Obfuscation and Deflection mode [ON]

[Remodeling Maidiac]

A total shitstorm is goin on with this administration and all we get from the posters on the left here is........

Bush's man is running the IRS (this AFTER they denied that there was a problem to begin with) But as soon as they found a republican scapegoat to blame it on they admitted it was a problem.

Republicans made Obama change the Benghazi talking points out of fear of news coverage.

Republicans cut consulate funding (despite testimony that it had 0 impact)

Republicans cheered for green loan failures (either way the end results are all that mattered)

Fast n Furious was a Bush program even though it wasn't (but they knew the public didn't know the facts)

ETC...

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Noticing a trend here yet lefties? Its either gop nonsense or actual issues but only the sole fault of the gop.

Just like the latest IRS issue. At first most of you denied it. Then when documents surfaced you tried to excuse it. Then when a republican was determined to be in charge you went from it being made up to hang the republican in charge.

 

[Freemason9]

Quite honestly, GMU, I still don't understand exactly what the Republican allegations amount to. It is utterly ridiculous to believe that President Obama was micromanaging the security of a remote outpost in Benghazi at the time. It was impossible to predict the event. You cannot send "air support" into such a place in a foreign country, in a populated area.

Your faction seemed fixated on rhetoric, but that's a stupid focus. Why should anyone give a shit about how often the much-abused tag "terrorist" is used? You guys are only wanting another big enemy to blame so that you can spend more trillions on aimless wars.

 

[Claudette]

Sorry to disagree but they had months worth or warnings and the State Department didn't beef up security or close the embassy. The Brits and the Red Cross closed down the're operations because of those same warnings.

Once the attack came they trotted out Rice to blame it on a video knowing full well that it was AQ, via the CIA.

Four very good men died because State did nothing.

Thats what I'm fixated on. That and the fact that they lied about it from the get go.

If Bush had been POTUS every lefty on this board would be screaming about lying, cover ups and did he watch in real time as they died. Since its Barry, they could give shit one.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Quite honestly, GMU, I still don't understand exactly what the Republican allegations amount to. It is utterly ridiculous to believe that President Obama was micromanaging the security of a remote outpost in Benghazi at the time. It was impossible to predict the event. You cannot send "air support" into such a place in a foreign country, in a populated area.

Your faction seemed fixated on rhetoric, but that's a stupid focus. Why should anyone give a shit about how often the much-abused tag "terrorist" is used? You guys are only wanting another big enemy to blame so that you can spend more trillions on aimless wars.

Hillary was responsible imo. It is her job to assign protection at our embassies. Obama imo is responsible for the mucked up response both here at home after the fact and during the attack. Even a simple low fly over by a couple jets could have stalled or even prevented the final attack. Then to lie to us about why it happened is just sad and a slap in the face of those that died and their families.

 

[Caroljo]

Sorry to disagree but they had months worth or warnings and the State Department didn't beef up security or close the embassy. The Brits and the Red Cross closed down the're operations because of those same warnings.

Once the attack came they trotted out Rice to blame it on a video knowing full well that it was AQ, via the CIA.

Four very good men died because State did nothing.

Thats what I'm fixated on. That and the fact that they lied about it from the get go.

If Bush had been POTUS every lefty on this board would be screaming about lying, cover ups and did he watch in real time as they died. Since its Barry, they could give shit one.

If Bush had been POTUS they would have had the security they needed and none of this would have happened.

 

[Freemason9]

Sorry to disagree but they had months worth or warnings and the State Department didn't beef up security or close the embassy. The Brits and the Red Cross closed down the're operations because of those same warnings.

Once the attack came they trotted out Rice to blame it on a video knowing full well that it was AQ, via the CIA.

Four very good men died because State did nothing.

Thats what I'm fixated on. That and the fact that they lied about it from the get go.

If Bush had been POTUS every lefty on this board would be screaming about lying, cover ups and did he watch in real time as they died. Since its Barry, they could give shit one.

If Bush had been POTUS they would have had the security they needed and none of this would have happened.

