paulitician
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,162
Do without what, food to feed a child?
When she said it was her choice because it was her body and I should butt out, I butted out. After that, not my concern. I did what I was asked to do. Now, it's her turn to do her job as a mother.
Yes, shut up and mind your own business... Until it's time for you to be forced to pay for their decisions. Then it's all your business. Pretty convenient, right?
That's what they say. When they make the decision, it's butt out. When they can't afford the decision, it's step in.
Hey. it's not that complicated. Oklahoma wants dirty sluts to go elsewhere to kill their babies. Oklahomans want them to know that Oklahoma is not a Baby Killer-friendly State. They don't like that, too bad. There's other states that welcome Baby Killers with open arms. They're free to go there.
Those that say this limits abortions are lying. It doesn't prohibit someone from getting an abortion, it says what will happen to them if they choose to do so. It's like laws with about stealing. Just saying someone shouldn't steal doesn't stop them. The laws say what will happen if someone chooses to steal.
I understand what this Senator is doing, but i have to say that i can't support it in the end. I truly despise Abortion, but i have to support the woman's right to it. We already have too many unwanted children that so many have condemned to miserable existences. It's definitely a mixed-emotion thing for me though.
But i think putting tougher restrictions on it can be acceptable. It's ok to let women know that your state is not a Baby Killer-friendly State. It will discourage those types of women from living there. It's ok to send that message.