MikeK
Gold Member
Good question.Is there a strong call for public arming in France?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good question.Is there a strong call for public arming in France?
Seen it all the time. hell there was a big party in Woodstock NY in the rain. I think there were bands there.No one does. Amps and rain don't mix.you mean you don't.We don't base public policy on slim chances. They could have been struck by lightning, that doesn't mean we hold concerts in the rain on the roof just in case.You're right. I reversed the Morlocks and Eloi. Pardon my impending senility and the momentary memory lapse (it's been awhile).You have that reversed. And getting off a head-shot in a panic of 1,000 kids? Good fuckin' luck.
Re: the "head shot," a slim chance is a lot better than no chance. Would you agree with that?
Your slim chance doesn't make for public policy. For that we use real numbers, not your daydream that you are John Wayne against Jihad Joe.Seen it all the time. hell there was a big party in Woodstock NY in the rain. I think there were bands there.No one does. Amps and rain don't mix.you mean you don't.We don't base public policy on slim chances. They could have been struck by lightning, that doesn't mean we hold concerts in the rain on the roof just in case.You're right. I reversed the Morlocks and Eloi. Pardon my impending senility and the momentary memory lapse (it's been awhile).You have that reversed. And getting off a head-shot in a panic of 1,000 kids? Good fuckin' luck.
Re: the "head shot," a slim chance is a lot better than no chance. Would you agree with that?
anyway derailed by you again, but again, that's you who doesn't believe in taking the slim chance, not the rest of us.
Charlie Hebdo Massacre: France Gun Control Debate Unlikely To Spring Up After Paris Shooting, Experts SayThere are an average of 31 guns per 100 people in France, making it the 11th highest in global gun ownership per capita
Despite strong gun-control laws across the EU, there is still some appetite for even stricter laws. A 2013 poll found 53 percent of Europeans wanted stricter laws on who can own, buy or sell guns. Roughly 58 percent wanted laws to be more uniform across the bloc. In an op-ed in late 2013, Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet called for more cooperation between EU nations to reduce smuggling by sharing information and closing down smuggling routes.
If there arises a debate in France following the Charlie Hebdo attack, said Barnes, it will be over national security and gun trafficking, not gun rights.
sure it does, that's why there is conceal and carry now. hmmmm. Damn son you're always losing.You slim chance doesn't make for public policy. For that we use real numbers, not your daydream that you are John Wayne against Jihad Joe.Seen it all the time. hell there was a big party in Woodstock NY in the rain. I think there were bands there.No one does. Amps and rain don't mix.you mean you don't.We don't base public policy on slim chances. They could have been struck by lightning, that doesn't mean we hold concerts in the rain on the roof just in case.You're right. I reversed the Morlocks and Eloi. Pardon my impending senility and the momentary memory lapse (it's been awhile).
Re: the "head shot," a slim chance is a lot better than no chance. Would you agree with that?
anyway derailed by you again, but again, that's you who doesn't believe in taking the slim chance, not the rest of us.
The most likely version is the guy who shot the carjacking victim, and then ran away.sure it does, that's why there is conceal and carry now. hmmmm. Damn son you're always losing.You slim chance doesn't make for public policy. For that we use real numbers, not your daydream that you are John Wayne against Jihad Joe.Seen it all the time. hell there was a big party in Woodstock NY in the rain. I think there were bands there.No one does. Amps and rain don't mix.you mean you don't.We don't base public policy on slim chances. They could have been struck by lightning, that doesn't mean we hold concerts in the rain on the roof just in case.
anyway derailed by you again, but again, that's you who doesn't believe in taking the slim chance, not the rest of us.
nope, I think there was that one guy who shot the robber in the store with his conceal and carry gun. Shot him dead. DEAD.....The most likely version is the guy who shot the carjacking victim, and then ran away.sure it does, that's why there is conceal and carry now. hmmmm. Damn son you're always losing.You slim chance doesn't make for public policy. For that we use real numbers, not your daydream that you are John Wayne against Jihad Joe.Seen it all the time. hell there was a big party in Woodstock NY in the rain. I think there were bands there.No one does. Amps and rain don't mix.you mean you don't.
anyway derailed by you again, but again, that's you who doesn't believe in taking the slim chance, not the rest of us.
He killed a man with a paintball gun. Hardly a threat eh. And now he faces years of dealing with lawyers and courts for wrongful death. Keep that in mind, John Wayne wannabe.nope, I think there was that one guy who shot the robber in the store with his conceal and carry gun. Shot him dead. DEAD.....The most likely version is the guy who shot the carjacking victim, and then ran away.sure it does, that's why there is conceal and carry now. hmmmm. Damn son you're always losing.You slim chance doesn't make for public policy. For that we use real numbers, not your daydream that you are John Wayne against Jihad Joe.Seen it all the time. hell there was a big party in Woodstock NY in the rain. I think there were bands there.No one does. Amps and rain don't mix.
anyway derailed by you again, but again, that's you who doesn't believe in taking the slim chance, not the rest of us.
sure it is as I've stated in the other thread. Keep up.He killed a man with a paintball gun. Hardly a threat eh...nope, I think there was that one guy who shot the robber in the store with his conceal and carry gun. Shot him dead. DEAD.....The most likely version is the guy who shot the carjacking victim, and then ran away.sure it does, that's why there is conceal and carry now. hmmmm. Damn son you're always losing.You slim chance doesn't make for public policy. For that we use real numbers, not your daydream that you are John Wayne against Jihad Joe.Seen it all the time. hell there was a big party in Woodstock NY in the rain. I think there were bands there.
anyway derailed by you again, but again, that's you who doesn't believe in taking the slim chance, not the rest of us.
