Curried Goats
Platinum Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 26,063
- 9,618
- 433
Then you're an oblivious moron because a MAGAt poster just did it.I don't know anyone who calls people defective except people who vote for demofks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then you're an oblivious moron because a MAGAt poster just did it.I don't know anyone who calls people defective except people who vote for demofks.
Yes, I am sure he should base his decisioning not on medical experts and advisors, but some random dude on the internet.It's the "do you want a dead son or a live daughter" argument, which hasn't been proved to be true in any way shape or form.
Meanwhile we are seeing more and more detransitioners stuck with their drugged and mutilated bodies.
suppress their freedoms? name one freedom anyone wants to suppress? come on you stepped in.Because fucks like you want to suppress their freedoms and possibly do harm to them.
name the poster or you are a liar.Then you're an oblivious moron because a MAGAt poster just did it.
No.... I'm stating publicly that it's the default biology of people born with XYY chromosomes to have XYY chromosomes. Try to keep to with the argument, Short Bus.so you're going to state publicly that a person with XX chromosomes can change their chromosomes to XY? Men can have babies? hahahahahahahaahahahahaahahahhhahahahahaha
Sure.name the poster or you are a liar.
XX and XY are the default condition, making male/female the default condition, and XX is female, XY is male.
Anything else is either a sub fractional genetic or developmental defect, or made up bullshit.
You are male or you are female, and you can't change that no matter how you feel.
But that isn't the discussion, people who want to be called tran don't fit that scenario. So you're fked in the head.No.... I'm stating publicly that it's the default biology of people born with XYY chromosomes to have XYY chromosomes. Try to keep to with the argument, Short Bus.
Other people's children.If someone is an adult and wants to take devastating hormone treatment and chop off their nads, I don't care if they do it or not.
But these are FUCKING CHILDREN.
Nor do they fit your argument fake argument about trying to change chromosomes.But that isn't the discussion, people who want to be called tran don't fit that scenario. So you're fked in the head.
what is it you think that statement made? You're truly confused. People who are born with XYY are babies who had developmental issues. Otherwise, it wouldn't be one out of a million who are born with that condition. Your just a panzi looking for a fight you can't win. Still want to know why you need to speak for them?Sure.
who don't want their children going through it, and government intervening.Other people's children.
Your response seemed like a non-sequitur. What did you mean?who don't want their children going through it, and government intervening.
I didn't say that at all. You implied something that wasn't there. Your point was anyone saying anything about a family who decides to do it, mine was unless parents don't want the child to get it and the government intervenes. Look up what intervene means. It's called another scenario.Your response seemed like a non-sequitur. In any case I was referring families who may see it differently than you. If you want to use government to tell them how do it, to force your values on them, then you open the door for the "other side" to do likewise to you - in ways you won't agree with.
marty never said that. fk youYes, I am sure he should base his decisioning not on medical experts and advisors, but some random dude on the internet.
Ok. I don't know what you're talking about. The thread is about a vetoed bill proposing to ban sex-change surgery for kids. The bill won't become law, so there's no intervention. Look up what coherent comment means.I didn't say that at all. You implied something that wasn't there. Your point was anyone saying anything about a family who decides to do it, mine was unless parents don't want the child to get it and the government intervenes. Look up what intervene means.
What does the term developmental issues actually mean? That they aren't real or that simply put they have a different biological make up than you do? How does infrequency or medical conditions that may cause things like infertility, invalidate their biological existence?what is it you think that statement made? You're truly confused. People who are born with XYY are babies who had developmental issues. Otherwise, it wouldn't be one out of a million who are born with that condition.
Is this a fight? I consider this me picking on the mentally retarded. It's only acceptable because you're also deplorable mutants.Your just a panzi looking for a fight you can't win. Still want to know why you need to speak for them?
yep, and some of us said he did the right thing. government needs to stay out of it. My point is that government still intervenes.Ok. I don't know what you're talking about. The thread is about a vetoed bill proposing to ban sex-change surgery for kids. The bill won't become law, so there's no intervention. Look up what coherent comment means.
OK.yep, and some of said he did the right thing. government needs to stay out of it. My point is that government still intervenes.
when the egg was developing, the transition to fetus didn't occur properly. Unless you think it's normal that people are born with XYY chromosomes? Where are they?What does the term developmental issues actually mean?