Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's that anger thing again. Have you tried Prozak? It might help.You seem to have a lot of stupidity, if it's not wilful, then you have no business commenting on this until you're better informed as to the meaning of "arm's length transactions".
You're still mischaractizing the Clinton Campaign's purchase of opposition research. Hillary didn't direct her lawyers to purchase dirt on Donald Trump from Russian nationals. She directed to lawyers to obtain opposition research on Donald Trump.
Miss Cleo again?Her lawyers didn't direct Fusion GPS to obtain dirt on Donald Trump from Russian nationals. They directed Fusion GPS to obtain opposition research on Donald Trump.
Miss Cleo?In order for Hillary Clinton to make "a stawman purchase" she would have to have known who and where the opposition research was coming from and the direct her middlemen as to who to deal with. She gave no direction to her staff, nor did they provide any direction to her go-betweens.
Back atcha Sweetpea. If you have any links to back up any of your "facts" I will gladly grovel at your feet and proclaim you my queen.I don't suffer fools gladly. I have no patience with those who don't fact check or take the trouble to admit when they're wrong. You clearly are guilty of both. Start fact checking and you'll stop making a total fool of yourself.
Of course trump's assertion about accepting foreign help is ridiculous. It is illegal! trump is aspiring to break the law!
Ask yourself...What would Ronald Reagan say about the words of Donald trump. RR....the man who brought the Soviet Union down...trump is an embarassment.....
There's that anger thing again. Have you tried Prozak? It might help.You seem to have a lot of stupidity, if it's not wilful, then you have no business commenting on this until you're better informed as to the meaning of "arm's length transactions".
You're still mischaractizing the Clinton Campaign's purchase of opposition research. Hillary didn't direct her lawyers to purchase dirt on Donald Trump from Russian nationals. She directed to lawyers to obtain opposition research on Donald Trump.
Really? Are you channeling Miss Cleo, or were you with the part of the Clinton campaign that engaged Perkins?
Miss Cleo again?Her lawyers didn't direct Fusion GPS to obtain dirt on Donald Trump from Russian nationals. They directed Fusion GPS to obtain opposition research on Donald Trump.
Miss Cleo?In order for Hillary Clinton to make "a stawman purchase" she would have to have known who and where the opposition research was coming from and the direct her middlemen as to who to deal with. She gave no direction to her staff, nor did they provide any direction to her go-betweens.
Back atcha Sweetpea. If you have any links to back up any of your "facts" I will gladly grovel at your feet and proclaim you my queen.I don't suffer fools gladly. I have no patience with those who don't fact check or take the trouble to admit when they're wrong. You clearly are guilty of both. Start fact checking and you'll stop making a total fool of yourself.
Another Media-Fueled Collusion Narrative Falls ApartThere's that anger thing again. Have you tried Prozak? It might help.You seem to have a lot of stupidity, if it's not wilful, then you have no business commenting on this until you're better informed as to the meaning of "arm's length transactions".
You're still mischaractizing the Clinton Campaign's purchase of opposition research. Hillary didn't direct her lawyers to purchase dirt on Donald Trump from Russian nationals. She directed to lawyers to obtain opposition research on Donald Trump.
Really? Are you channeling Miss Cleo, or were you with the part of the Clinton campaign that engaged Perkins?
Miss Cleo again?Her lawyers didn't direct Fusion GPS to obtain dirt on Donald Trump from Russian nationals. They directed Fusion GPS to obtain opposition research on Donald Trump.
Miss Cleo?In order for Hillary Clinton to make "a stawman purchase" she would have to have known who and where the opposition research was coming from and the direct her middlemen as to who to deal with. She gave no direction to her staff, nor did they provide any direction to her go-betweens.
Back atcha Sweetpea. If you have any links to back up any of your "facts" I will gladly grovel at your feet and proclaim you my queen.I don't suffer fools gladly. I have no patience with those who don't fact check or take the trouble to admit when they're wrong. You clearly are guilty of both. Start fact checking and you'll stop making a total fool of yourself.
