Obama's FAKE Russian-Connection Story Unraveling...

[bripat9643]

The Kenyan's plot against Trump is slowly surfacing with all it's idiotic implications. Hussein is content to take the rest of the Rat Pack down for the rejection of his sleazy legacy. His fellow-travelers inside the MSM, intel community, Dept of State, Congress, and various agencies have undermined Trump before they can be replaced. And now we learn Sessions didn't initiate the meeting with the Russian diplomat, OBAMA DID. Both Claire McCaskill and Pelosi lied about meeting the same guy, who incidentally met with Barry 22 times, 4 times in the last year. Yet Trump keeps steaming along, taking apart the little prick's schemes piece by piece. In the end, it seems the Kenyan wasn't any better at plotting a coup than he was at anything else.

Now we begin to understand the purpose of the Democrat stalling on approving Trump's cabinet. They want to give the Obama fellow travelors enough time to do their dirty work before Trump's team can remove them or assign them where they can do no harm.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Update:

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/lt-col-tony-schaffer-insidious-obama-administration-targeted-trump/

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

You have none....

Just like the DNC hacking allegations.

 

[Snouter]

Obama and the Democrats engaged in SOVIET BEHAVIOR in wire tapping The Donald before he became President. They "projected" the fake news Russian Thing on The Donald when it was Obama and the Democrats engaged in SOVIET BEHAVIOR in wire tapping! Obama and the democrats involved need to be arrested and face trial.

 

[Care4all]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

They tried for a FISA warrant for ties to Russia....no deal. Then they succeeded in getting a FISA warrant for "banking ties to Russia" and got it. What they were really after was the first assertion hoping to pick up anything they could get on Trump...clearly illegal.

FISA and the Trump Team

Ty

But the opinion piece says nothing about there ever being a criminal investigation, yet the link op in the last sentence implies this FISA warrant was issued for criminal purpose, right after it explained that FISA warrants are not used for Criminal investigations? Quite confusing?

the article says that FISA's are used for investigating foreign espionage type things....

Regardless, what in the world does this have to do with Trump CLAIMING he and his staff were wire tapped, his phones were wire tapped in Trump Tower and obama ordered it?

Was THAT just another one of his lies? OF COURSE it was....

 

[Billy_Bob]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

FISA only requires reasonable suspicion. AKA; hearsay

No judge would give them a PC warrant as there was insufficient evidence to do so. SO they shopped for a few months and then decided to go with a hearsay warrant under FISA.

 

[Doc1]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

FISA only requires reasonable suspicion. AKA; hearsay

No judge would give them a PC warrant as there was insufficient evidence to do so. SO they shopped for a few months and then decided to go with a hearsay warrant under FISA.

Correct, to get a FISA authorization all that's needed is that the AG have a written request from the Prez. It starts at the top.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

FISA and the Trump Team

You're expecting her to read something? Do you have the illustrated comic book proof?

So, you're saying President Obama ordered Republican FBI Director Comey to order a federal FISA Court to issue a Trump wiretapping warrant? That is just too fucking hilarious!

Actually the DOJ (Loretta Lynch) requested the warrant as it was a foreign government involvement case.

 

[Lakhota]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

FISA and the Trump Team

You're expecting her to read something? Do you have the illustrated comic book proof?

So, you're saying President Obama ordered Republican FBI Director Comey to order a federal FISA Court to issue a Trump wiretapping warrant? That is just too fucking hilarious!

Actually the DOJ (Loretta Lynch) requested the warrant as it was a foreign government involvement case.

Link?

 

[Care4all]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

FISA only requires reasonable suspicion. AKA; hearsay

No judge would give them a PC warrant as there was insufficient evidence to do so. SO they shopped for a few months and then decided to go with a hearsay warrant under FISA.

But the first warrant request was a FISA warrant also, yet turned down because the Judge felt it was too broad, and 3 months later the FBI narrowed their warrant request, and it was approved is what I had read.... it was a FISA request both times, it was for foreign intelligence surveillance...from what I can tell there was never a Criminal warrant request?

 

[Billy_Bob]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

They tried for a FISA warrant for ties to Russia....no deal. Then they succeeded in getting a FISA warrant for "banking ties to Russia" and got it. What they were really after was the first assertion hoping to pick up anything they could get on Trump...clearly illegal.

FISA and the Trump Team

Ty

But the opinion piece says nothing about there ever being a criminal investigation, yet the link op in the last sentence implies this FISA warrant was issued for criminal purpose, right after it explained that FISA warrants are not used for Criminal investigations? Quite confusing?

the article says that FISA's are used for investigating foreign espionage type things....