At a cost of around $3 trillion, of course.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Noticing a trend here yet lefties? Its either gop nonsense or actual issues but only the sole fault of the gop.

Just like the latest IRS issue. At first most of you denied it. Then when documents surfaced you tried to excuse it. Then when a republican was determined to be in charge you went from it being made up to hang the republican in charge.

The left is acting like a team pushing bs no matter what and blaming the gop. They can't think critically about anything.

Facts just simply don't matter. Scary times we live in.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Quite honestly, GMU, I still don't understand exactly what the Republican allegations amount to. It is utterly ridiculous to believe that President Obama was micromanaging the security of a remote outpost in Benghazi at the time. It was impossible to predict the event. You cannot send "air support" into such a place in a foreign country, in a populated area.

Your faction seemed fixated on rhetoric, but that's a stupid focus. Why should anyone give a shit about how often the much-abused tag "terrorist" is used? You guys are only wanting another big enemy to blame so that you can spend more trillions on aimless wars.

Hillary was responsible imo. It is her job to assign protection at our embassies. Obama imo is responsible for the mucked up response both here at home after the fact and during the attack. Even a simple low fly over by a couple jets could have stalled or even prevented the final attack. Then to lie to us about why it happened is just sad and a slap in the face of those that died and their families.

It doesn't matter if Obama told our troops to stand do to the left. As they simply believe that we shouldn't be within the middle east and Obama can do no wrong.

I'll agree with the first part as of this moment I want us the fuck out of the middle east. I think we should close down all of our embassies. No use in risking anymore life as we can't defend them.

 

[Freemason9]

Quite honestly, GMU, I still don't understand exactly what the Republican allegations amount to. It is utterly ridiculous to believe that President Obama was micromanaging the security of a remote outpost in Benghazi at the time. It was impossible to predict the event. You cannot send "air support" into such a place in a foreign country, in a populated area.

Your faction seemed fixated on rhetoric, but that's a stupid focus. Why should anyone give a shit about how often the much-abused tag "terrorist" is used? You guys are only wanting another big enemy to blame so that you can spend more trillions on aimless wars.

Hillary was responsible imo. It is her job to assign protection at our embassies. Obama imo is responsible for the mucked up response both here at home after the fact and during the attack. Even a simple low fly over by a couple jets could have stalled or even prevented the final attack. Then to lie to us about why it happened is just sad and a slap in the face of those that died and their families.

You know as well as I do that practically EVERY U.S. embassy or diplomatic property in the world is in some form of vague or more defined danger from a "terrorist" attack, since the U.S. decided to bomb the shit out of foreign countries to wage war on "terrorists."

It's sort of inevitable. You can't guard the shit out of every fucking building (we have limited spending, you know), and the ones left least guarded are the most targetted. Get it? It's actually inevitable.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Quite honestly, GMU, I still don't understand exactly what the Republican allegations amount to. It is utterly ridiculous to believe that President Obama was micromanaging the security of a remote outpost in Benghazi at the time. It was impossible to predict the event. You cannot send "air support" into such a place in a foreign country, in a populated area.

Your faction seemed fixated on rhetoric, but that's a stupid focus. Why should anyone give a shit about how often the much-abused tag "terrorist" is used? You guys are only wanting another big enemy to blame so that you can spend more trillions on aimless wars.

Hillary was responsible imo. It is her job to assign protection at our embassies. Obama imo is responsible for the mucked up response both here at home after the fact and during the attack. Even a simple low fly over by a couple jets could have stalled or even prevented the final attack. Then to lie to us about why it happened is just sad and a slap in the face of those that died and their families.

You know as well as I do that practically EVERY U.S. embassy or diplomatic property in the world is in some form of vague or more defined danger from a "terrorist" attack, since the U.S. decided to bomb the shit out of foreign countries to wage war on "terrorists."

It's sort of inevitable. You can't guard the shit out of every fucking building (we have limited spending, you know), and the ones left least guarded are the most targetted. Get it? It's actually inevitable.