Christopher Steele, the Man Behind the Trump Dossier
You know, one of the problems outlined in the Mueller report concerning Trump was that there was no way to prove intent, which is one of the reasons that there were no charges brought. If they had been able to prove intent, then Trump would be facing charges right now.
Interesting thing about this upcoming election, is that if Russia does any kind of meddling like they did last time, and it is favorable to Trump, the comments he just made will be enough to prove intent.
You mean covered up by either Bill Clinton or Barak Obama.Everything Hillary Clinton has ever done in her life has been investigated - multiple times, and each and every time she has been investigated, there has been no evidence of wrongdoing. Not, as in the case of Donald Trump "not enough evidence to convict", but "no evidence of wrong doing", and yet everything she has ever done has been documented, scrutinized by the media and Republicans, and investigated up the ying yang.
Seriously, if you were the Clintons and you knew the Judicial Watch, the entire Republican Party, a special prosecutor, and a whole bunch of people were looking for something, anything they could use to "lock her up", would you be breaking the law on a daily basis, and leaving a paper trail of bribery and corruption? And would someone have ratted them out by now. No one ever has. Other than Anita Broaddrick, not one person turned on Clinton, and they were all offered immunity to do so, and she had to do it or go to jail.
It took Donald Trump less than 6 months to land himself in trouble for corruption charges on his Inauguration Fund and golf club initiation fees, not to mention billing the SS for rooms and meals every weekend. The Clinton's survived 17 investigations without a single charge or a single claim of wrong doing.
Trump couldn't survive ONE investigation without committing impeachable offences.
You know, one of the problems outlined in the Mueller report concerning Trump was that there was no way to prove intent, which is one of the reasons that there were no charges brought. If they had been able to prove intent, then Trump would be facing charges right now.
Interesting thing about this upcoming election, is that if Russia does any kind of meddling like they did last time, and it is favorable to Trump, the comments he just made will be enough to prove intent.
Nonsense, Sailor. Mueller indicated possibly corrupt intent in several instance of obstructive behavior, and even outlined how a pattern of such obstructive behavior would itself be indicative of corrupt intent.
She only humiliated herself She was Scumps liar of choiceI will. I love watching her humiliate the fake news media.OT Sanders leaving WH Who will miss the lying pos?
There's that anger thing again. Have you tried Prozak? It might help.You seem to have a lot of stupidity, if it's not wilful, then you have no business commenting on this until you're better informed as to the meaning of "arm's length transactions".
You're still mischaractizing the Clinton Campaign's purchase of opposition research. Hillary didn't direct her lawyers to purchase dirt on Donald Trump from Russian nationals. She directed to lawyers to obtain opposition research on Donald Trump.
Really? Are you channeling Miss Cleo, or were you with the part of the Clinton campaign that engaged Perkins?
Miss Cleo again?Her lawyers didn't direct Fusion GPS to obtain dirt on Donald Trump from Russian nationals. They directed Fusion GPS to obtain opposition research on Donald Trump.
Miss Cleo?In order for Hillary Clinton to make "a stawman purchase" she would have to have known who and where the opposition research was coming from and the direct her middlemen as to who to deal with. She gave no direction to her staff, nor did they provide any direction to her go-betweens.
Back atcha Sweetpea. If you have any links to back up any of your "facts" I will gladly grovel at your feet and proclaim you my queen.I don't suffer fools gladly. I have no patience with those who don't fact check or take the trouble to admit when they're wrong. You clearly are guilty of both. Start fact checking and you'll stop making a total fool of yourself.
And what's worse is the punk republicans in congress who SHOULD know better stay silent
"Possibly corrupt intent". But, because he didn't have anything solid to back it up, he didn't press charges. He said it was that, as well as the policy of not indicting a sitting president as to why he didn't press charges.
The Clinton Cartel has broken so many laws that the Mafia looks like Choir boys.Everything Hillary Clinton has ever done in her life has been investigated - multiple times, and each and every time she has been investigated, there has been no evidence of wrongdoing. Not, as in the case of Donald Trump "not enough evidence to convict", but "no evidence of wrong doing", and yet everything she has ever done has been documented, scrutinized by the media and Republicans, and investigated up the ying yang.
