the late 90s but as we all know, the bubble burst in late 2001. In other words, the last half of Clinton's expansion was not an expansion at all.
 
"A Gallup poll taken in 1992 found that Ronald Reagan was the most unpopular living president apart from Nixon, and ranked even below Jimmy Carter; just 46 percent of Americans had a favorable view of Reagan while Carter was viewed favorably by 63 percent of Americans. "

Sure, Reagan was so unpopular that he was reelected in the biggest electoral landslide in history. Nixon's was the second biggest.

"Vox Verax"? LOL

"Mises Daily Mises Institute"? LOL
 
The NASDAQ bubble and the DOT COM bubble gave the impression of real growth during the late 90s but as we all know, the bubble burst in late 2001. In other words, the last half of Clinton's expansion was not an expansion at all.

REALLY? Do you EVER use your brain? Reagan inherited a Biz cycle. No what that was? How much did the economy contract when the bubble burst under Clinton/Dubya again? lol

22+ million jobs wasn't expansion???
 
"A Gallup poll taken in 1992 found that Ronald Reagan was the most unpopular living president apart from Nixon, and ranked even below Jimmy Carter; just 46 percent of Americans had a favorable view of Reagan while Carter was viewed favorably by 63 percent of Americans. "

Sure, Reagan was so unpopular that he was reelected in the biggest electoral landslide in history. Nixon's was the second biggest.

"Vox Verax"? LOL

"Mises Daily Mises Institute"? LOL

Weird right, less than 4 years later the America voters saw what horse crap Ronnie gave US and they rated him lower than even Carter, lol

What's wrong with the LIBERTARIAN MISES INSTITUTE AGAIN? Oh right you prefer Corp funded Heritage for their myths and fairy tales


How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan
With the Gipper's reputation flagging after Clinton, neoconservatives launched a stealthy campaign to remake him as a "great" president.

The myth of Ronald Reagan was already looming in the spring of 1997 — when a highly popular President Bill Clinton was launching his second-term, pre-Monica Lewinsky, and the Republican brand seemed at low ebb. But what neoconservative activist Grover Norquist and his allies proposed that spring was virtually unheard of — an active, mapped-out, audacious campaign to spread a distorted vision of Reagan’s legacy across America.

In a sense, some of the credit for triggering this may belong to those supposedly liberal editors at the New York Times, and their decision at the end of 1996 to publish that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. survey of the presidents. The below-average rating by the historians for Reagan, coming right on the heels of Clintons’ easy reelection victory, was a wake-up call for these people who came to Washington in the 1980s as the shock troops of a revolution and now saw everything slipping away.


The first Reagan salvos came from the Heritage Foundation, the same conservative think tank that also had feted the 10th anniversary of the Reagan tax cut in 1991.


How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan - Salon.com
 
"A Gallup poll taken in 1992 found that Ronald Reagan was the most unpopular living president apart from Nixon, and ranked even below Jimmy Carter; just 46 percent of Americans had a favorable view of Reagan while Carter was viewed favorably by 63 percent of Americans. "

Sure, Reagan was so unpopular that he was reelected in the biggest electoral landslide in history. Nixon's was the second biggest.

"Vox Verax"? LOL

"Mises Daily Mises Institute"? LOL

Weird right, less than 4 years later the America voters saw what horse crap Ronnie gave US and they rated him lower than even Carter, lol

What's wrong with the LIBERTARIAN MISES INSTITUTE AGAIN? Oh right you prefer Corp funded Heritage for their myths and fairy tales


How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan
With the Gipper's reputation flagging after Clinton, neoconservatives launched a stealthy campaign to remake him as a "great" president.

The myth of Ronald Reagan was already looming in the spring of 1997 — when a highly popular President Bill Clinton was launching his second-term, pre-Monica Lewinsky, and the Republican brand seemed at low ebb. But what neoconservative activist Grover Norquist and his allies proposed that spring was virtually unheard of — an active, mapped-out, audacious campaign to spread a distorted vision of Reagan’s legacy across America.

In a sense, some of the credit for triggering this may belong to those supposedly liberal editors at the New York Times, and their decision at the end of 1996 to publish that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. survey of the presidents. The below-average rating by the historians for Reagan, coming right on the heels of Clintons’ easy reelection victory, was a wake-up call for these people who came to Washington in the 1980s as the shock troops of a revolution and now saw everything slipping away.


The first Reagan salvos came from the Heritage Foundation, the same conservative think tank that also had feted the 10th anniversary of the Reagan tax cut in 1991.


How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan - Salon.com
All the ranting and raving and frothing at the mouth isn't going to make your fantasy true.

1984 Electoral College Map

1984.jpg
 
"A Gallup poll taken in 1992 found that Ronald Reagan was the most unpopular living president apart from Nixon, and ranked even below Jimmy Carter; just 46 percent of Americans had a favorable view of Reagan while Carter was viewed favorably by 63 percent of Americans. "

Sure, Reagan was so unpopular that he was reelected in the biggest electoral landslide in history. Nixon's was the second biggest.

"Vox Verax"? LOL

"Mises Daily Mises Institute"? LOL

Weird right, less than 4 years later the America voters saw what horse crap Ronnie gave US and they rated him lower than even Carter, lol

What's wrong with the LIBERTARIAN MISES INSTITUTE AGAIN? Oh right you prefer Corp funded Heritage for their myths and fairy tales


How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan
With the Gipper's reputation flagging after Clinton, neoconservatives launched a stealthy campaign to remake him as a "great" president.

