One of the many examples of R-W hypocrisy....

[BluesLegend]

Mention to right wingers that Trump won election because of the outdated electoral college system.....and they quickly respond with....."LOOK at the Constitution..."

Or dare mention that stricter gun laws should be enacted to curb the butchery....and they quickly respond with........"LOOK at the Constitution."

But when one of their ilk is convicted of breaking tenets within the Constitution, like the old goat Joe Arpaio did and this bigot gets pardoned....some of them quickly respond with......"us racists stick together."

Look at the Constitution dimwit, president Trump has the power to pardon Arpaio. Its like you want to be mocked.

 

[TheDude]

Slow day huh OP? This is where the liberal pretends his kind are free of hypocrisy. Yet unlike the OP, it's blatant hypocrisy. .

 

[Dreadnaught1968]

And if the EC went to Hillary and the popular vote to Trump you would hardly utter a word about it. Your glass house is breaking up.

here's a little challenge for you:

List how many time a democrat has won the WH ...WITHOUT the popular vote.....

VERSUS

how many times a republican has won the WH.....without the popular vote.

Go on, it'll be "instructional" and fun...............LOL

Give us a list of the people who won the presidency without winning the Electoral College.

 

[BULLDOG]

Mention to right wingers that Trump won election because of the outdated electoral college system.....and they quickly respond with....."LOOK at the Constitution..."

Or dare mention that stricter gun laws should be enacted to curb the butchery....and they quickly respond with........"LOOK at the Constitution."

But when one of their ilk is convicted of breaking tenets within the Constitution, like the old goat Joe Arpaio did and this bigot gets pardoned....some of them quickly respond with......"us racists stick together."

This sucks. Not because I think pardoning is a bad idea. But because it was literally a "contempt" misdeameanor and IT WAS UNDER APPEAL. Instead of waiting on the appeal, which prob would overturn the conviction because of the way the judge handled proceedings, Trump WANTED the controversy. He couldn't help himself from creating MORE friction than is needed.

Maybe he didn't want to miss the opportunity to have HIS name on it. And was AFRAID it would overturned on appeal. Even ICE can't agree internally on what's profiling and what's not.

What did you expect? Trump is an arrogant pig.

 

[Auld Phart]

what did the 'old goat' joe do, that he didn't deserve a pardon?

If you're here to get an education, please first attend our screening for folks with an IQ above their age.

please first attend our screening for folks with an IQ above their age.

I suggest you take the class yourself.

and why are you deflecting from the question?

 

[Mac1958]

Mention to right wingers that Trump won election because of the outdated electoral college system.....and they quickly respond with....."LOOK at the Constitution..."

Or dare mention that stricter gun laws should be enacted to curb the butchery....and they quickly respond with........"LOOK at the Constitution."

But when one of their ilk is convicted of breaking tenets within the Constitution, like the old goat Joe Arpaio did and this bigot gets pardoned....some of them quickly respond with......"us racists stick together."

Yes, you're definitely right, hypocrisy is a common thread among partisans. Among many common threads.

Was this news?
.

 

[Auld Phart]

The job the feds authorized him to do.

I don't think"profiling" anyone with dark skin was in Joe's position description.

"I don't think" is the story of your life.

Were people of a certain skin tone the only people he arrested?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There have only been 2 presidents who assumed the presidency with less than the popular vote since the 1800s Bush and Trump, and Bush didn't even win........he was appointed by the SC.

One of two things here about that lie: you either are informed and realize you are lying, or you are uninformed and don't realize you're lying.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Mention to right wingers that Trump won election because of the outdated electoral college system.....and they quickly respond with....."LOOK at the Constitution..."

Or dare mention that stricter gun laws should be enacted to curb the butchery....and they quickly respond with........"LOOK at the Constitution."

But when one of their ilk is convicted of breaking tenets within the Constitution, like the old goat Joe Arpaio did and this bigot gets pardoned....some of them quickly respond with......"us racists stick together."

There are so many examples of rightwing hypocrisy one hardly knows where to start.

One of the more glaring examples is the right’s inconsistent application of “states’ rights.”

When the courts strike down as un-Constitutional state laws that violate the privacy rights of women or the equal protection rights of gay Americans, most on the right will whine about ‘activist’ judges who are ‘legislating from the bench’ and ignoring the ‘will of the people.’

But when the states enact firearm regulatory measures which are perfectly Constitutional and comport with current Second Amendment jurisprudence, conservatives run to those same courts and implore those same ‘activist’ judges to invalidate firearm regulatory measures, ignoring the ‘will of the people’ of the states that enacted the laws.

