Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 67,955
- 49,305
- 3,565
You should at least make yourself knowledgable before commentingSome yardbird he dressed down for having his uniform on wrong, no doubt.
Both men held the same rank as Walz
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You should at least make yourself knowledgable before commentingSome yardbird he dressed down for having his uniform on wrong, no doubt.
No, sorryA CSM doesn't see actual combat. He's part of the command structure. He's not a grunt. Her son would have been dead whether Walz was there or not.
Gotta link btw?
He wasn't ANYTHING. He was retired. Someone else was "Top Kick".He was Top Kick
They were his soldiers
No he retired 2 months before his NOTICE OF DEPLOYMENT. His unit was deployed almost a year AFTER his retirement.Wrong
He retired two months before deployment and according to sources 2 years before his enlistment was up
The accusation by his peers in the unit is that Walz retired before his enlistment was up to avoid deploying to IraqHe wasn't ANYTHING. He was retired. Someone else was "Top Kick".
Again. When a person retires from a unit he no longer has a position within that unit.
It's funny how you keep on trying to pretend that retiring means that you keep being on active duty.
Of course they said it
You dont have to agree, but they were there and you werent
And he probably had to give notice of his retirement six months before that.No he retired 2 months before his NOTICE OF DEPLOYMENT. His unit was deployed almost a year AFTER his retirement.
Again, please provide a link.You should at least make yourself knowledgable before commenting
Both men held the same rank as Walz
The official notice does not fall out of the blueNo he retired 2 months before his NOTICE OF DEPLOYMENT. His unit was deployed almost a year AFTER his retirement.
Yes that's the accusation. An accusation that doesn't make any sense considering the notice of deployment came AFTER he put in his retirement papers.The accusation by his peers in the unit is that Walz retired before his enlistment was up to avoid deploying to Iraq
Again, link.The official notice does not fall out of the blue
According to his fellow soldiers the top echelon of the unit which he was a part of knew it was coming
Again, please provide a link.
Then prove they were in the same battalion.
You can say that, but it's just not true.
He retired two years before his unit went to Iraq.
He retired in May, his unit did not leave for Iraq till March of the following year.
Just about everyone retires before their final contract is up. I had two years left on mine when I retired, this is the norm.
Do you actually read this shit? .![]()
Paid letter: The Truth About Tim Walz
Tim Walz has embellished and selectively omitted facts and circumstances of his military career for years.www.wctrib.com
Guys that high up the chain of command are privy to quality scuttlebutt.Hmm, that's interesting. Thank you for providing that bit of insight.
From my understanding it was a few months between when he retired and before his unit was actually deployed. People acting like he was told he'd be deploying and then he up and quit that moment.
No, CSM is a position and a rank.The very definition of stolen valor: "I'm a retired Command Sergeant Major", which he knew to be a lie.
Scuttlebutt isn't the same as orders. I can't tell you how much scuttlebutt I heard that turned out not to be true.Guys that high up the chain of command are privy to quality scuttlebutt.
I'd lay even money he knew the unit would be deployed.
Walz is a stolen valor liar...The evidence is falling on you.No, CSM is a position and a rank.
He held the position of CSM.
He retired as a Master Sergeant.
99% of enlistees never achieve either rank.
DUUUUH!Scuttlebutt isn't the same as orders. I can't tell you how much scuttlebutt I heard that turned out not to be true.