One Man With A Gun

[2aguy]

sure it is as I've stated in the other thread. Keep up.

What he was thought was a threat, wasn't. At least he didn't shoot the victim and run away, like the other guy.

nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?

In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.

Yes…and the muslims figured out the corollary….only muslims with guns…..murder lots of unarmed people…...

No guns for anyone, problem solved.

actually, no. We had a period of human history where no guns existed…how did that turn out? The weak were made slaves to the strong and it was the bloodiest time in human history, even more so than today…...

 

[jc456]

What he was thought was a threat, wasn't. At least he didn't shoot the victim and run away, like the other guy.

nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?

In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.

Yes…and the muslims figured out the corollary….only muslims with guns…..murder lots of unarmed people…...

No guns for anyone, problem solved.

actually, no. We had a period of human history where no guns existed…how did that turn out? The weak were made slaves to the strong and it was the bloodiest time in human history, even more so than today…...

I told you the guy has no idea.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

What he was thought was a threat, wasn't. At least he didn't shoot the victim and run away, like the other guy.

nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?

In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.

Yes…and the muslims figured out the corollary….only muslims with guns…..murder lots of unarmed people…...

No guns for anyone, problem solved.

actually, no. We had a period of human history where no guns existed…how did that turn out? The weak were made slaves to the strong and it was the bloodiest time in human history, even more so than today…...

There was very little blood spilled at all. War was difficult, and never done on a large scale. Only modern weapons, including guns, made such a thing possible.

 

[jc456]

nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?

In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.

Yes…and the muslims figured out the corollary….only muslims with guns…..murder lots of unarmed people…...

No guns for anyone, problem solved.

actually, no. We had a period of human history where no guns existed…how did that turn out? The weak were made slaves to the strong and it was the bloodiest time in human history, even more so than today…...

There was very little blood spilled at all. War was difficult, and never done on a large scale. Only modern weapons, including guns, made such a thing possible.

hahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahaha, dude just too funny. Holy shit.

 

[MikeK]

We don't base public policy on slim chances. They could have been struck by lightning, that doesn't mean we hold concerts in the rain on the roof just in case.

Do you base public policy on no chance at all?

 

[MikeK]

you mean you don't.

With very few exceptions, those who relentlessly are opposed to guns know nothing about guns, they are afraid of guns, and they are not inclined to defend themselves under any circumstances. Reflexive self-defense is not a component of their instinctual make-up.

 

[2aguy]

nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?

In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.

Yes…and the muslims figured out the corollary….only muslims with guns…..murder lots of unarmed people…...

No guns for anyone, problem solved.

actually, no. We had a period of human history where no guns existed…how did that turn out? The weak were made slaves to the strong and it was the bloodiest time in human history, even more so than today…...

There was very little blood spilled at all. War was difficult, and never done on a large scale. Only modern weapons, including guns, made such a thing possible.

Look up the siege of Merv.....and how Mongols treated their conquered cities...or the Samurai...or the Muslims when they sacked a city.......you guys will make crap up no matter what.....

 

[2aguy]

nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?

In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.

Yes…and the muslims figured out the corollary….only muslims with guns…..murder lots of unarmed people…...

No guns for anyone, problem solved.

actually, no. We had a period of human history where no guns existed…how did that turn out? The weak were made slaves to the strong and it was the bloodiest time in human history, even more so than today…...

There was very little blood spilled at all. War was difficult, and never done on a large scale. Only modern weapons, including guns, made such a thing possible.

did you ever study warfare in human history....

Destruction under the Mongol Empire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources record massive destruction, terror and death if there was resistance. David Nicole notes in The Mongol Warlords: "terror and mass extermination of anyone opposing them was a well-tested Mongol tactic."[8] The alternative to submission was total war: if refused, Mongol leaders ordered the collective slaughter of populations and destruction of property. Such was the fate of resisting communities during the invasions of the Khwarezmid Empire.