Seriously, if you were the Clintons and you knew the Judicial Watch, the entire Republican Party, a special prosecutor, and a whole bunch of people were looking for something, anything they could use to "lock her up", would you be breaking the law on a daily basis, and leaving a paper trail of bribery and corruption? And would someone have ratted them out by now. No one ever has. Other than Anita Broaddrick, not one person turned on Clinton, and they were all offered immunity to do so, and she had to do it or go to jail.
It took Donald Trump less than 6 months to land himself in trouble for corruption charges on his Inauguration Fund and golf club initiation fees, not to mention billing the SS for rooms and meals every weekend. The Clinton's survived 17 investigations without a single charge or a single claim of wrong doing.
Trump couldn't survive ONE investigation without committing impeachable offences.
/——/ What crime is it to listen? What’s unethical about that? Just more fake outrage from the left wing looniesTrump admits he'd take info from foreign countries to help him win elections Now, did he take help, the dirt, from Russia ?? No morals No ethics The man is a walking slime bag Defends son for not calling fbi on russian meeting
Trump says he would accept dirt on political rivals from foreign governments - CNNPolitics
/——/ Trump might take info in a hypothetical situation.Trump admits he'd take info from foreign countries to help him win elections Now, did he take help, the dirt, from Russia ?? No morals No ethics The man is a walking slime bag Defends son for not calling fbi on russian meeting
Trump says he would accept dirt on political rivals from foreign governments - CNNPolitics
Perhaps it might have something to do with your engaging in insults and name-calling rather than substantive discussion.Why is that men try to characterize any woman they can’t bully or who won’t accept their lies as “angry”.
QEDAnyone who continues to characterize a third party arms length purchase as sinister or equal to sitting down with Russian agents to get dirt on Hillary is either stupid or desperate.
Which are you?
Hey OE, you never visit the sewer any more. Perhaps you can answer a question none of your friends down there will answer. Why didn't Mueller say in his report that the President committed obstruction of justice? There is nothing in the DoJ policy prohibiting him from telling the AG that."Possibly corrupt intent". But, because he didn't have anything solid to back it up, he didn't press charges. He said it was that, as well as the policy of not indicting a sitting president as to why he didn't press charges.
At no point in the report or Mueller's subsequent public statement did he ever mention any difficulty to prove intent as an influence on his decision not to bring charges. There is just one reason for that, namely, the DoJ policy to that effect. If there were no plausible corrupt intent, there would demonstrably be no crime of obstruction, and Muller could have exonerated Trump. He did, however, not. Pointedly so.
They interfered with our election in 2016. Donald Dork invited them to interfere in an interview showed to the world yesterday. He said it was OK to accept opposition research from foreign governments. Happens there is actually a federal law against doing that, but Donald is a dork, hence the name, Donald Dork.Trump knows he can not win the 2020 election without the same kind of help he got from Russia in the 2016 election. That is why he is inviting Putin ro help him again.
OH NO!!!!! Camp said it was the ROOOOOSKIES!!! AARRRRRRGGGGHHHHHHHhhhhhh!
As I pointed out HILLARY didn't hire anybody. What is wrong with a company that conducts international research hiring people who live outside the United States?And the information came from a “foreigner” yes or no?Hillary's campaign directed their legal counsel to procure oppo research from a firm that contacted them with an offer, and the research firm used its appropriate "specialist" on Russian business contacts. Quite a leap to what you said.Didn’t Hillary hire a foreigner for Opposition research ??Trump has put a ....For Sale sign on his presidency
If you have anything on my opponent, give me a call
I will be grateful.....wink, wink
He will just claim he never said it and anyone that reports otherwise will be fake news.You know, one of the problems outlined in the Mueller report concerning Trump was that there was no way to prove intent, which is one of the reasons that there were no charges brought. If they had been able to prove intent, then Trump would be facing charges right now.
Interesting thing about this upcoming election, is that if Russia does any kind of meddling like they did last time, and it is favorable to Trump, the comments he just made will be enough to prove intent.
