Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I ran across this, and thught hmmmmm...
In what is being called 'the biggest hustle in human history,' a special investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on Barack Obama's resume, including the outright lie that he was a 'Constitutional scholar and professor.'
The claim turns out to be false.
Continue reading on Examiner.com: Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume - National Conservative | Examiner.com Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume - National Conservative | Examiner.com
At first I thought, yeah right, ultra-right wing bs. Then I saw this link:
Sweet: Obama did NOT "hold the title" of a University of Chicago law school professor. - Lynn Sweet
So... the plot thickens I guess?
My thought is this is meaningless
But, aren't you Truthmatters?
Fucking idiot.
My thought is this is meaningless
But, aren't you Truthmatters?
Fucking idiot.
Um now in the face of facts i guess you will run away or jsut pulll a rove and claim you were right and Im wrong huh?
My thought is this is meaningless
But, aren't you Truthmatters?
Fucking idiot.
Um now in the face of facts i guess you will run away or jsut pulll a rove and claim you were right and Im wrong huh?
Well to be fair, he did ask if anyone had seen it before.So... the plot thickens I guess?
The 'plot' thickened in 2008. Can't you keep up with real current shit?
Idiot.
I ran across this, and thught hmmmmm...
In what is being called 'the biggest hustle in human history,' a special investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on Barack Obama's resume, including the outright lie that he was a 'Constitutional scholar and professor.'
The claim turns out to be false.
Continue reading on Examiner.com: Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume - National Conservative | Examiner.com Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume - National Conservative | Examiner.com
At first I thought, yeah right, ultra-right wing bs. Then I saw this link:
Sweet: Obama did NOT "hold the title" of a University of Chicago law school professor. - Lynn Sweet
So... the plot thickens I guess?
The President, Michelle, and myself continue to be grateful for making us look so good while making the birthers look so bat-shit crazy.
The President, Michelle, and myself continue to be grateful for making us look so good while making the birthers look so bat-shit crazy.
Are you their adopted daughter? BTW, I've often called Obama "Bush-III" because they are so similar. Many people have noticed this as well. It's like Obama took the GWB playbook and followed it to the letter. I really didn't like GWB, but I don't want people to know I don't like Obama because people might think I'm a racist so please keep this between you and me.
I ran across this, and thught hmmmmm...
In what is being called 'the biggest hustle in human history,' a special investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on Barack Obama's resume, including the outright lie that he was a 'Constitutional scholar and professor.'
The claim turns out to be false.
Continue reading on Examiner.com: Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume - National Conservative | Examiner.com Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume - National Conservative | Examiner.com
At first I thought, yeah right, ultra-right wing bs. Then I saw this link:
Sweet: Obama did NOT "hold the title" of a University of Chicago law school professor. - Lynn Sweet
So... the plot thickens I guess?
I'm not playing your game. I am not answering your fucking question I have asked you 50 pages to answer one simple question you did not do it, you side steped iut grazed over it, then denied you made the claim. and then turned around continued to ask me questions and others jump in and try to insinuate that I refused to answer your question fuck you fuck them you're a lying sack of shit. You know exactly what you said, and I am not going through 15 threads with hundreds of post.
Translation: I know I don't have jack shit, so I'm going to puff out my chest and huff and puff. I know I'm a hypocrite for stating something I can't prove about "Africans" while supporting a document that says "English", "Korean", "German", and "Portuguese" which are also not racial identifiers but which parents self identified as when they supplied information to hospitals.
In other words I've been "pwn'd".
BTW - I would sincerely like to thank you as you have "played my game" quite well over the last couple of weeks you've done exactly what I expected you to do and reacted as exected. The sad part is you never realized it, nor how bad and pitiful you were making yourself look. Truly sad.
>>>>
Bozo three of the post you used to support you were edited so kiss my ass liar. the only oine that wasn't eited was the second link.
>
And to the accusation of being a liar.
