Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For the 10th time (at least); cite the part of the Constitution that says ANYTHING about pricing.Yes... and you intend to "dry the pool up" by artificiallry raising the cost of gun ownership.No, I stated a free market truth.You supplied the intent noted above - "drive the price up and you dry the pool out".Now you're having to prove intent....good luck with that.Artificially driving up prices through government action with the intent to limit the exercise of a right infringes upon the right.Drive the price up and you dry the pool out.
Every time.
Artificially driving up the cost of exercising a right through government action with the intent to limit the exercise of a right infringes upon the right.
Every time.
.
A Hillary 'cloud' server has just been uncovered. Let's wait and see what the FBI finds on it before we 'anoint' Hillary shall we?KItten.....We're discussing a Constitutional amendment. Which requires 38 state legislatures to ratify an amendment which repeals an existing amendment. in any event, there is no court, no legislature that can stop people from killing. And you will never disarm the law abiding citizens who choose to exercise their rights. Never. Get it?The Court was clear when it had those 9 justices. The resulting bloodbath every month may compel some to change the ruling. This is why it is important to elect HRC. You get rid of Scalia and a few other dinosaurs....boom; you get legislation that will stem the red tide.
Again, it is humorous how you guys bitch and moan about judicial activsm but cling to it to in this case.
And of you think Clinton is going to get the opportunity to pack the court with hyper liberals, you're living in a parallel universe.
BTW, Clinton's polling numbers are terrible. Short of some kind of unbelievable turn around, Clinton is not going to win the WH...And don't go spewing that crap about electoral votes.
But.....You are a feminazi who arrogantly believes the election is over. That it is "her turn".....
There is a bunch of you. But not enough.
BTW, until "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" is stricken from the Bill of Rights, you will never have your way.
Time will tell.
Clinton will win the nomination easily. General elections are always a toss up but the GOP is doing it's best to lose it.
There was a line in the movie, The Right Stuff. It was a favorite in my house growing up and I remember my cousins coming over and watching it all the time in our old Sears VHS. Anyway, the scene is in this bar and the Chuck Yeager had just broken the sound barrier. Then another guy broke his record by a few mph. Then Yeager broke his record. Then the other guy re-gained the title of "fastest man alive".... When Yeager broke the record, the press was fanatical. Now the air force base was empty and nobody was covering them.
The "Liaison Man" pointed out to the pilots that the reason the press coverage had waned wasn't that their feats were not great but that for something to capture the public imagination; it needed to be a simple message; he cited the four minute mile, sixty homers; in short, a nice round number. This is the issue with Hillary's e-mails and the obsession the GOP has with it. The public isn't going to care unless she is frog-marched into a court-house. She should be ashamed for going the route of convenience and the ham-handed way she sees enemies behind every bush and looks to defend against foes who have zero real ammo. But the public isn't going to care unless there is a skin on the wall. The GOP didn't get there with Whitewater, "file gate", Ben-Gotcha, and it looks like the e-mail server is going to be a dud also.Would you like to go the 'sun room' now?Good point. It highlights the inherent dishonesty involved in the guns rights groups.Selling a gun to a buyer without an insurance policy.
Nobody knows I have a gun, how will they know I sold it?
Most states can. Every day people resign from State jobs. Some are vested, some are not. When they are not, they get a lump-sum payment (often times) for several thousand dollars. It's not as if the State is not equipped for the responsibility.Your assumption is that the investments made off of the policies purchased will be $0.00.
Your assumption was the state can magically "match" the cost. LOL!
We're talking billions of new capital for investments; paying off debts, etc...The $1,000 per gun sales is a given. The $10,000 is going to be a % of the persons who purchased. I answered that already. What you're getting if you're the state is another revenue stream. What you're getting, if you're the public, is some assurance that if you're the victim of a gun crime, you'll get some compensation. What you're getting if you're the gun owner is an investment vehicle that will pay off a much higher return than most other investments.Oh, they'll use the $1000 to build a road or a hospital and when I come back for the $10,000?
Are there details to be worked out? Sure.
The status quo is "good" in your book is it?
The status quo is better than your "annuity" idea.
