Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny

[Stephanie]

Seems a dictator is what the people want in this country. Or else they wouldn't have voted the thug in for second term and they would have been on the line with their Congresscritters threatening to vote them out of office FOR not doing what they Swore an OATH to do for us American citizens.

snip:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny
Denis McDonough says Obama’s administration doesn’t want his executive orders subject to anything so piddly and irritating as Congress.
January 26, 2016 By Derek Monson


The White House recently made an amazing—and disturbingly un-American—pronouncement regarding its desire to move its agenda via executive actions. In describing the administration’s intent to pursue “audacious” executive orders, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough stated the Obama administration’s desire that its actions “not be subjected to undoing through [Congress] or otherwise.”

Of course, Americans are accustomed to presidents using executive authority to forward their preferred public policies, especially when the popular will reflected in Congress stymies their agenda. But think carefully about the end goal animating the Obama administration’s upcoming actions, as articulated by McDonough: policy decisions that cannot be undone by Congress “or otherwise,” which seems broad enough a term to encompass the judiciary or any other source of government authority.

Unchecked Power Degrades Into Tyranny
The Founders had a term for the idea of government actions being “subject to undoing” by other public institutions. As noted and explained in Federalist 51, they were called “checks and balances.” James Madison summarized the wisdom and need for these checks: “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”


all of the article here:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny

 

[Skylar]

Seems a dictator is what the people want in this country. Or else they wouldn't have voted the thug in for second term and they would have been on the line with their Congresscritters threatening to vote them out of office FOR not doing what they Swore an OATH to do for us American citizens.

snip:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny
Denis McDonough says Obama’s administration doesn’t want his executive orders subject to anything so piddly and irritating as Congress.
January 26, 2016 By Derek Monson


The White House recently made an amazing—and disturbingly un-American—pronouncement regarding its desire to move its agenda via executive actions. In describing the administration’s intent to pursue “audacious” executive orders, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough stated the Obama administration’s desire that its actions “not be subjected to undoing through [Congress] or otherwise.”

Of course, Americans are accustomed to presidents using executive authority to forward their preferred public policies, especially when the popular will reflected in Congress stymies their agenda. But think carefully about the end goal animating the Obama administration’s upcoming actions, as articulated by McDonough: policy decisions that cannot be undone by Congress “or otherwise,” which seems broad enough a term to encompass the judiciary or any other source of government authority.

Unchecked Power Degrades Into Tyranny
The Founders had a term for the idea of government actions being “subject to undoing” by other public institutions. As noted and explained in Federalist 51, they were called “checks and balances.” James Madison summarized the wisdom and need for these checks: “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”


all of the article here:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny

So Obama's Chief of Staff didn't actually admit they want Tyranny.

 

[Stephanie]

Seems a dictator is what the people want in this country. Or else they wouldn't have voted the thug in for second term and they would have been on the line with their Congresscritters threatening to vote them out of office FOR not doing what they Swore an OATH to do for us American citizens.

snip:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny
Denis McDonough says Obama’s administration doesn’t want his executive orders subject to anything so piddly and irritating as Congress.
January 26, 2016 By Derek Monson


The White House recently made an amazing—and disturbingly un-American—pronouncement regarding its desire to move its agenda via executive actions. In describing the administration’s intent to pursue “audacious” executive orders, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough stated the Obama administration’s desire that its actions “not be subjected to undoing through [Congress] or otherwise.”

Of course, Americans are accustomed to presidents using executive authority to forward their preferred public policies, especially when the popular will reflected in Congress stymies their agenda. But think carefully about the end goal animating the Obama administration’s upcoming actions, as articulated by McDonough: policy decisions that cannot be undone by Congress “or otherwise,” which seems broad enough a term to encompass the judiciary or any other source of government authority.

Unchecked Power Degrades Into Tyranny
The Founders had a term for the idea of government actions being “subject to undoing” by other public institutions. As noted and explained in Federalist 51, they were called “checks and balances.” James Madison summarized the wisdom and need for these checks: “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”


all of the article here:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny

So Obama's Chief of Staff didn't actually admit they want Tyranny.

go start your own thread on it, thanks. Mr. Agitator

 

[jillian]

Seems a dictator is what the people want in this country. Or else they wouldn't have voted the thug in for second term and they would have been on the line with their Congresscritters threatening to vote them out of office FOR not doing what they Swore an OATH to do for us American citizens.

snip:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny
Denis McDonough says Obama’s administration doesn’t want his executive orders subject to anything so piddly and irritating as Congress.
January 26, 2016 By Derek Monson


The White House recently made an amazing—and disturbingly un-American—pronouncement regarding its desire to move its agenda via executive actions. In describing the administration’s intent to pursue “audacious” executive orders, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough stated the Obama administration’s desire that its actions “not be subjected to undoing through [Congress] or otherwise.”

