Only In A Democrat Kangaroo Court Can A Democrat Be A Witness, Judge, & Jurer

[sartre play]

If you don't watch you don't learn, the 15 min break is over. Watch both half's of the trial. for and against use your God given mind, not some ones face book post.

 

[bodecea]

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment
“Judge” Votes With Democrats in Vote to
Impeach Private Citizen



"This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump."

"Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham proceeding."


This whole thing would be funny if it was not both Un-Constitutional & Criminaly treasonous.

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment "Judge" Votes With Democrats in Vote to Impeach Private Citizen

This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. Democrats don’t care. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump. Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Ah...desperation now?

 

[easyt65]

Ah...desperation now?

I would say so...

Democrats who openly wept, ran out into the streets, and screamed at the sky after Hillary lost in 2016....

Democrats who not only failed to affect a political coup attempt to overthrow the US govt by illegally and treasonously removing the US President with the help of the Russian Intel Service and foreign ex-spies but were also exposwed for having tried to do so....

Democrats who were defeated by President Trump over and over and over again for 4 years....

Democrats who Un-Constitutionally and illegally attempted to Impeach President Trump once before in the 1st politically partisan Impeachment in US history and were again thewarted / defeated...

The same criminal, treasonous Deep State, CCP-owned, exposed Democrats and the humiliated, exposed media whose credibility was literally destroyed....

...having to set up a pre-planned faux 'spontaneous Incited Insurrection' to create a reason to admittedly abuse the Constitution agin by attempting to Impeach a former President / civilian in an attempt to protect the Democrat Party ... and their CCP masters ... from the perceived political threat of President Trump in 2024 and beyond....

....having at exposed Democrat CCP-espionage facilitator lead the Impeachment process to ensure the Democrat party...and CCP...is protected from the possible return of President Trump inthe future...

....a Democrat party whose obvious desperate obsession-driven attempt to achieve revenge was rejected by the USSC Chief justice, forcing them to appoint a Trump-hating Democrat member of Congress as witness, juror, and presideing Judge of the fully obvious partisan circus....


Yeah, the whole cow pie reeks of Democrat obession-driven desparation.

Bwuhahahahahaha......

 

[Batcat]

In this nation at this time there are two sets of rules and two rules of law. One applies to republicans (especially to Deplorables) and the other to democrats.

I can agree to the former but not the latter, One applies to the haves and the other applies to the have nots.

True, but the difference between how the law applies to the haves and have nots has always existed historically. Over millenniums the difference has decreased to a degree but still has a way to go. It is difficult to provide an individual with no money one of the best attorneys in the nation. O. J. Simpson would have likely been convicted of murder in his criminal trial if he was just a “little person.” He would have never had his “dream team.”

What I am seeing today is that the DOJ and the FBI favors high level democrats over high level republicans. That’s how we ended up with a President who when VP sold his influence to China through deals made by his son. The evidence of this malfeasance is on a computer that belonged to Hunter Biden. The FBI has had possession of that computer and its damning evidence since December of 2019. Now of course Hunter will waltz away Scot-Free as will Joe.

Now if one of Trump’s kids would have pulled off a lucrative deal with China using in a field he had no expertise in you can bet your ass the shit would have QUICKLY hit the fan. Trump would have been impeached for running a pay for play racket like Joe and Hillary and removed from office so quickly your head would spin.

 

[B. Kidd]

There is nothing in that 'shall' that prohibits the Senate trying him for acts he committed as President.

Why do you and your ilk continue to shit on our Constitution?

Secretary of War Belknap though he could get away from impeachment by secretly resigning. The house impeached him anyway, and the senate tried him. The senate even debated if they could try a private citizen, and they agreed they had that power.

They was wrong then and is wrong now!

 

[WTF19]

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment
“Judge” Votes With Democrats in Vote to
Impeach Private Citizen



"This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump."

"Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham proceeding."


This whole thing would be funny if it was not both Un-Constitutional & Criminaly treasonous.