I see you prefer the monthly blood bath. Typical gun crazy.
How would you stop the daily blood-bath in every fucking inner city shit hole in the country?
Anyone with a hundred bucks can buy an illegal gun in any inner city shit hole in the country.
Come on genius. Let's hear your wisdom. Specifics please. Not your usual bumbo jumbo bullshit.
Your man BOBO is waiting also. He's never even bothered trying to stop the blood baths.
Have a look 'Cornhole'. Every fucking one of these victims were murdered by another negro. Every fucking gun used was illegal.Artificially driving up prices through government action with the intent to limit the exercise of a right infringes upon the right.Drive the price up and you dry the pool out.
Every time.
Now you're having to prove intent....good luck with that.
The intent is to limit the monthly blood baths. It will do that over time.
Artificially driving up the cost of exercising a right through government action with the intent to limit the exercise of a right infringes upon the right. Every time.For the 10th time (at least); cite the part of the Constitution that says ANYTHING about pricing.
That's it jerk-off? A one-liner?A Hillary 'cloud' server has just been uncovered. Let's wait and see what the FBI finds on it before we 'anoint' Hillary shall we?KItten.....We're discussing a Constitutional amendment. Which requires 38 state legislatures to ratify an amendment which repeals an existing amendment. in any event, there is no court, no legislature that can stop people from killing. And you will never disarm the law abiding citizens who choose to exercise their rights. Never. Get it?
And of you think Clinton is going to get the opportunity to pack the court with hyper liberals, you're living in a parallel universe.
BTW, Clinton's polling numbers are terrible. Short of some kind of unbelievable turn around, Clinton is not going to win the WH...And don't go spewing that crap about electoral votes.
But.....You are a feminazi who arrogantly believes the election is over. That it is "her turn".....
There is a bunch of you. But not enough.
BTW, until "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" is stricken from the Bill of Rights, you will never have your way.
Time will tell.
Clinton will win the nomination easily. General elections are always a toss up but the GOP is doing it's best to lose it.
There was a line in the movie, The Right Stuff. It was a favorite in my house growing up and I remember my cousins coming over and watching it all the time in our old Sears VHS. Anyway, the scene is in this bar and the Chuck Yeager had just broken the sound barrier. Then another guy broke his record by a few mph. Then Yeager broke his record. Then the other guy re-gained the title of "fastest man alive".... When Yeager broke the record, the press was fanatical. Now the air force base was empty and nobody was covering them.
The "Liaison Man" pointed out to the pilots that the reason the press coverage had waned wasn't that their feats were not great but that for something to capture the public imagination; it needed to be a simple message; he cited the four minute mile, sixty homers; in short, a nice round number. This is the issue with Hillary's e-mails and the obsession the GOP has with it. The public isn't going to care unless she is frog-marched into a court-house. She should be ashamed for going the route of convenience and the ham-handed way she sees enemies behind every bush and looks to defend against foes who have zero real ammo. But the public isn't going to care unless there is a skin on the wall. The GOP didn't get there with Whitewater, "file gate", Ben-Gotcha, and it looks like the e-mail server is going to be a dud also.Would you like to go the 'sun room' now?Good point. It highlights the inherent dishonesty involved in the guns rights groups.Selling a gun to a buyer without an insurance policy.
Nobody knows I have a gun, how will they know I sold it?
Most states can. Every day people resign from State jobs. Some are vested, some are not. When they are not, they get a lump-sum payment (often times) for several thousand dollars. It's not as if the State is not equipped for the responsibility.Your assumption is that the investments made off of the policies purchased will be $0.00.
Your assumption was the state can magically "match" the cost. LOL!
We're talking billions of new capital for investments; paying off debts, etc...The $1,000 per gun sales is a given. The $10,000 is going to be a % of the persons who purchased. I answered that already. What you're getting if you're the state is another revenue stream. What you're getting, if you're the public, is some assurance that if you're the victim of a gun crime, you'll get some compensation. What you're getting if you're the gun owner is an investment vehicle that will pay off a much higher return than most other investments.Oh, they'll use the $1000 to build a road or a hospital and when I come back for the $10,000?
