Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Drilling permits? Are you for real?This makes no sense at all.
Why would we want oil we can't use over our own oil that is immediately usable?
Why would we want unusable oil when President Obama has issued more drilling permits than any other prez in the past?
Of course. Reality and thought mean nothing to you.Toe it? It's in my rear view mirror!He believes Obama because he must toe the liberal line.I'm disappointed in you.I'll believe the vast amounts of reports saying the same thing President Obama is saying over the self-serving, lone comment from an oil corporation executive, thank you very much.
Why don't you review the EIA website and educate yourself on the actual import/export statistics for both crude and refined products.
Really, don't be such a twit.
How DARE you question The Chosen One.I'll believe the vast amounts of reports saying the same thing President Obama is saying over the self-serving, lone comment from an oil corporation executive, thank you very much.
Are you still believing Obama will be the most transparent administration ever? Are you still believing Obama will close Gitmo? Are you still believing that Obama all the other lies Obama has told you?
Is it your contention that the ONLY oil piped through Keystone will be extracted in Canada?What are we charging them to transport across America?Please explain what's wrong with that.So you're advocating that Canada gets to transport their oil through our country, then turn around and charge us more than anyone else is willing to pay (the highest bidder) to purchase it?Because that "vast amount" comes from the likes of Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz.I'll believe the vast amounts of reports saying the same thing President Obama is saying over the self-serving, lone comment from an oil corporation executive, thank you very much.
It doesnt matter. The oil will be sold to highest bidder for the most money. The way things should work.
Bullshit he hasn't. And once January rolls around the Keystone bill will land on his desk. And if 6 democrats don't cross the aisle, he will veto the bill. Why? Because Obama thinks he is a supreme leader and what he says goes.He hasn't denied anything. Get your facts straight.In denying approval to Ketystone XL, Obama does two things.It won't be exported, according to the CEO of TransCanada Pipelines.
It certainly seems illogical that an oil pipeline should be elevated to the level of friction now represented by the Keystone XL project. But through one means or another, the project has become a source of real conflict. On Wednesday the CEO of TransCanada Corp. came pretty close to calling the President of the United States a liar. Russ Girling said that “the notion that this oil is going to get exported is pure fabrication by those that are opposed to our project.”
Later, he added: “It’s very highly unlikely that any of this crude leaves North America.”
The timing was important, because Mr. Obama made those very allegations just last week. The pipeline, he said was merely “providing the ability of Canada to pump their oil, send it through our land, down to the Gulf, where it will be sold everywhere else.” He was parroting the latest line in the war against Keystone mounted by U.S. environmentalists, which portrays Canada as a nefarious purveyor of dirty oil, with plans to send shipments across the pristine U.S. to ships in the Gulf, which will immediately transport it to China.
In reality, TransCanada doesn’t own the oil, it just ships it for the oil companies. It gets sent to a refining hub in Texas, which turns it into gasoline. The refiners say less than 10% of the gasoline they refine gets exported. If the refiners did decide, illogically, to export it all, they would have to ship in other oil from Venezuela or elsewhere to replace it, which makes no sense at all. The U.S. State Department, which has assessed Keystone to death, found that pipelines have no impact on U.S. exports, and that Alberta’s oil is likely to stay in the U.S.
The National Post
One, he gets to leave his pro green energy legacy intact. Of course not even considering the country as a whole
Two, he gets to pander to the environmentalist voting bloc.
He has repeatedly said that he would let the process play out. That means waiting for Nebraska, the EPA, the Native Tribes, etc. to satisfy their concerns.
THEN he'll deny it!
C'mere ya big knucklehead.Toe it? It's in my rear view mirror!He believes Obama because he must toe the liberal line.I'm disappointed in you.I'll believe the vast amounts of reports saying the same thing President Obama is saying over the self-serving, lone comment from an oil corporation executive, thank you very much.
Why don't you review the EIA website and educate yourself on the actual import/export statistics for both crude and refined products.
Really, don't be such a twit.
Yeah, right.No, I'm an America Sycophant.Of course you would. You're an Obama sycophant.I'll believe the vast amounts of reports saying the same thing President Obama is saying over the self-serving, lone comment from an oil corporation executive, thank you very much.
You read?......I read that ISIS is also exporting oil through various means, and suddenly oil prices in the US go down in the last few months. I hate to think the American consumer is helping Muslim terrorists that threaten freedom.
Go do some research.So you're advocating that Canada gets to transport their oil through our country, then turn around and charge us more than anyone else is willing to pay (the highest bidder) to purchase it?Because that "vast amount" comes from the likes of Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz.I'll believe the vast amounts of reports saying the same thing President Obama is saying over the self-serving, lone comment from an oil corporation executive, thank you very much.
It doesnt matter. The oil will be sold to highest bidder for the most money. The way things should work.
No, see here's the problem.What are we charging them to transport across America?Please explain what's wrong with that.So you're advocating that Canada gets to transport their oil through our country, then turn around and charge us more than anyone else is willing to pay (the highest bidder) to purchase it?Because that "vast amount" comes from the likes of Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz.I'll believe the vast amounts of reports saying the same thing President Obama is saying over the self-serving, lone comment from an oil corporation executive, thank you very much.
It doesnt matter. The oil will be sold to highest bidder for the most money. The way things should work.
The property owners will be offered compensation.Is this pipeline going to go across private property? If so, what if the property owner objects?
Um you understand that lower oil prices HURT people trying to sell it, like ISIS, right?I read that ISIS is also exporting oil through various means, and suddenly oil prices in the US go down in the last few months. I hate to think the American consumer is helping Muslim terrorists that threaten freedom.
I might, but do they? Were are they getting all the funding ? I don't think they care about capitalism as long as they turn a profit. However fleeting that may be.Um you understand that lower oil prices HURT people trying to sell it, like ISIS, right?I read that ISIS is also exporting oil through various means, and suddenly oil prices in the US go down in the last few months. I hate to think the American consumer is helping Muslim terrorists that threaten freedom.
Here's how we deal with troublemakers like youIs this pipeline going to go across private property? If so, what if the property owner objects?
Oil Transported Through Keystone Will Be Consumed in the US
Oil Transported Through Keystone Will Be Consumed in the US
Based on everything I've heard and read - that is a LIE.