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment "Judge" Votes With Democrats in Vote to Impeach Private Citizen

This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. Democrats don’t care. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump. Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

For those whose "Civics" class dealt with how to change the muffler on a Honda, it's standard procedure for some Senator to preside in the Chamber, and standard for the President Pro Tempore or the Vice President to preside in an impeachment of other than a sitting POTUS. That standard procedure includes voting, always did, from Daniel Inouye at the impeachment of Porteus to Thomas Jefferson at the impeachment of Blount in the eighteenth century. NONE of which has a goddam thing to do with political parties.

Perhaps news travels slow to the OP's home garbage can.

The fact that you are attempting to defend the Democrats running a kangaroo Court with a Trump-hating Democrat as witness, judge, and juror only proves my point. The Un-Constitutionality and ridiculousness of this whole thing is why Roberts wants no part in it.

It's a sham. Onlysnowflakes can and will try to defend such a joke.

If your teacher ever succeeds in teaching you how to read, you'll notice that not only does the quoted post have no need to "defend" jack friggety, being a simple Cliff's Notes primer for the uninterested on How The Senate Works, but you'll also discover --- oh happy day - discovery --- that I specifically pointed out that it has NOTHING to do with political parties anyway.

I posted a simple outline of how the Senate routinely works. Go find a flaw in any of what I put down. And when you realize you can't do it, that's your cue to come back and kiss my ass. Think you can handle that? I know that'll take you a while so imma go ahead and have a bowl of chili.

typical retarded demonRAT, always wanting someone else to do for them...how sad

 

[WTF19]

Nonsense.
It's unconstitutional to apply an impeachment process to a private citizen.

That isn't provided in the Constitution, correct. It's moot in this case though, as Rump was impeached while he was in office. Both times.

Half an impeachment does not a TOTAL impeachment make! Idiot.

You talk of an impeachment process. Which would be the impeachment, and the trial. Once the ball starts rolling, why should a change of status, especially one caused by intentional delays, change anything.

You are making a case that someone impeached could wait for the senators to vote guilty / not guilty, and if it looks like he would be convicted, he resign effective immediately, thus becoming a private citizen. Making the trial moot, and any judgement unconstitutional.

An impeachment get out of jail free clause.

yes, yes....you are a retard

 

[B. Kidd]

Nonsense.
It's unconstitutional to apply an impeachment process to a private citizen.

That isn't provided in the Constitution, correct. It's moot in this case though, as Rump was impeached while he was in office. Both times.

Half an impeachment does not a TOTAL impeachment make! Idiot.

You talk of an impeachment process. Which would be the impeachment, and the trial. Once the ball starts rolling, why should a change of status, especially one caused by intentional delays, change anything.

You are making a case that someone impeached could wait for the senators to vote guilty / not guilty, and if it looks like he would be convicted, he resign effective immediately, thus becoming a private citizen. Making the trial moot, and any judgement unconstitutional.

An impeachment get out of jail free clause.

yes, yes....you are a retard

A postman is one grade level above being on welfare! Only have to know how to read and sort. No thought really required!!

 

[Pogo]

Whelp, here's why we don't do that. A Senate impeachment trial is not a CRIMINAL trial. It isn't proving a crime occurred nor can it administer judicial penalty for it.

Nancy Pelosi already confessed the Impeachment is a sham, an abuse of power being carried out to protect the Democratic Partyfrpm a perceived future political threat.

The FBI has already proved that the events of 6 Jan was the result of pre-planning that did not include the knowledge or participation of the President.

The President's speech Transcripts prove he did not call for violence - just the opposite.

The reason the Democrats have had to put a Trump-hating Democrat as witness, juror, and Judge is because al the evidence - and Pelosi's confession - dstroys their case, whelp.

Absolute fucking bullshit. There is no such "confession" nor does there need to be, as the impeachment trial is ENTIRELY about Rump. Pelosi's only even mentioned in it as a specific personal target of his brownshirts.

 

[Pogo]

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment
“Judge” Votes With Democrats in Vote to
Impeach Private Citizen



"This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump."

"Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham proceeding."


This whole thing would be funny if it was not both Un-Constitutional & Criminaly treasonous.

