Oh Oh! Arizona

[XponentialChaos]

Not a violent mob

Tell that to the police officers who were injured holding off those idiots.

 

[Lastamender]

Tell that to the police officers who were injured holding off those idiots.

Have the FBI tell them, they instigated the trouble and an innocent woman died just for intimidation purposes.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Have the FBI tell them, they instigated the trouble and an innocent woman died just for intimidation purposes.

How was it not a violent mob when so many police officers were injured?

What exactly would you consider a violent mob?

 

[Lastamender]

How was it not a violent mob when so many police officers were injured?

What exactly would you consider a violent mob?

Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis.

And when so many Capitol police get injured, THAT’S not violent??????

Explain.

 

[Faun]

Then there's the idot that calls themselves "candycorn"...seriously? Let me guess: "candy" because you're just obnoxiously sweet, and "corn" because you're either CORNY or CORN-HOLED.


Give it up ass wipe. Anyone with half a brain can look at the results of the audit and make up their own mind about how "secure" and "fair" the election was.

And most think Biden won fair & square.

 

[Faun]

Not that I'm a big fan of the orange man, but since you seem to be an educated man, you KNOW he (trump) got more votes in 2020 than ANY INCUMBENT PRESIDENT IN HISTORY.

If biden got even more, truthfully and honestly, then great, that's fine. But it seems unlikely, and the evidence is stating to pile up. Don't worry, as long as you wake up, you'll be fine.

It's only unlikely to the brain-dead portion of America who struggle dealing with reality.

 

[Faun]

You have no problem with the murder of an unarmed woman too?

You mean Ashes Targetpractice? The MAGA moron who committed suicide by cop?

 

[Faun]

Not a violent mob, just agitators from the FBI.

Yeah, no violence here...

 

[Lastamender]

Yeah, no violence here...

Where are the burning buildings and burning police cars?

 

[Faun]

Where are the burning buildings and burning police cars?

LOL

FruitLoops, you don't need burning buildings or burning police cars to have violence.

You literally claimed that wasn't a violent mob at the Capitol on Insurrection Day and I proved yet again that you're out of your fucking mind.

 

[Lastamender]

Details of 2020 election audit reveal need for 'law enforcement' probe | WND | by Bob Unruh

Hans von Spakovsky, a former commissioner on the Federal Election Commission and former counsel to the assistant attorney general for civil rights at the U.S. Justice Department, says the audit of 2020 presidential election results in Arizona's Maricopa County shows some "serious potential...

www.wnd.com

He explained, "A recount does not verify or check whether ballots were cast by registered voters who are actually deceased; who do not actually live where they claim to live; who cast multiple votes because they are registered more than once; or who are not entitled to vote even though they are registered because they are not U.S. citizens or are felons who have not yet had their right to vote restored."


He said, "A simple example illustrates this problem. If a homeowners’ association has an election and the new president wins with 51 out of 100 votes, a recount will no doubt confirm that she received 51 votes. But it will not reveal whether 10 of her 51 votes were cast by individuals who falsely claimed to live in the neighborhood when they actually live elsewhere."

FRAUD.

 

[Faun]

Details of 2020 election audit reveal need for 'law enforcement' probe | WND | by Bob Unruh

Hans von Spakovsky, a former commissioner on the Federal Election Commission and former counsel to the assistant attorney general for civil rights at the U.S. Justice Department, says the audit of 2020 presidential election results in Arizona's Maricopa County shows some "serious potential...

www.wnd.com

He explained, "A recount does not verify or check whether ballots were cast by registered voters who are actually deceased; who do not actually live where they claim to live; who cast multiple votes because they are registered more than once; or who are not entitled to vote even though they are registered because they are not U.S. citizens or are felons who have not yet had their right to vote restored."


He said, "A simple example illustrates this problem. If a homeowners’ association has an election and the new president wins with 51 out of 100 votes, a recount will no doubt confirm that she received 51 votes. But it will not reveal whether 10 of her 51 votes were cast by individuals who falsely claimed to live in the neighborhood when they actually live elsewhere."

FRAUD.

He said the Maricopa audit "lists some disturbing findings. That includes 23,344 'mail-in ballots voted from a prior address'; 9,041 'more ballots returned by voter than received'; 5,295 'voters that potentially voted in multiple counties'; 2,592 'more duplicates than original ballots'; and 2,382 'in-person voters who had moved out of Maricopa County.'"​

... addressed by Maricopa County ...

​

You post from bullshit sites who lie like you because reality is just too inconvenient for you.

 

[Samofvt]

And most think Biden won fair & square.

You should re-phrase your remark. You could say "most Democrats think Biden won fair & square"...that would be somewhat truthful.

However, in most of the opinion polls taken since the 2020 election, there is a very large question-mark about election integrity: even many of those who are happy with the outcome support tighter security measures and continued forensic investigations.

CDMedia/Georgia Record/Big Data Poll – GA Voters Overwhelmingly Support Full Forensic Audit Of 2020 Election

CDMedia/Georgia Record/Big Data Poll – GA Voters Overwhelmingly Support Full Forensic Audit Of 2020 Election. Roughly 6 in 10 voters support calls from some Republicans to review the integrity of the vote last year.

www.georgiarecord.com

Polls Show ‘No Confidence’, ‘Stolen Elections’: Provocations in Post-Republic America

Election fraud effects all Americans, but what’s often not considered is the particularly negative impact it has on the historically disenfranchised black community, Joaquin Flores…

www.strategic-culture.org

https://www.wispolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/09102021_Stroebel.pdf

Election Integrity: 74% Of Voters Support Photo ID Requirement

Voters overwhelmingly believe it’s important to prevent cheating in elections and agree that requiring photo identification is a reasonable measure to ensure election integrity.

www.rasmussenreports.com

 

[Faun]

You should re-phrase your remark. You could say "most Democrats think Biden won fair & square"...that would be somewhat truthful.

However, in most of the opinion polls taken since the 2020 election, there is a very large question-mark about election integrity: even many of those who are happy with the outcome support tighter security measures and continued forensic investigations.

CDMedia/Georgia Record/Big Data Poll – GA Voters Overwhelmingly Support Full Forensic Audit Of 2020 Election

CDMedia/Georgia Record/Big Data Poll – GA Voters Overwhelmingly Support Full Forensic Audit Of 2020 Election. Roughly 6 in 10 voters support calls from some Republicans to review the integrity of the vote last year.

www.georgiarecord.com

Polls Show ‘No Confidence’, ‘Stolen Elections’: Provocations in Post-Republic America

Election fraud effects all Americans, but what’s often not considered is the particularly negative impact it has on the historically disenfranchised black community, Joaquin Flores…

www.strategic-culture.org

https://www.wispolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/09102021_Stroebel.pdf

Election Integrity: 74% Of Voters Support Photo ID Requirement

Voters overwhelmingly believe it’s important to prevent cheating in elections and agree that requiring photo identification is a reasonable measure to ensure election integrity.

www.rasmussenreports.com

By a margin of nearly 2 to 1, Americans believe Biden won fairly. And among the 32% who think he cheated, the vast majority and Republican. Establishing Republicans are certifiably crazy.

Public Supports Both Early Voting And Requiring Photo ID to Vote | Monmouth University Polling Institute

One-third remain convinced of 2020 election fraud

www.monmouth.edu

 

[candycorn]

‘Stop the Steal’ Movement Races Forward, Ignoring Arizona Humiliation (Published 2021)

As a Republican review of 2020 votes in Arizona sputtered to a close, Donald Trump and his allies signaled that their attack on the election, and their drive to reshape future elections, were far from over.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Samofvt]

By a margin of nearly 2 to 1, Americans believe Biden won fairly. And among the 32% who think he cheated, the vast majority and Republican. Establishing Republicans are certifiably crazy.

Public Supports Both Early Voting And Requiring Photo ID to Vote | Monmouth University Polling Institute

One-third remain convinced of 2020 election fraud

www.monmouth.edu

Congratulations, you found one article that appears well written and might be construed to support your argument.

According the the article you found: "Most Americans support both easier access to early voting and requiring photo identification to vote"

I'll go along with that. No problem with the first part (hesitantly, with conditions), and the second should be mandatory *anyway*.

The only reason the first part (early voting) is an issue is the fact that, hypothetically, if someone had access to the machines and knew a week ahead of time that their candidate was behind in votes, it would give them plenty of time to manufacture "something". From the evidence found in Arizona, it looks like that's what happened (I know, I know... you don't believe the audit results...fine...). AP News has been forecasting the results of elections based on less than 2% of the first voter turnout exit pols for over a century, and they've been right more than they've been wrong. Until recently.

 

[Faun]

Congratulations, you found one article that appears well written and might be construed to support your argument.

According the the article you found: "Most Americans support both easier access to early voting and requiring photo identification to vote"

I'll go along with that. No problem with the first part (hesitantly, with conditions), and the second should be mandatory *anyway*.

The only reason the first part (early voting) is an issue is the fact that, hypothetically, if someone had access to the machines and knew a week ahead of time that their candidate was behind in votes, it would give them plenty of time to manufacture "something". From the evidence found in Arizona, it looks like that's what happened (I know, I know... you don't believe the audit results...fine...). AP News has been forecasting the results of elections based on less than 2% of the first voter turnout exit pols for over a century, and they've been right more than they've been wrong. Until recently.

While your imagination is quite entertaining, the Arizona audit found no fraudulent ballots. They raised some questions which the Maricopa County Election Board answered.

 

[Samofvt]

While your imagination is quite entertaining, the Arizona audit found no fraudulent ballots. They raised some questions which the Maricopa County Election Board answered.

You are making a false statement. The forensic investigation found more questionable ballots submissions than the difference in totals counted for the presidential election. The blank signatures on envelopes alone account for a large percentage, let alone lack of signature verification on those that were stamped "ready for counting"

Not only did the county delay months in handing over subpoenaed physical evidence, but 1) there was no accountability (chain of custody) of much of that evidence between the election and time of surrender 2) they still have not turned over all of the evidence, and 3) some of the physical evidence indicates the county officials either lied about their knowledge (eg internet connectivity of machines) or were incompetent.

Go fish.

 

[Faun]

You are making a false statement. The forensic investigation found more questionable ballots submissions than the difference in totals counted for the presidential election. The blank signatures on envelopes alone account for a large percentage, let alone lack of signature verification on those that were stamped "ready for counting"

Not only did the county delay months in handing over subpoenaed physical evidence, but 1) there was no accountability (chain of custody) of much of that evidence between the election and time of surrender 2) they still have not turned over all of the evidence, and 3) some of the physical evidence indicates the county officials either lied about their knowledge (eg internet connectivity of machines) or were incompetent.

Go fish.

A "questionable ballot" isn't necessarily a fraudulent ballot. So far, zero ballots have been proven to be fraudulent.