Of course, Americans are accustomed to presidents using executive authority to forward their preferred public policies, especially when the popular will reflected in Congress stymies their agenda. But think carefully about the end goal animating the Obama administration’s upcoming actions, as articulated by McDonough: policy decisions that cannot be undone by Congress “or otherwise,” which seems broad enough a term to encompass the judiciary or any other source of government authority.

Unchecked Power Degrades Into Tyranny
The Founders had a term for the idea of government actions being “subject to undoing” by other public institutions. As noted and explained in Federalist 51, they were called “checks and balances.” James Madison summarized the wisdom and need for these checks: “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”


all of the article here:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny

poor lying delusional steffie

 

[jillian]

Seems a dictator is what the people want in this country. Or else they wouldn't have voted the thug in for second term and they would have been on the line with their Congresscritters threatening to vote them out of office FOR not doing what they Swore an OATH to do for us American citizens.

snip:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny
Denis McDonough says Obama’s administration doesn’t want his executive orders subject to anything so piddly and irritating as Congress.
January 26, 2016 By Derek Monson


The White House recently made an amazing—and disturbingly un-American—pronouncement regarding its desire to move its agenda via executive actions. In describing the administration’s intent to pursue “audacious” executive orders, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough stated the Obama administration’s desire that its actions “not be subjected to undoing through [Congress] or otherwise.”

Of course, Americans are accustomed to presidents using executive authority to forward their preferred public policies, especially when the popular will reflected in Congress stymies their agenda. But think carefully about the end goal animating the Obama administration’s upcoming actions, as articulated by McDonough: policy decisions that cannot be undone by Congress “or otherwise,” which seems broad enough a term to encompass the judiciary or any other source of government authority.

Unchecked Power Degrades Into Tyranny
The Founders had a term for the idea of government actions being “subject to undoing” by other public institutions. As noted and explained in Federalist 51, they were called “checks and balances.” James Madison summarized the wisdom and need for these checks: “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”


all of the article here:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny

So Obama's Chief of Staff didn't actually admit they want Tyranny.

go start your own thread on it, thanks

I have a better idea. stop being a compulsive liar

 

[Stephanie]

the trolls are out in force

 

[jillian]

the trolls are out in force

yes, you are.

 

[ScienceRocks]

And you do too...You want it with corporations subjecting the workers and the rest of society to their well.

You want a polluted environment
You want most of the population to be serfs.

What you want is another form of tyranny....

 

[DarkFury]

Is it a wonder they want that sell out whore in the oval office to push their islamic democrat agenda?

 

[guno]

Seems a dictator is what the people want in this country. Or else they wouldn't have voted the thug in for second term and they would have been on the line with their Congresscritters threatening to vote them out of office FOR not doing what they Swore an OATH to do for us American citizens.

snip:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny
Denis McDonough says Obama’s administration doesn’t want his executive orders subject to anything so piddly and irritating as Congress.
January 26, 2016 By Derek Monson


The White House recently made an amazing—and disturbingly un-American—pronouncement regarding its desire to move its agenda via executive actions. In describing the administration’s intent to pursue “audacious” executive orders, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough stated the Obama administration’s desire that its actions “not be subjected to undoing through [Congress] or otherwise.”

Of course, Americans are accustomed to presidents using executive authority to forward their preferred public policies, especially when the popular will reflected in Congress stymies their agenda. But think carefully about the end goal animating the Obama administration’s upcoming actions, as articulated by McDonough: policy decisions that cannot be undone by Congress “or otherwise,” which seems broad enough a term to encompass the judiciary or any other source of government authority.

Unchecked Power Degrades Into Tyranny
The Founders had a term for the idea of government actions being “subject to undoing” by other public institutions. As noted and explained in Federalist 51, they were called “checks and balances.” James Madison summarized the wisdom and need for these checks: “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”


all of the article here:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny

wow!! from a kook web site, who would have thought!!

 

[DarkFury]

And you do too...You want it with corporations subjecting the workers and the rest of society to their well.

You want a polluted environment
You want most of the population to be serfs.

What you want is another form of tyranny....

Nixon fought FOR and SIGNED the clean air and water act you retard.

