Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,452
- 82,932
Fucking moron, you said the article said nothing about a saw....Wrong, shit for brains, I said the following:Who cares what kind of saw it was? You said the article said nothing about a saw. How can we now be talking about what kind of saw was used if the article said nothing about saws?Fucking moron, I said, ”I’m saying what the border patrol is saying.”Now you're talking about some other story, not the one mentioned in the OP. That quote isn't in the story you linked to, dipstick. You're backing and filling because you got caught saying something that just isn't true.Fucking moron, NBC is reporting on what the government is reporting...
Steel prototype for border wall cut through with saw, photo shows
President Donald Trump has repeatedly advocated for a steel slat design for his border wall, which he described as "absolutely critical to border security" in his Oval Office address to the nation Tuesday. But Department of Homeland Security testing of a steel slat prototype proved it could be cut through with a saw, according to a report by DHS.
Do you ever spout anything that isn’t fucking moronic?
Ever???
BTW, moron, the slats in the photo look like they were cut with a blowtorch, not a saw. The wall isn't intended to keep safe crackers out of the country.
Your credibility just flew out the window.
... and I backed that up with a link. Now I’ve reduced you to crying like a two year old toddler, wailing about my sources.
![]()
We're talking about what the article says, not what some faceless person in the BP says. And exactly what kind of "saw" are we talking about? There are saws that will but through 4 inches of solid steel.
Anyone who pretends that the wall is intended to be invulnerable to any kind of attack is simply an imbecile and a douchebag. Fort Knox isn't invulnerable to any kind of attack.
This argument is just another example of leftwing douchebags setting the bar so high that it couldn't possibly be met. This argument is con.
"The only person who mentioned the word "saw" was the NBC reporter, you fucking dumbass."
Again, I'm quoting you....
”The article says the wall samples were "vulnerable to breaching."It doesn't say how it was done.” ~ the USMB fucking moron
... so why are you arguing about what kind of saw was used when you said the article said nothing about a saw?