Vox
Gold Member
- Jun 17, 2013
- 10,937
- 867
- 138
The way they are handling that "threat" now is by cutting employees' hours, so they don't have to provide them insurance. I understand that; but why would they make their employees suffer two years prior them them being affected by the mandate? Why couldn't they say; "As of January 1, 2015 all employees hours will be cut." , and make it effective January 1, 2015?
I have just explained it to you - the change was made a YEAR prior - at the end of 2012 nobody knew the effective year was going to be moved to 2015 - so the effective date was set up to be 1/1/13 for the policies setting up on /1/14.
the change came in the middle of 2013 when the hours have already been cut - nobody is going to be reversing it for 12-16 months - business plans are made AHEAD and so it stays.
you can not blame business for government stupidity
LOL, I'm not blaming anybody for anything. You said " at the end of 2012 nobody knew the effective year was going to be moved to 2015 - so the effective date was set up to be 1/1/13 for the policies setting up on /1/14. " , if so why are they doing it on "9/13/2013", instead of 1/1/14 even after it is known to now take effect on 1/1/2015?
they are not doing it 9/13/13 - it took effect 1/1/2013 and stays there.
I am not talking about OP business, I have mentioned in a thread before that our ancillary staff had their hours cut to the part-time mode. They are employed by not a very big business which is not MY employer.
I was talking all the time about situation at my place