Conservatives can’t have it both ways.

If the ‘will of the people’ can be invalidated by the courts with regard to firearm regulatory measures, then the ‘will of the people’ can likewise be invalidated when the people seek to disadvantage women and gay Americans.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Mention to right wingers that Trump won election because of the outdated electoral college system.....and they quickly respond with....."LOOK at the Constitution..."

Or dare mention that stricter gun laws should be enacted to curb the butchery....and they quickly respond with........"LOOK at the Constitution."

But when one of their ilk is convicted of breaking tenets within the Constitution, like the old goat Joe Arpaio did and this bigot gets pardoned....some of them quickly respond with......"us racists stick together."

This sucks. Not because I think pardoning is a bad idea. But because it was literally a "contempt" misdeameanor and IT WAS UNDER APPEAL. Instead of waiting on the appeal, which prob would overturn the conviction because of the way the judge handled proceedings, Trump WANTED the controversy. He couldn't help himself from creating MORE friction than is needed.

Maybe he didn't want to miss the opportunity to have HIS name on it. And was AFRAID it would overturned on appeal. Even ICE can't agree internally on what's profiling and what's not.

What did you expect? Trump is an arrogant pig.

Oh, great argument.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Mention to right wingers that Trump won election because of the outdated electoral college system.....and they quickly respond with....."LOOK at the Constitution..."

Or dare mention that stricter gun laws should be enacted to curb the butchery....and they quickly respond with........"LOOK at the Constitution."

But when one of their ilk is convicted of breaking tenets within the Constitution, like the old goat Joe Arpaio did and this bigot gets pardoned....some of them quickly respond with......"us racists stick together."

Would you like a list of people your Presidents have pardoned in the past?

Crack Dealer Released Early From Prison By Obama Murders Woman And Her 2 Young Kids… ⋆ US Herald

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Conservatives can’t have it both ways.

If the ‘will of the people’ can be invalidated by the courts with regard to firearm regulatory measures, then the ‘will of the people’ can likewise be invalidated when the people seek to disadvantage women and gay Americans.

If you are referring to gay marriage, I would like you to point out the words gay marriage, or "gay" or "marriage" anywhere in the Constitution. I can point to "arms" in the Constitution, so I would say your argument is apples and oranges.

 

[nat4900]

Were people of a certain skin tone the only people he arrested?

Of course not.....but mostly "people of a certain skin tone".....

Did you know that fuck head Joe held people in his jails BEYOND their release date waiting for ICE to get around to them to check out their legal status???

Did you know that fuck head Joe had the judge (and his wife) investigated by his goons after being sentenced?

Law and order does NOT mean breaking laws because you're a hard core racist....Sheriff Joe is a modern day Bull Connors.

 

[nat4900]

I would like you to point out the words gay marriage, or "gay" or "marriage" anywhere in the Constitution. I can point to "arms" in the Constitution, so I would say your argument is apples and oranges.

Here's a rotten "apple" in the Constitution; the document was NOT without flaws and if you right wing morons want to get your MORALITY from the Constitution, you must also acknowledge your fucking prejudices and join Arpaio's morality ...

The Constitution ALSO addresses the existence and condoning of SLAVERY.
For example, the Enumeration Clause, where representatives are apportioned. Each state is given a number of representatives based on its population - in that population, slaves, called "other persons," are counted as three-fifths of a whole person.

 

[Doc1]

Mention to right wingers that Trump won election because of the outdated electoral college system.....and they quickly respond with....."LOOK at the Constitution..."

Or dare mention that stricter gun laws should be enacted to curb the butchery....and they quickly respond with........"LOOK at the Constitution."

But when one of their ilk is convicted of breaking tenets within the Constitution, like the old goat Joe Arpaio did and this bigot gets pardoned....some of them quickly respond with......"us racists stick together."

Poor Gnatty, crying all day every day because Trumpy beat Hillary and then has the temerity to pardon a man who was ding a job that Liberals hate and doing it well.

I'm curious how it's "racist" to enforce immigration Law?

 

[PredFan]

Mention to right wingers that Trump won election because of the outdated electoral college system.....and they quickly respond with....."LOOK at the Constitution..."

Or dare mention that stricter gun laws should be enacted to curb the butchery....and they quickly respond with........"LOOK at the Constitution."

But when one of their ilk is convicted of breaking tenets within the Constitution, like the old goat Joe Arpaio did and this bigot gets pardoned....some of them quickly respond with......"us racists stick together."