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment "Judge" Votes With Democrats in Vote to Impeach Private Citizen

This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. Democrats don’t care. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump. Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

For those whose "Civics" class dealt with how to change the muffler on a Honda, it's standard procedure for some Senator to preside in the Chamber, and standard for the President Pro Tempore or the Vice President to preside in an impeachment of other than a sitting POTUS. That standard procedure includes voting, always did, from Daniel Inouye at the impeachment of Porteus to Thomas Jefferson at the impeachment of Blount in the eighteenth century. NONE of which has a goddam thing to do with political parties.

Perhaps news travels slow to the OP's home garbage can.

Bull. Spare us the sophistry. Leahy is a partisan leftist hack. That's all.

Actually he's the President Pro Tempore as the longest-serving Senator. That's all there is to it.

As was Inouye in the Porteus impeachment. And so on.

For those of you completely oblivious to Robert's Rules of Order, all the chair does is keep order, declare the session open or adjourned, etc. Partisanship" doesn't even enter into that.

He has no vote but he is a partisan hack. Anyway, this is kabuki theatre of the ages. It's all a show based on propaganda and partisan hackery. Nothing else.

Of course he has a vote, he's a fuckin' Senator. Read your Constitution.

Speaking of which nothing about that Document is "partisan" in any way shape or form. Political parties didn't even EXIST when it was created. As for what it's based on, you have a SHITLOAD of video evidence to catch up on.

 

[B. Kidd]

Whelp, here's why we don't do that. A Senate impeachment trial is not a CRIMINAL trial. It isn't proving a crime occurred nor can it administer judicial penalty for it.

Nancy Pelosi already confessed the Impeachment is a sham, an abuse of power being carried out to protect the Democratic Partyfrpm a perceived future political threat.

The FBI has already proved that the events of 6 Jan was the result of pre-planning that did not include the knowledge or participation of the President.

The President's speech Transcripts prove he did not call for violence - just the opposite.

The reason the Democrats have had to put a Trump-hating Democrat as witness, juror, and Judge is because al the evidence - and Pelosi's confession - dstroys their case, whelp.

Absolute fucking bullshit. There is no such "confession" nor does there need to be, as the impeachment trial is ENTIRELY about Rump. Pelosi's only even mentioned in it as a specific personal target of his brownshirts.

Let's bring in witnesses!
I want witnesses NOW!!!

 

[Pogo]

If you don't like it, then amend the constitution. Or suggest that everybody witness to what happened on 1-6 recuse themselves from the jury.

The Constitution states an Impeachment mustbe presided by the Chief justice, who refuses to participate in an Un-Constitutional abuse of power intended to protect the Democratic party from a perceived future political Threat.



I would welcome witnesses. I would love to see called as witnesses:

1. FBI Members
They could testify how the events of 6 jan were Pre-planned on BigTech Twitter and facebook without the President's knowledge, participation, or encouragement / incitement.

The FBVI could answer why they knew abot the Pending violence and did nothing to stop it.

2. Capitol Police
Theycould alsoanswer the question about how theyknew of the pending violence and did nothing to prevent it or beef up to be ready for it. They could testify / answer to why their members moved barriers to give the tioters access to the Capitol, why they stood down and allowed windows to be broken and entry into ther Capitol, why they guided rioters throughthe Capitol...WHO paid them / ordered them to do so....

3. Maxine Waters
She could testify about how she incited illegal public harassment and confrontateion / assault og GOP Reps and Trump Team Members

4. Nancy Pelosi
She could testify how she and other Democfrats incited the attempted assassination of GOP Politicians, how immediatelyafterwards Democrats apologized for their violent rhetoric that contributed to the attempted murder of fellow Republicn politicians...she couls also testify about her own threats against the President. UYse the videotape of Pelosi's interview in whichshe declres this is a Democrat Shhap Impeachment to protect the Party by finally taking out Trump - use it againsther and the Democrats

5. Chuck Schumer
He could answer for his threat of violence against USSC justices

6 The current VP, Harris
She could answer for helping bail out terrorists during riots that caused BILLIONS of dollars in damage throughout Democrat-run communities to put these terrorists back on the streets to perpetrate more crime / damage...she could answer for inciting Antifa / BLM to continue committing acts of terrorism and violence after the election

7. Feinstein, Swalwell
They can answer for their CCP-espionage facilitation and answer the question if the CCP funded, supported, or incited Antifa's / BLM's participation in ther 6 Jan violence, since it is already proven these groups are partially funded bythe CCP.

