horselightning
Diamond Member
- Jul 14, 2013
- 13,160
- 7,284
- 1,928
No Longer Available
![www.wgal.com](https://kubrick.htvapps.com/htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/htv_default_image/wgal/favicon.png?resize=16:16)
Guess that means nothing will happen form opening of the case. I do not think these people running ferguson k ow what they are doing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
It means they also cannot say with any confidence that what he did is not murder or manslaughter.But Wilson is not exonerated? What the fuck does that mean?
Wait a minute, Bell said:
“The question for this office was a simple one: Could we prove beyond a reasonable doubt that when Darren Wilson shot Micheal Brown he committed murder or manslaughter under Missouri law? After an independent and in-depth review of the evidence, we cannot prove that he did,” Bell said.
Then he goes on to say:
"But", he said, “our investigation does not exonerate Darren Wilson.”
He's not charging Wilson with a crime and so won't go to trial and in turn Wilson will not be convicted. But Wilson is not exonerated? What the fuck does that mean? Is this his way of passing judgment on Wilson and implying he is guilty nevertheless?
It means they also cannot say with any confidence that what he did is not murder or manslaughter.But Wilson is not exonerated? What the fuck does that mean?
NO NO NO, according to the left anyone they dislike MUST be guilty. No trial no Facts NO evidence is needed.It means they also cannot say with any confidence that what he did is not murder or manslaughter.But Wilson is not exonerated? What the fuck does that mean?
That's not how it works. You are innocent until proven guilty. Unless there is some obscure proviso I don't know about, since there will be no charges and thus no trial, in the eyes of the law, Wilson is innocent.
Technically "not guilty," but he is innocent among people not driven by "racial justice"It means they also cannot say with any confidence that what he did is not murder or manslaughter.But Wilson is not exonerated? What the fuck does that mean?
That's not how it works. You are innocent until proven guilty. Unless there is some obscure proviso I don't know about, since there will be no charges and thus no trial, in the eyes of the law, Wilson is innocent.
Technically "not guilty," but he is innocent among people not driven by "racial justice"It means they also cannot say with any confidence that what he did is not murder or manslaughter.But Wilson is not exonerated? What the fuck does that mean?
That's not how it works. You are innocent until proven guilty. Unless there is some obscure proviso I don't know about, since there will be no charges and thus no trial, in the eyes of the law, Wilson is innocent.
It means they are cowardly scum afraid of the black lawless mob who they bend over for.Wait a minute, Bell said:
“The question for this office was a simple one: Could we prove beyond a reasonable doubt that when Darren Wilson shot Micheal Brown he committed murder or manslaughter under Missouri law? After an independent and in-depth review of the evidence, we cannot prove that he did,” Bell said.
Then he goes on to say:
"But", he said, “our investigation does not exonerate Darren Wilson.”
He's not charging Wilson with a crime and so won't go to trial and in turn Wilson will not be convicted. But Wilson is not exonerated? What the fuck does that mean? Is this his way of passing judgment on Wilson and implying he is guilty nevertheless?
That means "innocent", for the record.It means they also cannot say with any confidence that what he did is not murder or manslaughter.But Wilson is not exonerated? What the fuck does that mean?