-----------
Ancient sources described Genghis Khan's conquests as wholesale destruction on an unprecedented scale in certain geographical regions, causing great demographicchanges in Asia. According to the works of the Iranian historian Rashid al-Din (1247–1318), the Mongols killed more than 700,000 people in Merv and more than a million in Nishapur. The total population of Persia may have dropped from 2,500,000 to 250,000 as a result of mass extermination and famine. Population exchanges did also in some cases occur but depends as of when.[12]


700,000 people....1 million people slaughtered all without one gun....they assigned several hundred victims to each Mongol warrior after they captured Merv...they murdered them with their swords...


in th e time without guns the weak were slaves...and they were slaughtered at the whim of the strong....guns changed that...the weak could fight back and win......that is how people finally achieved the end of slavery around the world...

 

[2aguy]

nah, he shot the gunman. killed him dead. That dude ain't doing that no more eh?

In this case his aim was better, but the problem remains. With no guns, no one gets shot.

Yes…and the muslims figured out the corollary….only muslims with guns…..murder lots of unarmed people…...

No guns for anyone, problem solved.

actually, no. We had a period of human history where no guns existed…how did that turn out? The weak were made slaves to the strong and it was the bloodiest time in human history, even more so than today…...

There was very little blood spilled at all. War was difficult, and never done on a large scale. Only modern weapons, including guns, made such a thing possible.

do you realize the mass murder committed by the Aztecs.....all without guns......

 

[jc456]

We don't base public policy on slim chances. They could have been struck by lightning, that doesn't mean we hold concerts in the rain on the roof just in case.

Do you base public policy on no chance at all?

mike, not my post relook at that one.

 

[bucs90]

We all know you will not give a damn until its one of yours. Not wishing that mind you but by the time YOU learn it then it will be you and the crickets.

Unlike you morons I don't make decisions or change position based on emotions.

You're right. From now on...when Muslims open fire...we should all get on our knees...dial 911...and hope the clock works in our favor.

 

[bucs90]

Paris is filled with police, with guns. Some kid at a concert wouldn't have changed a damn thing.

You can't be certain of that.

But unarmed subjects of a terrorist attack will be victims for sure. That is a certainty. So what do you have to lose by being armed?

Really, how many people made it out alive that night? Oh right, far more than were killed.

And your thought that some graphic designer at a concert with a handgun is a solution to a heavily armed and trained terrorist in body armor with a suicide bomb strapped to him and a death wish is fucking laughable. A peashooter against a tank.

How about ARMED COPS or security at the gate?? Remember Texas...the art show....2 Muslims with AK47s storm in....and a cop with a pistol drops them both. 2 dead rag heads. 0 dead Americans. See how that works?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

We all know you will not give a damn until its one of yours. Not wishing that mind you but by the time YOU learn it then it will be you and the crickets.

Unlike you morons I don't make decisions or change position based on emotions.

You're right. From now on...when Muslims open fire...we should all get on our knees...dial 911...and hope the clock works in our favor.

That's how most of them made it, not trying to play John Wayne against an AK-47 armed terrorist with a suicide bomb on him.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Paris is filled with police, with guns. Some kid at a concert wouldn't have changed a damn thing.

You can't be certain of that.

But unarmed subjects of a terrorist attack will be victims for sure. That is a certainty. So what do you have to lose by being armed?

Really, how many people made it out alive that night? Oh right, far more than were killed.

And your thought that some graphic designer at a concert with a handgun is a solution to a heavily armed and trained terrorist in body armor with a suicide bomb strapped to him and a death wish is fucking laughable. A peashooter against a tank.

How about ARMED COPS or security at the gate?? Remember Texas...the art show....2 Muslims with AK47s storm in....and a cop with a pistol drops them both. 2 dead rag heads. 0 dead Americans. See how that works?

There were cops all over that place, and it cost that Zionist **** 15k to have them there.

 

[MikeK]

mike, not my post relook at that one.

Sorry.