Regardless, what in the world does this have to do with Trump CLAIMING he and his staff were wire tapped, his phones were wire tapped in Trump Tower and obama ordered it?

Was THAT just another one of his lies? OF COURSE it was....

I wonder what undocumented "evidence" they used? The other courts denied them a warrant as their "evidence" did not meet the probable cause demand and as I am told, they shopped three different courts who told them they did not meet the PC standard.

After being told no three times, they proceeded to use the hearsay level of warrant shopping under FISA. Or was it a demand from lynch, that they thought Trump was a foreign agent? That one would have only come from the white-house and Obama.

I would love to see that hearing and its transcripts released. ( I already know it was Lynch and by inference Obama, who demanded the warrant)

 

[Care4all]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

FISA only requires reasonable suspicion. AKA; hearsay

No judge would give them a PC warrant as there was insufficient evidence to do so. SO they shopped for a few months and then decided to go with a hearsay warrant under FISA.

Correct, to get a FISA authorization all that's needed is that the AG have a written request from the Prez. It starts at the top.

NOPE, I showed you where you were wrong on this by posting the law, the parts you left out in your post....what you are speaking about is a warrantless surveillance...

What you are speaking about is when no Americans or permanent Residents are involved, and Both Intelligence Select committees, the Senate and the HOuse, have to be a part of it.

ALSO, silly....the articles STATEs that a FISA WARRANT was requested through a Judge, and the Judge turned it down for being too broad, then the second time, when they narrowed the surveillance request, the JUDGE approved it.

A judge was involved both times....

so stop the bull crud about boama being able to order the surveillance without a warrant, is simply impossible....because Americans were likely involved or alien residents were involved.

 

[Doc1]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

FISA only requires reasonable suspicion. AKA; hearsay

No judge would give them a PC warrant as there was insufficient evidence to do so. SO they shopped for a few months and then decided to go with a hearsay warrant under FISA.

Correct, to get a FISA authorization all that's needed is that the AG have a written request from the Prez. It starts at the top.

NOPE, I showed you where you were wrong on this by posting the law, the parts you left out in your post....what you are speaking about is a warrantless surveillance...

What you are speaking about is when no Americans or permanent Residents are involved, and Both Intelligence Select committees, the Senate and the HOuse, have to be a part of it.

ALSO, silly....the articles STATEs that a FISA WARRANT was requested through a Judge, and the Judge turned it down for being too broad, then the second time, when they narrowed the surveillance request, the JUDGE approved it.

A judge was involved both times....

so stop the bull crud about boama being able to order the surveillance without a warrant, is simply impossible....because Americans were likely involved or alien residents were involved.

Nope, sorry. The Patriot Act relaxed the requirements, I'm sorry you don't understand what you are reading.

 

[Care4all]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

They tried for a FISA warrant for ties to Russia....no deal. Then they succeeded in getting a FISA warrant for "banking ties to Russia" and got it. What they were really after was the first assertion hoping to pick up anything they could get on Trump...clearly illegal.

FISA and the Trump Team

Ty

But the opinion piece says nothing about there ever being a criminal investigation, yet the link op in the last sentence implies this FISA warrant was issued for criminal purpose, right after it explained that FISA warrants are not used for Criminal investigations? Quite confusing?

the article says that FISA's are used for investigating foreign espionage type things....

Regardless, what in the world does this have to do with Trump CLAIMING he and his staff were wire tapped, his phones were wire tapped in Trump Tower and obama ordered it?

Was THAT just another one of his lies? OF COURSE it was....

View attachment 115488

I wonder what undocumented "evidence" they used? The other courts denied them a warrant as their "evidence" did not meet the probable cause demand and as I am told, they shopped three different courts who told them they did not meet the PC standard.

After being told no three times, they proceeded to use the hearsay level of warrant shopping under FISA. Or was it a demand from lynch, that they thought Trump was a foreign agent? That one would have only come from the white-house and Obama.

I would love to see that hearing and its transcripts released.

TY
The reason given for the first denial, was that the FBI's warrant request was TOO BROAD, their second request was narrowed, and then accepted.

There were ONLY two requests from what I have read.

And YES, MEEEE TOO, I would love to see the wording on both requests to compare, and also get an idea of what these surveillance requests were actually all about!?!?

 

[Billy_Bob]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

FISA only requires reasonable suspicion. AKA; hearsay

No judge would give them a PC warrant as there was insufficient evidence to do so. SO they shopped for a few months and then decided to go with a hearsay warrant under FISA.