I would welcome putting Democrats on trial as well.

I'm sure you would "welcome" a carton of comic books delivered to your door in which the world works that way. Irrelevant.

 

[Pogo]

Whelp, here's why we don't do that. A Senate impeachment trial is not a CRIMINAL trial. It isn't proving a crime occurred nor can it administer judicial penalty for it.

Nancy Pelosi already confessed the Impeachment is a sham, an abuse of power being carried out to protect the Democratic Partyfrpm a perceived future political threat.

The FBI has already proved that the events of 6 Jan was the result of pre-planning that did not include the knowledge or participation of the President.

The President's speech Transcripts prove he did not call for violence - just the opposite.

The reason the Democrats have had to put a Trump-hating Democrat as witness, juror, and Judge is because al the evidence - and Pelosi's confession - dstroys their case, whelp.

Absolute fucking bullshit. There is no such "confession" nor does there need to be, as the impeachment trial is ENTIRELY about Rump. Pelosi's only even mentioned in it as a specific personal target of his brownshirts.

Let's bring in witnesses!
I want witnesses NOW!!!

Cool, let's do it. Although you know, there are some 538 witnesses available, over 100 of which are right there in the room, plus an untold number of staffers and spectators. We could set records for number of witnesses in the room --- we probably already have.

But let's bring in who's not in the room, starting with Mike Pence. And then once he's safely out of the room, Rump himself. Let's do it. Hell bring in Rooty and the hair dye too. We'll have pizza delivered. Complete with a knife and fork so Rump can have some too.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment
“Judge” Votes With Democrats in Vote to
Impeach Private Citizen



"This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump."

"Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham proceeding."


This whole thing would be funny if it was not both Un-Constitutional & Criminaly treasonous.

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment "Judge" Votes With Democrats in Vote to Impeach Private Citizen

This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. Democrats don’t care. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump. Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

For those whose "Civics" class dealt with how to change the muffler on a Honda, it's standard procedure for some Senator to preside in the Chamber, and standard for the President Pro Tempore or the Vice President to preside in an impeachment of other than a sitting POTUS. That standard procedure includes voting, always did, from Daniel Inouye at the impeachment of Porteus to Thomas Jefferson at the impeachment of Blount in the eighteenth century. NONE of which has a goddam thing to do with political parties.

Perhaps news travels slow to the OP's home garbage can.

Bull. Spare us the sophistry. Leahy is a partisan leftist hack. That's all.

Actually he's the President Pro Tempore as the longest-serving Senator. That's all there is to it.

As was Inouye in the Porteus impeachment. And so on.

For those of you completely oblivious to Robert's Rules of Order, all the chair does is keep order, declare the session open or adjourned, etc. Partisanship" doesn't even enter into that.

He has no vote but he is a partisan hack. Anyway, this is kabuki theatre of the ages. It's all a show based on propaganda and partisan hackery. Nothing else.

Of course he has a vote, he's a fuckin' Senator. Read your Constitution.

Speaking of which nothing about that Document is "partisan" in any way shape or form. Political parties didn't even EXIST when it was created. As for what it's based on, you have a SHITLOAD of video evidence to catch up on.

You just contradicted yourself. He is part of the jury and yes, leahy is a partisan leftist hack.

 

[B. Kidd]

Whelp, here's why we don't do that. A Senate impeachment trial is not a CRIMINAL trial. It isn't proving a crime occurred nor can it administer judicial penalty for it.

Nancy Pelosi already confessed the Impeachment is a sham, an abuse of power being carried out to protect the Democratic Partyfrpm a perceived future political threat.

The FBI has already proved that the events of 6 Jan was the result of pre-planning that did not include the knowledge or participation of the President.

The President's speech Transcripts prove he did not call for violence - just the opposite.

The reason the Democrats have had to put a Trump-hating Democrat as witness, juror, and Judge is because al the evidence - and Pelosi's confession - dstroys their case, whelp.