Are there details to be worked out? Sure.
The status quo is "good" in your book is it?
The status quo is better than your "annuity" idea.
I see you prefer the monthly blood bath. Typical gun crazy.
How would you stop the daily blood-bath in every fucking inner city shit hole in the country?
Anyone with a hundred bucks can buy an illegal gun in any inner city shit hole in the country.
Come on genius. Let's hear your wisdom. Specifics please. Not your usual bumbo jumbo bullshit.
Your man BOBO is waiting also. He's never even bothered trying to stop the blood baths.
Speaking of gun crazy....lol
Oregon Gunman described himself as a "Conservative Republican" in an online dating profile.
Spiritual Passions: ironcross45 - Doesn't Like Organized Religion, Left-hand Path, Magick and Occult, Meditation, Not Religious, But Spiritual
Artificially driving up the cost of exercising a right through government action with the intent to limit the exercise of a right infringes upon the right. Every time.For the 10th time (at least); cite the part of the Constitution that says ANYTHING about pricing.
The right to arms, specifically, shall not infringed.
Thus, you lose.
That's it jerk-off? A one-liner?A Hillary 'cloud' server has just been uncovered. Let's wait and see what the FBI finds on it before we 'anoint' Hillary shall we?Time will tell.
Clinton will win the nomination easily. General elections are always a toss up but the GOP is doing it's best to lose it.
There was a line in the movie, The Right Stuff. It was a favorite in my house growing up and I remember my cousins coming over and watching it all the time in our old Sears VHS. Anyway, the scene is in this bar and the Chuck Yeager had just broken the sound barrier. Then another guy broke his record by a few mph. Then Yeager broke his record. Then the other guy re-gained the title of "fastest man alive".... When Yeager broke the record, the press was fanatical. Now the air force base was empty and nobody was covering them.
The "Liaison Man" pointed out to the pilots that the reason the press coverage had waned wasn't that their feats were not great but that for something to capture the public imagination; it needed to be a simple message; he cited the four minute mile, sixty homers; in short, a nice round number. This is the issue with Hillary's e-mails and the obsession the GOP has with it. The public isn't going to care unless she is frog-marched into a court-house. She should be ashamed for going the route of convenience and the ham-handed way she sees enemies behind every bush and looks to defend against foes who have zero real ammo. But the public isn't going to care unless there is a skin on the wall. The GOP didn't get there with Whitewater, "file gate", Ben-Gotcha, and it looks like the e-mail server is going to be a dud also.Would you like to go the 'sun room' now?Good point. It highlights the inherent dishonesty involved in the guns rights groups.Selling a gun to a buyer without an insurance policy.
Nobody knows I have a gun, how will they know I sold it?
Most states can. Every day people resign from State jobs. Some are vested, some are not. When they are not, they get a lump-sum payment (often times) for several thousand dollars. It's not as if the State is not equipped for the responsibility.Your assumption is that the investments made off of the policies purchased will be $0.00.
Your assumption was the state can magically "match" the cost. LOL!
We're talking billions of new capital for investments; paying off debts, etc...The $1,000 per gun sales is a given. The $10,000 is going to be a % of the persons who purchased. I answered that already. What you're getting if you're the state is another revenue stream. What you're getting, if you're the public, is some assurance that if you're the victim of a gun crime, you'll get some compensation. What you're getting if you're the gun owner is an investment vehicle that will pay off a much higher return than most other investments.Oh, they'll use the $1000 to build a road or a hospital and when I come back for the $10,000?
Are there details to be worked out? Sure.
The status quo is "good" in your book is it?
The status quo is better than your "annuity" idea.
I see you prefer the monthly blood bath. Typical gun crazy.
How would you stop the daily blood-bath in every fucking inner city shit hole in the country?
Anyone with a hundred bucks can buy an illegal gun in any inner city shit hole in the country.
Come on genius. Let's hear your wisdom. Specifics please. Not your usual bumbo jumbo bullshit.
Your man BOBO is waiting also. He's never even bothered trying to stop the blood baths.
Speaking of gun crazy....lol
Permanent Ignore.