Correct, to get a FISA authorization all that's needed is that the AG have a written request from the Prez. It starts at the top.

NOPE, I showed you where you were wrong on this by posting the law, the parts you left out in your post....what you are speaking about is a warrantless surveillance...

What you are speaking about is when no Americans or permanent Residents are involved, and Both Intelligence Select committees, the Senate and the HOuse, have to be a part of it.

ALSO, silly....the articles STATEs that a FISA WARRANT was requested through a Judge, and the Judge turned it down for being too broad, then the second time, when they narrowed the surveillance request, the JUDGE approved it.

A judge was involved both times....

so stop the bull crud about boama being able to order the surveillance without a warrant, is simply impossible....because Americans were likely involved or alien residents were involved.

Nope, sorry. The Patriot Act relaxed the requirements, I'm sorry you don't understand what you are reading.

Actually Obama used foreign nations intelligence services who spied on us here. Our sharing agreements allowed Obama to use this unrestricted by the patriot act. Obama used the back door to spy on specific people without warrants here in the US. This is just now coming fully into the light and its going to get a lot uglier before were done.

I would wager that Obama requested those foreign agencies do things for him to avoid our laws.

 

[Doc1]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

FISA only requires reasonable suspicion. AKA; hearsay

No judge would give them a PC warrant as there was insufficient evidence to do so. SO they shopped for a few months and then decided to go with a hearsay warrant under FISA.

Correct, to get a FISA authorization all that's needed is that the AG have a written request from the Prez. It starts at the top.

NOPE, I showed you where you were wrong on this by posting the law, the parts you left out in your post....what you are speaking about is a warrantless surveillance...

What you are speaking about is when no Americans or permanent Residents are involved, and Both Intelligence Select committees, the Senate and the HOuse, have to be a part of it.

ALSO, silly....the articles STATEs that a FISA WARRANT was requested through a Judge, and the Judge turned it down for being too broad, then the second time, when they narrowed the surveillance request, the JUDGE approved it.

A judge was involved both times....

so stop the bull crud about boama being able to order the surveillance without a warrant, is simply impossible....because Americans were likely involved or alien residents were involved.

Nope, sorry. The Patriot Act relaxed the requirements, I'm sorry you don't understand what you are reading.

Actually Obama used foreign nations intelligence services who spied on us here. Our sharing agreements allowed Obama to use this unrestricted by the patriot act. Obama used the back door to spy on specific people without warrants here in the US. This is just now coming fully into the light and its going to get a lot uglier before were done.

I don't if Obambi used FISA or not. I don't know if Trump is being honest or not, I do know how easy to use FISA is. I do know that no Warrant is needed for at least one year and all that is needed is for the President to give the AG a written request to present to the Court.

 

[Care4all]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

FISA only requires reasonable suspicion. AKA; hearsay

No judge would give them a PC warrant as there was insufficient evidence to do so. SO they shopped for a few months and then decided to go with a hearsay warrant under FISA.

Correct, to get a FISA authorization all that's needed is that the AG have a written request from the Prez. It starts at the top.

NOPE, I showed you where you were wrong on this by posting the law, the parts you left out in your post....what you are speaking about is a warrantless surveillance...

What you are speaking about is when no Americans or permanent Residents are involved, and Both Intelligence Select committees, the Senate and the HOuse, have to be a part of it.

ALSO, silly....the articles STATEs that a FISA WARRANT was requested through a Judge, and the Judge turned it down for being too broad, then the second time, when they narrowed the surveillance request, the JUDGE approved it.

A judge was involved both times....

so stop the bull crud about boama being able to order the surveillance without a warrant, is simply impossible....because Americans were likely involved or alien residents were involved.

Nope, sorry. The Patriot Act relaxed the requirements, I'm sorry you don't understand what you are reading.

To put it as politely as I can, you are full of it!

Here is the LAW, as it stands TODAY. Read it! And try your hardest to comprehend it....