Absolute fucking bullshit. There is no such "confession" nor does there need to be, as the impeachment trial is ENTIRELY about Rump. Pelosi's only even mentioned in it as a specific personal target of his brownshirts.

Let's bring in witnesses!
I want witnesses NOW!!!

Cool, let's do it. Although you know, there are some 538 witnesses available, over 100 of which are right there in the room, plus an untold number of staffers and spectators. We could set records for number of witnesses in the room --- we probably already have.

But let's bring in who's not in the room, starting with Mike Pence. And then once he's safely out of the room, Rump himself. Let's do it. Hell bring in Rooty and the hair dye too. We'll have pizza delivered. Complete with a knife and fork so Rump can have some too.

Bring on all 538 and add a thousand more!
Maybe this bitch can be stretched out until the mid-term elections!

 

[Pogo]

Nonsense.
It's unconstitutional to apply an impeachment process to a private citizen.

Trump wasn't a private citizen when he incited violence.
Trump wasn't a private citizen when they impeached him
Trump wasn't a private citizen when they delivered the articles of impeachment to the senate for trial.
But Mitch McConnell sat on his hands to give Trump time to become a private citizen.
But that doesn't fly.

If the republican delay made the trial unconstitutional, then the republican delay would be unconstitutional.

This whole shitshow infomercial is unconstitutional!
The penalty for impeachment is removal from office. He is not in office dimwit!

Removal from office is not the only penalty of being convicted.

It's the primary one and the Constitution uses the word 'Shall' meaning that it has to be applied! It cannot be applied because he is not sitting in office. Therefore, one more reason this Shampeachment IS unconstitutional!

Once AGAIN --- read the text.

>> Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to [sic] removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law. << --- Article 1 Section 3 Clause 7​

There is no such designation of "primary" or "secondary". There's no preference stated at all. What it actually says is "SHALL NOT", not "shall". That doesn't mean EITHER of them MUST happen (it's technically possible to convict on impeachment but neither remove from office nor disqualify from future office) --- rather, it's a LIMITATION. "Shall not extend further than", IOW "you can do A, you can do B, you can do A and B, but you can't do anything else'.

 

[Pogo]

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment
“Judge” Votes With Democrats in Vote to
Impeach Private Citizen



"This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump."

"Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham proceeding."


This whole thing would be funny if it was not both Un-Constitutional & Criminaly treasonous.

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment "Judge" Votes With Democrats in Vote to Impeach Private Citizen

This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. Democrats don’t care. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump. Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

For those whose "Civics" class dealt with how to change the muffler on a Honda, it's standard procedure for some Senator to preside in the Chamber, and standard for the President Pro Tempore or the Vice President to preside in an impeachment of other than a sitting POTUS. That standard procedure includes voting, always did, from Daniel Inouye at the impeachment of Porteus to Thomas Jefferson at the impeachment of Blount in the eighteenth century. NONE of which has a goddam thing to do with political parties.

Perhaps news travels slow to the OP's home garbage can.

Bull. Spare us the sophistry. Leahy is a partisan leftist hack. That's all.

Actually he's the President Pro Tempore as the longest-serving Senator. That's all there is to it.

As was Inouye in the Porteus impeachment. And so on.

For those of you completely oblivious to Robert's Rules of Order, all the chair does is keep order, declare the session open or adjourned, etc. Partisanship" doesn't even enter into that.

He has no vote but he is a partisan hack. Anyway, this is kabuki theatre of the ages. It's all a show based on propaganda and partisan hackery. Nothing else.

Of course he has a vote, he's a fuckin' Senator. Read your Constitution.

Speaking of which nothing about that Document is "partisan" in any way shape or form. Political parties didn't even EXIST when it was created. As for what it's based on, you have a SHITLOAD of video evidence to catch up on.

You just contradicted yourself. He is part of the jury and yes, leahy is a partisan leftist hack.

There's no contradiction. Prove me wrong.

If he's "part of the jury" then how would he not have a vote? Think about it.

One other correction, there is no "leahy". His name is Leahy. Proper names get capitalized in English. And your characterization of his politics matters not a whit as he's not your Senator.