We should OBVIOUSLY be guarding the "shit out of" an embassy that resides in the country we just finished bombing just prior to the anniversary of 9-11.

common sense

 

[velvtacheeze]

Hillary was responsible imo. It is her job to assign protection at our embassies. Obama imo is responsible for the mucked up response both here at home after the fact and during the attack. Even a simple low fly over by a couple jets could have stalled or even prevented the final attack. Then to lie to us about why it happened is just sad and a slap in the face of those that died and their families.

You know as well as I do that practically EVERY U.S. embassy or diplomatic property in the world is in some form of vague or more defined danger from a "terrorist" attack, since the U.S. decided to bomb the shit out of foreign countries to wage war on "terrorists."

It's sort of inevitable. You can't guard the shit out of every fucking building (we have limited spending, you know), and the ones left least guarded are the most targetted. Get it? It's actually inevitable.

We should OBVIOUSLY be guarding the "shit out of" an embassy that resides in the country we just finished bombing just prior to the anniversary of 9-11.

common sense

Well then demand Congressional hearings for all the attacks that happened during the Bushtarded Era. Common Sense.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

You know as well as I do that practically EVERY U.S. embassy or diplomatic property in the world is in some form of vague or more defined danger from a "terrorist" attack, since the U.S. decided to bomb the shit out of foreign countries to wage war on "terrorists."

It's sort of inevitable. You can't guard the shit out of every fucking building (we have limited spending, you know), and the ones left least guarded are the most targetted. Get it? It's actually inevitable.

We should OBVIOUSLY be guarding the "shit out of" an embassy that resides in the country we just finished bombing just prior to the anniversary of 9-11.

common sense

Well then demand Congressional hearings for all the attacks that happened during the Bushtarded Era. Common Sense.

For what purpose? Nanananabooboo?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Quite honestly, GMU, I still don't understand exactly what the Republican allegations amount to. It is utterly ridiculous to believe that President Obama was micromanaging the security of a remote outpost in Benghazi at the time. It was impossible to predict the event. You cannot send "air support" into such a place in a foreign country, in a populated area.

The issue isn't that he micromanaged the situation. It's that he's been lying about it.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

At a cost of around $3 trillion, of course.

I'm certain it costs nowhere near $3 trillion to beef up security at one overseas embassy, but hey, flame away.

 

[NYcarbineer]

A total shitstorm is goin on with this administration and all we get from the posters on the left here is........

Bush's man is running the IRS (this AFTER they denied that there was a problem to begin with) But as soon as they found a republican scapegoat to blame it on they admitted it was a problem.

Republicans made Obama change the Benghazi talking points out of fear of news coverage.

Republicans cut consulate funding (despite testimony that it had 0 impact)

Republicans cheered for green loan failures (either way the end results are all that mattered)

Fast n Furious was a Bush program even though it wasn't (but they knew the public didn't know the facts)

ETC...

Who said there was no problem with the IRS after the IRS story broke until they found out the IRS was run by a Bush appointee?

Can you give us a short list of those people? With proof?

 

[ba1614]

Hannity said it best when he said "Obama could get caught robbing a bank and his supporters would make a case that it's all right because he was going to give it to the poor".

lol sadly he's right.

 

[francoHFW]

No lies, no coverup, just total Pubcrappe, for dupes only.

 

[RoadVirus]

No lies, no coverup, just total Pubcrappe, for dupes only.

Just keep telling yourself that. It'll help you get through the rest of Obama's term.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

A total shitstorm is goin on with this administration and all we get from the posters on the left here is........

Bush's man is running the IRS (this AFTER they denied that there was a problem to begin with) But as soon as they found a republican scapegoat to blame it on they admitted it was a problem.

Republicans made Obama change the Benghazi talking points out of fear of news coverage.

Republicans cut consulate funding (despite testimony that it had 0 impact)

Republicans cheered for green loan failures (either way the end results are all that mattered)

Fast n Furious was a Bush program even though it wasn't (but they knew the public didn't know the facts)

ETC...

Who said there was no problem with the IRS after the IRS story broke until they found out the IRS was run by a Bush appointee?

Can you give us a short list of those people? With proof?

I'm not going to dig through the last 2 days of posts. I've read them. If you choose to ignore them that is your choice.