Obamagate? Exactly what crime did Obama commit?


The link is just a small sample, but the evidence is overwhelming. President Obama is guilty of:

Speaking in complete and coherent sentences.
Being loved and respected around the world.
Making factual statements, supported by science and, where necessary, by medical experts.
Being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Reading books.
Neglecting to praise the current President and making statements that are unflattering of him.
Golfing very infrequently when he was in office.

Among others.
The evidence is overwhelming that Obama was a far superior president to Trump.
 
You do realize that the Mueller investigation was going on, and more than likely those unmaskings were done trying to prove something that was not.
Unmasking?

If you are talking with foreign nationals you are going to be recorded. Unmasking does nothing but let intel folks know WHO is on this end of the conversation.
Yeah, and they were trying to see if any Trump associates were at the end of the conversations.
 

The link is just a small sample, but the evidence is overwhelming. President Obama is guilty of:

Speaking in complete and coherent sentences.
Being loved and respected around the world.
Making factual statements, supported by science and, where necessary, by medical experts.
Being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Reading books.
Neglecting to praise the current President and making statements that are unflattering of him.
Golfing very infrequently when he was in office.

Among others.

Fake news.

What's with the Cyrillic writing?

It's so non English speakers can know what a worthless pos obama is.
 
we do not even know if those who have contracted the virus, are now immune from getting it again.....

and if they are immune, we don't know if it is for 3 weeks, 3 months or 3 years......

this certificate thingy ain't gonna happen

The fact that 5 or 8 of the sailor's returned to the USS Roosevelt have tested positive again says there probably isn't much or any immunity..
Fake news.
 

The link is just a small sample, but the evidence is overwhelming. President Obama is guilty of:

Speaking in complete and coherent sentences.
Being loved and respected around the world.
Making factual statements, supported by science and, where necessary, by medical experts.
Being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Reading books.
Neglecting to praise the current President and making statements that are unflattering of him.
Golfing very infrequently when he was in office.

Among others.
The evidence is overwhelming that Obama was a far superior president to Trump.
Funny, I've never seen anything to suggest that.
 

The link is just a small sample, but the evidence is overwhelming. President Obama is guilty of:

Speaking in complete and coherent sentences.
Being loved and respected around the world.
Making factual statements, supported by science and, where necessary, by medical experts.
Being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Reading books.
Neglecting to praise the current President and making statements that are unflattering of him.
Golfing very infrequently when he was in office.

Among others.
And he makes delusional and poorly educated shitolini shake like a leaf every time he talks...

With laughter, yes.
 

The link is just a small sample, but the evidence is overwhelming. President Obama is guilty of:

Speaking in complete and coherent sentences.
Being loved and respected around the world.
Making factual statements, supported by science and, where necessary, by medical experts.
Being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Reading books.
Neglecting to praise the current President and making statements that are unflattering of him.
Golfing very infrequently when he was in office.

Among others.
The evidence is overwhelming that Obama was a far superior president to Trump.

How could that be, when he was not?

Must be another media fiction appended to the Messiah story.
 
Let's get down to brass tacks.

I watched the Trump interview this morning on FOX. Trump laid it bare. Trump stated that on January 4, 2017 Obama and some 9 others, in Obama's office, were informed that no collusion existed and the case was to be closed. They kept the Flynn case open despite this evidence and then attempted to use another fictitious case against him. They knew there was no pretext for FISA warrants or any investigation at all but they concocted a plan to get Trump through Flynn.

This was an intentional Coup D'eTat and it started with Obama. With 39 warrants, under seal, in federal court this is about to burst wide open. I'm Betting that the Durham report is held until prosecutions are started. Once discovery is submitted it will all be made public.
 

The link is just a small sample, but the evidence is overwhelming. President Obama is guilty of:

Speaking in complete and coherent sentences.
Being loved and respected around the world.
Making factual statements, supported by science and, where necessary, by medical experts.
Being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Reading books.
Neglecting to praise the current President and making statements that are unflattering of him.
Golfing very infrequently when he was in office.

Among others.

Speaking in complete and coherent sentences.

From a teleprompter.
Without one, he's a stuttering fuck.

Being loved and respected around the world.

His weakness was loved by our enemies.
 