 

[Pogo]

Democrats who Un-Constitutionally and illegally attempted to Impeach President Trump once before in the 1st politically partisan Impeachment in US history and were again thewarted / defeated...

Ummmmmmmmmm............ the 1st politically partisan impeachment --- of a President anyway --- happened in 1868 there Rip van Winkle, and it was Republicans who got thwarted.

 

[B. Kidd]

Nonsense.
It's unconstitutional to apply an impeachment process to a private citizen.

Trump wasn't a private citizen when he incited violence.
Trump wasn't a private citizen when they impeached him
Trump wasn't a private citizen when they delivered the articles of impeachment to the senate for trial.
But Mitch McConnell sat on his hands to give Trump time to become a private citizen.
But that doesn't fly.

If the republican delay made the trial unconstitutional, then the republican delay would be unconstitutional.

This whole shitshow infomercial is unconstitutional!
The penalty for impeachment is removal from office. He is not in office dimwit!

Removal from office is not the only penalty of being convicted.

It's the primary one and the Constitution uses the word 'Shall' meaning that it has to be applied! It cannot be applied because he is not sitting in office. Therefore, one more reason this Shampeachment IS unconstitutional!

Once AGAIN --- read the text.

>> Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to [sic] removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law. << --- Article 1 Section 3 Clause 7​

There is no such designation of "primary" or "secondary". There's no preference stated at all. What it actually says is "SHALL NOT", not "shall". That doesn't mean EITHER of them MUST happen (it's technically possible to convict on impeachment but neither remove from office nor disqualify from future office) --- rather, it's a LIMITATION. "Shall not extend further than", IOW "you can do A, you can do B, you can do A and B, but you can't do anything else'.

Shall means must. Most Constitutional experts agree on this.
Trump must be removed from office upon impeachment.
The problem is, there is NO office he has as a private citizen.
It's just this simple and UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment
“Judge” Votes With Democrats in Vote to
Impeach Private Citizen



"This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump."

"Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham proceeding."


This whole thing would be funny if it was not both Un-Constitutional & Criminaly treasonous.

Banana Republic: Impartial Impeachment "Judge" Votes With Democrats in Vote to Impeach Private Citizen

This is what happens in banana republics and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. Democrats don’t care. The Senate impeachment “judge” voted on Tuesday to proceed with the impeachment of private citizen Donald Trump. Far-left Senator Patrick Leahy is acting as witness, juror and judge in this sham...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

For those whose "Civics" class dealt with how to change the muffler on a Honda, it's standard procedure for some Senator to preside in the Chamber, and standard for the President Pro Tempore or the Vice President to preside in an impeachment of other than a sitting POTUS. That standard procedure includes voting, always did, from Daniel Inouye at the impeachment of Porteus to Thomas Jefferson at the impeachment of Blount in the eighteenth century. NONE of which has a goddam thing to do with political parties.

Perhaps news travels slow to the OP's home garbage can.

Bull. Spare us the sophistry. Leahy is a partisan leftist hack. That's all.

Actually he's the President Pro Tempore as the longest-serving Senator. That's all there is to it.

As was Inouye in the Porteus impeachment. And so on.

For those of you completely oblivious to Robert's Rules of Order, all the chair does is keep order, declare the session open or adjourned, etc. Partisanship" doesn't even enter into that.

He has no vote but he is a partisan hack. Anyway, this is kabuki theatre of the ages. It's all a show based on propaganda and partisan hackery. Nothing else.

Of course he has a vote, he's a fuckin' Senator. Read your Constitution.

Speaking of which nothing about that Document is "partisan" in any way shape or form. Political parties didn't even EXIST when it was created. As for what it's based on, you have a SHITLOAD of video evidence to catch up on.

You just contradicted yourself. He is part of the jury and yes, leahy is a partisan leftist hack.

There's no contradiction. Prove me wrong.

If he's "part of the jury" then how would he not have a vote? Think about it.

One other correction, there is no "leahy". His name is Leahy. Proper names get capitalized in English. And your characterization of his politics matters not a whit as he's not your Senator.

Again, I know grammar and english well. I don't waste time on a message board using capital letters....or for that matter, proper english or grammar. If I were writing an abstract for work I would use proper grammar. Get it. Lol.