Derideo_Te
Je Suis Charlie
- Mar 2, 2013
- 20,461
- 7,961
- 360
Why don't you all stop dancing around this issue and answer the following question (YES OR NO):
Do you think 3rd trimester abortions should be legal where only the mother's "emotional health" is at risk?
Define "emotional health".
Bear in mind that there have been instances of women who have murdered their own children because of their state of "emotional health". Granted this is the extreme and these are anecdotal but they illustrate the point as to who has the qualifications to make that judgment call?
Should it be a bunch of all male legislators who make a blanket one-size-fits-all decision that "emotional health" is not sufficient "justification" and by doing so ultimately condemn innocent children to be raised by mentally unstable mothers who will inflict both physical and emotional harm on the children they are forced to bear and raise?
Or should it be decided on a case by case basis by a qualified medical professional in consultation with the individual woman concerned?