bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
i didn't think libs would like this thread
![]()
The turds are grasping at straws because the known facts are so incriminating. What else can they do?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i didn't think libs would like this thread
![]()
i didn't think libs would like this thread
![]()
The turds are grasping at straws because the known facts are so incriminating. What else can they do?
Is that the same Blaze that broke the big scandal about the Boston Bombing that would bring down Obama? After that I would be embarrassed to link to anything associated with the Blaze.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57549294/congressional-leaders-view-secure-benghazi-documents/November 13, 2012, 5:00 PM
State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland said that the documents being shared are "really specific to the requests as they come in." The State Department did screen these documents for sensitive information before choosing which items to share. Members are allowed to view the documents and take notes but cannot make copies or remove them from the secure location.
Keith Olbermann cant find another job:
One of the cards his people played was hardship, the source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told POLITICO. He spent last fall talking to all the major networks, and he couldnt get a job. The idea was, this could be the last money he ever earned.
Keith Olbermann cant find another job:
One of the cards his people played was hardship, the source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told POLITICO. He spent last fall talking to all the major networks, and he couldnt get a job. The idea was, this could be the last money he ever earned.
The White House has only released 94 pages of approx. 25,000 documents. And there is a gap in the ones that have been released. Unless you want to believe that there was no communication about Benghazi for the first 67 hours from the attack.
So the point of this is what?
That we should apply the same standard of proof to the email issue as we apply to the President's culpability in any of these 'scandals'?
lol, Okay.
“The penultimate point is a paragraph talking about all the previous warnings provided by the Agency (CIA) about al-Qaeda’s presence and activities of al-Qaeda.“
“The penultimate point could be abused by members to beat the State Department for not paying attention to Agency warnings.“
I think it's stupid to call them "Republican" talking points - I don't see what the Republican party has to do with them at all - but the context was changed.
The emails supposedly "read" to the reporter:
The penultimate point is a paragraph talking about all the previous warnings provided by the Agency (CIA) about al-Qaedas presence and activities of al-Qaeda.
The actual email:
The penultimate point could be abused by members to beat the State Department for not paying attention to Agency warnings.
Adding references to al-Qaeda to make it scarier changes the context. There was no mention of al-Qaeda in the actual email.
The left keeps saying the Republicans altered the E-mails so simple question who was it ? Unless you have a name and some proof that the person did this then your really just guessing aren't you?