What he was thought was a threat, wasn't. At least he didn't shoot the victim and run away, like the other guy.sure it is as I've stated in the other thread. Keep up.He killed a man with a paintball gun. Hardly a threat eh...nope, I think there was that one guy who shot the robber in the store with his conceal and carry gun. Shot him dead. DEAD.....The most likely version is the guy who shot the carjacking victim, and then ran away.sure it does, that's why there is conceal and carry now. hmmmm. Damn son you're always losing.You slim chance doesn't make for public policy. For that we use real numbers, not your daydream that you are John Wayne against Jihad Joe.
nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?What he was thought was a threat, wasn't. At least he didn't shoot the victim and run away, like the other guy.sure it is as I've stated in the other thread. Keep up.He killed a man with a paintball gun. Hardly a threat eh...nope, I think there was that one guy who shot the robber in the store with his conceal and carry gun. Shot him dead. DEAD.....The most likely version is the guy who shot the carjacking victim, and then ran away.sure it does, that's why there is conceal and carry now. hmmmm. Damn son you're always losing.
In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?What he was thought was a threat, wasn't. At least he didn't shoot the victim and run away, like the other guy.sure it is as I've stated in the other thread. Keep up.He killed a man with a paintball gun. Hardly a threat eh...nope, I think there was that one guy who shot the robber in the store with his conceal and carry gun. Shot him dead. DEAD.....The most likely version is the guy who shot the carjacking victim, and then ran away.
he should have thought about that before he walked in. Dead. there you go!In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?What he was thought was a threat, wasn't. At least he didn't shoot the victim and run away, like the other guy.sure it is as I've stated in the other thread. Keep up.He killed a man with a paintball gun. Hardly a threat eh...nope, I think there was that one guy who shot the robber in the store with his conceal and carry gun. Shot him dead. DEAD.....
Your slim chance doesn't make for public policy. For that we use real numbers, not your daydream that you are John Wayne against Jihad Joe.Seen it all the time. hell there was a big party in Woodstock NY in the rain. I think there were bands there.No one does. Amps and rain don't mix.you mean you don't.We don't base public policy on slim chances. They could have been struck by lightning, that doesn't mean we hold concerts in the rain on the roof just in case.You're right. I reversed the Morlocks and Eloi. Pardon my impending senility and the momentary memory lapse (it's been awhile).
Re: the "head shot," a slim chance is a lot better than no chance. Would you agree with that?
anyway derailed by you again, but again, that's you who doesn't believe in taking the slim chance, not the rest of us.
In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?What he was thought was a threat, wasn't. At least he didn't shoot the victim and run away, like the other guy.sure it is as I've stated in the other thread. Keep up.He killed a man with a paintball gun. Hardly a threat eh...nope, I think there was that one guy who shot the robber in the store with his conceal and carry gun. Shot him dead. DEAD.....
that fk doesn't a give a rats ass. He's such a fk'd up human, he's is completely in a world of his own.Your slim chance doesn't make for public policy. For that we use real numbers, not your daydream that you are John Wayne against Jihad Joe.Seen it all the time. hell there was a big party in Woodstock NY in the rain. I think there were bands there.No one does. Amps and rain don't mix.you mean you don't.We don't base public policy on slim chances. They could have been struck by lightning, that doesn't mean we hold concerts in the rain on the roof just in case.
anyway derailed by you again, but again, that's you who doesn't believe in taking the slim chance, not the rest of us.
Real numbers in U.S……1.5 million violent crimes stopped by armed citizens…according to bill clinton.
Nonsense, total.Your slim chance doesn't make for public policy. For that we use real numbers, not your daydream that you are John Wayne against Jihad Joe.Seen it all the time. hell there was a big party in Woodstock NY in the rain. I think there were bands there.No one does. Amps and rain don't mix.you mean you don't.We don't base public policy on slim chances. They could have been struck by lightning, that doesn't mean we hold concerts in the rain on the roof just in case.
anyway derailed by you again, but again, that's you who doesn't believe in taking the slim chance, not the rest of us.
Real numbers in U.S……1.5 million violent crimes stopped by armed citizens…according to bill clinton.
No guns for anyone, problem solved.In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?What he was thought was a threat, wasn't. At least he didn't shoot the victim and run away, like the other guy.sure it is as I've stated in the other thread. Keep up.He killed a man with a paintball gun. Hardly a threat eh...
Yes…and the muslims figured out the corollary….only muslims with guns…..murder lots of unarmed people…...
won't work, you are a fool. You have no idea why guns were invented in the first place. holy shit dude, you are fk'd up for sure.No guns for anyone, problem solved.In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?What he was thought was a threat, wasn't. At least he didn't shoot the victim and run away, like the other guy.sure it is as I've stated in the other thread. Keep up.
Yes…and the muslims figured out the corollary….only muslims with guns…..murder lots of unarmed people…...