yidnar
Diamond Member
Trump's latest whine is about something he calls Obamagate. Despite being asked several times, he can't say what crimes he thinks Obama committed. I'm sure there are a lot of smart Trump supporters who can shed light on what Trump is talking about since Trump is incapable of doing that himself. I'm not asking for a list of everything you want to whine about. Just specifically what Obamagate is supposed to refer to, and what definable crime you think Obama committed to deserve gate to be added to his name. Also, show any evidence you might have that proves he committed any crimes you might mention.
That's easy! TREASON, ELECTION FRAUD of the highest order against our nation...directing conspiracy and fraud on the courts, in order to illegally spy on an American citizens and then plotting to use our law enforcement and spy agencies to damage the candidate of an opposing party, and then plotting the removal of a duly elected president. I can't think of a higher crime against our nation and the constitution. in other words they acted like a bunch of third world fascist dictator thugs.
These things did not happen.
it sure looks like thats exactly what happened .... and this is not hearsay or biased opinion ,but evidence that is being revealed by documents and other proof thats being uncovered .... remember the prosecutors dropped the case on Flynn ...... dems lie once again and say thats because Barr has politicized the doj ....but the prosecution has been trying to destroy Flynn for nearly 3 yrs ! they would not flush all that hard work down the toilet for something as fickle as political opinions ....obama and his cronies went after Flynn because he was viewed as a road block in their attempted coup against the POTUS .
You need a little more up to date information.
Flynn’s prosecution was handled by the office of special counsel, Mueller’s team. Mueller shut down last year. The prosecution was basically over after having gotten a guilty plea so they handed it off to career prosecutors. Barr decides to put the US attorney from Missouri in charge. Guy is a former FBI field agent and a prosecutor, so no big deal. Okay whatever. At first seems like Jensen is just wrapping up. Then this week, the career prosecutor drops off the case in protest and Jensen files the motion by himself. Normally these motions are signed by all the prosecutors involves but only Jensen’s name shows up on the motion. No career prosecutors were on board. Just one Trump appointee.
The prosecution team didn’t throw away years of work. Jensen did. Swooping in at the last minute.
So YOU claim no exculpatory evidence was withheld? You can prove this?
Can’t prove a negative. Nothing that’s been produced is exculpatory.
My mistake, I was somehow under the impression that you could dispute the reports that exculpatory evudence had been withheld, you don't so you're just spouting your desires.
Provide a report and I’ll dispute it.
You can dispute all you want, you'll need to prove it. Filed under sel, bummer for you.
Now your left with showing that Attorney filed a knowingly false brief.
Good luck.
Newly Filed Court Documents Include Exculpatory Evidence For Michael Flynn
New court documents filed under seal include significant exculpatory information about Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump’s former National Security Adviser, an FBI official familiar with the situation told The Federalist on Friday. The new documents, which were filed under seal by the Department of Justice Friday, allegedly include exonerating evidence about Flynn, who pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators about his conversations with foreign diplomats as Trump’s top incoming foreign policy adviser and is currently attempting to withdraw his plea, as well as evidence of malfeasance by the FBI during its investigation of Flynn.
![]()
New Court Documents Include Exculpatory Evidence For Michael Flynn
New documents filed under seal in federal court include exculpatory information about former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.thefederalist.com
Is that a joke? You want me to dispute an anonymous report about documents that aren’t public?
It's been filed and it isn't a joke. Now you're left with showing that the Attorney knowingly filed a false Brief.
Good luck
Maybe it’s been filed. Maybe it hasn’t. We don’t know. You’re post is speculation.
LOL. Sure, ALL the sources are "speculating". Does it hurt when you step on your d*ck?
it doesnt have one to step on ..... it had it removed to protest toxic masculinity .
Last edited: