OFFICIAL: Kavanaugh Hearings Thread

[keepitreal]

Over the last year or so, we have seen allegations against men on both sides of the isle, and across every industry. In all instances the men did a litany of denial's, including Trump, and in all cases the women ended up being the truth tellers, and the men were found to be lying.

This insured that Brett Kavanaugh would be swimming upstream against a river of suspicion. Dr. Ford's testimony was infallable, and Brett Kavanaugh continued to deny.

Republicans are in a corner on this issue. The Republican party already has a serious issue with women voters. 7 in 10 women view Trump unfavorably, and the party itself doesn't hold up much better. Why Republicans didn't choose a woman SCOTUS nominee to get themselves out of the mud with women, exemplifies an astounding lack of foresight.. But this party has a long history of misogyny, and old habits & ideology--lead by old white men- are difficult to correct.
Seven in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

This is the second annual women's march in Washington D.C, January 20, 2018.

More Than 4,000 Women Say They Want to Run for Office Since Trump's Election

It's unfortunate that it took 2 women cornering Jeff Flake in an elevator today, to get him to change his mind and demand an FBI investigation into these allegations prior to confirming. This is what Dr. Ford wanted all along (prior to testifying.) Which leads one to think that she believes there is something that the FBI is going to find on Brett Kavanaugh.
Christine Blasey Ford Wants F.B.I. to Investigate Kavanaugh Before She Testifies

Surprisingly even a FOX NEWS poll suggests support of Kavanuagh is down, especially among women.
Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination

If Republicans had just confirmed Kavanaugh without an investigation, that would have been, most certainly, the final nail in their coffin with women in this country.

Women are the largest voting block in this country today. They are the power house in the voting booth.

A sleeping giant has awoken!

1st Womans March, Washington D.C. January 20, 2017--the day after Trump was inaugurated. Click thsi link and scroll through the many pages of pictures (start on page 20) & you will probably find your home state here.
Woman's march pictures

yes, you have sacrificed due process on the alter of abortion that was never even threatened.

As a woman, thank you for lending legitimate credence to the argument that women are too emotional to be allowed to vote...

The U.S Supreme court made a decision on Roe v Wader 45 years ago. It was a right leaning court that gave us Roe v Wade and it's been considered a right leaning court ever since.

I know that Republican GOP candidates like to play paddy feet with abortion activists. In fact one of Trump's and others campaign promises in 2016 was to appoint U.S. Supreme court justices so you could rid the constituion of Roe v Wade once and for all.

What you don't know, is that both Niel Gorsuch and Brett Kavanuagh have already run the Democrat gaunlet under G.W.Bush. In 2006 Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and while they denied a lot of G.W;s nominee's they confirmed both Gorsuch and Kavanaugh to Federal District appeals courts.

What you don't know, is that during confirmation hearings, Niel Gorsuch is the first nominee in my memory that stated Roe v Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone to you.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

In fact here are the Democrats that voted to confirm both Niel Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh in 2006.

The only reason Democrats tried to block Gorsuch, is simply because they were angry that Republicans didn't give Obama's last nominee (Merrick Garland) an up or down vote.

You're campaigning on abortion actually was the reason that Mitt Romney lost in 2012.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump
Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

The U.S. Supreme court has decided that you have no right to interfere into the personal, very private decisions that women and their families make. Roe v Wade is a U.S. Supreme court decision that is here to stay, and it never belonged on a political platform. By continually campaigning and talking about it, you are insulting the intelligence & integrity of the largest voting block in this country--WOMEN.

So why are you worried?

You arent worried a sexual predator and functioning alcoholic might become a SC justice? Let me guess. Youre a repub?

You arent worried a sexual predator and functioning alcoholic might become a SC justice? Let me guess. Youre a repub?

Sexual predator... functioning alcoholic

Guesswork not necessary... You're a racist and an idiot

 

[keepitreal]

Why now?

And not during the last 30 years?

That is the question.

Because in sexual assault cases it often works like that. Look at it from the victims side. Someone assaults you when you are 15. You don't report him, like so many people don't. 30 Years later you see the president putting this guy on the shortlist for the Supreme Court as being particularly high qualified. I can imaging a now middle aged women being wronged in such a way being sufficiently angered by that development to speak up.

15 years ago he was...
assistant to the President (Bush)
White House Staff Secretary
and, nominated for the United States Court of Appeals.

His nomination was stalled in the Senate,
for nearly 3 fucking years

HE WAS THE PRINCIPAL AUTHOR OF THE STARR REPORT

HE WAS A KEY PLAYER DURING IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST BILL CLINTON FOR HIS SEXUAL LIAISONS
WITH A WHITE HOUSE INTERN AND LYING ABOUT IT...

IF THERE WERE EVER A TIME TO SPEAK UP.....
IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THEN!

Please remove head from ass...please and thank you!

 

[forkup]

Why now?

And not during the last 30 years?

That is the question.

Because in sexual assault cases it often works like that. Look at it from the victims side. Someone assaults you when you are 15. You don't report him, like so many people don't. 30 Years later you see the president putting this guy on the shortlist for the Supreme Court as being particularly high qualified. I can imaging a now middle aged women being wronged in such a way being sufficiently angered by that development to speak up.

15 years ago he was...
assistant to the President (Bush)
White House Staff Secretary
and, nominated for the United States Court of Appeals.

His nomination was stalled in the Senate,
for nearly 3 fucking years

HE WAS THE PRINCIPAL AUTHOR OF THE STARR REPORT

HE WAS A KEY PLAYER DURING IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST BILL CLINTON FOR HIS SEXUAL LIAISONS
WITH A WHITE HOUSE INTERN AND LYING ABOUT IT...

IF THERE WERE EVER A TIME TO SPEAK UP.....
IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THEN!

Please remove head from ass...please and thank you!

Lol please give me the name of 3 prosecutors in the Mueller probe, without looking it up on google? I can't. Name 4 people on the United States court of appeals without looking it up? Give me the name of the Deputy assistant press secretary in the Trump administration? Now give me the name of the people on the Supreme court? In terms of exposure and job importance the Supreme Court blows these other positions out of the water . Not only that but discounting that rage can and does usually builds up and it's hard to predict what is the straw that breaks the camels back for anyone seems a bit weird.

 

[Bush92]

Senate Democrats employed numbers 11 and 13 on Kavanaugh and GOP.
Saul Alinsky's 13 Tried-and-True Rules for Creating Meaningful Social Change | Open Culture

 

[keepitreal]

And it validates what? First both sides have done plenty of shit they shouldn't. If your honest about it, the reason the GOP is in such a hurry is that if they hold the nomination until after the midterms and they lose the senate they are afraid the Dems will play the same dirty politics they played with Garland. Secondly you still haven't established to me that objecting to someone who is credibly accused of sexual assault is unfair to begin with.

How does the word "credibly" get into this ?

Well, not even Kavanaugh himself during his testimony dared to suggest Ford was not credible. Not one GOP member suggested she was not credible. The words used were compelling and credible if I'm not mistaken. Credible is another word for believable. Doesn't mean it's true, but simply believable.

Well, not even Kavanaugh himself during his testimony dared to suggest Ford was not credible.

Denying her allegations wasn't stating as much?

I'm curious as to why her and her husband,
are in couples counseling....

You'd be amazed at the lengths,
women will go to, to keep a man

 

[shockedcanadian]

If and when Trump loses this Supreme Court, and assume he loses in the Mid-Terms, what is Trumps play in 2019?

 

[Bush92]

And it validates what? First both sides have done plenty of shit they shouldn't. If your honest about it, the reason the GOP is in such a hurry is that if they hold the nomination until after the midterms and they lose the senate they are afraid the Dems will play the same dirty politics they played with Garland. Secondly you still haven't established to me that objecting to someone who is credibly accused of sexual assault is unfair to begin with.

How does the word "credibly" get into this ?

Well, not even Kavanaugh himself during his testimony dared to suggest Ford was not credible. Not one GOP member suggested she was not credible. The words used were compelling and credible if I'm not mistaken. Credible is another word for believable. Doesn't mean it's true, but simply believable.

Well, not even Kavanaugh himself during his testimony dared to suggest Ford was not credible.

Denying her allegations wasn't stating as much?

I'm curious as to why her and her husband,
are in couples counseling....

You'd be amazed at the lengths,
women will go to, to keep a man

This memory came out of a psychotherapy session after lying dormant for 30 years. Her husband, her lawyers, and herself will make millions of $$$ off book deals, interviews, and Hollywood movie rights.

 

[Bush92]

If and when Trump loses this Supreme Court, and assume he loses in the Mid-Terms, what is Trumps play in 2019?

Kavanaugh will be confirmed...Republicans will certainly maintain control of the Senate and probably a razor thin majority in the House. He runs for re-election against Democratic nominee Kamala Harris.

 

[shockedcanadian]

If and when Trump loses this Supreme Court, and assume he loses in the Mid-Terms, what is Trumps play in 2019?

Kavanaugh will be confirmed...Republicans will certainly maintain control of the Senate and probably a razor thin majority in the House. He runs for re-election against Democratic nominee Kamala Harris.

Wow, you are far more confident than I am. I follow you guys closely but I admit I'm not "on the ground". Does is a bias you have because of your circle of friends, or an honest, objective view?

If they can maintain control of the Senate and the House, and replace some RINO's with legitimate Trump supporters, I wouldn't be nearly as worried as I am now.

I trust that the FBI will clear this guy, I have no doubt whatsoever the Dems will try any and every trick to get this nomination thrown out and after the Mid-Terms.

 

[beagle9]

needed some humor in here.

Good idea

View attachment 219184

Use to be strangers, now it's girls... LOL. Unbelievable.

 

[Bush92]

If and when Trump loses this Supreme Court, and assume he loses in the Mid-Terms, what is Trumps play in 2019?

Kavanaugh will be confirmed...Republicans will certainly maintain control of the Senate and probably a razor thin majority in the House. He runs for re-election against Democratic nominee Kamala Harris.

Wow, you are far more confident than I am. I follow you guys closely but I admit I'm not "on the ground". Does is a bias you have because of your circle of friends, or an honest, objective view?

If they can maintain control of the Senate and the House, and replace some RINO's with legitimate Trump supporters, I wouldn't be nearly as worried as I am now.

I trust that the FBI will clear this guy, I have no doubt whatsoever the Dems will try any and every trick to get this nomination thrown out and after the Mid-Terms.

I am a former Democrat and worked with or managed campaigns for Democrats. My checks came from state Democratic Party or the campaign. There is no Democratic Party anymore. It has been taken over and radicalized by socialist. So now I vote Republican like millions of others who left the party. I left Democrats behind about 20 years ago. Complete separation about 12 years ago. I was a Blue Dog Democrat. We are no more. Now the DNC makes me sick. BTW...I always liked GH Bush.

 

[beagle9]

Over the last year or so, we have seen allegations against men on both sides of the isle, and across every industry. In all instances the men did a litany of denial's, including Trump, and in all cases the women ended up being the truth tellers, and the men were found to be lying.

This insured that Brett Kavanaugh would be swimming upstream against a river of suspicion. Dr. Ford's testimony was infallable, and Brett Kavanaugh continued to deny.

Republicans are in a corner on this issue. The Republican party already has a serious issue with women voters. 7 in 10 women view Trump unfavorably, and the party itself doesn't hold up much better. Why Republicans didn't choose a woman SCOTUS nominee to get themselves out of the mud with women, exemplifies an astounding lack of foresight.. But this party has a long history of misogyny, and old habits & ideology--lead by old white men- are difficult to correct.
Seven in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

This is the second annual women's march in Washington D.C, January 20, 2018.

More Than 4,000 Women Say They Want to Run for Office Since Trump's Election

It's unfortunate that it took 2 women cornering Jeff Flake in an elevator today, to get him to change his mind and demand an FBI investigation into these allegations prior to confirming. This is what Dr. Ford wanted all along (prior to testifying.) Which leads one to think that she believes there is something that the FBI is going to find on Brett Kavanaugh.
Christine Blasey Ford Wants F.B.I. to Investigate Kavanaugh Before She Testifies

Surprisingly even a FOX NEWS poll suggests support of Kavanuagh is down, especially among women.
Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination

If Republicans had just confirmed Kavanaugh without an investigation, that would have been, most certainly, the final nail in their coffin with women in this country.

Women are the largest voting block in this country today. They are the power house in the voting booth.

A sleeping giant has awoken!

1st Womans March, Washington D.C. January 20, 2017--the day after Trump was inaugurated. Click thsi link and scroll through the many pages of pictures (start on page 20) & you will probably find your home state here.
Woman's march pictures

yes, you have sacrificed due process on the alter of abortion that was never even threatened.

As a woman, thank you for lending legitimate credence to the argument that women are too emotional to be allowed to vote...

The U.S Supreme court made a decision on Roe v Wader 45 years ago. It was a right leaning court that gave us Roe v Wade and it's been considered a right leaning court ever since.

I know that Republican GOP candidates like to play paddy feet with abortion activists. In fact one of Trump's and others campaign promises in 2016 was to appoint U.S. Supreme court justices so you could rid the constituion of Roe v Wade once and for all.

What you don't know, is that both Niel Gorsuch and Brett Kavanuagh have already run the Democrat gaunlet under G.W.Bush. In 2006 Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and while they denied a lot of G.W;s nominee's they confirmed both Gorsuch and Kavanaugh to Federal District appeals courts.

What you don't know, is that during confirmation hearings, Niel Gorsuch is the first nominee in my memory that stated Roe v Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone to you.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

In fact here are the Democrats that voted to confirm both Niel Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh in 2006.

The only reason Democrats tried to block Gorsuch, is simply because they were angry that Republicans didn't give Obama's last nominee (Merrick Garland) an up or down vote.

You're campaigning on abortion, who's not going to pay for birth control, and legitimate rape questions was actually the reason that Mitt Romney lost in 2012.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump
Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

The U.S. Supreme court has decided that you have no right to interfere into the personal, very private decisions that women and their families make. Roe v Wade is a U.S. Supreme court decision that is here to stay, and it never belonged anywhere on a political platform.

By continually campaigning and talking about abortion, you are insulting the intelligence & integrity while alienating the largest voting block in this country--WOMEN.

So you are saying that all this bullcrap that has taken place against Kavanaugh is a get back, a sham, a ruse ????? I mean reading your post here suggest that the demon-crats are in meltdown down mode still, and they will do anything and everything to get out of the traps they have put themselves in over time now. Its so wonder that Lindsey Graham went Stark raving mad at what he was seeing go on in it all.

 

[EverCurious]

Over the last year or so, we have seen allegations against men on both sides of the isle, and across every industry. In all instances the men did a litany of denial's, including Trump, and in all cases the women ended up being the truth tellers, and the men were found to be lying.

This insured that Brett Kavanaugh would be swimming upstream against a river of suspicion. Dr. Ford's testimony was infallable, and Brett Kavanaugh continued to deny.

Republicans are in a corner on this issue. The Republican party already has a serious issue with women voters. 7 in 10 women view Trump unfavorably, and the party itself doesn't hold up much better. Why Republicans didn't choose a woman SCOTUS nominee to get themselves out of the mud with women, exemplifies an astounding lack of foresight.. But this party has a long history of misogyny, and old habits & ideology--lead by old white men- are difficult to correct.
Seven in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

This is the second annual women's march in Washington D.C, January 20, 2018.

More Than 4,000 Women Say They Want to Run for Office Since Trump's Election

It's unfortunate that it took 2 women cornering Jeff Flake in an elevator today, to get him to change his mind and demand an FBI investigation into these allegations prior to confirming. This is what Dr. Ford wanted all along (prior to testifying.) Which leads one to think that she believes there is something that the FBI is going to find on Brett Kavanaugh.
Christine Blasey Ford Wants F.B.I. to Investigate Kavanaugh Before She Testifies

Surprisingly even a FOX NEWS poll suggests support of Kavanuagh is down, especially among women.
Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination

If Republicans had just confirmed Kavanaugh without an investigation, that would have been, most certainly, the final nail in their coffin with women in this country.

Women are the largest voting block in this country today. They are the power house in the voting booth.

A sleeping giant has awoken!

1st Womans March, Washington D.C. January 20, 2017--the day after Trump was inaugurated. Click thsi link and scroll through the many pages of pictures (start on page 20) & you will probably find your home state here.
Woman's march pictures

yes, you have sacrificed due process on the alter of abortion that was never even threatened.

As a woman, thank you for lending legitimate credence to the argument that women are too emotional to be allowed to vote...

The U.S Supreme court made a decision on Roe v Wader 45 years ago. It was a right leaning court that gave us Roe v Wade and it's been considered a right leaning court ever since.

I know that Republican GOP candidates like to play paddy feet with abortion activists. In fact one of Trump's and others campaign promises in 2016 was to appoint U.S. Supreme court justices so you could rid the constituion of Roe v Wade once and for all.

What you don't know, is that both Niel Gorsuch and Brett Kavanuagh have already run the Democrat gaunlet under G.W.Bush. In 2006 Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and while they denied a lot of G.W;s nominee's they confirmed both Gorsuch and Kavanaugh to Federal District appeals courts.

What you don't know, is that during confirmation hearings, Niel Gorsuch is the first nominee in my memory that stated Roe v Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone to you.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

In fact here are the Democrats that voted to confirm both Niel Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh in 2006.

The only reason Democrats tried to block Gorsuch, is simply because they were angry that Republicans didn't give Obama's last nominee (Merrick Garland) an up or down vote.

You're campaigning on abortion, who's not going to pay for birth control, and legitimate rape questions was actually the reason that Mitt Romney lost in 2012.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump
Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

The U.S. Supreme court has decided that you have no right to interfere into the personal, very private decisions that women and their families make. Roe v Wade is a U.S. Supreme court decision that is here to stay, and it never belonged anywhere on a political platform.

By continually campaigning and talking about abortion, you are insulting the intelligence & integrity while alienating the largest voting block in this country--WOMEN.

So you are saying that all this bullcrap that has taken place against Kavanaugh is a get back, a sham, a ruse ????? I mean reading your post here suggest that the demon-crats are in meltdown down mode still, and they will do anything and everything to get out of the traps they have put themselves in over time now. Its so wonder that Lindsey Graham went Stark raving mad at what he was seeing go on in it all.

I'm not sure I'd put much stock in his claims. Not a single woman I'm close to is feeling warm on D's right now. They're all smart enough to see what the D's did to Ford and her family in this power grab and most of them have husbands, sons, brothers, male friends, etc.

 

[keepitreal]

Why now?

And not during the last 30 years?

That is the question.

Because in sexual assault cases it often works like that. Look at it from the victims side. Someone assaults you when you are 15. You don't report him, like so many people don't. 30 Years later you see the president putting this guy on the shortlist for the Supreme Court as being particularly high qualified. I can imaging a now middle aged women being wronged in such a way being sufficiently angered by that development to speak up.

15 years ago he was...
assistant to the President (Bush)
White House Staff Secretary
and, nominated for the United States Court of Appeals.

His nomination was stalled in the Senate,
for nearly 3 fucking years

HE WAS THE PRINCIPAL AUTHOR OF THE STARR REPORT

HE WAS A KEY PLAYER DURING IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST BILL CLINTON FOR HIS SEXUAL LIAISONS
WITH A WHITE HOUSE INTERN AND LYING ABOUT IT...

IF THERE WERE EVER A TIME TO SPEAK UP.....
IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THEN!

Please remove head from ass...please and thank you!

Lol please give me the name of 3 prosecutors in the Mueller probe, without looking it up on google? I can't. Name 4 people on the United States court of appeals without looking it up? Give me the name of the Deputy assistant press secretary in the Trump administration? Now give me the name of the people on the Supreme court? In terms of exposure and job importance the Supreme Court blows these other positions out of the water . Not only that but discounting that rage can and does usually builds up and it's hard to predict what is the straw that breaks the camels back for anyone seems a bit weird.

In terms of exposure and job performance,
Brett was already out there....

So, the straw that broke the camels back was,
Brett being chosen for the SC nomination, in 2018,
not when he was working with Kenneth Starr,
to impeach the sitting President for sexual misconduct
and perjury, pertaining to that sexual misconduct

What nerve!

Ford has been keeping tabs on Brett, moron

In an interview, her husband, Russell Ford, said that in the 2012 sessions, she recounted being trapped in a room with two drunken boys, one of whom pinned her to a bed, molested her and prevented her from screaming. He said he recalled that his wife used Kavanaugh’s last name and voiced concern that Kavanaugh — then a federal judge — might one day be nominated to the Supreme Court.

Even the shit above is bullshit...
That's why her story was edited on Thursday

 

[Mindful]

As all the scandals seem to be centred around sex, of one form or another; it leads me on to this:

5 American sex norms that Europeans will never understand

And with good reason. When it comes to physical intimacy, the U.S. is the land of the free, home of the crazed
This article originally appeared on AlterNet.

​

Europeans tend to see a lot of American ideals and behaviors as bizarre. In particular, they aren’t wild about our politics and our food (though they love our television and our movies). And when it comes to sex? Well, Europeans tend to view us as the land of the free, home of the batshit crazy.

Below are some of the biggest sexual WTFs Europeans have about America.

5 American sex norms that Europeans will never understand

 

[beagle9]

Why now?

And not during the last 30 years?

That is the question.

Because in sexual assault cases it often works like that. Look at it from the victims side. Someone assaults you when you are 15. You don't report him, like so many people don't. 30 Years later you see the president putting this guy on the shortlist for the Supreme Court as being particularly high qualified. I can imaging a now middle aged women being wronged in such a way being sufficiently angered by that development to speak up.

15 years ago he was...
assistant to the President (Bush)
White House Staff Secretary
and, nominated for the United States Court of Appeals.

His nomination was stalled in the Senate,
for nearly 3 fucking years

HE WAS THE PRINCIPAL AUTHOR OF THE STARR REPORT

HE WAS A KEY PLAYER DURING IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST BILL CLINTON FOR HIS SEXUAL LIAISONS
WITH A WHITE HOUSE INTERN AND LYING ABOUT IT...

IF THERE WERE EVER A TIME TO SPEAK UP.....
IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THEN!

Please remove head from ass...please and thank you!

EXACTLY - WHERE WAS MRS.FORD AND HER CIVIC DUTY IN THE CASE OF MONICA LEWINSKY AND BILL CLINTON ?????? WHY DIDN'T SHE FEEL A NEED TO COME FOWARD IN THAT SITUATION ???? I MEAN IF KAVANAUGH WAS THIS SEX PREDATOR, AND HE WAS GOING AFTER MONICA AND BILL OVER THAT SITUATION WITH KEN STARR, YOU SURE AS HELL WOULD HAVE FIGURED THAT FORD WOULD HAVE DONE HER CIVIC DUTY BACK THEN.

 

[forkup]

And it validates what? First both sides have done plenty of shit they shouldn't. If your honest about it, the reason the GOP is in such a hurry is that if they hold the nomination until after the midterms and they lose the senate they are afraid the Dems will play the same dirty politics they played with Garland. Secondly you still haven't established to me that objecting to someone who is credibly accused of sexual assault is unfair to begin with.

How does the word "credibly" get into this ?

Well, not even Kavanaugh himself during his testimony dared to suggest Ford was not credible. Not one GOP member suggested she was not credible. The words used were compelling and credible if I'm not mistaken. Credible is another word for believable. Doesn't mean it's true, but simply believable.

Well, not even Kavanaugh himself during his testimony dared to suggest Ford was not credible.

Denying her allegations wasn't stating as much?

I'm curious as to why her and her husband,
are in couples counseling....

You'd be amazed at the lengths,
women will go to, to keep a man

No, at least not according to the GOP. The position the GOP members take is that they believe "something happened" to Ford, just not Kavanaugh, or something like that. It's convoluted as hell, something I noted on Thursday when they were making the argument. Kavanaugh NEVER, not a single time during the hearing even hinted on that she was wasn't assaulted. The only thing he spoke to was that he didn't do it.

 

[Mindful]

Why now?