1. U.S. Code › Title 50 › Chapter 36 › Subchapter I › § 1802

50 U.S. Code § 1802 - Electronic surveillance authorization without court order; certification by Attorney General; reports to Congressional committees; transmittal under seal;...of communication common carrier; applications; jurisdiction of court

prev | next
(a)
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—

(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at—
(i)
the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii)
the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;
(B)
there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and
(C)
the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.
(2)
An electronic surveillance authorized by this subsection may be conducted only in accordance with the Attorney General’s certification and the minimization procedures adopted by him. The Attorney General shall assess compliance with such procedures and shall report such assessments to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence under the provisions of section 1808(a) of this title.
section 1803(a) of this title a copy of his certification. Such certification shall be maintained under security measures established by the Chief Justice with the concurrence of the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, and shall remain sealed unless—
(A)
an application for a court order with respect to the surveillance is made under sections 1801(h)(4) and 1804 of this title; or
(B)
the certification is necessary to determine the legality of the surveillance under section 1806(f) of this title.
(4) With respect to electronic surveillance authorized by this subsection, the Attorney General may direct a specified communication common carrier to—
(A)
furnish all information, facilities, or technical assistance necessary to accomplish the electronic surveillance in such a manner as will protect its secrecy and produce a minimum of interference with the services that such carrier is providing its customers; and
(B)
maintain under security procedures approved by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence any records concerning the surveillance or the aid furnished which such carrier wishes to retain.
The Government shall compensate, at the prevailing rate, such carrier for furnishing such aid.
(b)
Applications for a court order under this subchapter are authorized if the President has, by written authorization, empowered the Attorney General to approve applications to the court having jurisdiction under section 1803 of this title, and a judge to whom an application is made may, notwithstanding any other law, grant an order, in conformity with section 1805 of this title, approving electronic surveillance of a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence information, except that the court shall not have jurisdiction to grant any order approving electronic surveillance directed solely as described in paragraph (1)(A) of subsection (a) unless such surveillance may involve the acquisition of communications of any United States person.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

if the FBI got a FISA warrant, for the Russians who ended up communicating with the Trump campaign members, then you can bet your bottom dollar, there was Probable Cause....a judge can not issue one without this probable cause, and during an election, the judge authorizing it would be super careful before approving one.

So if the liar n chief is not lying, and the FBI did get this warrant, then I'd like to know what the probable cause is....wouldn't you?

So Pres Trump, should declassify the warrant, and let us citizens know what it was all about!

Obama does not have to know or be updated about the alleged FBI Warrant...in fact, presidents are suppose to stay out of it, and do stay out of any investigations of the DOJ....

so, Trump can clear this all up, by declassifying these supposed warrants for his campaign team members...and we can see the probable cause part and eventually, maybe the conversations, or the senate intelligence committee can see them for their investigation?

Are these the same FISA courts that have been in place since 911 and have suposedly detaing millions of innocent muslims everywhere. Isn't that a secret court?

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Do you know what is funny about the wiretapping? Obama didn't find anything because if he did he would have made sure that it would be on MSNBC somewhere. This just means that there is no Russian connection.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

President Trump Accuses Obama Of 'Wire Tapping,' Provides No Evidence

Lewis, Obama's spokesman, rejected the allegation that the former president was involved in surveillance:

"A cardinal rule of the Obama Administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice. As part of that practice, neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false."​

Trump did not produce evidence to support his assertions, nor did he cite the source of his information — though on Weekend Edition Saturday, NPR's Ron Elving notes the fact that Trump says he "just found out":

"It appears perhaps to be a response to a narrative in Breitbart.com, the right-wing website that was previously published by Steve Bannon, the president's senior adviser.

"There, you will find a narrative about how the Obama administration was so intent on thwarting Donald Trump last fall that they had much of the intelligence community doing everything it could to gather skullduggery and information about Donald Trump.

"And that would have included, according to Donald Trump, wiretapping his phones. But there does not seem to be any direct evidence of that."

"That is an extraordinary thing to hear from a sitting president about his predecessor," NPR's Mary Louise Kelly notes on Weekend Edition Saturday. For our Newscast unit, Mary Louise adds: "Tapping his phones would require a warrant from the foreign intelligence surveillance court."

She also says the director of national intelligence is declining comment.

The FBI has opened an investigation into allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 election to boost Trump's campaign. Congressional intelligence committees are currently reviewing documents related to possible links between Russian officials and the campaign, as well as recent leaks of classified information.

Shortly after his final tweet about Obama, which says "this is Nixon/Watergate," Trump turned his attention to other matters, berating Arnold Schwarzenegger, his successor on Celebrity Apprentice. Schwarzenegger announced Friday he was leaving the show, blaming the show's recent poor ratings on Trump.​

So evidence is a thing now? The dems have been blowing smoke up our asses since Nov 9th with no evidence of anything and that was fine for the left. Now though you have to have concrete evidence to even claim anything happens with a dem.

There's been plenty of evidence offered for the Russian hacking. There is zero evidence offered for this.

When? What was it and where is it? I've been watching the libs go a-hole crazy over this russian thing with nothing. There's no evidence. There's not even a hint of wrong doing. There's...nothing. Yet you insist there is so let's see it.