Here are a few more posts where I've clearly laid out my position that birth certificate race identifications are self-selected by the parent(s) and not from a restrictive government list like BR claims.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/3510221-post240.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/3512852-post330.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/3513846-post395.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/3514325-post405.htmlWorldwatcher said:The person taking the hospital forms and then typing up medical records and hospital birth records - that are the sent to the government to create the official birth certificate - will never have even seen the person that filled out the forms.
Yes they would. Racial identifiers are SELF identification and when that information is provided by the individual it is completely up to them to SELF identify. If a fair skinned Irish redhead walks into our office to be hired and fills out her paperwork and lists black as her race, then that's what goes into the system. We do not have the authority to override a self identification.
That's her choice and we follow the self identification.
>>>>
Translation: I know I don't have jack shit, so I'm going to puff out my chest and huff and puff. I know I'm a hypocrite for stating something I can't prove about "Africans" while supporting a document that says "English", "Korean", "German", and "Portuguese" which are also not racial identifiers but which parents self identified as when they supplied information to hospitals.
In other words I've been "pwn'd".
BTW - I would sincerely like to thank you as you have "played my game" quite well over the last couple of weeks you've done exactly what I expected you to do and reacted as exected. The sad part is you never realized it, nor how bad and pitiful you were making yourself look. Truly sad.
>>>>
Bozo three of the post you used to support you were edited so kiss my ass liar. the only oine that wasn't eited was the second link.
>
And to the accusation of being a liar.
Here are a few more posts where I've clearly laid out my position that birth certificate race identifications are self-selected by the parent(s) and not from a restrictive government list like BR claims.
>>>>
Those posts date from 4/8/2011 (and on 4/9/2011) and they were all edited within minutes for grammatical or typographical errors not content. Any one that cares to go look can see the original post time (at the top) and the edit time (at the bottom).
The point at which made your false was on 4/29/2011. There is no way in God's green earth I could have edited them after your 4/29/2011 post because the date stamp would have changed.
Link #1 was made on 4/8/2011 @ 08:42AM. Edit was on 4/8/2011 @ 08:46. I'm sure I edited a post 4 minutes latter so that could claim THREE WEEKS later that I'd made a change to content.
Link #2 as you point out was not changed.
Link #3 was made on 4/8/2011 @ 11:58PM. Edit was made on 4/9/2011 at 12:01AM. Again I'm such a devious bastard that I edited a post within three minutes so that you could claim THREE WEEKS later that I'd made a change to content.
Link #4 was made on 4/9/2011 @ 07:32AM. Edit was made on 4/9/2011 @ 07:51 AM. Fourteen minutes later is all part of my master conspiracy plot, I figured no one would notice the 14-minute gap. I just knew that THREE WEEKS later you would be going back to look for it.
>>>>>
note teh right wing posters have still not accepted the real facts even though they are presented here clearly
Bozo three of the post you used to support you were edited so kiss my ass liar. the only oine that wasn't eited was the second link.
Those posts date from 4/8/2011 (and on 4/9/2011) and they were all edited within minutes for grammatical or typographical errors not content. Any one that cares to go look can see the original post time (at the top) and the edit time (at the bottom).
The point at which made your false was on 4/29/2011. There is no way in God's green earth I could have edited them after your 4/29/2011 post because the date stamp would have changed.
Link #1 was made on 4/8/2011 @ 08:42AM. Edit was on 4/8/2011 @ 08:46. I'm sure I edited a post 4 minutes latter so that could claim THREE WEEKS later that I'd made a change to content.
Link #2 as you point out was not changed.
Link #3 was made on 4/8/2011 @ 11:58PM. Edit was made on 4/9/2011 at 12:01AM. Again I'm such a devious bastard that I edited a post within three minutes so that you could claim THREE WEEKS later that I'd made a change to content.
Link #4 was made on 4/9/2011 @ 07:32AM. Edit was made on 4/9/2011 @ 07:51 AM. Fourteen minutes later is all part of my master conspiracy plot, I figured no one would notice the 14-minute gap. I just knew that THREE WEEKS later you would be going back to look for it.
>>>>>
Don't talk to me hack fuck off your edited evidence is no evidence.