And not during the last 30 years?

That is the question.

Because in sexual assault cases it often works like that. Look at it from the victims side. Someone assaults you when you are 15. You don't report him, like so many people don't. 30 Years later you see the president putting this guy on the shortlist for the Supreme Court as being particularly high qualified. I can imaging a now middle aged women being wronged in such a way being sufficiently angered by that development to speak up.

15 years ago he was...
assistant to the President (Bush)
White House Staff Secretary
and, nominated for the United States Court of Appeals.

His nomination was stalled in the Senate,
for nearly 3 fucking years

HE WAS THE PRINCIPAL AUTHOR OF THE STARR REPORT

HE WAS A KEY PLAYER DURING IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST BILL CLINTON FOR HIS SEXUAL LIAISONS
WITH A WHITE HOUSE INTERN AND LYING ABOUT IT...

IF THERE WERE EVER A TIME TO SPEAK UP.....
IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THEN!

Please remove head from ass...please and thank you!

EXACTLY - WHERE WAS MRS.FORD AND HER CIVIC DUTY IN THE CASE OF MONICA LEWINSKY AND BILL CLINTON ?????? WHY DIDN'T SHE FEEL A NEED TO COME FOWARD IN THAT SITUATION ???? I MEAN IF KAVANAUGH WAS THIS SEX PREDATOR, AND HE WAS GOING AFTER MONICA AND BILL OVER THAT SITUATION WITH KEN STARR, YOU SURE AS HELL WOULD HAVE FIGURED THAT FORD WOULD HAVE DONE HER CIVIC DUTY BACK THEN.

That's a good point.

 

[forkup]

Why now?

And not during the last 30 years?

That is the question.

Because in sexual assault cases it often works like that. Look at it from the victims side. Someone assaults you when you are 15. You don't report him, like so many people don't. 30 Years later you see the president putting this guy on the shortlist for the Supreme Court as being particularly high qualified. I can imaging a now middle aged women being wronged in such a way being sufficiently angered by that development to speak up.

15 years ago he was...
assistant to the President (Bush)
White House Staff Secretary
and, nominated for the United States Court of Appeals.

His nomination was stalled in the Senate,
for nearly 3 fucking years

HE WAS THE PRINCIPAL AUTHOR OF THE STARR REPORT

HE WAS A KEY PLAYER DURING IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST BILL CLINTON FOR HIS SEXUAL LIAISONS
WITH A WHITE HOUSE INTERN AND LYING ABOUT IT...

IF THERE WERE EVER A TIME TO SPEAK UP.....
IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THEN!

Please remove head from ass...please and thank you!

Lol please give me the name of 3 prosecutors in the Mueller probe, without looking it up on google? I can't. Name 4 people on the United States court of appeals without looking it up? Give me the name of the Deputy assistant press secretary in the Trump administration? Now give me the name of the people on the Supreme court? In terms of exposure and job importance the Supreme Court blows these other positions out of the water . Not only that but discounting that rage can and does usually builds up and it's hard to predict what is the straw that breaks the camels back for anyone seems a bit weird.

In terms of exposure and job performance,
Brett was already out there....

So, the straw that broke the camels back was,
Brett being chosen for the SC nomination, in 2018,
not when he was working with Kenneth Starr,
to impeach the sitting President for sexual misconduct
and perjury, pertaining to that sexual misconduct

What nerve!

Ford has been keeping tabs on Brett, moron

In an interview, her husband, Russell Ford, said that in the 2012 sessions, she recounted being trapped in a room with two drunken boys, one of whom pinned her to a bed, molested her and prevented her from screaming. He said he recalled that his wife used Kavanaugh’s last name and voiced concern that Kavanaugh — then a federal judge — might one day be nominated to the Supreme Court.

Even the shit above is bullshit...
That's why her story was edited on Thursday

Apparently that was what happened. I also don't really care about you calling me moron. So far what has struck me about the people I've talked to on your side about this, is that they have been able to keep the name calling to a minimum. This whole topic is charged enough, don't exacerbate that please.

 

[AZGAL]

Maryland authorities are offering cooperation to investigate if the victim files a claim now.