Obama warns congress not to stop him on Iran "deal"

It's never been what is best for the country, it's all about what he can give liberal historians to write about him. He's looking out for his imagined legacy, not us.

Right! And he has just been called out by none other than the Ayatollah Khamenei, as a liar.

SNIPS:

Earlier today, Khamenei broke his silence on the supposed “framework” the Obama administration has been trumpeting as the basis for a nuclear accord. Khamenei’s speech pulled the rug out from underneath the administration.

Khamenei accused the Obama administration of “lying” about the proposed terms, being “deceptive,” and having “devilish” intentions, according to multiple published accounts of his speech, as well as posts on his official Twitter feed.

"What has been done so far does not guarantee an agreement, nor its contents, nor even that the negotiations will continue to the end," Khamenei elaborated.

When Obama announced that a “framework” for the deal was in place earlier this month, the administration released a fact sheet purportedly showing the agreed upon “parameters.” The White House said the terms outlined in the fact sheet “reflect the significant progress that has been made in discussions between the P5+1, the European Union, and Iran.”

Khamenei would beg to differ.

“The White House put out a statement just a few hours after our negotiators finished their talks...this statement, which they called a 'fact sheet', was wrong on most of the issues," Khamenei said, according to Reuters. Khamenei added that the fact sheet, which doesn’t match Iran’s understanding, exposes America’s “devilish” intentions.

more:

Ayatollah Khamenei Accuses WH of Lying Being Deceptive and Having Devilish Intentions The Weekly Standard
 
ROTFLMBAO!
_______________________________

Here is a thread calculated to spark debate over whether the President has sole authority to make a deal...which will give, in not more than a decade, the nuclear bomb to a rogue country run by religious zealots who regularly cry "Death to America".....or whether the people's Representatives in Congress should have a say in the transaction....and this is your contribution?

That you are Black and you are rolling on the floor because you are laughing so hard?

Why don't you undertake to defend you man with your brain...make rational arguments on his behalf?

This isn't an elementary school playground...at least it shouldn't be. Nor is it a topic to be trivialized.

It will insure "Peace in our time" at least for the next two years. What about after that? Do you plan to live just two more years? Do you have kids? Do you care about how their lives will be?

Why, if this deal goes through, wouldn't all the other lunatic Muslim countries immediately start their own nuclear program? Do you and your children live in one of the big rotting cities of the North which would be the most likely destination of a dirty bomb handed off by one of these Muslim countries to one of their terrorist cells?

Have you thought about this matter any further than blind support for your Black President?

Mature response please, if you are up to it.

______
 
The President has sole authority to negotiate an executive agreement.

The President has sole authority to negotiate a treaty, which must be submitted to the Senate for advice and consent.
 
ROTFLMBAO!
_______________________________

Here is a thread calculated to spark debate over whether the President has sole authority to make a deal...which will give, in not more than a decade, the nuclear bomb to a rogue country run by religious zealots who regularly cry "Death to America".....or whether the people's Representatives in Congress should have a say in the transaction....and this is your contribution?

That you are Black and you are rolling on the floor because you are laughing so hard?

Why don't you undertake to defend you man with your brain...make rational arguments on his behalf?

This isn't an elementary school playground...at least it shouldn't be. Nor is it a topic to be trivialized.

It will insure "Peace in our time" at least for the next two years. What about after that? Do you plan to live just two more years? Do you have kids? Do you care about how their lives will be?

Why, if this deal goes through, wouldn't all the other lunatic Muslim countries immediately start their own nuclear program? Do you and your children live in one of the big rotting cities of the North which would be the most likely destination of a dirty bomb handed off by one of these Muslim countries to one of their terrorist cells?

Have you thought about this matter any further than blind support for your Black President?

Mature response please, if you are up to it.

______

MarcATL, unfortunately is black before he is a citizen of the US, a person of integrity or a person who can analyze thoughts in an objective manner. Your post was an excellent attempt for him to respond with an intelligent discussion, but alas, he could not do even that.
 
It's never been what is best for the country, it's all about what he can give liberal historians to write about him. He's looking out for his imagined legacy, not us.

Right! And he has just been called out by none other than the Ayatollah Khamenei, as a liar.

SNIPS:

Earlier today, Khamenei broke his silence on the supposed “framework” the Obama administration has been trumpeting as the basis for a nuclear accord. Khamenei’s speech pulled the rug out from underneath the administration.

Khamenei accused the Obama administration of “lying” about the proposed terms, being “deceptive,” and having “devilish” intentions, according to multiple published accounts of his speech, as well as posts on his official Twitter feed.

"What has been done so far does not guarantee an agreement, nor its contents, nor even that the negotiations will continue to the end," Khamenei elaborated.

When Obama announced that a “framework” for the deal was in place earlier this month, the administration released a fact sheet purportedly showing the agreed upon “parameters.” The White House said the terms outlined in the fact sheet “reflect the significant progress that has been made in discussions between the P5+1, the European Union, and Iran.”

Khamenei would beg to differ.

“The White House put out a statement just a few hours after our negotiators finished their talks...this statement, which they called a 'fact sheet', was wrong on most of the issues," Khamenei said, according to Reuters. Khamenei added that the fact sheet, which doesn’t match Iran’s understanding, exposes America’s “devilish” intentions.

more:

Ayatollah Khamenei Accuses WH of Lying Being Deceptive and Having Devilish Intentions The Weekly Standard

Khamenei has also said they would not be held to any obligation for inspections, all we have is pathetic liars lying to each other.
 
The President does NOT have authority to create a binding deal with a foreign power without the approval of the Senate. No matter what he claims.

Treaty, no.

an executive decision/agreement with other countries AND Iran, yes he does.
 
The President does NOT have authority to create a binding deal with a foreign power without the approval of the Senate. No matter what he claims.

Treaty, no.

an executive decision/agreement with other countries AND Iran, yes he does.
Yeah, he does have the right make an Executive Agreement with the Iranians Congress does not like.
 
The President has sole authority to negotiate an executive agreement.

The President has sole authority to negotiate a treaty, which must be submitted to the Senate for advice and consent.

Exactly where is the constitutional authority for these so called executive agreements? Also elaborate on exactly how they work.
 
It is not binding however .
I agree. I remember when the Bush admin starting getting out of war crime agreements in 2001 and on. 9-11 happened. We were going to war. That was so obvious. Nothing is binding, really, if an admin wants to get out of it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top