The myth of Ronald Reagan was already looming in the spring of 1997 — when a highly popular President Bill Clinton was launching his second-term, pre-Monica Lewinsky, and the Republican brand seemed at low ebb. But what neoconservative activist Grover Norquist and his allies proposed that spring was virtually unheard of — an active, mapped-out, audacious campaign to spread a distorted vision of Reagan’s legacy across America.

In a sense, some of the credit for triggering this may belong to those supposedly liberal editors at the New York Times, and their decision at the end of 1996 to publish that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. survey of the presidents. The below-average rating by the historians for Reagan, coming right on the heels of Clintons’ easy reelection victory, was a wake-up call for these people who came to Washington in the 1980s as the shock troops of a revolution and now saw everything slipping away.


The first Reagan salvos came from the Heritage Foundation, the same conservative think tank that also had feted the 10th anniversary of the Reagan tax cut in 1991.


How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan - Salon.com
All the ranting and raving and frothing at the mouth isn't going to make your fantasy true.

1984 Electoral College Map

1984.jpg

Weird, 8 years later the people ranked him lower than even Carter...
 
"A Gallup poll taken in 1992 found that Ronald Reagan was the most unpopular living president apart from Nixon, and ranked even below Jimmy Carter; just 46 percent of Americans had a favorable view of Reagan while Carter was viewed favorably by 63 percent of Americans. "

Sure, Reagan was so unpopular that he was reelected in the biggest electoral landslide in history. Nixon's was the second biggest.

"Vox Verax"? LOL

"Mises Daily Mises Institute"? LOL

Weird right, less than 4 years later the America voters saw what horse crap Ronnie gave US and they rated him lower than even Carter, lol

What's wrong with the LIBERTARIAN MISES INSTITUTE AGAIN? Oh right you prefer Corp funded Heritage for their myths and fairy tales


How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan
With the Gipper's reputation flagging after Clinton, neoconservatives launched a stealthy campaign to remake him as a "great" president.

The myth of Ronald Reagan was already looming in the spring of 1997 — when a highly popular President Bill Clinton was launching his second-term, pre-Monica Lewinsky, and the Republican brand seemed at low ebb. But what neoconservative activist Grover Norquist and his allies proposed that spring was virtually unheard of — an active, mapped-out, audacious campaign to spread a distorted vision of Reagan’s legacy across America.

In a sense, some of the credit for triggering this may belong to those supposedly liberal editors at the New York Times, and their decision at the end of 1996 to publish that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. survey of the presidents. The below-average rating by the historians for Reagan, coming right on the heels of Clintons’ easy reelection victory, was a wake-up call for these people who came to Washington in the 1980s as the shock troops of a revolution and now saw everything slipping away.


The first Reagan salvos came from the Heritage Foundation, the same conservative think tank that also had feted the 10th anniversary of the Reagan tax cut in 1991.


How Republicans created the myth of Ronald Reagan - Salon.com
All the ranting and raving and frothing at the mouth isn't going to make your fantasy true.

1984 Electoral College Map

1984.jpg

Weird, 8 years later the people ranked him lower than even Carter...
Did you say it was a Gallup poll? Yeah, I thought you did.

Americans Rate JFK as Top Modern President
 
Harding/Coolidge created the great depression Hoover inherited, ALL 3 were GOPers/Conservatives

Hoover and FDR were flaming liberals who kept the Depression going for 15 years with soviet policies when it could have been ended in a year with Republican capitalism.
 
Harding/Coolidge created the great depression Hoover inherited, ALL 3 were GOPers/Conservatives

Hoover and FDR were flaming liberals who kept the Depression going for 15 years with soviet policies when it could have been ended in a year with Republican capitalism.

lol, Sure, after listening to the GOPers/conservatives in 1937 and cutting spending 10% , their policies took US into the GOP great depression
 
He's nothing like a socialist. Which is unfortunate, as income inequality has continued to increase while he's been in office
 
lol, Sure, after listening to the GOPers/conservatives in 1937 and cutting spending 10% , their policies took US into the GOP great depression

stupid ignorant liberal parrot!!

Economists disagree about the causes of this downturn. Keynesian economists tend to assign blame to cuts in Federal spending and increases in taxes at the insistence of the US Treasury[1], while monetarists, most notably Milton Friedman tended to assign blame to the Federal Reserve's tightening of the money supply in 1936 and 1937.[2]


They argued that the New Deal had been hostile to business expansion in 1935–37 and had encouraged massive strikes.

Catalan: The Federal Reserve tightened its open market operations in late 1936, causing another credit contraction and another period of market clearing—that is, the market forced the liquidate of malinvestments made during the “boom” years of 1933–36. This leads to two conclusions. First, the “recovery” made during the first administration of the Roosevelt presidency was artificial and did not represent a recovery of real wealth. Second, the principle cause of the “depression within a depression” was a restoration of the market after it had been distorted by the prior credit boom of the mid-1930s.
There were likely other factors, including increased employment costs and increased taxes. Clearly, however, it was credit expansion which catalyzed the inevitable boon



By 1936, the commercial banking system had enormous “excess” reserves—double the required amount of currency and reserve-deposit accounts with Fed Banks, which also had double the amount of required gold reserves. Observing the volume of reserves in the banking system and arguing that it would fuel inflation, the Fed Board—with the approval of the secretary of the treasury, most financial experts, and many academicians—doubled commercial bank reserve requirements in three steps: by 50 percent in August 1936, 25 percent in March 1937, and the final 25 percent in May 1937. This momentous change stifled the recovery and initiated the 1937 recession. In fact, even had the banks used all of their excess reserves to expand credit and the money supply, virtually no inflation was possible. The high unemployment of 1936 and 1937 meant that even a fully expanded banking system could not have created enough money to raise prices more than a few percent above their 1929 level.
 

Forum List

Back
Top