You're a waste of bandwidth.
Allow me to provide a citation.Still waiting for the quote from the Constitution that supports your jibberish. Now get busy and provide the quote little man.Artificially driving up the cost of exercising a right through government action with the intent to limit the exercise of a right infringes upon the right. Every time.For the 10th time (at least); cite the part of the Constitution that says ANYTHING about pricing.
The right to arms, specifically, shall not infringed.
Thus, you lose.
Feel free....show us where the Constitution mentions price. To give you an example of what a citation looks like, I'll cite myself.Allow me to provide a citation.Still waiting for the quote from the Constitution that supports your jibberish. Now get busy and provide the quote little man.Artificially driving up the cost of exercising a right through government action with the intent to limit the exercise of a right infringes upon the right. Every time.For the 10th time (at least); cite the part of the Constitution that says ANYTHING about pricing.
The right to arms, specifically, shall not infringed.
Thus, you lose.
I provided a citation as the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.Feel free....show us where the Constitution mentions price.Allow me to provide a citation.Still waiting for the quote from the Constitution that supports your jibberish. Now get busy and provide the quote little man.Artificially driving up the cost of exercising a right through government action with the intent to limit the exercise of a right infringes upon the right. Every time.For the 10th time (at least); cite the part of the Constitution that says ANYTHING about pricing.
The right to arms, specifically, shall not infringed.
Thus, you lose.
I provided a citation as the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.Feel free....show us where the Constitution mentions price.Allow me to provide a citation.Still waiting for the quote from the Constitution that supports your jibberish. Now get busy and provide the quote little man.Artificially driving up the cost of exercising a right through government action with the intent to limit the exercise of a right infringes upon the right. Every time.For the 10th time (at least); cite the part of the Constitution that says ANYTHING about pricing.
The right to arms, specifically, shall not infringed.
Thus, you lose.
You simply choose to be wrong.
This is a lie.Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.I provided a citation as the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.Feel free....show us where the Constitution mentions price.Allow me to provide a citation.Still waiting for the quote from the Constitution that supports your jibberish. Now get busy and provide the quote little man.Artificially driving up the cost of exercising a right through government action with the intent to limit the exercise of a right infringes upon the right. Every time.
The right to arms, specifically, shall not infringed.
Thus, you lose.
You simply choose to be wrong.
I have a better idea...
Instead of playing the name games...
Let's us pray for the victim's this crap has to stop....
This is a lie.Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.I provided a citation as the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.Feel free....show us where the Constitution mentions price.Allow me to provide a citation.Still waiting for the quote from the Constitution that supports your jibberish. Now get busy and provide the quote little man.
You simply choose to be wrong.
I provided a citation to the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.
You simply choose to be wrong
Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.This is a lie.Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.I provided a citation as the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.Feel free....show us where the Constitution mentions price.Allow me to provide a citation.
You simply choose to be wrong.
I provided a citation to the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.
You simply choose to be wrong
This is a lie.Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.This is a lie.Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.I provided a citation as the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.Feel free....show us where the Constitution mentions price.
You simply choose to be wrong.
I provided a citation to the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.
You simply choose to be wrong
I provided a citation to the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.
You simply choose to be wrong
Funny... I don't see anyone doing that. can you cite an example?Because Republicans never do that. If there is any link to a gunman for a "liberal" point of view.I have a better idea...
Instead of playing the name games...
Let's us pray for the victim's this crap has to stop....
Fox News and the rest of the conservative media will blame democrats and liberals for the shooting. You don't get to pull that shit anymore and scream uncle when its your guy. We won't allow it anymore.
Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.This is a lie.Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.This is a lie.Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.I provided a citation as the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.
You simply choose to be wrong.
I provided a citation to the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.
You simply choose to be wrong
I provided a citation to the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.
You simply choose to be wrong
See, told ya.This is a lie.Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.This is a lie.Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.This is a lie.Ahh, that game....claiming you did something you've never done.
I provided a citation to the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.
You simply choose to be wrong
I provided a citation to the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.
You simply choose to be wrong
I provided a citation to the relevant text of the Constitution and explained how your idea violates that text.
You simply choose to be wrong