It’s difficult to overstate the extent to which a scandal around this "Obamagate" canard is baseless. A number of high-ranking Obama admin officials asked to learn the identity of American citizens picked up in intelligence reports, thereby "unmasking" Flynn. This past week Trump hack, acting DNI Grenell, declassified the list of Obama administration officials. All of this has led to a hullabaloo on the right, expressly because Joe Biden was among the officials (which is why the list was released).

But the whole batshyte crazy conspiracy theory conveniently ignores a lot and completely mischaracterizes the process that it purports to describe. By law, the intelligence community redacts the names of U.S. citizens who appear in intelligence reports. High-ranking officials can then ask for the identity of a particular redacted name. The fact of the request means that the officials who are asking don’t know the identity of the target. Such requests themselves are incredibly common. The NSA releases data on these types of requests, and it shows that there were 9,217 requests from 09/2015 to 08/2016.

Why ask for the unmasking. Because the then unidentified person had made contacts with Russian nationals, one of which was Kislyak.

Why go to all these lengths to save the confessed criminal Michael Flynn?

Simple. Joe Biden's name is on the list. The smear campaign has begun in earnest and duped, knuckle dragging Trump cultists are along for the ride.

High-ranking officials can then ask for the identity of a particular redacted name. The fact of the request means that the officials who are asking don’t know the identity of the target. Such requests themselves are incredibly common.

So common that the fucking ambassador to Italy was unmasking Flynn. What in the actual fuck?
 
It’s difficult to overstate the extent to which a scandal around this "Obamagate" canard is baseless. A number of high-ranking Obama admin officials asked to learn the identity of American citizens picked up in intelligence reports, thereby "unmasking" Flynn. This past week Trump hack, acting DNI Grenell, declassified the list of Obama administration officials. All of this has led to a hullabaloo on the right, expressly because Joe Biden was among the officials (which is why the list was released).

But the whole batshyte crazy conspiracy theory conveniently ignores a lot and completely mischaracterizes the process that it purports to describe. By law, the intelligence community redacts the names of U.S. citizens who appear in intelligence reports. High-ranking officials can then ask for the identity of a particular redacted name. The fact of the request means that the officials who are asking don’t know the identity of the target. Such requests themselves are incredibly common. The NSA releases data on these types of requests, and it shows that there were 9,217 requests from 09/2015 to 08/2016.

Why ask for the unmasking. Because the then unidentified person had made contacts with Russian nationals, one of which was Kislyak.

Why go to all these lengths to save the confessed criminal Michael Flynn?

Simple. Joe Biden's name is on the list. The smear campaign has begun in earnest and duped, knuckle dragging Trump cultists are along for the ride.
right! along with trump's never ending goal to make people believe the lie, that Russia did nothing to help him or support him, it was all a hoax bulloney!

The NSA has a procedure for unmasking.... only certain higher ups, are even eligible to make the request, the request has to include why the person needs to know.... the NSA legal team has to agree with the request.... then, it can be released to that person, in a SCIF.... IN A TOP SECRET ROOM.... not via email etc....

the Obama admin, requested 9200 unmaskings in 2016

the Trump admin, requested 22000 unmaskings in 2016

why have they more than doubled under Trump, if trumpers think it is nefarious?

people believe the lie, that Russia did nothing to help him or support him,

Ridiculous, right? Everyone knows that a couple of thousand dollars of Facebook ads plus Facebook memes tricked hundreds of thousands (millions?) of Dem voters to vote for Trump.
 
Were those overseas calls to russia?

They only wiretap overseas calls? Only calls to Russia?
I bet they were all overseas calls. its illegal to wiretap internal calls but international calls are fair game

its illegal to wiretap internal calls

Link?
Wait, are you confused or unaware? Our government can wiretap or eavesdro any call going out or coming in to America. Do you not know this? Maybe this is why you are confused.

the cia or fbi can listen or spy on any calls going in or out of the usa.

but, you stupid fuck, the government cant listen to you calling Timothy mcveigh in Michigan.

ill bet you obama was only listening to carter page and Paul manafort calling Russia. or, maybe they heard carter page and manafort colluding with russia and then later listened to page and manafort talking.

in other words, you’re trying to pretend manafort isn’t a guilty fuck

the government cant listen to you calling Timothy mcveigh in Michigan.