That is a huge straw man you built there. Have fun beating on it and crowing about your prowess.

 

[Doc1]

Were people of a certain skin tone the only people he arrested?

Of course not.....but mostly "people of a certain skin tone".....

Did you know that fuck head Joe held people in his jails BEYOND their release date waiting for ICE to get around to them to check out their legal status???

Did you know that fuck head Joe had the judge (and his wife) investigated by his goons after being sentenced?

Law and order does NOT mean breaking laws because you're a hard core racist....Sheriff Joe is a modern day Bull Connors.

You make a lot of noise, level a myriad of accusations and offer no proof whatsoever. Interesting. Intellectually vacuous, but interesting.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I would like you to point out the words gay marriage, or "gay" or "marriage" anywhere in the Constitution. I can point to "arms" in the Constitution, so I would say your argument is apples and oranges.

Here's a rotten "apple" in the Constitution; the document was NOT without flaws and if you right wing morons want to get your MORALITY from the Constitution, you must also acknowledge your fucking prejudices and join Arpaio's morality ...

The Constitution ALSO addresses the existence and condoning of SLAVERY.
For example, the Enumeration Clause, where representatives are apportioned. Each state is given a number of representatives based on its population - in that population, slaves, called "other persons," are counted as three-fifths of a whole person.

Uhhhhhhhh.......okay, but what does that have to do with the constitutionality of firearms and gay marriage?

 

[BULLDOG]

There have only been 2 presidents who assumed the presidency with less than the popular vote since the 1800s Bush and Trump, and Bush didn't even win........he was appointed by the SC.

One of two things here about that lie: you either are informed and realize you are lying, or you are uninformed and don't realize you're lying.

Presidents Winning Without Popular Vote - FactCheck.org
Q: How many times was a president elected who did not win the popular vote?

A: It has happened five times.

FULL ANSWER

The 2016 election was the most recent when the candidate who received the greatest number of electoral votes, and thus won the presidency, didn’t win the popular vote. But this scenario has played out in our nation’s history before.

In 1824, John Quincy Adams was elected president despite not winning either the popular vote or the electoral vote. Andrew Jackson was the winner in both categories. Jackson received 38,000 more popular votes than Adams, and beat him in the electoral vote 99 to 84. Despite his victories, Jackson didn’t reach the majority 131 votes needed in the Electoral College to be declared president. In fact, neither candidate did. The decision went to the House of Representatives, which voted Adams into the White House.

In 1876, Rutherford B. Hayes won the election (by a margin of one electoral vote), but he lost the popular vote by more than 250,000 ballots to Samuel J. Tilden.

In 1888, Benjamin Harrison received 233 electoral votes to Grover Cleveland’s 168, winning the presidency. But Harrison lost the popular vote by more than 90,000 votes.

In 2000, George W. Bush was declared the winner of the general election and became the 43rd president, but he didn’t win the popular vote either. Al Gore holds that distinction, garnering about 540,000 more votes than Bush. However, Bush won the electoral vote, 271 to 266.

In 2016, Donald Trump won the electoral vote by 304 to 227 over Hillary Clinton, but Trump lost the popular vote. Clinton received nearly 2.9 million more votes than Trump, according to an analysis by the Associated Press of the certified results in all 50 states and Washington, D.C.

Update, Dec. 23, 2016: We have updated this article to include the results of the 2016 election.
Sources
Office of the Federal Register, U.S. National Archives and Records Administration Web site, 2000 Presidential Election: Electoral Vote Totals, 12 March 2008

Office of the Federal Register, U.S. National Archives and Records Administration Web site, 2000 Presidential Election: Popular Vote Totals, 12 March 2008

Office of the Federal Register, U.S. National Archives and Records Administration Web site, Historical Election Results: 1789-2004 Presidential Elections, 12 March 2008

 

[Auld Phart]

Were people of a certain skin tone the only people he arrested?

Of course not.....but mostly "people of a certain skin tone".....

Did you know that fuck head Joe held people in his jails BEYOND their release date waiting for ICE to get around to them to check out their legal status???

Did you know that fuck head Joe had the judge (and his wife) investigated by his goons after being sentenced?

Law and order does NOT mean breaking laws because you're a hard core racist....Sheriff Joe is a modern day Bull Connors.

Did you know that fuck head Joe held people in his jails BEYOND their release date waiting for ICE to get around to them to check out their legal status???

didn't know there was a statue of limitations on checking the status of illegal immigrants.

How long is it?