 

[guno]

Is it a wonder they want that sell out whore in the oval office to push their islamic democrat agenda?

are you using the palin word salad word generator

 

[Two Thumbs]

assuming this story true

the leftist excuse for this is he didn't use the word tyranny, so it's all good.


so the Pres can now pass his own laws, w/o Congress and w/o the Scotus, but that's not tyranny to leftist.

 

[DarkFury]

Is it a wonder they want that sell out whore in the oval office to push their islamic democrat agenda?

are you using the palin word salad word generator

What's the matter Guno? Did Steph push your dumpster in the river again?

 

[Two Thumbs]

And you do too...You want it with corporations subjecting the workers and the rest of society to their well.

You want a polluted environment
You want most of the population to be serfs.

What you want is another form of tyranny....

Nixon fought FOR and SIGNED the clean air and water act you retard.

mutt thinks standing up for freedom means you're going to pollute the world to death.

boys been stuck on shockingly stewpud for a long time

 

[Dot Com]

Is it a wonder they want that sell out whore in the oval office to push their islamic democrat agenda?

are you using the palin word salad word generator

Him & Steph deserve each other,

Not going to even get into the rw kook- generated link

 

[Agit8r]

Couldn't find the yawn emoticon. There is a yawn emoticon, right?

 

[ABikerSailor]

Some right wing opinion piece where the author tries to spin things to make Obama look bad.

What's new? Because, this sure ain't.

 

[Pogo]

Seems a dictator is what the people want in this country. Or else they wouldn't have voted the thug in for second term and they would have been on the line with their Congresscritters threatening to vote them out of office FOR not doing what they Swore an OATH to do for us American citizens.

snip:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny
Denis McDonough says Obama’s administration doesn’t want his executive orders subject to anything so piddly and irritating as Congress.
January 26, 2016 By Derek Monson


The White House recently made an amazing—and disturbingly un-American—pronouncement regarding its desire to move its agenda via executive actions. In describing the administration’s intent to pursue “audacious” executive orders, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough stated the Obama administration’s desire that its actions “not be subjected to undoing through [Congress] or otherwise.”

Of course, Americans are accustomed to presidents using executive authority to forward their preferred public policies, especially when the popular will reflected in Congress stymies their agenda. But think carefully about the end goal animating the Obama administration’s upcoming actions, as articulated by McDonough: policy decisions that cannot be undone by Congress “or otherwise,” which seems broad enough a term to encompass the judiciary or any other source of government authority.

Unchecked Power Degrades Into Tyranny
The Founders had a term for the idea of government actions being “subject to undoing” by other public institutions. As noted and explained in Federalist 51, they were called “checks and balances.” James Madison summarized the wisdom and need for these checks: “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”


all of the article here:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny

So Obama's Chief of Staff didn't actually admit they want Tyranny.

I love how the title goes "so and so admits..." and then in her OP the first word is .... "seems..."

 

[Skylar]

Seems a dictator is what the people want in this country. Or else they wouldn't have voted the thug in for second term and they would have been on the line with their Congresscritters threatening to vote them out of office FOR not doing what they Swore an OATH to do for us American citizens.

snip:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny
Denis McDonough says Obama’s administration doesn’t want his executive orders subject to anything so piddly and irritating as Congress.
January 26, 2016 By Derek Monson


The White House recently made an amazing—and disturbingly un-American—pronouncement regarding its desire to move its agenda via executive actions. In describing the administration’s intent to pursue “audacious” executive orders, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough stated the Obama administration’s desire that its actions “not be subjected to undoing through [Congress] or otherwise.”

Of course, Americans are accustomed to presidents using executive authority to forward their preferred public policies, especially when the popular will reflected in Congress stymies their agenda. But think carefully about the end goal animating the Obama administration’s upcoming actions, as articulated by McDonough: policy decisions that cannot be undone by Congress “or otherwise,” which seems broad enough a term to encompass the judiciary or any other source of government authority.

Unchecked Power Degrades Into Tyranny
The Founders had a term for the idea of government actions being “subject to undoing” by other public institutions. As noted and explained in Federalist 51, they were called “checks and balances.” James Madison summarized the wisdom and need for these checks: “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”


all of the article here:
Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny

So Obama's Chief of Staff didn't actually admit they want Tyranny.

I love how the title goes "so and so admits..." and then in her OP the first word is .... "seems..."

It certainly simplified the thread in a hurry.

"Oh, you're just completely full of shit. Carry on."