Link?
You need a link? You don't know this?

If the guy is a suspect they can go get a warrant to spy on calls inside the USA, but the government doesn't need a warrent to listen in on overseas calls.

Why don't you go find out if I'm wrong. And provide a link.

The point is, if you look at the details, I'm sure Obama didn't do anything wrong listening to Carter Page and Paul Manafort when they were committing their crimes.

I'm sure Obama didn't do anything wrong listening to Carter Page and Paul Manafort when they were committing their crimes...












Carter Page committed crimes? Dude!


the press gave shitolini a chance to say what law did Biden break, and in typical shitolini style, there was no answer...


View attachment 336447View attachment 336448

I was wondering, was there anyone in the entire Obama administration who WASN'T
unmasking Flynn in NSA intercepts?


I hope not, all criminals need to be investigated, luckily for flynn he is backed up by the two biggest criminals of all barr and shitolini...




1589742572275.png
1589742638518.png



1589742681385.png
 

Attachments

  • 1589742544027.png
    1589742544027.png
    18.5 KB · Views: 29
It may turn out that obama used the CIA to spy on Trump and Flynn.....Andrew McCarthy point out that there is no record of unmasking request for the Flynn/Kisliyak phone call........but he was known by this call.......he suggests that obama went around the FISA court and simply ordered the CIA to spy or used information from a friendly country to spy on Flynn....

The greatest political scandal in our history....




According to McCarthy, the evidence suggests that Flynn’s call with Kislyak was likely not recorded by the FBI, but a different agency. “I suspect that’s because General Flynn’s identity was not ‘masked’ in the first place. Instead, his December 29 call with Kislyak was likely intercepted under an intelligence program not subject to the masking rules, probably by the CIA or a friendly foreign spy service acting in a nod-and-wink arrangement with our intelligence community.”

One theory is that Ambassador Kislyak was routinely being surveilled by the FBI and that Flynn was simply caught up in that surveillance, but McCarthy does not buy the theory. “If it were true, there would be a record of Flynn’s unmasking. DNI Grenell has represented that the list he provided to Senators Grassley and Johnson includes all requested unmaskings of Flynn […] Yet, it appears that not a single listed unmasking pertains to the December 29 Kislyak call,” he explained.

“There are no unmasking requests on December 29, the date of the Kislyak call. Nor is there one during the week after that.” The first request following that call came on January 5, 2017, by Barack Obama’s Chief of Staff Denis McDonough—which itself raises its own questions, especially since that was the same day Barack Obama discussed the Flynn surveillance with Joe Biden, Sally Yates, James Comey and Susan Rice. But, based on what we know about that meeting, Flynn’s identity was already known at this point—supporting McCarthy’s thesis that his name was never masked in the first place.


In fact, McCarthy’s belief that Flynn’s name was never masked doesn’t seem to be a hunch at all. Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe seems to have confirmed this theory during an interview in an executive session of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on December 19, 2017:
---------

McCarthy posits that Flynn’s call was surveilled by an intelligence operation that isn’t governed by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). This gives two possibilities: that the call was intercepted by the CIA, which is not governed by FISA, or by a friendly foreign intelligence operation. The latter is an interesting theory, but considering what we know about the Trump-Russia investigation, there’s ample evidence to support the fact that there were deliberate attempts to undermine the incoming Trump administration. Despite there being no empirical evidence of Trump-Russia collusion, the Obama administration sought surveillance requests through the FISA court—using the Steele dossier, which the FBI knew was Russian disinformation, to justify that surveillance.

The Obama administration’s initial applications to surveil the Trump campaign in June was rejected by the FISA court—a normally agreeable body that rarely rejects applications for surveillance. The Obama administration never had any justifiable reason to surveil the Trump campaign in the first place, so if the Obama administration was hellbent on surveilling the Trump campaign, which it clearly was, they needed to get around the FISA court—which wouldn’t approve their application to surveil the Trump campaign for another five months.

In the meantime, how do you get around the FISA court? Barack Obama had the power to do so himself.

Under 50 U.S. Code § 1802, the president can authorize electronic surveillance without a court order “to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year” provided that the attorney general certifies that “the electronic surveillance is solely directed at … the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers,” or “the acquisition of technical intelligence … from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power,” and that there is “no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party.”
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top