- Sep 16, 2012
- 59,560
- 53,372
- 3,605
Thatās a very optimistic theory. I hope itās right, but fear it isnāt. I donāt believe Donnie is that smart.lol weāll see.I donāt watch any. Iām just a lot smarter than you.You watch way too much television news.We can only hope the Ayatollahs show restraint. You know? The Ayatollahs Americans are told are blood thirsty animals. If they donāt, here comes WWIII.
Crazy Don has really fucked up. Ironic that we have to hope the leaders of Iran keep their heads.
OTH. ..
This all could be one giant elaborate ruse of Trump's to outsmart the Deep State and the Military?
If after it is all done, if Gipper IS right, and the Iranians show restraint, and the U.S. ends up having to leave, not only Iraq, but Syria and possibly Afghanistan as well, doesn't Trump get what he has always wanted, over and above, Israel, the Military, the Deep State and all the generals?
After U.S. Strike On Iraqi Forces Its Troops Will (Again) Have To Leave
MoA - After U.S. Strike On Iraqi Forces Its Troops Will (Again) Have To Leave
". . . There are some 5,000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq in bases which also house 10,000nds of Iraqi soldiers and PMF troops. Revenge attacks are now inevitable:
In the aftermath of the American strikes, Iraqi Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi said, āWe have already confirmed our rejection of any unilateral action by coalition forces or any other forces inside Iraq. We consider it a violation of Iraqās sovereignty and a dangerous escalation that threatens the security of Iraq and the region,ā according to a statement released on Iraqi state television.
Abdul-Mahdi now finds himself facing the nightmare possibility of Iranian-linked paramilitaries, whose political wings hold enormous sway over his government, going to war with American forces on Iraqi territory, which would compound a disastrous few months in which the deaths of hundreds of protestors have been laid at his feet, prompting him to hand in his resignation to parliament.
The coming days and weeks will answer a number of questions about how this perilous situation will play out, primarily how far are the paramilitaries willing to act upon their rhetoric which has endlessly stated that the American presence in Iraq is a continuation of the occupation, in addition to their readiness to take military action in order to force out the Americans, āonce againā.
The U.S. and Israel have already killed hundreds of Iraqi forces that are aligned with Iran. But these were the most egregious strikes. There is no doubt. The U.S. forces will have to (again) leave Iraq:
Brasco_Aad @Brasco_Aad - 19:55 UTC Ā· Dec 29, 2019
Iraqi PMU Asai'b Ahl al-Haq statement on the American attack on Iraq tonight:
''The American military presence has become a burden for the State and a source of aggression against our forces and therefore it has become mandatory for all of us to expel them from Iraq.''
U.S. President Donald Trump had declared that he wants U.S. troops to leave the Middle East. But the 'deep state', the Pentagon and State Department bureaucracy, have resisted any such move:
Pompeo, Esper and Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, flew to Palm Beach, Florida, after the operation to brief President Donald Trump.
Esper said they discussed with Trump āother options that are availableā to respond to Iran.
...
Trump was at Mar-a-Lago but did not appear with his top national security officials. After Pompeo and Esper spoke, the president traveled to his private golf club in West Palm Beach. The White House did not immediately say why Trump returned to the club after spending nearly six hours there earlier Sunday.
Yesterday's attacks guarantee that all U.S. troops will have to leave Iraq and will thereby also lose their supply lines to Syria.
One wonders if that was the real intent of those strikes."
I agree.
More than likely, the gang of eight had always known about this, since Israel gave the coordinates of the assassination.
It is my suspicion, that this is the true reason these articles of impeachment have been held up. Blackmail? Trump has made clear he doesn't have an interest in more war, so how do you get him to engage in nation building and being like previous presidents? Perhaps he was always lying, but he was so consistent throughout Obama and Bush. How do you get him to do the bidding of the dogs of war? It seems to be the exact reverse of everything he has criticized the previous administrations for. It is a complete continuation of establishment policy and a reversal of everything he has said for 30 years.
This antagonism has been planned. However, I just don't think Iran will take the bait.
![before-usa-after-usa-iraq-libya-a-reminder-that-much-38491812.png](https://pics.me.me/before-usa-after-usa-iraq-libya-a-reminder-that-much-38491812.png)